fbpx

January 11, 2013

Ban the Guns, Strengthen Democracy

There are two different forces arrayed against gun control in the current debate—the forces of opposition and the forces of obfuscation. The forces of opposition are those whose allegiance to gun ownership brooks neither compromise nor debate. The forces of obfuscation are a more challenging opponent. Their stance is not a fealty to gun ownership per se, nor a mindless chanting of the fantastical slogans of opposition to government tyranny, neither are they simple supporters of easy and universal access to guns. They think gun owners should be trained, perhaps even licensed. Guns should be regulated. However, they stand on the peak of an Olympus of their own making from where they can discern that the territory is far more complicated than you know (you on the right, you on the left) and therefore none of your solutions are really helpful. Most mass killings were not carried out by people with rifles. Most of the gun violence in this country does not involve the types of weapons that the current and proposed laws would regulate or ban.

More importantly, nobody who is writing in support of gun control actually knows of what they speak. The editorial writers and pundits make rookie mistakes when speaking of weapons and ammunition. It’s enough to make you laugh out loud. Then, there is the fact that in the midst of a violent assault by a man armed with a gun it is better to be armed than unarmed; teaching people to defend themselves with furniture or their laptops is tragically absurd. Finally, those on the gun control side of the aisle need to admit that there are actually bad and violent people in this country and a person should defend themselves and their family. Ultimately, the obfuscator’s final argument (and ” target=”_blank”>two hundred seventy million guns of various kinds in private hands already. Banning certain categories of firearms will not do anything about crimes committed with firearms that do not fit those criteria—and the gun lobbyists spend a lot of time applying pressure to massage those definitions. There are bad people, and in the middle of a violent situation many people might think that it would be better if they had a gun—if not, the odds are that the stronger bad people would always win. There is no solution, and therefore in the current situation as we find it (having created it) we should abandon all attempts at flimsy regulations and perhaps just try to train people on the weapons that they already have. With the density of gun ownership as it is, disarming is reckless. There is then no solution, so we should, reluctantly perhaps abandon the fight to control gun violence.

This approach, however, inadvertently points to the beginning of the solution—a solution that Harris, for one, does not want, nor does he think is possible.

First, taking care of business. It seems to be a necessary part of the rhetoric nowadays to have to claim knowledge of and use of guns to gain some sort of credibility. Here goes. I have carried and fired, at various points in my life, an M1, an M14, an Uzi, an M16 (both fixed stock and collapsible stock), and a 9mm Beretta pistol that I actually owned. As long as we are on the subject, I was also a tank gunner pulling the trigger on a 105mm gun. For what its worth, I was a pretty good marksman with both the M16 and the 105mm. It is, actually, not worth very much.

The problem of gun violence (which is a subset of a larger problem of violence) in our country is not dependent on knowing the arcane details of weaponry. It matters not a whit whether you know the difference between the AR15 and the M16 if you are really trying to solve the problem. It matters a lot if you are trying to keep as many guns as possible in play. If you want to evade any and all gun laws it is important to be able to argue about the number of rounds a semi-automatic gun can shoot in a minute. If you are trying to clamp down on guns, control the number of weapons that are in the hands of people this does not really matter.

The only solution, as Harris knows, is to ban all guns. This might even require the repeal of the second amendment to the constitution. And so, in the interest of full disclosure, I should say that I do want to take your guns away. All of them. Every last one.

At the same time, I do not think this will be accomplished this year or perhaps even this decade. We must however, ” target=”_blank”>here.

My book Justice in the City: An Argument from the Sources of Rabbinic Judaism is available Ban the Guns, Strengthen Democracy Read More »

Antidote for anti-Semitism? “I’m a Jew”

After reading ” target=”_blank”>mormon.org website and click on the “People” tab, where they can explore several features. The “I’m a Mormon” link allows viewers to watch videos of famous and not-so-famous Mormons sharing moments from their lives and introducing themselves as Mormons. The “Meet Mormons” link allows viewers to scroll through tens of thousands of online profiles of church members, searchable by gender, age, ethnicity, and location. Finally, interested viewers can chat live with Mormons if they’re interested in learning more about their faith.

