fbpx

January 26, 2012

Writer’s Guild to Honor ‘Extremely’ Talented Screenwriter Eric Roth

Several weeks before he was to receive the lifetime achievement award from the Writers Guild of America, West, Eric Roth was in his study in Malibu conducting a breezy conversation that veered from his communist Jewish parents to his Oscar-winning screenplay for “Forrest Gump.”

“Out of this room has come about 25 movies — pretty good, huh?” he said. “But I write on a really old movie program,” he added of his screenwriting software. “I feel like if I took probably two hours, I could learn Final Draft.  But I’m superstitious — it’s silly. I make things more difficult for myself. But I feel if I’m still successful on it, let’s leave it as is.”

Roth’s repertoire also includes Oscar-nominated fare such as “The Insider,” written with director Michael Mann, about the relationship between a journalist and a tobacco industry whistleblower; Steven Spielberg’s “Munich,” spotlighting Israeli assassins tracking down the murderers of athletes at the 1972 Olympics; and the unlikely fable “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button,” in which the protagonist finds himself aging in the opposite direction from everyone he loves. 

Now in theaters is his “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close,” based on Jonathan Safran Foer’s novel about a boy named Oskar Schell (played by Thomas Horn) who loses his father (Tom Hanks) in the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks and embarks upon a citywide quest to heal his grief.

Roth’s four-decades-long career places him among an elite cadre of writers who pen major dramas for major studios, merging art and entertainment. At 66, Roth’s work “has traced the larger span of our history and the smaller, individual arcs of the human life,” Christopher Keyser, president of the Writers Guild of America, West, said in a statement. “He has made going to the movies both a stirring emotional education and a true joy.”

Even though some of his best-known scripts fall in the adapted screenplay category, don’t assume that Roth eschews original work. “I just argued with someone about that,” he said. “People think I just do big book adaptations, and while that’s accurate to some extent, it’s not entirely fair. If you look at the list of my films, ‘The Horse Whisperer’ and ‘Forrest Gump’ are from books, but ‘The Good Shepherd’ isn’t.  ‘Benjamin Button’ is from a short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald, but I used just the central conceit. ‘Munich’ came from a nonfiction book, but it became a lot of other things, and ‘The Insider’ was from a magazine article.”

When Roth does adapt material, he said, his first job is “as a dramatist.” He has to make the story work on the big screen.

“Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close” proved a huge challenge in this regard — so difficult, in fact, that Roth did more than 50 drafts before satisfying himself, as well as director Stephen Daldry and the exacting producer Scott Rudin. It was Rudin who first sent Roth Foer’s epic novel, which resonated with the Jewish writer. “I liked the tone of Jonathan’s voice,” he said. “It felt familiar to me in its sort of ironic, Jewish quality.”

Thomas Horn as Oskar Schell in “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close.”

Yet the tome proved “so kinetic, so postmodern, that I needed to figure out how it could be contained and also visualized,” Roth said. Complicating matters was the fact that the novel had not one, but two parallel story lines: The second thread focuses on Oskar’s German grandfather, who survived the World War II bombing of Dresden and has been mute ever since. Roth loved the grandfather’s journey, in part “because it felt like an Isaac Bashevis Singer story, or a Marc Chagall painting, with shades of old Europe and, obviously, the Holocaust. But I knew we couldn’t tell both stories in one film.”

In the end, Roth decided to focus on the boy and his mourning process, with his mute grandfather, played by Max von Sydow, hinting of his wartime trauma through the expressions flitting across his face.

“Tom Hanks once told me, ‘You write the loneliest people I’ve ever seen,’ ” Roth said. “It’s true that all my work is somehow about loneliness and loss.  I’m surrounded by all the love anyone could ever want [he has a wife, Debra, and children and grandchildren], but I think it’s the artist’s curse.  Whether I’m a good or a bad artist, we can discuss.  But an artist feels the burden of trying to express things that are probably inexpressible — and that can be lonely.”

If the tragedy of Sept. 11, 2001, is also inexpressible, Roth said, the film only sparingly shows images of the disintegrating World Trade Center. When Oskar envisions his father falling from one of the buildings, for example, the picture is grainy and vague. “My instinct was that the boy wanted to catch his father, which was the instinct we all had for people in those buildings,” Roth said.

