fbpx

June 25, 2013

Berlin State Senate forced to turn over withheld funds to Jewish community

The Berlin State Senate must hand over some $1.3 million in funds it withheld from Berlin’s cash-strapped Jewish community, a Berlin court ruled.

The Administrative Court of Berlin said in Monday’s ruling that the money withheld in May must be paid immediately, helping the community to cover salaries, pensions and other costs.

Critics of the community’s president said the money was not enough to pay the bills, according to reports.

The State Senate said it was freezing its subsidy to the community after the community’s president, Gideon Joffe, reportedly failed to provide the required list of community employees and their salaries. Joffe said he would comply with the request.

The court said the missing report was not grounds for the state to withhold its subsidy, which reportedly is about $6.5 million.

Its ruling came less than a week after a Berlin administrative court refused to intervene in a dispute within the Jewish community stemming from its financial situation. The court claimed the law prevented it from interfering in the affairs of autonomous religious organizations.

Board members opposing Joffe had asked for the intervention after Joffe’s faction voted to take out a mortgage of an unstated amount on unidentified communal property in order to pay bills. Opponents cried foul due to lack of transparency.

The decision triggered a physical fight at the board meeting on May 23, leading to charges and counter charges.

The official number of Jewish community members has nearly tripled, to about 11,000, with the influx of former Soviet Jews since 1990. Many of the newcomers were poor and unable to contribute to the costs of services provided by the community, from schools to senior housing.

In addition, the community reportedly pays out far more in pensions than it can afford. The state subsidy helps meet the gap, but the community still reportedly has to pay back nearly $8 million to the state in pension overpayments.

The faction opposing Joffe is gathering signatures to prompt a new election. They reportedly are only 250 names away from meeting the required minimum of about 2,000.

Berlin State Senate forced to turn over withheld funds to Jewish community Read More »

French police arrest cell with possible Syria link

France's interior minister said on Tuesday that police had arrested three suspected Jihadists whom a security expert said were part of a group sending Islamist fighters to Syria.

Socialist President Francois Hollande has made clamping down on violent cells and self-radicalized “lone-wolf” operators planning domestic attacks a top priority since an al Qaeda-inspired gunman shot dead seven people in March 2012.

France has been on heightened security alert since January, when it intervened in Mali to repel al Qaeda-linked rebels who had seized control of the north of the former French colony.

“These are individuals already known to us, notably for threats to republican institutions and our values on the Internet,” Interior Minister Manuel Valls told reporters following the arrests in southern France.

“This certainly shows the threat is still present.”

France is concerned that some 100 to 200 French citizens who have left for Syria to fight against President Bashar Assad could return and plot attacks against French interests.

[Related: An Israel-Syria war would not be a ‘surprise’]

Valls has said at least 30 such fighters have returned and suggested the three arrested were part of such a group.

“We need very powerful action to attack the phenomenon linked to terrorism and to these channels that prepare individuals to fight in Syria in Jihadist groups that call themselves al Qaeda and are particularly dangerous,” he said.

The head of the International Terrorism Observatory think tank, Roland Jacquard, told Reuters Television the group appeared to be sending fighters abroad, likely to Syria.

The arrests came a day after police rounded up six other people, aged 22 to 38, in the Paris area. All were known to police for organized crime offences.

Valls called the six “particularly dangerous” and said they had a “willingness to engage in terrorism”. They were suspected of an armed robbery a few months ago in the Paris area, he said.

Jacquard described the six as “gangster terrorists” who had been planning a bank heist.

Under French law, terror suspects can be held for up to 96 hours before judges decide whether to put them under formal investigation, a step that can lead to a trial.

MANY SMALL GROUPS

Also on Tuesday, police in Germany raided several flats of suspected Islamists around Stuttgart, Bavaria and Saxony, but there were no arrests. The federal prosecutors' office said the suspects may have been planning attacks using remote-controlled model airplanes.

Jacquard said the two French groups were a good example of small autonomous cells, many of which have no visible ties to known terror groups, that operate in France and Europe.