Think of what an “I’m a Jew” campaign would look like for, say, Hungary. Interesting, down-to-earth Magyar-speaking Jews from Hungary and other countries, including Israel, would have a video photographer visit their homes for a day or two and record candid moments in their lives, including closing scenes where they identify themselves as Jews and give a 30-second explanation of what Judaism means to them. Hungarians would also be free to look at profiles of Hungarian Jews around the world, and could chat with them if they wanted to learn more. Conversion from stereotypes and prejudice, not religious conversion, is the ultimate goal here.  

It’s hard to see how an “I’m a Jew” campaign would do any harm, and easy to see how it could break down barriers to understanding created by unfamiliarity. Having lived in Europe four times, I know many Europeans who do not have any Jewish friends or acquaintances. I’m sure that Jewish communities in the U.S., Europe, and Israel have the resources – human, technological, and financial – to launch a professional pilot campaign in one or two countries. As with any PR campaign, the target audience is not the fanatics but the fair-minded. I have said for many years that the best ambassadors for Judaism and Israel are Jews, and this would be a great chance for them to demonstrate this. I can’t wait to see the first videos.

Antidote for anti-Semitism? “I’m a Jew” Read More »

Simple and Basic Tomato Basil Sauce (RECIPE)

Learning to make tomato sauce is challenging. This recipe is quite simple as promised, don’t get me wrong.  But there are so many ways of making a tomato sauce, so many good ways, that it’s easy to get confused. The reality is it takes time and practice to get to a point when you feel you own the  sauce you are making. The upshot is that you get to eat your way to learning and make everyone around you very happy in the meantime.  

Hence,  as someone who has been studying tomato sauce religiously from the Italians for the last 15 years and as someone who would like to see YOU progress in a lot less time, here is my tomato sauce HOMEWORK GUIDE:

  1. Make this particular sauce until you feel comfortable with it. Make it a few times in the next few weeks.
  2. Then start experimenting with other tomato basil recipes that you encounter either in this blog or through other chefs. Notice how a slight difference in ingredients and process changes the flavor.
  3. Begin now to try out all different kinds of tomato sauce recipes, not just a tomato and basil one, and notice how the inclusion of onion or celery or thyme or oregano changes the character of the sauce. You will find that even how you cut the ingredients will affect the flavor,  as will  the exact heating method contribute to nuanced differences.  You might prefer one sauce depending on the mood you are in or the meal you are making.
  4. Soon you will begin to make your own array of sauces inspired by personally informed creative impulses.  This is freedom in the kitchen!!

If you can’t be bothered by all that, just follow the instructions below and enjoy.

But, for those still interested in learning, I will dispel the secrets of this particular sauce. As you will see there are not many ingredients. This  sauce is the opposite of Emril Lagasse’s expression ” BAM, BAM BAM!” There are no explosions of flavor here.  This sauce is about harmony and about letting the garlic and whole basil leaves gently infuse their flavors into the tomatoes. The carrots are not to be eaten inside of the sauce, but are used rather to add sweetness to the tomatoes naturally, without sugar. They also lend a mildly earthy flavor. (The carrots cooked in the tomato sauce will however, make a leftover side dish!)

Lastly, a good tomato sauce cannot be made without good tomatoes. I like canned  tomatoes for certain sauces because they are just as good in the winter as they are in the summer (unlike fresh tomatoes which are only good in summer) and lend themselves to a richer sauce with very little work.

The guidebook for choosing canned tomatoes:

  • Always read the ingredients on a can of tomatoes. If there is oregano or garlic  or other spices, those canned flavors are going into your sauce and it will not taste like Italy. It will taste like the cheap  American spaghetti sauce your mother made.
  • Whole peeled tomatoes will have better flavor than those that are already diced. The cutting process ruins them somehow. I pulse them in my Vitamix or Cuisinart very briefly, leaving the puree the slightest bit chunky, just before I throw it into the hot pan.
  • Choose Italian plum tomatoes when possible. The best are San Marzano.

Here is a list of some of my favorite brands:  (again, no one is sponsoring me, this is for your own good and the good of tomato sauce at large):

  1. Carmelina Italian Peeled Tomatoes
  2. San Marzano Whole Peeled Tomatoes
  3. Cento San Marzano Whole Peeled Tomatoes
  4. Whole Foods 365 Organic Whole Peeled Tomatoes
  5. Whole Foods 365 Whole Peeled Tomatoes
  6. Trader Joe’s  canned tomatoes with basil, my friend Francesca, a real Italian,  says they are great and uses them all the time. I think they are ok, but not fantastic.
  7. Organic Muir Glenn Whole Peeled Plum Tomatoes
  8. S&W Premium Organic Diced Tomatoes *Note: these are not my favorite brand, I put them down because they can be found at some Costco’s in bulk and can help us insure that we always have a can of tomatoes on hand. I do find them a bit watery and flavorless though, but certain clients of mine never noticed!

