fbpx

April 8, 2014

Danny Danon’s warning to Bibi

As the latest round of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks deteriorates, several Israeli government ministers are asking whether the Palestinian Authority is interested in an agreement.

Israeli Deputy Defense Minister Danny Danon is asking a different question: Is Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pushing a path that is at odds with his own Likud party?

After backing out of a promised release of 26 Palestinian prisoners, Netanyahu reportedly discussed a more expansive deal involving the release of 400 prisoners and a slowdown in settlement expansion. In exchange, Israel would receive an extension of talks and the release of Jonathan Pollard, the imprisoned spy for Israel.

But Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas instead applied for Palestinian membership in 15 international conventions.

Danon says that Netanyahu’s readiness to offer concessions calls into question his fitness to lead a party that long opposed a Palestinian state. Speaking to JTA in his office in Israel’s Tel Aviv military headquarters, Danon warned Netanyahu against following the lead of U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Israeli Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, a staunch advocate of a two-state solution.

“I’m not saying he’s there now, but if you assume he’s adapting the policies of Kerry and Livni, he will not be able to stay in the Likud,” Danon told JTA. “If somebody will adapt a different ideology, he will not be able to stay. When you hear it from all directions, it is problematic.”

An opponent of the two-state solution and the peace process that began with the signing of the Oslo Accords 21 years ago, Danon has emerged as a rival of sorts to Netanyahu within the Likud. He isn’t Likud’s most influential two-state naysayer, but he’s been the most vocal during this round of talks.

Two weeks ago, in a JTA op-ed, Danon wrote that he would resign if Israel went ahead with the planned release of 26 prisoners.

“My interest is to stop the insanity that includes releasing convicted murderers who massacre Jewish families,” he told JTA. “I’m not against the negotiations, but I’m against the price we have to pay only for the pleasure of sitting with the Palestinians.”

Danon’s threat, though, had little effect on Netanyahu. The discussion of an expanded prisoner release was reported in the press after Danon made the vow. No other ministers have since joined him in promising to resign, but Danon said he has no problem being in the minority. His decision, he said, was one of principle.

“I think it’s morally wrong,” he said. “That’s why I decided to stick to my commitment not to be part of such a government. More people will have to ask themselves where they want to be — with Netanyahu basically caving to the American pressure, or trying to present a different approach where we stick to our values and do what is good for Israel.”

Danon and Netanyahu have disagreed on what’s best for Israel vis-a-vis the Palestinians since Netanyahu accepted the principle of eventual Palestinian statehood in 2009. Danon is the chairman of the Likud Central Committee and said he one day hopes to have Netanyahu’s job.

“In politics you have a triangle,” he said. “Every member of Knesset wants to be a minister, and every minister wants to be the prime minister. Whoever is not admitting that is lying to you. I’m on the ladder. I’m playing the political game, and I do want to move up.”

Danon has long advocated annexation of large parts of the West Bank. A majority of Israelis oppose the idea, but he hopes this round of negotiations will sway the Israeli public to his position.

“Many Israelis will open their ears for another option,” he said. “Israelis are willing to pay a price if they will know there is a partner. Today, the Israelis understand there is no partner. So the issue of the price is not relevant.”

Danny Danon’s warning to Bibi Read More »

U.S. accuses Russian agents of stirring Eastern Ukraine unrest

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry accused Russian agents and special forces on Tuesday of stirring separatist unrest in eastern Ukraine, saying Moscow could be trying to prepare for military action as it had in Crimea.

Armed pro-Moscow protesters were still occupying Ukrainian government buildings in two cities in the largely Russian-speaking east on Tuesday, although police ended a third occupation in a lightning night-time operation.

Ukraine's security service said separatists occupying the security headquarters in Luhansk had planted bombs in the building and were holding as many as 60 hostages. Activists in the building denied they had explosives or hostages, but said they had seized an armory full of automatic rifles.

The Ukraine government says the occupations that began on Sunday are part of a Russian-led plan to dismember the country. Kerry said he feared Moscow might repeat its Crimean operation.