The police did not give the nationalities of those arrested. Terrorism experts say those attracted to violent Islam are often young men from tough neighborhoods around big cities who are second- or third-generation French born of Muslim immigrants.

France's worst terror attack in nearly 30 years occurred in March 2012 when French-born Mohamed Merah shot dead a rabbi, three Jewish children, and two soldiers in and around the southern city of Toulouse.

More recently, a Muslim convert suspected of stabbing a French soldier in Paris in a religiously motivated attack was placed under formal investigation last month.

French authorities have carried out 21 terrorism-related operations so far in 2013 and arrested 48 people. Seventeen have been jailed, according to the interior ministry.

Additional reporting by Pauline Mevel; Writing by Alexandria Sage; Editing by Michael Roddy

French police arrest cell with possible Syria link Read More »

Martini Judaism: for those who want to be shaken and stirred

“It’s Only Rock And Roll…
 
…but I like it.”  Those were the immortal words of the Rolling Stones.

And I do. I do like rock and roll, especially when its practitioners like Israel — or, at the very least, are benignly neutral towards it.

Unfortunately, it would seem that such Israel-philes are in short supply in the world of popular music. Too many rock stars have bought into the BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) movement by refusing to play concerts in Israel. We’re talking about people like Elvis Costello (though not his wife, Diana Krall), Carlos Santana, Gil Scott-Heron, Roger Waters of Pink Floyd, among others. It’s not limited to rock stars. Meg Ryan and Emma Thompson have joined this infamous crowd. I have thought of turning around and boycotting their music and their work, but why sink to their level?

The whole boycotting Israel thing is dark, dangerous and extremely hypocritical. I am thinking about all of the national conflicts in the past thirty years that these rock stars have ignored, at least when it comes to choosing concert venues. I realize that some of the boycotters are British, so I suppose that’s why they didn’t self-boycott and refuse to play in London during the darkest days of the troubles in Northern Ireland. Or why you never hear of artists boycotting China even when the Chinese destroyed Tibet. Hmnnn…

But then, there’s the list of popular artists who have gone ahead and played concerts in Israel. That list includes Paul McCartney, Leonard Cohen, Paul Simon, Bob Dylan, Madonna, Depeche Mode, Elton John (who has criticized the Israel boycotters), The Scorpions, Rod Stewart, Rihanna, the Pixies, Barbara Streisand…

And now, add to that list Alicia Keys. The pop singer has blatantly dissed Alice Walker in rejecting the famous author’s call to boycott Israel and not play concerts there. Alice Walker is such an Israel-hater that she refuses to have her books translated into Hebrew, which means that you can forget about picking up a copy of Ha-Tzevah Argaman (The Color Purple) at Steimatzky’s in Jerusalem anytime soon.

Boycotting Israel is bad enough. But boycotting Hebrew as a language? Waging a linguistic war against a (probably the) Jewish language? Hmnnn….

I have to tell you: I am really moved when rock stars and popular artists decide to play in Israel. Let’s face it. Most popular artists tend to move in very left wing circles (I myself am a boring centrist liberal type), and sadly, those very left wing circles are not always particularly friendly towards the Jewish State. I am sure that most popular artists and their management companies never really take the political situation into account when making their schedules. An audience of ticket-buyers is an audience of ticket-buyers. Still, playing in Israel – like visiting Israel – is a statement.

So, for a while I have believed that the Jewish community has to do a better job of thanking these rock stars for sharing their artistry with Israelis and, implicitly or explicitly, not allowing politics to get in the way of a rocking good time. And when they go to Israel, the crowds always adore them and they come back with a greater appreciation of what we have created in Israel. I even thought of creating an organization called “Rock of Israel” that would thank those stars and promote their work.

That’s why I posted on Alica Keys’ Facebook page. It was very simple and non-political. “Thank you for choosing to play in Israel and bringing your music as a message of peace.” I urge you to do it as well. And continue doing it for rock stars who play in Israel. Gratitude is a basic Jewish value. You don’t have to say “thanks for bucking the BDS stuff.” Just say “thanks.”