The image proved helpful to the film’s young star: “It represents Oskar’s feeling of impending doom,” Horn, now 14, said. “It’s what he feared would happen if he doesn’t ‘find’ his father — that he would also hit the ground.”

While reviewers for NPR and The Atlantic found the tone of the film — the first to show the attacks from an orphan’s viewpoint — to be just right, Manohla Dargis of The New York Times wrote that the movie has “no reason for being other than as another pop-culture palliative for a trauma it can’t bear to face. …When tears are milked as they are here, the truer response should be rage.”

In response, Roth cites the screenings he attended for 9/11 survivors, whose tears “weren’t just false emotion.” 

Critics of “Munich,” which Roth wrote with Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright Tony Kushner, were perhaps even more virulent, accusing the filmmakers of equating the Arab terrorists with their Israeli avengers.  “I was only interested in how the Israelis felt about the film, and they had mixed feelings, which is how I felt,” he said.

“I liked the ‘tough Jew’ quality, and one day when I would be writing the script I would think, ‘How great — the terrorists killed all these people and it’s right.’ And then the next day the Israelis had bulldozed some house with people [in it], and I felt like, ‘Well, that doesn’t accomplish anything.’ ”

These days, Roth is executive producing HBO’s horseracing series, “Luck,” which stars Dustin Hoffman and premieres Jan. 29. Roth, who himself is a racetrack aficionado, said he almost forgot about our interview because he was so immersed in writing the season finale. Is there something Jewish about gambling on horses? “It’s pretty Jewish,” he mused. “I think somehow Jews have taken to it — probably as a way to rise above their station.” There’s perhaps another reason he is drawn to Hoffman’s character of Chester “Ace” Bernstein: “He’s a landsman,” Roth said. 

The Writers Guild of America, West, 2012 Laurel Award for Screen, which honors lifetime achievement, will be presented during the WGA Awards ceremony Feb. 19 at the Hollywood Palladium.

Writer’s Guild to Honor ‘Extremely’ Talented Screenwriter Eric Roth Read More »

IAEA talks in Tehran to test Iran’s nuclear defiance

A rare visit by senior U.N. nuclear inspectors next week raises pressure on Iran to address suspicions it is trying to develop atomic weapons, though Western powers that are piling on sanctions expect no significant breakthrough.

How Tehran deals with the International Atomic Energy Agency may offer pointers to prospects for resolving a long-running dispute that an oil embargo and threats of war, along with talk of Iran closing in on nuclear weapons capability and the U.S. presidential election calendar, have escalated to crisis level.

The outcome of the inspectors’ meetings from Sunday to Tuesday will be closely watched in Washington, European capitals and Israel for signs of whether Iran’s leadership may finally be prepared to give ground after a decade of pursuing its nuclear development goals or whether it remains as defiant as ever.

“I hope that, at a minimum, the parties can agree on how to proceed in resolving outstanding issues, and that also includes the military dimension of Iran’s nuclear program,” said Olli Heinonen, a former chief U.N. safeguards inspector.

Western diplomats, who have often accused Tehran of using offers of meetings as a stalling tactic while pressing ahead with its nuclear program, say they doubt that it will lead to the kind of concrete progress the U.N. agency is looking for.

But some speculate that Iranian officials could show more openness or make limited concessions in the discussions in Tehran with senior IAEA delegates in a bid to keep channels of dialogue open and avert even more punitive steps.

“We are skeptical that anything substantive is going to come out of the meeting,” one Vienna-based diplomat said.

But, “it would be a smart move on their part to do something, to provide some sort of…cooperation.”

The IAEA team, to be headed by global inspections chief Herman Nackaerts, is expected to call for access to sites, officials and documents that could help clarify mounting concerns that Iran may be trying to develop nuclear arms.

The IAEA issued a detailed report in November that laid bare a trove of intelligence suggesting Iran is seeking nuclear weapons capability, including accusations of work on bomb triggers and computer-simulated detonations.

“SPORADIC COOPERATION”

Washington and its European allies, vowing not to tolerate any Iranian push for nuclear bombs, seized on the IAEA document to ratchet up sharply the sanctions pressure on Iran. Financial measures and bans on buying Iranian oil aim to choke its budget.

Tehran, which some experts say could have the potential to build at least one nuclear device as early as next year, responded by threatening to disrupt global oil trade.