“It is clear that Russian special forces and agents have been the catalyst behind the chaos of the last 24 hours,” he said in Washington, and this “could potentially be a contrived pretext for military intervention just as we saw in Crimea.”

Moscow annexed the Black Sea peninsula last month after a referendum staged when Russian troops were already in control.

Earlier, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov dismissed Western accusations that Moscow was destabilizing Ukraine, saying the situation could improve only if Kiev took into account the interests of Russian-speaking regions.

Russia, Ukraine, the United States and the European Union will hold a ministerial meeting next week to discuss the Ukraine crisis, the EU said on Tuesday.

The meeting, to be held at a still unspecified location in Europe, will involve Kerry, Lavrov, EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and Ukraine's foreign minister, Andriy Deshchytsia.

The U.S. State Department said Kerry and Lavrov in a phone call on Monday discussed convening direct talks among the parties to try to defuse tensions.

PROTESTERS DEMAND REFERENDUM

Shots were fired, a grenade thrown and 70 people detained as Ukrainian officers ended the occupation in the city of Kharkiv during an 18-minute “anti-terrorism” action, the Interior Ministry said.

But elsewhere in Ukraine's eastern industrial heartland, activists armed with Kalashnikov rifles and protected by barbed-wire barricades vowed there was no going back on their demand for a vote on returning to Moscow rule.

In the city of Luhansk, a man dressed in camouflage told a crowd outside the occupied state security building: “We want a referendum on the status of Luhansk and we want Russian returned as an official language.”

The Kremlin's standoff with the West has knocked investors' confidence in the Russian economy, and the International Monetary Fund on Tuesday cut its forecast of growth this year to

1.3 percent, less than half the 3 percent it had originally projected.

Britain expressed fears that Russia wanted to disrupt the run-up to presidential elections next month in Ukraine, which has been ruled by an interim government since the overthrow of Moscow-backed President Viktor Yanukovich in February.

Ukraine, which was controlled by Moscow until the Soviet Union collapsed more than two decades ago, has been in turmoil since late last year when Yanukovich rejected closer relations with the European Union and tilted the country back toward Russia. That provoked mass protests in which more than 100 people were killed by police and which drove Yanukovich from office, leading to Kiev's loss of control in Crimea.

In Kiev, Interior Minister Arsen Avakov partly pinned responsibility for the Kharkiv occupation on Russian President Vladimir Putin. “All this was inspired and financed by the Putin-Yanukovich group,” he said.

An aide said police went in when the protesters failed to give themselves up and surrender their arms. Officers did not open fire, despite shooting and the grenade attack from the other side, he said. One police officer was badly wounded and some others less seriously hurt.

In Luhansk, a city of about 450,000, protesters have blocked streets leading to the state security building with barbed wire, tires, crates, metal police barriers and sandbags.

Andrei, who said he had stormed the building on Sunday but would not give his family name, said the protesters had 200 to 300 Kalashnikovs and some stun grenades, but there had been no shooting so far.

“Once you've taken up arms, there's no turning back. We will stay until the authorities agree to hold a referendum on the status of Luhansk,” he said.

A standoff also continued in the mining center of Donetsk, Yanukovich's home base, where a group of pro-Russian deputies inside the main regional authority building on Monday declared a separatist republic.

Unlike in Kharkiv, there was no clear sign that further police operations were imminent in the other two cities. “We hope the buildings occupied in Donetsk and Luhansk will soon be freed,” acting President Oleksander Turchinov said.

Russia has warned Kiev against using force to end the occupations, but authorities may have decided not to give Moscow an excuse to intervene, holding back in the hope that the protests will fizzle out.

MASS DISORDER

In London, British Foreign Secretary William Hague said the occupations bore “all the hallmarks of a Russian strategy to destabilize Ukraine.

The West has expressed concern about what it says has been a buildup of Russian forces along the border with Ukraine. Moscow has said the troops are merely taking part in exercises, but NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen urged caution.

“If Russia were to intervene further in Ukraine it would be a historic mistake,” he told a news conference in Paris. “It would have grave consequences for our relationship with Russia and would further isolate Russia internationally.”