One last thing. This posting-on-Facebook thing is not without its perils. Or, minor perils anyway. The Israel-haters are going to respond to your gratitude with, well, attitude. And they will be loud and shrill and crass and frankly anti-Semitic.

My advice: ignore the haters who respond to your pro-Alicia/pro-Israel Facebook post. Don’t get into it with them. You have better things to do with your time.

One last thing: Since I began this blog post with a quote from the Rolling Stones, the rumor that they will be playing in Israel is, at this time, alas, simply a rumor.

May it come to be true. That, at the very least, would give a lot of us “satisfaction.”

Martini Judaism: for those who want to be shaken and stirred Read More »

The Power of Powerlessness

By Matt Shapiro

Working at Beit T’Shuvah full-time for the past year has been a wild ride, with plenty of ups and downs, Although it can occasionally be somewhat (alright, very) stressful working here, I really love my job. Part of the reason I appreciate it so much is because I’m constantly able to learn in many different ways, including and especially about myself. One of the most important things I’ve learned, and continue to learn, is about the lack of control I have over my own life. This is not to say I don’t make decisions or have important choices to make over the course of the day. Just as it’s important for me to see what I must do in each moment, it’s equally important for me to see that I can respond to events, but not control them. I can’t control if my son gets strep throat, I can’t control if a resident I’m working with relapses and I can’t control whether I break my toe playing barefoot football (barefootball?) in the park. I can respond in healthy and constructive ways (taking care of my son, meeting someone in need where they’re at, wearing shoes when I play sports), but I can’t change the situation itself.

With that in mind, an article I was reading recently struck a false note with me. Over the weekend, the Wall Street Journal published an article entitled Why She Drinks about the recent increase of alcoholism among women and different approaches to dealing with this problem. One of the article’s main points is that Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), frequently seen as the most prominent organization dealing with this issue, isn’t a good fit for women for a number of reasons, particularly the concept of powerlessness.  The article suggests that “the idea of being powerless can underscore a woman's sense of vulnerability.  ‘Women need to feel powerful, not like victims of something beyond their control,’ says Dr. Mary Ellen Barnes.” With all due respect to Dr. Barnes, I think this is missing the point of recognizing one’s powerlessness over life.  The issue of powerlessness is not in relationship to one’s ego exclusively. The concept of powerlessness speaks to each of our tendencies to try to control and eliminate things that make us uncomfortable. To me, powerlessness holds out the challenge of seeing the world as it is, instead of how I might like it to be. 

It was also telling to scroll down and see that the title of the larger work this piece was taken from is Her Best-Kept Secret- Why Women Drink and How They Can Regain Control. From what I’ve seen, recovery isn’t about regaining control, but instead about recognizing how little we have control over. I know I feel very different when I’m able to accept everything from not finding a good parking spot in the morning to painful experiences from my adolescence instead of trying to control everything I’m feeling and others are doing. Rabbi Rami Shapiro wrote a book titled Recovery: The Sacred Art in which he brings spiritual teachings from a number of traditions to the Twelve Steps. He writes about how the Twelve Steps can, in many ways, be applied to anyone’s life, not just addicts. He emphasizes the importance of “quitting in the sense of giving up on the illusion of personal power, control, and life’s manageability.  And when we do quit, we discover…life goes on and at last we are free to live it rather than doomed to try to control it.” I know how important that message continues to be for me, and I don’t think gender has anything to do with it.

The Power of Powerlessness Read More »

Millepied mum on Judaism

Benjamin Millepied wasn’t as daring as Miriam with her timbrels when he accompanied L.A. Dance Project, the experimental dance troupe of his creation, to a performance at American Jewish University on June 16.

Following the unique double-bill with another local company, BodyTraffic, the choreographer and dancer — also known as actress Natalie Portman’s husband — appeared on a panel with BodyTraffic co-founders Tina Berkett and Lillian Barbeito for a dialogue advertised as a discussion of Judaism’s impact on their work.

It promised to be a revealing moment.