 

Ingredients:

(to read Health Benefits of each ingredient, click on them)

Simple and Basic Tomato Basil Sauce (RECIPE) Read More »

The Importance of Truth

By Rabbi Mark Borovitz

I was reading an article in last Saturday’s New York Times titled: No Religious Exemption when it comes to Abuse. In it, there were stories about different Religious Institutions, including Jewish places of Higher Learning, and the abuse that they “swept under the rug” because they didn’t want to embarrass the perpetrators and themselves. I got very angry about this. If we are not going to hold ourselves to transparency and Truth, then how can we preach this to others? I am so tired of the Holier than Thou attitude of Religious Institutions, Political Parties and Politicians, NGOs, etc. What part of T’Shuvah don’t they understand?? When Yeshiva University is unwilling to DO and BE T’Shuvah, what is this saying about our Tradition? It is not only Yeshiva University that does this, most of our Jewish Institutions “hide their dirty laundry,” following, as the article says, the 11th Commandment; thou shalt not air thy dirty laundry. We even used to say, “SHHHH, it’s a Shonda for the Goyim. Don’t say anything, it will be a shame for Non-Jews to know this ‘secret.’”

As a person who believes in T’Shuvah, this is antithetical to me! I am angry and upset that we keep violating the tenets and the essence of our Torah with these actions. Our Torah and our entire Bible tells the stories of our ancestor’s greatness and their flaws. It tells the stories of how our People Israel hid, violated God’s laws for living well, and the consequences of these actions, both good and not good. Yet, our leaders and institutions continue to hide and deflect and explain away our errors. Aren’t we tired of the same old lies?? When are we going to LIVE TORAH, BE TORAH and stop being afraid of our whole selves and our authentic selves? When are we going to accept our imperfections and accept the parts of us we don’t like so much?

What does this have to do with my life, you may be asking? I will tell you. This week at Beit T’Shuvah, I declared Amnesty. I do this every so often in order to give people the experience of being transparent and not needing to hide. There is no punishment attached to this Amnesty. Instead, all of the Spiritual Counselors work with their people to find ways to do T’Shuvah and change behaviors that stop them from living well. This is for the individual and the community. I read the writings this morning. While there was not any mayhem or murder, there were/are constant violations of our “rules” and hiding and sneaking around. If someone else were to read these amnesties they would not be aghast or upset, yet I am.

I am upset that the teachings of wholeness, transparency and principles of T’Shuvah are not believed in and practiced more by our residents. I am upset that the same things that people were doing “out there” and in their families are being repeated here in their recovery! I am upset that our staff can’t keep on top of these things because there are too many clients and not enough staff. I am upset that the staff isn’t getting these messages through to our clients well enough. I am most upset that I am not inspiring and communicating our belief in Truth as one of the most important principles of living.

I am excited at the honesty of our clients. I am excited by their belief that telling the truth will not bring punishment. I am excited that we can help all of them take their hidings and make them into stepping stones for living better. I am excited that we can help them do T’Shuvah and change their behaviors and be unafraid of “baring” all.

Because I am “addicted to redemption” I am excited to help people learn to live with their “dark” sides and not have these “shames” to live in. I am excited to help our staff look at themselves and help them grow in their own lives. I am excited to see where I have missed the mark and take steps to improve my own living and teaching.

I have not committed the wrongs of the institutions that were in last Saturday’s New York Times. Most of us have not and we all have things that we are hiding from. I propose that all of us do an “AMNESTY” with ourselves and find a guide/Rabbi/Spiritual Counselor to share this with and then find the ways to DO and BE T’Shuvah.

The Importance of Truth Read More »

McConnell: Israeli, U.S. Mideast agendas ‘the same’

Sen. Mitch McConnell said in a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that the U.S. and Israeli agendas in the Middle East were identical.

Netanyahu met Friday with McConnell, the minority leader in the U.S. Senate, who was leading a group of senators on an Israel tour.

“As everybody in Israel knows, there are a lot of things we disagree on in America, we've had big battles over deficit and debt, but there's broad bi-partisan support for Israel, and our agenda in this part of the world is the same as your agenda,” McConnell said, according to a statement from Netanyahu's office.