There is speculation that Israel, which says an Iranian atom bomb would threaten the survival of the Jewish state, might launch attacks on the country’s nuclear sites. U.S. President Barack Obama also says force is an option. He faces criticism in his re-election campaign this year of being “soft” on Tehran.

Iran, which says its nuclear program is entirely peaceful, angrily dismissed the IAEA findings as fabricated and baseless.

But it has recently sent more conciliatory signals to the agency in Vienna, inviting Nackaerts and his aides to visit and saying it is ready to discuss “any issues” that interest them.

“Iran will have to at least give the appearance of having dealt substantively with the issue,” one European diplomat said, but added: “I would be shocked if Iran actually confessed to anything.”

Making clear he did not expect quick results, Heinonen said the IAEA mission could be “the first step in a long process where the first real results would emerge in coming months.”

Ali Vaez, an expert at the Washington-based Federation of American Scientists, said Iran’s goal was to avoid being referred once again to the U.N. Security Council by the IAEA’s 35-nation governing board, which meets in early March.

The IAEA board groups both Western states pushing to isolate Iran, and Russia and China which are critical of unilateral measures. It first reported Iran in 2006 to the Security Council, which has since imposed four rounds of sanctions on the country, a major oil producer.

“Sporadic cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog is a consistent feature of Iran’s dual-track strategy of dividing the international community and deflecting additional sanctions,” Vaez said.

In line with this, Iran has indicated readiness to address the concerns of the IAEA – tasked with preventing the spread of nuclear arms – about possible military dimensions to its nuclear program in the meeting with the visiting agency officials.

“Iran has in the past continued to question the IAEA mandate on these topics. I hope that we can now put that era behind us,” said Heinonen, Nackaerts’ predecessor at the IAEA and now a senior fellow at Harvard University.

DEAL POSSIBLE?

Separately, but closely linked to the IAEA’s discussions, Iran has also voiced willingness to resume wider nuclear negotiations with world powers that have been frozen for a year.

“Iran is prepared to engage in dialogue … over the nuclear issue on the basis of mutual respect,” chief Iranian nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili was quoted as saying in Iranian media.

But Western officials say Iran has yet to back this up with a specific offer of meaningful talks about its uranium enrichment program, which Tehran is refusing to suspend despite repeated U.N. resolutions calling on it to do so.

Iran has in previous meetings spurned offers from the six powers – the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany – of economic and other incentives if it curbs such work, which can have both military and civilian purposes.

Tehran says it is enriching uranium to fuel planned nuclear power plants and sees it as a source of prestige in testament to its technical and scientific prowess. But the material can also be used for atomic bombs if it is processed much further.

Last week, diplomats said the six powers were split over what to put on the table should talks resume and on whether to allow Iran to continue enrichment to some degree.

Echoing the views of other Western experts, a former British ambassador to the IAEA advocated a deal under which Iran could keep on refining uranium if it accepted stricter U.N. safeguards inspections to ensure it had intention to build nuclear weapons.

However, Peter Jenkins wrote in the Daily Telegraph, “it may be asking a lot of our leaders that they swallow their words, lower their sights and focus on a realistic target.”

Editing by Alastair Macdonald

IAEA talks in Tehran to test Iran’s nuclear defiance Read More »

Barney Frank to wed same-sex partner in Mass.

Barney Frank, a 16-term U.S. congressman from Massachusetts, plans to marry his partner, his office said on Thursday.

Frank, 71, who announced his decision to retirement from the House of Representatives late last year, will marry partner Jim Ready in a ceremony in Massachusetts, spokesman Harry Gural said. Frank is a Democrat.

Massachusetts was the first state to legalize same-sex marriage in 2004.

No other details on the date or location were being released at this time.

Elected to the House of Representatives in 1980, Frank was one of the first openly gay politicians to serve in office at a national level in the United States.

Reporting By Lauren Keiper; Editing by Paul Thomsach and Will Dunham

Barney Frank to wed same-sex partner in Mass. Read More »

Who’s afraid of children’s art?

In September 2011, the Museum of Children’s Art in Oakland (MOCHA) was expected to open an exhibition called “A Child’s View of Gaza.” The selection of artwork drawn by Palestinian children in the wake of the 2009 Gaza War, known as Operation Cast Lead, had been assembled by MECA, the Middle East Children’s Alliance and was scheduled to stay at the museum for two months. Had things gone as planned, it’s likely this article never would have been written — but things most definitely did not go as planned.