Ukraine's ambassador to NATO, Ihor Dolhov, said on Tuesday that Kiev was counting on the United States and other NATO members to supply equipment ranging from uniforms to aircraft fuel, but was not asking for weapons.

Lavrov denied responsibility for the trouble in Russian-speaking areas of Ukraine. “One should not seek to put the blame on someone else,” he told a news conference in Moscow.

Unlike in Crimea, where ethnic Russians form a majority, most people in the east and south are ethnically Ukrainian, although they speak Russian as a first language.

Putin will meet his senior officials on Wednesday to discuss economic ties with Ukraine, including on energy, his spokesman said. He gave no details, but the Crimea dispute has raised fears Russia might cut off gas supplies to Ukraine's crippled economy, having nearly doubled the price it charges Kiev.

Kiev missed a midnight deadline to reduce its $2.2 billion gas debt to Russia, although producer Gazprom did not say whether it would take any action against Kiev.

In Brussels, Ukraine's energy minister, EU officials and industry representatives discussed how to reduce reliance on Russian gas.

An EU diplomat said the 28-nation body planned to set up a support group to help Ukraine stabilize its precarious economy and political situation.

Additional reporting by Gabriela Baczynska, Jason Bush, Lidia Kelly, Vladimir Soldatkin and Denis Pinchuk in Moscow; William James and Kylie MacLellan in London, Barbara Lewis and Adrian Croft in Brussels and John Irish in Paris; Writing by Richard Balmforth, David Stamp and Peter Cooney; Editing by Giles Elgood and Lisa Shumaker

U.S. accuses Russian agents of stirring Eastern Ukraine unrest Read More »

Kerry: Procedural issues holding up talks

The Palestinians and Israelis are at odds now more about the process rather than substance, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said.

“The bitter irony is that at this point the fight is over process, it’s not over the final status agreement,” Kerry said in testimony Tuesday before the U.S. Senate.

He said there had been considerable progress made since the relaunching of talks last July on the “substantive decisions.”

Talks have verged on collapse since March 29, when Israel failed to meet a deadline to release a fourth and final batch of prisoners under the terms that allowed the talks to reconvene. Three days later, the Palestinian Authority applied to join 15 international conventions, also in violation of the agreement that advanced the talks.

The United States has been in intensive discussions with the sides in a bid to extend the talks beyond the April 29 deadline for an agreement.

“At the request of the parties, the U.S. facilitated a meeting between Israeli and Palestinian negotiators this evening to continue the intensive effort to resolve their differences,” a State Department statement said Monday evening. “Gaps remain, but both sides are committed to narrow the gaps.”

Kerry: Procedural issues holding up talks Read More »

Chozen (A ‘Frozen’ Passover parody)

When John Travolta mispronounced Idina Menzel's name while introducing her during the Oscars, he had no idea that the song she sang from 'Frozen' would become a major hit within the Tribe.

It could be because the lyrics can easily be changed from, “Let it Go,” to “Let us Go” or because the melody is so charming. Either way, there have been a spate of Passover versions of the song making it to YouTube.

Six13's a capella version, “Chozen,” might be our favorite, but don't let that deter you from checking out some of the other videos out there.

Chozen (A ‘Frozen’ Passover parody) Read More »

Fox picks up another Israeli-developed TV show format

Fox has purchased the rights to Boom!, a new Israeli game show.

The program debuted earlier this month in Israel. Under the format, four contestants race against the clock to diffuse a bomb by cutting colored wires that hold the answers to trivia questions. Viewers can also play using a smartphone app. If the bomb explodes, the studio set shakes.

The show, from Keshet International, was first sold to a French network earlier this week at the MIPTV conference in Cannes.

Keshet is the creator of the “Rising Star” format picked up last year by a U.S. studio and elsewhere, as well as of the Emmy Award-winning show “Homeland” and “In Treatment.”

Fox picks up another Israeli-developed TV show format Read More »

In music, tracing the 600-year odyssey of the Sarajevo Haggadah

Growing up in Bosnia, Merima Kljuco was familiar with the Sarajevo Haggadah.