Instead, according to several people who were present, Millepied said nothing concrete either about converting to Judaism or if he considers himself Jewish. “He said he has a Jewish family,” said one source who attended the performance.

Millepied was recently appointed director of dance at the Paris Opera Ballet and agreed to return to Los Angeles from France for this special performance; Millepied’s first public appearance with L.A. Dance Project since their Disney Hall debut last fall. In conjunction with AJU’s Geller Festival of the Arts, the performance was promoted within a Jewish context: BodyTraffic performed the piece “Transfigured Night” by Israeli choreographers Roni Haver and Guy Weizman which was set to an Arnold Schoenberg score that was suppressed during the Holocaust.

But Millepied remained mum on his experience of Judaism.

Interesting how communal identity can be such a private matter.

Millepied mum on Judaism Read More »

Ethiopian aliyah to end Aug. 28, Jewish Agency says

The Jewish Agency is preparing to end mass aliyah from Ethiopia with two final flights consisting of 400 immigrants on Aug. 28.

The Jewish Agency emissary to Ethiopia, Asher Seyum, made the announcement in a brief letter, saying the Jewish Agency will hand over its aid compounds in the Ethiopian city of Gondar to local authorities at the end of August.

For years the compounds — originally established by the North American Conference on Ethiopian Jewry and only recently taken over by the Jewish Agency — provided thousands of Ethiopians waiting to immigrate to Israel with educational, nutritional and some employment services.

Once the final flights are complete, Ethiopians wishing to immigrate to Israel will be subject to the same rules as potential immigrants from elsewhere in the world and considered on a case-by-case basis, a New York-based spokesman for the Jewish Agency told JTA.

A steady trickle of approximately 200 Ethiopian immigrants per month has been coming to Israel since 2010, when the government decided to check the aliyah eligibility of an additional 8,000 or so Ethiopians.

The petitioners are known as Falash Mura — Ethiopians who claim links to descendants of Jews who converted to Christianity generations ago but who now seek to return to Judaism and immigrate to Israel. They have been accepted to Israel under  different rules than those governing other immigrants.

The Israeli government has declared an official end to mass Ethiopian immigration several times. Each time, however, aliyah from Ethiopia resumed after pressure by advocates.

In August 2008, for example, the Israeli government declared mass Ethiopian immigration over only to reverse course several months later and agree to check the aliyah eligibility of 3,000 additional Ethiopians.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in May 2009 that those would be the last Ethiopians to be checked en masse, but that decision was reversed in 2010, opening the door for this latest group of immigrants.

Calling the decision to end Ethiopian aliyah “sensitive and complex,” Seyum acknowledged pressure from the Ethiopian community in Israel for the aliyah to continue but said he was bound by the government’s decision to end it.

Under his implementation of the government’s 2010 decision, Seyum said, more than 6,500 Ethiopians have immigrated to Israel.

Ethiopian aliyah to end Aug. 28, Jewish Agency says Read More »

A Shame

In response to yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in the Fisher v University of Texas case, this blog offered its view and Community Advocates’ vice president, Joe Hicks, wrote an op/ed that appears in today’s OC Register (see below). Both pieces, we would like to think, were driven by arguments relevant to the decision, the issue of racial preferences and data that is accurately cited.

Attempting to be accurate, especially in dealing with an issue as fraught with emotion and four decades of passion as affirmative action is, seems the least that any commentator should aspire to. That made it all the more troubling to see major media outlets belie their biases and blatantly misrepresent not only the relevant data relating to the affirmative action debate, but some of the key actors as well.

The most egregious misrepresentation that I came across was by The New York Times in a special on-line column entitled ” target=”_blank”>last month they would have seen the obvious inaccuracy of their stats and their argument:

California was one of the first states to abolish affirmative action, after voters approved Proposition 209 in 1996. Across the University of California system, Latinos fell to 12 percent of newly enrolled state residents in the mid-1990s from more than 15 percent, and blacks declined to 3 percent from 4 percent. At the most competitive campuses, at Berkeley and Los Angeles, the decline was much steeper.