What happened is not fully clear, but pressure from the Jewish community and worries that some of the imagery would be disturbing to children caused MOCHA to cancel the exhibition. The move was celebrated by some Bay Area Jewish organizations. According to The Forward, the Federation called the cancellation “great news,” and said that “the ‘Child’s View of Gaza’ exhibit at MOCHA has been canceled thanks to some great East Bay Jewish community organizing.”

Others outside the Jewish community were not so thrilled. Online petitions were circulated to attempt to force the museum to reconsider. One person angry about the museum’s decision was the Pulitzer Prize-winning author Alice Walker, who penned a blog post calling the decision “sad” and lamenting that censorship still exists in the United States of the 21st century. It was a post of more muted tones than her interview with Foreign Policy magazine three months prior, when she’d opined: “I think Israel is the greatest terrorist in that part of the world. And I think in general, the United States and Israel are great terrorist organizations themselves.”

The more measured, regretful tones of Walker’s blog post about the situation in Oakland caught the eye of Jordan Elgrably, an Arab Jew and one of the co-founders of the Levantine Center in Los Angeles. “I said, ‘Well, what are people really afraid of?’ ” Elgrably said recently, speaking on the phone from the park, his children at play a few feet away. “This is kids, and it’s from their experience. It’s searing; it’s real. We should host this.”

Around the same time Elgrably was contemplating Walker’s op-ed, an e-mail from MECA, the organizers of the failed Oakland exhibition, popped into the in-box of Amani Jabsheh, a Los Angeles-based peace activist. MECA was looking for places to show the work around the country, and they needed help. Jabsheh knew she had to do something. “When I saw what they painted — that’s their reality. I want people to see how the children suffer there under the occupation.”

According to Jabsheh, it was Rachel Corrie, a young American woman who was killed while protesting in front of an Israeli bulldozer, who inspired her to get involved in promoting peace in the Middle East. She saw what Corrie had done and thought to herself that if someone like Corrie, who shared no background with Palestinians, was getting involved, she couldn’t sit on the sidelines. “She was not Muslim, she couldn’t speak the language, you know, [had] nothing [in common] with us, and since that time, I’ve felt an obligation as a human being to do my part,” Jabsheh said.

Jabsheh wrote back to the organizers and MECA, and they put her in touch with another woman in Los Angeles who had also contacted them, Dara Wells-Hajjar. When Jabsheh and Wells-Hajjar connected, they realized that they’d both worked with the Levantine Cultural Center and that it would be the perfect place to stage the exhibition.

Elgrably agreed. “For a decade now, we’ve been championing a greater understanding of the Middle East and North Africa by presenting arts and educational programs that really attempt to bridge political and religious divides,” he said of the Levantine Center.

The center is presenting the exhibition through Feb. 17, and on Jan. 29 will host an event at the Hollywood Women’s Club with guest speakers Laila Al-Marayati, Diane Shammas and Kristen Ess Schurr, three women with deep knowledge of the Middle East who’ve all spent time in Gaza. Musician Naser Musa will also be performing. “He’s also all about the kids,” said Elgrably of Musa, “so he felt strongly about performing for this.” 

Jabsheh believes art is an incredibly important tool for peace. “If we can help those children when they’re young not to be angry and not to seek revenge, and to have a chance to express their feelings in a beautiful way, like through art and through singing … why not?” It’s far better than rockets and war, in her mind. “In the future … they will paint, maybe, kids playing together, and Jewish kids next to them playing together.”

Although Elgrably says the Levantine Cultural Center hasn’t faced the sort of pressure that caused MOCHA to cancel the exhibition, he noted, “We’ve had already a couple of menacing phone calls.”

Most of all, Jabsheh hopes people will give the exhibition a chance before they cast judgment on it. “Come and see and listen, and if you disagree, that’s fine,” she said. “All of us can have disagreements with people, but we still can be friends.”

“A Child’s View of Gaza,” will be shown from Jan. 17 to Feb. 17 at the Inside/Outside Gallery, Levantine Cultural Center, 5998 W. Pico Blvd., Los Angeles. On Jan. 29 from 4-7 p.m., the Hollywood Woman’s Club will host the special event with speakers and music, at 1749 N. La Brea Ave., Los Angeles. For more information, visit http://www.levantinecenter.org/event/childs-view-gaza-exhibition-comes-los-angeles.

