fbpx

February 5, 2012

Where is the Next Big Jewish Basketball Star?



The NBA is up and running. Omri Casspi is starting without very impressive numbers and Jordan Farmar remains a solid backup on the verge of leading a team. Since everything is status quo with our star NBA players, TGR begs to ask the question, who is next? (Not a Goldberg reference).


In the college game right now, our upperclassmen and top scorers play for small schools. Certainly Zach Rosen and Jake Cohen will have a chance to play overseas, but it is unlikely either will make the NBA. Corbin Moore and Chris Wroblewski have improved but there chances are even dimmer. 


If we look at some of the younger players at top programs, we have a few. Jacob Susskind at Maryland, Danny Rubin at Boston College, and Nate Lubick at Georgetown. As of now none of them show NBA caliber potential  but should improve at these big time programs. Also, next year Aaron Liberman will join the Northwestern Wildcats. At 6’9 he is a project but could have some potential if he puts on weight, but again NBA is very unlikely.




So we look overseas to Israel. I bring to you Idam Zalmanson, a 6’9 forward who is only 16 and already playing with the pros. He is not draft eligible until 2017, but with his size could make Zalmanson the next big Jewish star. He was pre-draft already by Maccabi Tel Aviv, so he will get top competition and European recognition.


Of course, there is the outside chance that Jon Scheyer or Sylven Landesberg put it together and make a run at the NBA, but neither has been NBA impressive in their short time in Israel. Landesberg is averging 21.8 ppg but his team has been a big let down at 3-12.


So watch out for Zalmanson even if its a little ways away, so until then enjoy the Casspi and Farmar moments.
And Let Us Say…Amen.
– Jeremy Fine

Where is the Next Big Jewish Basketball Star? Read More »

Must Read, February 5, 2012

Newt’s very bad night

Not only did Gingrich suffer an anticipated loss in Nevada’s caucus, writes Steve Kornacki in Salon, but he also faces the abdication of super-sponsor Sheldon Adelson.

“Ultimately, this may be the biggest story to come out of Saturday night. It’s hard enough to see Gingrich bouncing back now, and if his chief patron turns off the spigot…”

Iran will strike back

Writing for CNN‘s Global Public Square blog, Geneive Abdo and Reza H. Akbari examine the statement by U.S. Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. that Iran would certainly fiercely retaliate to any strike on its nuclear facilities.

The recent pronouncements from Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and other Iranian officials should be taken seriously.  In November, Khamenei said: “Iran is not a nation to sit still and just observe threats from fragile materialist powers which are being eaten by worms from inside.”

Iran raid likely to drag in U.S. and hurt global economy

William Maclean of Reuters looks at the potential international impact of an Israeli strike on Iran.

[L]ongstanding U.S. and European assumptions about the consequences of an Israeli attack on Iran are being re-examined with greater urgency in Western capitals after repeated warnings by Israel that the chance of a peaceful resolution may be closing.

Egypt: Three scenarios

Abdel Monem Said of Asharq Alawsat sets out three paths for post-revolutionary Egypt to take, each strewn with its own pitfalls.

In this way, one year after the Egyptian revolution, and the so-called Arab Spring, the state of affairs have changed in an unprecedented manner which is not likely to reoccur in the future. What we came to know is that the early romance [of the revolution] has produced a reality that is not so romantic today.

Islam and Government: How It Can Be

Ed Husain of the Council on Foreign Relations looks at future in which a long tradition of scholarship and government cooperation is revived.

Now, several Islamist movements find themselves in government and seem unsure how to respond to traditional Muslim scholarship that accepted secular rule. Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood has had a fractured relationship with the Sunni al-Azhar seminary for more than five decades. What will happen now?

 

Must Read, February 5, 2012 Read More »

Ski resort Jesus statue gets another 10 years from Forest Service

There is a statue of a skiing Jesus at Whitefish Mountain Resort in Whitefish, Mont. The statue, a memorial to World War II veterans that has resided on federal land since 1995, was evicted by the U.S. Forest Service a year ago. That move led to protests from religious groups and Montana’s congressman.