Netanyahu thanked the senators and said his major priority, should he win reelection on Jan. 22, would be ” to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons.”

The statement from Netanyahu's office did not say who else was in McConnell's group. Other senators known to be in Israel this week include Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.).

McConnell: Israeli, U.S. Mideast agendas ‘the same’ Read More »

Scientific American mocks claims that Darwin was Jewish

Scientific American magazine satirized claims in a Turkish children's book that Charles Darwin was Jewish.

The Jan. 8 article was written in response to reports in October about a series of books aimed at Turkish schoolchildren which describe Darwin as a hook-nosed Jew who kept the company of monkies.

The books sparked outrage in Turkey and protests from Turkish teachers. The Istanbul area school district which distributed the books later claimed it was not aware of their content.

In the online article, Steve Mirsky writes that the “Judaic background” of Darwin — who studied to be a priest at Cambridge’s Christ’s College — is “common knowledge in the Jewish community” but “seems to be a shock to many non-Jews.”

Mirsky added that this background influenced the writing of Darwin, who first described biological evolution through natural selection with scientific rigor in his book “On the Origin of Species.”

The manuscript, Mirsky wrote, was originally entitled “L'Chaim: The Whole Megillah.”

The official website of Darwin Day — an international organization which celebrates Darwin’s heritage — says his parents are buried at Montford Parish Church. His mother belonged to the Christian Unitarian theological stream and took him as a young child with her to the Unitarian Church. Darwin, who died in 1882 at the age of 73, was married to Emma Darwin, a devout Christian.

Scientific American mocks claims that Darwin was Jewish Read More »

Standups of the 70’s–Still Stars Today

Not to be confused with, yet reminiscent of a current film by the same name (both feature lots of depressing nights in bars) Standup Guys: A Generation of Laughs by John DeBellis (on Amazon) is one of the most hilarious histories of any artistic era you'll ever read,  much funnier than Kerns’ Team of Rivals, or Caro’s book on LBJ—Passage of Power. A book with purposes beyond decorative, it’s palliative, yet stimulating, educational, yet entertaining, and darn flattering (I’m in it).

So, John–wonder how it's possible that you've gotten even funnier with age.  

I don’t know if I’m funnier or people’s sense of humor has gotten worse.  Actually, the truth is that I’m learning to be less funny.  I used to try to punch up every line.  It’s like a pitcher learning to take something off his fastball, changing speeds to make the fastball more effective. 

I know– laughing at you was wearing out my mouth. Since our formative years together in NYC, have new traumas gotten integrated into your psyche?

I didn’t have any new traumas, the old ones seem to still be working.   Maybe when they run out I’ll have to get more. 

I think you can get some at trauma centers. Do you feel your book can help people cope with the PTSD of crazy families?

No, I can just make them feel better knowing that other people are suffering.  And learning from my toxic childhood that it’s possible to handle tragedy without cutting up and eating a neighbor. 

Was it your profusion of photos of successful friends that prompted you to write the book?

The pictures came later.  And there wasn’t one person who refused to let me use a picture of them.  That’s great considering comics aren’t the most handsome bunch on the planet. 

Funny was always handsome to me. In recent years you’ve gone from quite a head of hair to none. Did it take a lot of courage to shave your head, or were you honoring and emulating L. David’s emerging skull?

No, the only thing I’d want to emulate in Larry’s life is his bank account.

It started when I was on the phone with Pat Benatar and asked her what I should do being newly divorced and she said the shave your head, grow a beard and get an earring.  I was meeting LD for lunch and he must have spotted the earring from a hundred yards away and let me have it for the entire lunch. 

He was always so helpful. What impact did all the Jewish Comics  have on the art form when we got started?

Standup in the US had been adopting the Jewish rhythms, that have a natural timing mechanism built in, for decades.  I think the way

Jewish people speak was made for comedy; they tend to pause and to punctuate at all the right places. Jackie Mason used to point and me and say, “You're funny.  You're a Jew.”  It's like Italians are usually good singers because of their culture and genes. Except for me when I sing deaf people won't even look at my lips. 

Groucho Marx may have reflected the Jewish influence on television better than anyone. Jackie Mason then made that cadence more pronounced.  Woody Allen made it his  own and was my personal comedy hero.   

Standup Guys: A Generation of Laughs will definitely generate laughs from any English speaking reader.  But how will it play in Spanish? German? Japanese?