Eventually, the numbers rebounded. Until last fall, 25 percent of new students were Latino, reflecting the booming Hispanic population, and 4 percent were black. A similar pattern of decline and recovery followed at other state universities that eliminated race as a factor in admissions.

Clearly, the authors had a point they wanted to make and meaningful data that might intrude on that point were unwelcomed.

A second troubling article that surfaced in the post-Fisher media frenzy was in the Huffington Post and mischaracterize the concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas. The screaming headline that begs for readers to “click through” was “Clarence Thomas Compares Affirmative Action to Slavery, Segregation in Opinion.” The author, clearly wanting to pique readers’ interest, completely misrepresented Thomas’ assertions.

Whether one agrees with Justice Thomas and his ideology or not, he deserves to have his opinions portrayed accurately—or at a minimum not totally distorted. In his opinion, in which he couldn’t have been clearer, he argued that historically “the worst forms of discrimination in the Nation have always been accompanied by straight-faced representations that discrimination helped minorities.” His examples included defenders of slavery saying it was “a positive good” that civilized blacks and segregationists who argued that segregation was good for black students.

There was not a hint in the opinion that he compared affirmative action to those sins. The only arguable language was in his transition from his discussion of slavery and segregation to the defenders of affirmative action, “following in those inauspicious footsteps, the University would have us believe that its discrimination is likewise…” He was unambiguously referring to the rationales offered both for the historic sins of slavery and Jim Crow and the rationale for affirmative action—not the activities themselves. There is simply no honest way to read what Thomas wrote as comparing slavery, Jim Crow and affirmative action. 

Clearly, the Fisher decision has struck some raw nerves, but passions and strong feelings don’t justify spinning data or dishonesty.

A Shame Read More »

France’s soaring anti-Semitism lures Jewish Defense League vigilantes out of shadows

With scooter helmets in hand, a man called Yohan and six buddies stroll around Paris’ 20th arrondissement. The seven look much like a typical group of French students — until they locate a group of Arab men they suspect of perpetrating an anti-Semitic attack the previous day.

Using their helmets as bludgeons, members of France’s Jewish Defense League, or LDJ, set upon the Arabs and beat them. Several of the Arabs attempt to escape in a blue sedan, but the LDJ members pursue the vehicle, causing it to crash into a stone wall.

The attack last August, filmed by a television crew shooting a documentary on LDJ, was one of at least 115 violent incidents that critics attribute to the group since its registration in France in 2001 — a year after the eruption of the second intifada in Israel and the sevenfold increase in anti-Semitic incidents in the 12 years that followed.

“Now they know the price of Jewish blood,” said Yohan, the nom de guerre of Joseph Ayache, one of LDJ’s young bosses.

An offshoot of the American Jewish Defense League, which was founded in New York by the ultranationalist Rabbi Meir Kahane in 1968 and which the FBI considers a domestic terrorist group, LDJ stages violent reprisals to anti-Semitic attacks.

The group, which numbers about 300 members, is now on a collision course with France’s Jewish establishment, which has condemned its activities and threatened a lawsuit.

French authorities have ignored calls to ban LDJ, though in Israel the Kach movement, also founded by Kahane, has been outlawed.

The French government’s apparent acquiescence may have inspired LDJ to ratchet up its deterrent potential by showcasing its activities following the murder of four Jews in Toulouse last year by a Muslim extremist.

LDJ traditionally had shied away from media attention. But in the weeks after the killings, which was followed by a 58 percent increase in attacks on Jews in France over the year before, LDJ for the first time allowed a television crew to tag along on a number of guerrilla operations.

In addition to the helmet assault, Ayache was filmed calling for revenge killings in posters he and his group posted around central Paris. When a police car neared, Ayache told officers that he and his friends were working on an art project. The police officers wished him a pleasant evening and drove away.

Ayache also was filmed attempting to storm a performance of the anti-Semitic comedian Dieudonne.

“Since when is it illegal to run?” a brazen Ayache told the police after they detained him.