Who’s afraid of children’s art? Read More »

Adelson millions ensure Gingrich steers to far right on Israel

It is safe to say that without multi-billionaire Sheldon Adelson’s help the chances of Newt Gingrich becoming the Republican nominee for president would be zero — and consequently the race itself, going into Florida at the moment, would not be the competitive, drag-out fight it has become. Adelson, the hotel and casino magnate, has kept Gingrich alive, first through an infusion of $5 million into a super PAC, which allowed the former speaker to defend himself against attacks by Mitt Romney and led to Gingrich’s thumping victory in South Carolina. And now we know that Adelson’s wife, Miriam, has committed another $5 million to the cause of Newt.

One of Adelson’s passions — and a reason for his desire to play such a big role in American politics — is undoubtedly Israel. And his positions are unambiguously right-wing and hawkish to the extreme. When it comes to the Palestinians, there is no one to be trusted. The New Yorker quotes him as calling Salam Fayyad, the Palestinian prime minister widely respected in the West, as being one of the “terrorists” running the Palestinian Authoriy. Even AIPAC was not far enough to the right for him. After being a diehard supporter — funding a new building in Washington, D.C. — he split with the group in 2007 when it decided to support a congressional initiative, backed by the Israelis, to increase economic aid to the Palestinians. “I don’t continue to support organizations that help friends committing suicide just because they want to jump,” he said at the time by way of explanation. He had the same reaction when Ehud Olmert, whom Adelson had once befriended, came to the conclusion that he had to pursue negotiations with the Palestinian leadership.

In short, Adelson does not believe in the two-state solution. As he told The Jewish Week last year, “The two-state solution is a stepping stone for the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people.”

What does it mean to have someone with these views have such an outsized influence on a candidate and the race he is in? Well, for Gingrich it seems this has translated into him tripping over himself to prove his pro-Israel bona fides, to the point where he was willing to say, this past December in an interview with the Jewish Channel, that the Palestinians were an “invented” people who “had the chance to go many places.’’ No Palestinians, no need to negotiate a state. And Adelson clearly showed his satisfaction with Gingrich’s line. As he told a group of Birthright participants at a Hanukkah party a few weeks later, “Read the history of those who call themselves Palestinians, and you will hear why Gingrich said recently that the Palestinians are an invented people.”

As Wayne Barrett recently reported in The Daily Beast, there has been a marked turn in Gingrich’s positions on Israel since his political life began depending on Adelson. Not that long ago, in a 2005 Middle East Quarterly article, Gingrich urged the “Palestinian diaspora” to invest in “their ancestral lands,” and even proposed that Congress “establish a program of economic aid for the Palestinians to match the aid the U.S. government provides Israel.”

You will not hear anything like this from Gingrich again any time soon.

But the greater concern is that because of his influence on Gingrich, Adelson has turned the Republican contest into a competition of extreme rhetoric, in which there is no room for compromise or diplomacy, and the only answer to any international problem is unmitigated toughness. No one wants to be outflanked by the right when it comes to foreign policy (no one, I should say, besides Ron Paul) and so Gingrich’s apparent parroting of Adelson’s hardline attitudes about Israel — and, I should add, Iran — means that the whole tone of the race is affected.

So in a recent debate in Florida, Gingrich advocated a covert war with Cuba to deal with the problem of Fidel Castro. Romney, at a number of the now mind-numbingly frequent candidate gatherings, answered that he would not be negotiating with the Taliban. When asked by Brian Williams, “Governor, how do you end the war in Afghanistan without talking to the Taliban?” Romney simply said, “By beating them.” Isn’t this what we’ve been trying to do without much success for a decade now?