Last week, the ” title=”AP reports” target=”_blank”>AP reports:

Forest Service supervisor Chip Weber said the revised decision took into account that the statue is eligible for placement on National Register of Historic Places, and that no substantive concerns related to environmental conditions were found in about 95,000 comments received by the agency.

The latest decision renews a 10-year special-use permit for the Knights of Columbus Council, members of which placed the statue there.

“I understand the statue has been a long-standing object in the community since 1955, and I recognize that the statue is important to the community for its historical heritage based on its association with the early development of the ski area on Big Mountain,” Weber said.

Of course, the Freedom From Religion Foundation, which claims that the statue’s presence on federal land is a blatant violation of the separation of church and state, isn’t pleased with the issuance of a new special-use permit. Annie Laurie Gaylor, the organization’s co-president, called the permit a “sham.”

A lawsuit challenging the decision can be expected. And I don’t think that supporters can lean too much on the ” title=”since stolen” target=”_blank”>since stolen—which was heavily tied to the facts of that case and, in my opinion, was not the watershed moment that proponents of religious symbols on public land wanted it to be.

So how will this one turn out?

Ski resort Jesus statue gets another 10 years from Forest Service Read More »

‘The Artist’s’ Jewish connection runs deep

Don’t be fooled by the ardent Americana on display in the Oscar-nominated homage to silent film, because the only thing not utterly Jewish about “The Artist” is its abstention from dialogue.

The film is in fact the product of a Jewish troika that includes director Michel Hazanavicius, producer Thomas Langmann and movie kingpin Harvey Weinstein.

When I met Hazanavicius for a short interview the other day (he was between lunch and a spot on Piers Morgan), I was surprised to learn that he is the child of both parents and grandparents who survived the Nazi occupation of France during World War II. He seemed at ease discussing it, though his answers were sometimes cursory. 

“In France, it’s really different the way you live. It’s a non-religious country,” he explained. “So the public space is not religious; religion is a private thing.”

Not in Hollywood, I told him.

“Here I know that there’s no problem. I mean, I’m not ashamed of being Jewish, but I am also not proud.”

Before you get excited, dear Jewish readers, consider the context. Because language barrier aside, I understood what he meant. He wasn’t being judgmental about his Judaism—in fact, he emailed afterward, “I’m very proud of being Jewish but I’m very private about it, and I respect all religions”—but he simply wasn’t raised with a substantive Judaism. His inheritance was a Judaism of trauma; his parents spent the formative years of their childhood hiding from the Nazis. The war changed everything. The Holocaust left scars… and silence.

“My grandparents didn’t talk,” Hazanavicius said. “There’s a lot of things that you can’t say. You know some of [my relatives] came back from the concentration camps and they tried to say…”

But something is lost in translation.

Hazanavicius goes on to tell me that his parents and grandparents avoided the camps because they were politically connected. When whispered conversations became ominous, they immediately made plans to flee Paris.  In the countryside, his grandparents had no recourse but to protect their children by disavowing their Judaism. Hazanavicius recalled that one grandfather, a French resistance fighter, “told all his [Jewish] friends: ‘Don’t go register yourself as Jewish people. Don’t do it, just don’t do it. Don’t wear the yellow star.’”

And this is a Jewish story. It is one in a long, unending thread in a tradition of storytelling that had to endure a moment of silence but is again finding its voice. Funny how a silent movie, in the words of the poet Walt Whitman, can “contain multitudes.”

On Friday, Langmann, the film’s producer and the son of French director Claude Berri whom French President Nicolas Sarkozy called, “the most legendary figure of French cinema” told the New York Post’s Page Six that he and Hazanavicius shared an “emotional connection” beyond the film. Berri, who was the son of a Polish Jewish father and Romanian Jewish mother made his first film, “The Two of Us,” a story about a French-Jewish boy sent to the country to hide from the Nazis.

“The Artist” itself, I pointed out to Hazanavicius, is a story about transformation – a central message of the Jewish tradition. I’m only a little embarrassed to add that I actually sat in that wine bar weaving metaphors about “The Artist” and the Exodus story. From slavery to freedom, from degradation to dignity…!