The medieval, illuminated manuscript was considered a treasure of the Bosnian National Museum for more than a century. Its 600-year journey from Spain through Italy and then Sarajevo, and its survival through persecution and near destruction at the hands of enemies of Jews, heightened its wonderment.

But four years ago, a friend gave Kljuco a copy of “People of the Book,” the acclaimed 2008 historical novel about the Sarajevo Haggadah by Geraldine Brooks, a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer who reported on the Bosnian war for The Wall Street Journal.

Kljuco’s interest in the Haggadah was transformed from fascination to creative passion.

“I became obsessed with the idea of a project that would musically and visually follow the Haggadah’s journey from Spain to Sarajevo,” Kljuco told JTA.

The Haggadah’s odyssey also reminded Kljuco of her own life and “exodus,” having been forced to leave her country, she said in an email, “under the strangest and heaviest circumstances.”

Now Kljuco, an internationally acclaimed concert accordionist, has composed a piece of music that gives voice to the Sarajevo Haggadah’s trek.

“The Sarajevo Haggadah: Music of the Book” is a multimedia presentation, an artistic collaboration of Kljuco, pianist Seth Knopp and Bart Woodstrup, an artist who created a visual animation that accompanies the concert.

The composition, commissioned by the Foundation for Jewish Culture’s New Jewish Culture Network, had its world premiere to sold out-audiences at the end of March. The first was at Yellow Barn, a prominent center for chamber music in Putney, Vt., where Kljuco developed the piece in an earlier residency, and then at the Boston Jewish Music Festival in partnership with New Center for the Arts.

Upcoming performances on a North American tour include Dallas, San Francisco, Toronto and Austin, Texas.

The composition reflects the foundation’s vision to support cultural works that are accessible to audiences of all backgrounds, according to Andrew Ingall, former director of its New Jewish Culture Network.

“The music is contemporary but also reflects Sephardic music traditions,” Ingall wrote in an email. “It communicates the wonders, traumas and geographic journeys of this remarkable codex.”

While the Foundation for Jewish Culture closed earlier this year due to funding problems, Ingall is traveling to many of the Sarajevo Haggadah performances.

The mesmerizing one-hour piece is divided into 12 movements that trace the Haggadah’s history, from playful Sephardic melodies and dances to nearly silent, prayer-like tones and then harsh, brutal rhythms that erupt from Knopf’s piano.

During an emotional passage on the Siege of Sarajevo, Kljuco’s accordion nearly weeps. Woodstrup’s visual images, which include illustrations from the Haggadah, are projected onto a long white sheet, as if it were a seder table covering.

At the Boston performance, Brooks offered introductory remarks and later joined Kljuco for an onstage interview. The two met that evening for the first time.

“It is an amazing experience to be part of the transmission of inspiration in this way,” Brooks told JTA the day after the concert. In an email, she described her contribution as a tiny link in a creative chain.

“Now Merima and her collaborators have extended the chain,” she wrote.

The Sarajevo Haggadah stands out among others of its time in several ways, according to Aleksandra Buncic, an art historian and a scholar born and raised in Sarajevo.

Produced in the Crown of Aragon between 1330 and 1350, the Haggadah features the most complete illuminated cycle of biblical events, from the Book of Genesis as well as Exodus, Buncic told JTA in a phone conversation from Philadelphia, where she is a Fulbright scholar. It also illuminates all seven days of the creation of the world, which is not found in any other example of Jewish art through the Middle Ages, she added.

The Haggadah was presumed to have been smuggled out of Spain and survived the 1492 Expulsion of Jews, and later, in Venice, was spared the fate of being burned by the pope’s inquisitor.

At the end of the 19th century, the Haggadah, which found its way to Sarajevo, the source of its name, was sold to the Bosnian National Museum by its Jewish owners. Twice during the 20th century it was saved by Muslims there at great risk to their lives — once by Dervis Korkut from the hands of the Nazis, and more recently in the mid-1990s by Enver Imamovic during the deadly years of the Siege of Sarajevo.

Kljuco grew up in the former Yugoslavia but left her home in 1993 during the Bosnian War. She spent time in refugee camps, a painful memory to this day, she said in the email.