And then there is Iran. The only tool in the toolbox for these candidates is belligerence. Rick Santorum might present the most extreme example, advocating preemptive action, telling David Gregory on Meet the Press recently that he would demand the Iranians open up their nuclear facilities, “or we will degrade those facilities through air strikes — and make it very public that we are doing that.” This is, of course, one of the implicit last options in the president’s repeated threat that “all options are on the table.” But for Santorum there seems to be no other method but the threat itself, no carrots, no sticks, nothing besides a bomb. Nor do Romney or Gingrich have any other ideas. They don’t talk of a preemptive strike, but they speak about war as an inevitability. Romney says that “if you elect Mitt Romney, Iran will not have a nuclear weapon,” and calls for regime change as well as “covert and overt” actions. Gingrich says he would “break the Iranian regime” within a year by “cutting off the gasoline supply to Iran and then, frankly, sabotaging the only refinery they have.”

Regardless of what you believe needs to be done to avoid a nuclear Iran — and something surely has to be done — this is just toughness for toughness sake, without much thought to its implications for the United States and the world or the realities of actual leadership.

Can one man’s predilections and attitudes — his worldview — have an effect on an entire election? If he’s willing to spend enough money, the answer is, apparently, yes.

Adelson millions ensure Gingrich steers to far right on Israel Read More »

The Jewish Journal announces iPhone/Android apps

” title=”iPhone and Android” target=”_blank”>iPhone and Android.

These new smartphone apps build on the ” title=”JewishJournal” target=”_blank”>JewishJournal is the number one downloaded Jewish news app for the iPad. The new smartphone apps offer the same cutting-edge local, national and global news updates throughout the 24-hour news cycle, along with an easy-to-navigate interactive experience.

The release of the smartphone apps makes ” title=”jewishjournal.com” target=”_blank”>jewishjournal.com, including ” title=”Rosner’s Domain” target=”_blank”>Rosner’s Domain, ” title=”Nice Jewish Doctor” target=”_blank”>Nice Jewish Doctor and webmaster@jewishjournal.com or call 213-368-1661 or visit The Jewish Journal announces iPhone/Android apps Read More »

Hail to the chief rabbi

The chief rabbi of the British Commonwealth, Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks, will address several Los Angeles gatherings Feb. 3-5 in a scholar-in-residence program sponsored by a consortium of Modern Orthodox organizations.

Sacks, who became chief rabbi in 1991 and retires next year, has established himself as one of the leading voices of Modern Orthodoxy, offering his views in more than 20 books and numerous articles. As the official representative of British Jewry, he has the ear of political and religious leaders worldwide.

Sacks advocates for Jewish responsibility in the broader world, Jewish unity, and an intellectual and open approach to Jewish tradition. His commentary on the daily and High Holy Day prayer books, published by Koren, have become widely popular in the Orthodox world.

Sacks will spend Shabbat in the Pico-Robertson neighborhood. He will deliver a short sermon on Friday night at Congregation B’nai David-Judea, where Great Britain’s Shabbaton Choir will lead services. On Shabbat morning, the rabbi will deliver a sermon at Beth Jacob Congregation, and on Shabbat afternoon he will deliver a D’var Torah at Young Israel of Century City. Shabbat lunch with the rabbi, at Beth Jacob Congregation, is sold out, but seats are still available for Friday night dinner, also at The Mark.

Sacks will be the keynote speaker at the Westin Bonaventure on Feb. 5 at the annual gala for Harkham Hillel Hebrew Academy, a Modern Orthodox preschool-8th grade day school in Beverly Hills.

For information, visit Hail to the chief rabbi Read More »

Tu B’Shevat fest branching out

What do Grammy-winning band Ozomatli, tree planting and a bungee trampoline have in common? This year, they’ll all be part of a festival celebrating Tu B’Shevat, the Jewish holiday of nature and abundance.

On Jan. 29, Ozomatli, known for fusing Latin music with hip-hop and rock, will headline a concert bill at the Tu B’Shevat Nature Fest.

An expected 2,000-2,500 people likely will turn out for the festival, according to Craig Taubman, founder of Craig N’ Co. and an organizer of the festival. Taubman, a musician in his own right, handpicked the artists.

“If your goal is quality and to represent as many people, support as many people as possible, then your talent has to reflect that,” Taubman said.

Veteran songwriter Cindy Paley, folkie Billy Jonas and the MATI Kids Choir round out the versatile lineup.

Taubman says that it’s no small thing that Ozomatli is performing. In addition to the 2004 Grammy win and the high-profile gigs, the U.S. State Department selected Ozomatli to be cultural ambassadors on a series of government-sponsored musical tours overseas in 2007.