He probably thought I was crazy.

And yet, he told Charlie Rose almost the same thing: “To me the story is more about how a man, a human being, has to adapt himself in a transition period. And, how when your world is changing, you have to face that period.” 

No red carpets in the desert (though Oscar would be thrilled to know there were indeed golden statues).

“I think all the history of the Jewish people is about adaptation,” Hazanavicius told me. “Because for so many so many years, like 2000 years, they were a people that didn’t have any country, so they had to adapt themselves to protect themselves. How do you continue to be what you are but also live with other cultures? That’s the bipolar issue of being Jewish.”

Simon Wiesenthal Center founder Rabbi Marvin Hier told the New York Times’ Michael Cieply he saw in the film a moral tale about human evolution:

In “The Artist” Rabbi Hier detects the story of a man, Jean Dujardin’s George Valentin, who wrestles with a universal question: What do you do when the lights go out?

“You can either cry about it and make demands,” he said. Or, like Valentin, you can retool yourself. “In the end he finds love, he learns to become a dancer,” said the rabbi, who recalled a passage in Psalms about stretching one’s allotted years to 80, 90 or more by showing inner strength.

Transformation. Adaptation. Retooling. Through silence, “The Artist” teaches the power of communicating without words, the power that lies in a look, a gesture, a dance. But it is also a story about change, the need to adjust when the things we most rely on disappear. And the answer it offers is in reinvention and return, to words, to stories, to the universal language of love.

‘The Artist’s’ Jewish connection runs deep Read More »

Netanyahu to address AIPAC as Iran speculation intensifies

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he will address the AIPAC policy conference as speculation grows about how the United States and Israel will tackle Iran’s suspected nuclear weapons program.

Netanyahu’s formal Twitter feed announced his decision on Sunday to attend the American Israel Public Affairs Committee conference in Washington, from March 4-6.

“PM #Netanyahu to visit the #US next month and give speech at annual conference of #AIPAC,” the tweet said,

Such visits usually include meetings with the president, but there was no notice yet from either Netanyahu’s office or the White House that a meeting with President Obama would be scheduled.

The announcement comes against the backdrop of increased U.S.-led pressure on Iran to make transparent its nuclear program and speculation that Israel may strike Iran this year.

The New York Times and the Washington Post have run major articles in recent weeks saying that Israel could strike as early as April and that its refusal to give the United States advance warning is increasing tensions between the governments.

The AIPAC conference coincidentally is timed just as the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, is set to convene its board in Vienna for its semi-annual meeting.

U.S. officials have asked their Israeli counterparts to wait out the IAEA board meeting, suggesting that the IAEA report on Iran to be released then will likely be tough enough to spur an intensified international effort to isolate the country.

Netanyahu to address AIPAC as Iran speculation intensifies Read More »

‘Secular-Zionist Israeliness being challenged by strengthening Jewish identity’

Professor Tamar Hermann discusses the findings of the new Guttman Center report on Israelis’ ‘beliefs, observance and values,’ which she coordinated.

I wrote two earlier posts on this study: Hanukkah miracle: Israeli Jews light more candles than American Jews and Most Israelis believe in God — Is that a problem?

So between 1991 and 1999 the number of observant Israelis went down and between 1999 and 2009 it went up – do we know why? Can we forecast what’s going to happen between 2009 and 2019?

The report’s findings suggest three possible explanations for the higher level of observance amongst Jewish Israelis:

1. The higher birth rates amongst the ultra-Orthodox and the Orthodox communities compared to those of the traditional and the secular sectors; 2. The growing numbers of newcomers form the former Soviet Union who became more aware of their Jewish identity, and hence moved away from their former utterly secular way of life; 3. The growing numbers of the mainly Shas voters who formerly defined the themselves traditional (some even secular), who have become more religious in the past few years. The combination of the three developments apparently increased the level of observance reflected in the report.

Half of Israeli Jews say they would not consider someone to be Jewish if he or she had not been converted by the Orthodox rabbinate; most Israeli Jews feel a strong bond with Diaspora Jewry; the more religious the Israeli the stronger the chance he feels this bond with Diaspora Jewry. What do you make out of all these findings? Do they not contradict one another? 