“The Haggadah … suffered transformations which make it even more special by giving it a richer history that reflects it passage through different cultures,” Kljuco wrote. “I also travel around the world and with every journey I get a new ‘scar,’ positive or negative. But I keep my dignity and get richer by traveling through different circumstances and sharing culture with others through my music.”

In the former Yugoslavia, Kljuco was exposed to an array of musical styles. She began playing accordion, the leading instrument, at an early age, “falling in love at first sound.”

Hailed for her virtuosity, Kljuco performs around the world with symphony and chamber orchestras. She now makes her home in Los Angeles.

Kljuco has become steeped in Sephardic and Yiddish music through her many collaborations with Shura Lipovsky, an international performer of Yiddish song, the Jewish folk balladeer Theodore Bikel, and the late pianist and composer Tamara Brooks, to whom she dedicated her composition.

“They all became my musical family,” she said.

Buncic, who attended the Yellow Barn performance, was impressed with the composition’s opening moment, when Kljuco makes her accordion sound like the wind. It is a perfect match with the first illumination of the Haggadah, she said.

The Sarajevo Haggadah, nearly 700 years after its production, still evokes the interest and inspiration among scholars, artists, composers and layman, Buncic said.

“This composition,” she said, “means there is an interest among the people about this fascinating manuscript.”

In music, tracing the 600-year odyssey of the Sarajevo Haggadah Read More »

‘Occupied territories’ is a flawed and biased term

When New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie apologized to Republican donor Sheldon Adelson for using the term “occupied territories” to refer to the West Bank, critics pounced. Jon Stewart of “The Daily Show” ridiculed the apology, insisting that the phrase is “widely accepted” and accurate.

While the term is indeed widely used to describe Israel’s relationship to the West Bank areas of Judea and Samaria, that doesn’t make it accurate. Indeed, the use of the term “occupied territories” in this context is flawed legally, historically and factually.[

[Related: The West Bank is under military occupation, and that’s a fact]

The phrase does not accurately reflect the status of the areas that it purports to describe. Yet it has regrettably become lingua franca in contemporary international and U.N. parlance, including for senior members of the U.S. administration and European leaders.

The expressions “occupied territory” and “occupied Palestinian territory” are political terms frequently used in nonbinding political resolutions, principally in the U.N. General Assembly, representing nothing more than the political viewpoint of the majority of states voting in favor of such resolutions.

These political pronouncements have never constituted, nor should they constitute, an authority for any determination that the territories are Palestinian or that they are occupied. Such determinations would appear to be based on incorrect and partisan readings of the factual situation and of the relevant international legal documentation.

In the 1967 Six Day War Israel took control of Samaria, Judea, eastern Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip. These areas had previously been seized by the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and Egypt and held by them since the 1948 war, initiated by them against Israel.

International law relates to occupation of foreign territory from a “prior legitimate sovereign,” and these areas never constituted the legitimate sovereign territory of Jordan or Egypt. Hence, the accepted international law definition of “occupation” of territory cannot be attributed to Israel’s status in these areas.

The unique historic and legal nature of these territories, in which there has existed a basic indigenous Jewish presence since at least 1500 BCE, long before the arrival of Islam in the 7th-century CE, with concomitant Jewish historic rights, inevitably renders these territories as sui generis, or having a unique legal status. This status runs counter to any attempt to use standard definitions such as “occupied territories” in order to designate or describe these areas.

Furthermore, the historic and legal rights of the Jewish people to this territory, rendering it unique and not “occupied,” have been acknowledged and encapsulated legally and historically in official, binding and still valid international documents: the 1917 Balfour Declaration, the 1920 San Remo Declaration, the 1922 League of Nations Mandate Instrument and the 1945 U.N. Charter.

By any objective criteria, the status of the territory could therefore only be considered to be at the most “disputed territory,” subject to an agreed-upon negotiation process between Israel and the Palestinians aimed at determining its ultimate status by agreement. This negotiating process includes the requirement to agree on secure and recognized permanent boundaries.