“By having Ozomatli there, it also makes a statement,” Taubman said, “…we’re having an outdoor festival, and it’s not just a Jewish value, nature, it’s a universal value so why not get a group that represents universal symbols.”

Craig n’ Co is new to the Tu B’Shevat festival. For the past 14 years, the Shalom Institute has been the presenter. This year, Taubman and Bill Kaplan, executive director of the Shalom Institute, teamed up to boost the profile of the festival, making it more community-oriented, bringing it under the umbrella of the Big Jewish Tent. Founded in 2011, the Big Jewish Tent facilitates themed, large-scale recreational community events, hoping to build bridges. More than 60 local synagogues and nonprofits, including The Jewish Journal, are sponsors of Big Jewish Tent events, Taubman said.

Two of the four Big Jewish Tent events, including an outdoor Shabbat celebration with Israeli musician Idan Raichel, were held in August and October last year. The final one, a health and wellness retreat in celebration of Shavuot, which marks the giving of the Torah at Sinai, will be titled “Spavuot” and held in May.

The Big Jewish Tent’s Tu B’Shevat festival takes place at the Shalom Institute’s 135-acres Malibu campus. Activities at the Tu B’Shevat festival — suitable for all ages — go from 11 a.m. until 4 p.m. 

Activities at the festival will reflect the environmental spirit of the holiday, including tree planting on an organic farm, a green-themed scavenger hunt and a seder hike. If that’s not enough, a bungee trampoline, a petting zoo, tomahawk throwing, pita cooking and a climbing wall should keep the kids busy.

Tu B’Shevat’s actual date is Feb. 8. Other holiday events taking place in the coming weeks include the Friendship Circle Tu B’Shevat Festival on Feb. 5, as well as the Westside JCC’s Annual Tu B’Shevat Festival and IKAR’s community-wide 3rd Annual Tu B’Shevat Seder and Celebration, both on Feb. 12.

Still not convinced to attend on the 29th? Perhaps you need some encouragement from Taubman, who exclaimed that he lives and breathes events like these.

“I love community,” he said. “It’s what turns me on.”

Big Jewish Tent’s Tu B’Shevat Nature Fest takes place at the Shalom Institute, 34342 Mulholland Highway, Malibu. $5 (advance), $10 (door), free (kids 3 and under). Visit bigjewishtent.com for more details.

Tu B’Shevat fest branching out Read More »

Four L.A. schools win PEJE Challenge Grant Awards

Four Los Angeles-area day schools were selected last month as winners of the 2011 Partnership for Excellence in Jewish Education (PEJE) Challenge Grant Award, making Los Angeles the city with the most winners.

The four L.A.-area schools included both the YULA Boys and Girls high schools, which submitted a joint application focused on building enrollment, and Valley Beth Shalom Day School in Encino and Weizmann Day School in Pasadena, both of which boosted their general fundraising efforts. 

Of the 127 day schools that submitted applications for the $25,000 cash award, 27 received the award for their creative initiatives to make themselves more sustainable, whether through building enrollment, increasing endowment or boosting general fundraising.

Applications were scored based on a weighted formula and ranked by PEJE professionals and a team of outside readers that included PEJE board members and experts in the field of Jewish day school education.

“The challenge for applicants was to think innovatively, to defy their status quo and to initiate bold changes within their school with the intention of stimulating growth in one of their key revenue streams,” PEJE Executive Director Amy Katz said.

All four schools have been working steadily with PEJE and the BJE, formerly the Bureau of Jewish Education, to enhance sustainability, according to Miriam Prum Hess, director of the Centers for Excellence in Day School Education and Educational Engagement at BJE.

Through increasing differentiated instruction options and boosting community outreach, the two YULA schools were able to attain dramatically increased enrollment over the past three years: 10.6 percent for the boys school and 19.7 percent for the girls school.

For Valley Beth Shalom, the challenge was “reaching out to stakeholders and donors and exciting them about the opportunity to give with real purpose and passion,” Prum Hess said. 

And at Weizmann, which doesn’t have a formal development department, the focus was on creating a strategic development plan and helping board members to make the case for giving, she said.

The $25,000 cash awards are unrestricted, meaning schools can use them as they see fit.

“It’s really an award to help them and to acknowledge schools that created innovative work,” Prum-Hess said.

Four L.A. schools win PEJE Challenge Grant Awards Read More »