I see no contradiction whatsoever between these findings. On the contrary. In the past, mainly the secular were “indoctrinated” in schools and elsewhere that the Israeli Jew (Tzabar) and the Diaspora Jew (Galuti)  embodied two antithetical even irreconcilable identities/cognitions. Therefore Judaism for them played a relatively weak bonding function with the Diaspora Jews, who were often considered a different collective entity. Today, because of various changes in the self-identity of the Jewish Israelis, their growing national (some would argue nationalistic)  awareness, their skepticism with the traditional Zionist worldview and the like, as well as their much more frequent personal contacts with Jewish communities aboard, this dichotomy was considerably eroded. Therefore their sense of unity with the Diaspora Jewry got stronger (while as Peter Beinart correctly observed, it has significantly weakened on the other side, at least on that of the American young Jews). Amongst the non-secular the sense of unity with the Diaspora has always been strong, and for obvious reasons, it is strongest amongst the non and anti-Zionist sectors, who actually see themselves as living in a kind of Diaspora in the Zionist State of Israel.

How can a “majority of Israeli Jews (73%) accept the official position in Israel that Orthodox conversion is the path leading to recognition of a person’s Jewishness” but still “agree” or “totally agree” that the Conservative and Reform movements should have equal status in Israel – are we Israelis idiots?

Idiots? Not at all – the two views are in no contradiction with each other. Personally, the respondents see Orthodox Judaism as the “authentic” one. At the same time, particularly the secular would like the state to grant those who prefer the Conservative or the Reform versions the same formal rights as granted to the Orthodox. It is the same phenomenon as the majority personal preference for Orthodox marriage combined with the call for having civil marriage in Israel.

Most commentators followed the publication of your study with punditry related to the growing power of the religious sects in Israeli society, but all in all, the percentage of the ultra-Orthodox is still relatively low (7%) and the Orthodox, while growing in number, are also still a relatively small fraction of Israel’s society (15%). Do you think those commentators are just being hysterical (because most of them are secular) or do they have good reason to be concerned?

The number of those defining themselves as ultra-Orthodox and Orthodox (altogether about one quarter of the adult population. Their share of the younger age cohorts is significantly larger) seem to be less important to these concerned (mostly secular) commentators than the fact that by and large the data suggest that the Israeli Jewish society is turning less and less secular in the Western sense of this term. Today, more Jewish Israelis than in the past are performing various Jewish “duties” and attribute more importance to Jewish ritual functions as a manifestation of their personal and collective identity. In other words, it seems that the classical, secular-Zionist “Israeliness” is being defeated or at least strongly challenged by the strengthening Jewish awareness/identity.

Are the commentators just panicking? Not necessarily if we bring into the picture the findings of this survey and of other research projects that the more Orthodox a Jewish Israeli is, the less he or she is concerned with democratic values, such a human rights and civil rights, and the more they see the halakha as superior to the state’s laws. This correlation in my view should worry all of us who are supportive of the democratic essence of the State of Israel and its functioning, and in particular, those who are in charge of the political education in the country.

Here’s a question that can be very important when one measures the real strength of the different sectors: If you had to divide Israel’s society into two camps instead of five (Haredi, Orthodox, traditional, secular and not anti-religious, secular and anti-religious), would you have the “traditional” more in the “secular” camp or more in the “religious” camp?

It is important to note that measuring the relative size of each of the four groups was not one of the aims of this research project, which is meant basically to connect between the respondents self-definition and their attitudes towards a variety of issues in reference to the Jewish religion and traditions.  In fact, the sample was constructed according to the information about the relative size of these groups as presented in the various reports of the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS).

In other words – we did not give the readers any new demographic data in this regard. However, to the main point raised in the above question – nowadays the CBS offers two categories of “traditional” – Orthodox traditional and secular traditional.  The former seems to be closer in almost all aspects to the Orthodox camp, while the latter are very close to the secular. Numerically then, if divided into two only camps, the secular (whatever than means in a society in which over 80% tell you that they believe in God) is still bigger today than the religious one.