Demands that Israel withdraw to the “1967 lines,” which are in effect the 1949 armistice demarcation lines, are equally flawed and misleading. Such demands attempt to prejudge an open negotiating issue.

Efforts by leading elements in the international community to assign the territory to the Palestinians, prior to a successful conclusion of the negotiating process, or to deny the rights and status of Israel, demonstrate nothing more than political ignorance and bias.

(Alan Baker is director of the Institute for Contemporary Affairs at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, as well as of the International Action Division of the Legal Forum for Israel. He has served as the legal counsel to Israel’s Foreign Ministry and as Israel’s ambassador to Canada.)

‘Occupied territories’ is a flawed and biased term Read More »

Hunt for Nazi art shows museum failings, former minister says

A German pensioner's decision to let experts check his art trove for Nazi-looted treasures contrasts sharply with the approach of some museums that may hold works stolen from Holocaust victims, a former minister said on Tuesday.

Over 2,000 German museums hold works created before 1945 and acquired after the Nazis came to power in 1933, according to the Institute for Museum Research in Berlin. Some of them could have been looted or extorted from Jewish owners by the Nazis.

But only 285 museums, or less than five percent, have researched the ownership history of such works.

“It's not as if museums haven't been doing anything, but because of budget issues, they haven't done as much as they could have,” Michael Naumann, a former German culture minister, told Reuters on Tuesday.

Elderly recluse Cornelius Gurlitt, whose hoard of some 1,400 art works was discovered in February 2012 in his Munich flat and confiscated by authorities in a tax probe, agreed on Monday to allow a task force of art experts to study the collection.

In exchange for his cooperation Gurlitt, whose art dealer father took orders from Adolf Hitler to buy and sell so-called 'degenerate art' to fund Nazi activities, will get back those works whose provenance is not in doubt.

Gurlitt also agreed to waive Germany's 30-year statute of limitations, under which he could be considered the legal owner of the paintings.

ACCELERATE RESEARCH

Gurlitt's move should “inspire those who own looted art to act morally”, Naumann said. But he added there should also be legislative possibilities to accelerate provenance research.

The German government and the state of Bavaria have agreed to pay for research of the works found in Gurlitt's apartment and for any additional works not yet confiscated.

In January, World Jewish Congress President Ronald Lauder accused German museums of neglecting their duty to come clean about works they hold that were looted from Jews by the Nazis.

“They know what's been stolen,” Lauder told Reuters in an interview during a visit to Berlin. “And what they've been doing is turning a blind eye.”

Since 2008, Germany's Bureau for Provenance Research has offered funds to study the ownership of cultural artifacts in public collections. As of January 2013, only 58 applications from museums had been submitted.

In an interview with Spiegel Online last month, Monika Gruetters, Germany's culture minister, said she had doubled the bureau's 2014 budget for such projects to four million euros ($5.52 million), with additional resources and structures planned for 2015.

She said experience gained through the research of Gurlitt's collection would help guide a future national centre she hoped to establish to support public organisations in the search for Nazi-looted art in their collections. ($1 = 0.7249 Euros)

Reporting By Monica Raymunt; Editing by Michael Roddy and Tom Heneghan

Hunt for Nazi art shows museum failings, former minister says Read More »

U.S. warns on Iran ‘breakout’ capability as nuclear talks start

The United States said on Tuesday Iran has the ability to produce fissile material for a nuclear bomb in two months, if it so decided, as Tehran and six world powers swung into a new round of talks in Vienna on resolving their atomic dispute.

Secretary of State John Kerry's comments in Washington highlighted Western concerns about Iran's nuclear intentions and the wide divisions between the two sides that could still foil a deal. Iran says its nuclear program is entirely peaceful.

The overarching goal of the powers – Britain, France, China, Russia, Germany and the United States – in the talks is to persuade Iran to scale back its program to the point that it would take it much longer, perhaps as much as a year, to produce fuel for a bomb if it chose to do so.

“I think it's public knowledge today that we're operating with a time period for a so-called 'break-out' of about two months. That's been in the public domain,” Kerry testified at a Senate hearing.