My humor works the same in any language, in fact it’s appreciated even more by the deaf and blind.  See,  I was the only comic who would go to hospitals and work to people in comas.  

My spelling would definitely be better in those languages.  Actually I had a professional editor correct the spelling in my book then retire prematurely. 

How do you regard the up and coming comedians of today, compared to our peers who continue to have so much impact on TV programming?

It’s painful to see the changes in standup. Today when I see a comic, it’s like a game, “search for the hidden punch line.”  Not that I’m saying stand-up was better when we did it. It was just different. Today there is less concern for the language or the purity of wit.  It’s like reading novels now, so few writers worry about the color and sound of words, they just lay it out without any flare.   

One of Webster's Dictionary definitions of “stand up” is  'informal courageous and loyal in a combative way'–how might that terminology apply to the comics you encountered back in the early days at the Improv and Catch a Rising Star?

There probably was no one more combative than Larry David, nor courageous.  He bombed more than anyone, because of the nature of his material, which was way off beat, borderline insane.  And even if a chair squeaked at the wrong time LD would lose his temper, thinking he was being mocked. 

Michael Richards hated being interrupted, too. I used to combat hecklers by breaking down in tears (“Look what you’ve done!”) – those classes with Stella Adler paid off. I remember L.D. heckling the hecklers back. Very bold.

That was the best.  When he got mad, you never knew what he’d say, but to us it was always hysterical.  He’d slam the microphone onto the stage and call customers out to fight, or he’d throw gum on them.   Larry and I spent a ton of time together in those early years so there’s lots of LD stories in the book.  In fact the first person to read the book was Larry.  I wanted to ok it with him.  The only thing he made me take out was something positive I said about him. 

How does the comedy scene differ today from when we were in our 20's, desperately sacrificing our families and dignities for a cheap laugh?

I don’t know much about the scene today.  I just know that back then we were compelled to do standup. There was no money.  It was just something inside us that had to come out besides the ninety-nine cent breakfasts.  I never gave a thought about offending my family members — most of my stuff did.  One difference was that back then, us starving comics, despite our limited wardrobe, dressed to look successful. Today even the successful comics dress to look like they’re starving.   I think I like it better today. 

But, it was a creative time in the seventies.  When we started at the Improv, it was run by Chris Albrecht who was twenty-five. I don't think there was anyone in the club over thirty.  Gilbert Gottfried couldn’t even legally drink. So, the Improvisation had a real loose atmosphere that was encouraged creativity rather than relying on results.  For Catch a Rising Star you had to be more polished and the Comic Strip grew its own great group of comics, like Jerry Seinfeld, Paul Reiser, Larry Miller, Eddie Murphy. 

So many of our gang became creators of shows and talk show hosts in this era.  How has the scene changed in late night for stand ups?

One of the reasons for the change in standup comedy, is the loss of Johnny Carson.  Johnny was our God. He would bring on a new comic or two almost every week.  And he loved them.  

Standups of the 70’s–Still Stars Today Read More »

Letters to the Editor: Murder, USAID, Menches

Why Is Murder Wrong? It’s Simple … and Complex

The reason I can’t accept the foundation for Dennis Prager’s argument is that it relies exclusively on secondhand testimony (“Why Is Murder Wrong?” Dec. 14). Hearsay. Sadly, there is no irrefutable proof that the Bible is written by God; indeed, there is evidence that it was drafted by multiple people. The witnesses you may summon to profess God’s word — preachers, statesmen and busloads of devoted ordinary people — can do no more than exclaim their own personal faith. Good for them, but inadmissible as evidence. 

So, if murder isn’t punished by God, is it evil? Can’t say. But I can say that it’s abhorred pretty close to universally. People don’t like it. It’s treated as one of the worst crimes in every culture. It’s recognized as an act that fractures a society, and so societies rebel against it. 

Perhaps we’re hard-wired to not like seeing people we care about get killed, and therefore put great effort into devising laws and punishment to keep that from happening. Perhaps it’s just something that evolved along with civilization to help us keep from exterminating ourselves altogether. The prohibitions against murder are multitudinous and nearly universal without needing it to spring from Scripture.

We need rules that allow us to function as a civilization. Perhaps they are merely manufactured items forged by citizens desiring to bring harmony to the world. But that doesn’t make them any less valuable or useful.