 

The headlines focused on the fact that more Israelis now believe in God and that more practice some Jewish rituals than in the past, but the study also identified several practices that Israelis keep less than they used to do. Less Israelis keep kosher today, more Israelis eat hametz at Passover, a lot less go to Megilah readings on Purim. So, are we becoming more or less traditional, and in what way?

There seems to be no coherent “we” here. Aggregate data is always “confusing” when it gets to the specific details and the matching between the various parameters which often look inconsistent because of the aggregation process. By and large, however, it seems that the Israeli society is getting closer to Jewish traditional (not necessarily religious) modes of thinking and conduct.

The strongest reason for this I suppose is the ‘sociological conversion’ of the newcomers from the former Soviet Union. The younger generation has been socialized by various Israeli institutions (schools, IDF, etc), and hence adopted a variety of Jewish practices which are common in the Israeli Jewish “native” society. A certain contribution to the above move towards tradition was also made by the so-called “Jewish Renaissance,” via which secular participants in these learning and social activities have become more familiar with various Jewish rituals and concepts and also adopted them and reported thereof .

With all the recent talk about the “exclusion” of women in Israel – do you see a problem with what most Israelis say about the status of women – is Israeli society really becoming more exclusionary towards women?

Jewish society at large – apparently not. At the same time, the ultra-Orthodox and even the Orthodox are certainly more insistent that the public space gets more gendered, and that women and men become more separated. Unfortunately, this demand is getting more voice and legitimacy these days, while in the past it was widely rejected. It should be noted, however, that the greater legitimacy is not only the outcome of these two sectors growing demographic proportion, but also due to the multi-cultural ideology which legitimizes sectarian practices and calls for greater respect for different culture-based demands regarding the nature of the public sphere. 

‘Secular-Zionist Israeliness being challenged by strengthening Jewish identity’ Read More »

Kosher Sutra: Generation Flux

There is a question as to whether our economy is in a recession or if it has entered a full depression. One thing we can be certain of is that things have changed. The current issue of Fast Company magazine leads with a story about ‘Generation Flux’, its name for the status quo. Gen Fluxers could be 20 years old, 40, 60 or older, and are defined not by their age but by their attitude. “You don’t need to be a jack of all trades to flourish now”, they wrote, “but you do need to be open-minded”.

Our Kosher Sutra joins the Children of Israel who are in a state of flux. They have been uprooted from the ‘comfort’ of slavery and are being pursued by Egyptian forces as they escape towards the Sea of Reeds. Things have become so uncertain that their anxieties are running sky-high and they are campaigning to return to a life of slavery rather than open up to the possibilities of a new and exciting world. Moses gives them a very simple and very yogic instruction: “Do not fear! Stand fast and see the salvation of God….[and] remain silent” (Exodus 14:14).

How can we stand still and remain silent when we are overcome with the fear and anxiety that is brought on by sudden change? Which Bibliyoga tools can we use when we are longing to wind back the clock to the way things were?

On a recent trip to China, yoga guru BKS Iyengar gave some helpful clues on how we can learn to stand fast, using the metaphor of a tree. He explained that “the movements for any asana (yoga pose) should come from the root not the shoot”*. For example in a standing forward straddle bend (Prasarita Padottanasana), the focus should be on spreading the legs from the groins (‘the roots’) rather than the feet (‘the shoots’). When standing straight we might also focus on keeping the front of the groins open and using gravity to bring our weight so that it is evenly distributed across our feet.

The world is going to change whether we like it or not, and it is our choice how much we want to suffer. We may feel like resisting the flux and turning back the clock. Some say ‘better the devil you know’, but that doesn’t need to be the motto by which we live our lives if we desire liberation. Rather, we can stand up straight, get rooted, listen actively and watch carefully for the miracles that are about to unfold before our eyes.

*Yoga Rahasya, Vol 18, No 3, 2011. Sweet timing for Tu B’shvat.

Marcus J Freed is the creator of Bibliyoga (” title=”www.jewishyoganetwork.org” target=”_blank”>www.jewishyoganetwork.org) and CEO of Freedthinking ( Kosher Sutra: Generation Flux Read More »