Iran's “break-out” time is defined as how long it would take it to produce fissile material for one nuclear weapon, if it decided to build such weapons of mass destruction.

To lengthen this potential timeline, the powers want Iran to cut back the number of centrifuges it operates refine uranium and the overall amount of enriched uranium it produces, as well as to limit its research into new technologies and submit to invasive inspections by the United Nations' nuclear watchdog.

The Islamic Republic says its nuclear fuel-making activity is only for peaceful purposes such as electricity generation, and it wants the West to lift crippling economic sanctions as part of any final accord with the powers.

The February 8-9 round is the third meeting between the powers and Iran since February and part of a series which they hope will culminate in a broad settlement of the decade-old nuclear dispute that threatens to sink the Middle East into a new war.

The meetings so far have been used by the sides largely as an opportunity to spell out their positions on issues such as the scope of Iran's uranium enrichment efforts, its contested nuclear facilities, rather than to narrow their differences.

“We are involved in very detailed and substantial negotiations and we are trying as hard as we can to drive the process forward,” the spokesman for European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who coordinates the discussions on behalf of the powers, told reporters.

GETTING INTO THE DETAILS

Both sides say they want to start drafting a comprehensive agreement in May, some two months before a July 20 deadline for finalizing the accord.

“What matters most to us is that there is a good agreement. Clearly we want to make progress as fast as possible but the most important thing is the quality of the agreement,” Ashton's spokesman, Michael Mann, said.

“It has to be a good agreement that everyone is happy with. So we will work as hard as we can to achieve that.”

Iranian and U.S. negotiators are wary that any deal will face criticism from conservative hardliners at home wedded to confrontation since Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution.

The six nations have agreed internally to have a draft text of an accord by the end of May or early June, one diplomat from the powers said. But he added: “We're still in an exploratory phase … In the end, things will happen in July.”

Tuesday's opening session was chaired by Ashton and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, but their deputies later took over.

The diplomat said issues to be discussed included how U.N. nuclear inspectors would verify whether Iran was meeting its end of any deal, suspected past atomic bomb research by Tehran, and how to deal with U.N. Security Council resolutions on Iran adopted since 2006.

A senior Iranian negotiator, Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, said major issues discussed in previous meetings – Iran's level of uranium enrichment and a heavy-water nuclear reactor project at Arak – would also be covered.

Refined uranium can be used to fuel nuclear power plants, Iran's stated purpose, but can also provide material for a bomb, which the West suspects may be Tehran's ultimate aim. The Arak reactor, once operational, can yield plutonium – another weapons-usable fissile material – but Iran says it only intends to use it for medical and agricultural research ends.

The goal of the negotiations begun almost two months ago is to hammer out a long-term deal to define the permissible scope of Iran's nuclear program in return for an end to sanctions that have hobbled the OPEC country's economy.

In November, the two sides agreed an interim accord curbing some Iranian enrichment activities in exchange for some easing of sanctions. This six-month deal, which took effect on January 20, was designed to buy time for talks on a final accord.

The talks can be extended by another half-year if both sides agree to do so, and negotiate the content of an extension deal.

Israel has threatened to attack its long-time foe Iran if diplomatic efforts fail. Iran says it is Israel's assumed atomic arsenal that threatens peace and stability in the Middle East.

Additional reporting by Fredrik Dahl and Louis Charbonneau in Vienna,; Patricia Zangerle in Washington; Editing by Mark Heinrich

U.S. warns on Iran ‘breakout’ capability as nuclear talks start Read More »

Outfit Post: My Last Sweaters of Winter

So in LA it's been spring since… spring of last year? But in many other parts of the country, winter is still raging on. For my last winter outfit hurrah, I'm showing two of my favorite sweater/outwear options (budget friendly of course!) 


Sweater 1: H&M brown oversized sweater 
 
” target=”_blank”>Old Navy
Brown booties: Target (no longer available online) 
Black high heel boots: No brand (thrifted) $10
 
 
” target=”_blank”>www.thechickgoescheap.com for more posts and to check out my online store! 

Outfit Post: My Last Sweaters of Winter Read More »