Roger Thiessen, via e-mail


Highlighting the Good Work of USAID

The most important work our government does for our long-term global security goes unnoticed at best and funding is cut at worst (“America, the Mensch,” Jan. 4). Rajiv Shah is an excellent USAID director as well as an incredible talent and find for the U.S. government. I’m glad Rob Eshman got to hear him speak and was excited enough about what development and diplomacy can do to write a piece about it. 

Naomi Leight, via e-mail


My son, Robert M. Birkenes, who lives in Bangkok and who has been working with USAID for many years now, forwarded your wonderful article on Rajiv Shah to me. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.

The wonderful things USAID programs accomplish in our world should be publicized. Our government should employ a professional PR firm, which has international connections, and have them promote the great things USAID does every day throughout the world.

Robert E. Birkenes, Boca Raton, Fla.


Great Need for Board of Rabbis

If one area in the country needs an independent Board of Rabbis, it’s Los Angeles, which is ethnically diverse and has a pattern of relatively weak religious practice and affiliation among its Jews (“Federation Re-evaluating Board of Rabbis,” Jan. 4). Rabbis, congregants, noncongregants and synagogues in our local environment face significant challenges. Considering the removal of a service agency that has proven its worth over the past five decades is shortsighted. Unfortunately, that’s nothing new.

Pini Herman, Carthay Circle


A Bar Mitzvah to Remember

As a Jewish educator for more than 40 years, I have attended many outstanding b’nai mitzvah. None has meant as much to me as Shawn Lapin’s at Temple Judea of Tarzana (“Two-Person Army for Their Son,” Jan. 4). As I recall, the idea began with his two brothers, who felt that Shawn deserved what every 13-year-old is expected to attain. The Lapins, with the support and encouragement of Rabbi Steven Jacobs, prepared for a unique, beautiful rite of passage.

I can picture Shawn dressed in a handsome suit on the bimah. He sat patiently with a sympathetic aide by his side. When we reached the highlight of every bar mitzvah, the Torah service, Shawn proudly stood and said the word “Torah” loud and clear. It took him a year of preparation to learn that one powerful word.

Congratulations to the Jewish Journal for highlighting the activism of the Lapins. As advocates, may they go from strength to strength.

Judith V. Aronson, Los Angeles


Listen to One Who Knows About Learning a Trade

I was happy to see that the young man in the photo accompanying your article about vocational training (“Training for a Trade,” Dec. 14) was wearing hand and eye protection while operating a grinding tool. I didn’t, however, see any sort of hearing protection in the picture. As a lifelong tradesman who has reached the age of 60 (with fingers and eyes intact, thank God), I do have significant hearing loss, due, no doubt, to long exposure to screeching power tools.

I firmly believe the trades can offer mentally, physically and financially rewarding opportunities for our youth, but the skills acquired must be accompanied by an awareness of the related safety and health issues. I hope all the young folks who follow this career path will find it as deeply satisfying as I have.

Gary Abraham, Los Angeles

Letters to the Editor: Murder, USAID, Menches Read More »

Lack of deal with Iran on nuclear talks alarms Russia

Russia expressed alarm on Friday that no date or venue had been agreed for a new round of talks between global powers and Iran over Tehran's nuclear program.

Iran, which denies Western accusations it is seeking to develop a capability to make nuclear weapons, said last week it had agreed to resume talks in January with six powers.

But Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said on Friday there was no final agreement on when or where a meeting would take place.

“This alarms us, because the pause has dragged on,” the Interfax news agency quoted Ryabkov, who is the Russian negotiator, as saying.

“As a nation and a member of the 'group of six' we are working actively to find a solution.”

The European Union, which represents the powers, said last week that it had proposed a date to Iran but Western diplomatic sources said on Friday that Iran had yet to respond.

One source suggested that the date the EU proposed was next Tuesday but said that was now unlikely.

“It is our understanding that Iran has not responded to the Jan. 15 date,” the diplomatic source said.

The six powers – the United States, France, Britain, China, Russia and Germany – were therefore not planning for that, he source said.

Global powers, particularly in the West, want to rein in Iran's uranium enrichment work. Tehran says it is refining uranium for peaceful ends only but enrichment yields material that can be used to make nuclear bombs if processed further.

There was no breakthrough in three rounds of talks last year, the most recent in Moscow in June, and Israel has stepped up talk of pre-emptive attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, lending urgency to diplomacy.

Ryabkov said he hoped the talks will take place this month.