Another sequence shows Ayache firing a pistol at a shooting range.

“We’ve noticed the Muslim community believes LDJ is some vast machine that operates with impunity and help from Mossad,” said an LDJ spokesman who goes by the alias Amnon Cohen. “It’s not true, but it’s not a bad thing if they are scared. It’ll make them think twice.”

LDJ’s growing assertiveness has further strained the group’s already tense relationship with the CRIF, the umbrella body of French Jewish communities.

In April, CRIF’s former president, Richard Prasquier, said he would sue LDJ for defamation for posting a photograph on its website depicting him with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. The caption accuses Prasquier of “pardoning [a] killer.”

LDJ, meanwhile, has accused CRIF of being undemocratic, obsolete and ineffective.

“We operate outside and independently, and that creates opposition within the establishment, which is run by men and women who mean well but don’t know the painful reality of the Jewish rank and file in Paris’ suburbs and poor neighborhoods,” Cohen said.

“There are hundreds of French and Belgian Muslims fighting in the Syrian civil war. When they return, do you think they will be scared of a couple guards trained by the community?”

CRIF declined to comment.

Earlier this month, LDJ announced that its “soldiers” had put a young Arab in the hospital with a coma, “a rapid and effective response” to the man’s attack on Jews at Saint-Mande, just east of Paris.

The announcement drew calls to ban LDJ. As criticism mounted, LDJ retracted the statement and denied any involvement in the violence.

Cohen told JTA the person who published the “false statement” had been removed from the group and that the violence actually resulted from a drug deal gone sour. A spokesperson for the Saint-Mande municipality confirmed that account.

Still, the events at Saint-Mande resulted in a public row between LDJ and CRIF, which on June 4 blamed LDJ for the violence at Saint Mande and for subsequent calls “to take revenge against the Jews.”

Cohen said CRIF is looking for a “scapegoat” to distract from its failure to prevent attacks on Jews through outreach and education. He also denied the group engages in violence, despite ample evidence to the contrary.

Besides the television footage, a French court last week sentenced LDJ activist David Ben Aroch to six months in prison for an attack he staged with another LDJ member at a Paris bookstore owned by a pro-Palestinian activist.

Aroch’s accomplice, Jason Tibi, was sentenced to four months for the attack at Librairie Resistance that sent the two victims to the hospital for days.

It may have been a real-life demonstration of what one masked LDJ boss recently called “treatment a la Israel” during a speech at a secret training camp in France.

The filmed address was the introduction to a LDJ propaganda clip titled “Five cops for every Jew, 10 Arabs for each rabbi.”

France’s soaring anti-Semitism lures Jewish Defense League vigilantes out of shadows Read More »

Days before Kerry visit, Netanyahu visits West Bank school named for father

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited a West Bank settlement days before a scheduled visit by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry to jump-start the peace process.

Netanyahu on Monday attended a dedication ceremony for an elementary school in the Barkan settlement named for his father, Ben Tzion Netanyahu, who died last year at 102.

It was Netanyahu’s first visit to a West Bank settlement since his election in January. Barkan is located in one of the settlement blocs that Israel has said will remain part of the country under any peace agreement.

Netanyahu criticized the perpetrators of “price tag” attacks, saying, “We cannot accept this lawlessness in our midst. We are acting against it with a strong hand and we will continue to do so.”

Netanyahu also spoke about Israel’s right to defend itself.

“I believe that the Jews must be capable of defending themselves by themselves and to take determined action against any enemy that tries to attack us,” he said.

Netanyahu said his father believed that a fundamental part of establishing the State of Israel as a renewed Jewish state was the ability of the Jews to defend themselves on their own.

“This has guided me in every arena against every threat,” he said.

Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat in an interview with The New York Times accused Netanyahu of doing something “to undermine the possibility of a Palestinian state.”

“It’s more than provocative, it’s devastating,” Erekat said.

Kerry is scheduled to arrive in Israel at the end of the week.

Days before Kerry visit, Netanyahu visits West Bank school named for father Read More »