“When we parted in June after the Moscow round, we agreed that the process should continue without substantial breaks,” Interfax quoted him as saying.

SUSPECT SITE

Western diplomats and analysts say it is unclear why Iran has not agreed a date for new talks. Some suggest Tehran may want to wait until after its next meeting with the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency, next Wednesday.

IAEA chief Yukiya Amano said in Tokyo on Friday he was not optimistic about the talks or getting access to a military base Western powers suspect has been used for atom bomb-related work.

“The outlook is not bright,” Amano said.

He was referring to negotiations to be held in Tehran on the framework accord the Vienna-based IAEA hopes will enable it to quickly resume its stalled investigation into suspected atom bomb research.

His remarks contrasted with a more upbeat assessment given by the IAEA after a meeting with Iranian officials last month.

“Talks with Iran don't proceed in a linear way,” Amano said. in Japanese comments translated into English. “It's one step forward, two or three steps back…So we can't say we have an optimistic outlook” for the Jan. 16 meeting.

Russia, which built Iran's first nuclear power plant, has supported four rounds of U.N. Security Council sanctions against Tehran over its nuclear program but opposes further measures and has sharply criticised Western sanctions.

Russia has adamantly warned against attacking Iran and, while it says Tehran must cooperate and dispel concerns about its nuclear program, officials including Ryabkov have suggested Western fears it seeks nuclear weapons are overblown.

Lack of deal with Iran on nuclear talks alarms Russia Read More »

Rules for an Al Dente Pasta

You will need:

  • large pot of water
  • kosher salt
  • a timer/stopwatch to help you stay on task.
  • one pound (one box) pasta- serves 4 people

(Best brands for pasta are DeCecco, Barilla, Garofalo (available at CostCo) and Tinyada Brown Rice Pasta*)

  1. Always use a big pot of boiling water, even if you are making pasta only for one. The pasta needs to “breathe” while it cooks.
  2. Once water boils, throw in a full handful of salt. Yes, a handful. Just do it.
  3. Put in the pasta all at once, i.e. not put in one handful after the other or you will mess up cooking times.
  4. Stir pasta a couple times at the beginning to make sure it doesn’t stick. Spaghetti and all brown rice pasta needs extra stirring. Get your tongs* in there!
  5. YELL TO FAMILY AND FRIENDS: “ Butto la pasta. I am throwing in the pasta.” This lets them know they have about 10 minutes to finish up whatever they are doing and to get ready to be at the table the moment the pasta is served.
  6. Don’t leave wooden spoon or tongs in the pasta water while it is cooking.
  7. Colander must be put in sink now, early. If you fumble for it later, you risk mushy pasta, which is punishable by law in certain parts of Italy.
  8. Do NOT go on the computer while your pasta is cooking. You are risking mushy pasta. which is punishable by law in Italy.
  9. If you must step away from the pasta, set a timer for 4 minutes before the pasta is said to be ready, according to box instructions.
  10. Start testing pasta for done-ness 3 minutes before it is supposed to be ready, according to package instructions.
  11. If your sauce has been turned off, turn the flame on again to medium to make sure it is heated through.
  12. All crunchiness in pasta should be gone and the intense chewiness should just be giving way to a softer texture. Stop. You are done.
  13. 30 Seconds too much or too little DOES make a difference. (When in doubt: Better to undercook a tad than to overcook it.)
  14. Drain pasta.
  15. DO NOT RINSE PASTA. The starch on the pasta is what marries the sauce to the noodles.
  16. YELL TO FAMILY AND FRIENDS: “La pasta e` pronta. The pasta is ready”. This is when they need to come to the table.
  17. Raise flame of sauce to a “fuoco vivace”, lively flame  (medium-high to high ) and pour drained pasta into it.
  18. Use tongs* or two big forks or wooden spoons to TOSS (and not mix) the pasta and sauce together.
  19. Serve onto individual plates and top with freshly grated parmigiano reggiano or fresh parsley or mint  if the dish calls for it.
  20. FINAL IMPORTANT RULE: the pasta is to be eaten immediately. There is no such thing as letting it sit until you are ready to eat. If you are not ready, do not go past step 1. The pasta is a demigod in Italian culture. It’s readiness dictates your readiness. If someone is late to the table, you do not wait for them to eat. The pasta is ready. Eat it now!!

 

* Shop for these items “>here

Rules for an Al Dente Pasta Read More »