fbpx

November 29, 2011

Iceland votes to recognize Palestinian state

Iceland’s parliament voted on Tuesday in favor of recognizing the Palestinian Territories as an independent state, the first Western European country to do so according Iceland’s foreign minister.

The vote paves the way for formal recognition by the small north Atlantic island, which led the way in recognising the independence of the three Baltic states after the collapse of the former Soviet Union in 1991.

“Iceland is the first Western European country to take this step,” Foreign Minister Össur Skarphedinsson told Icelandic state broadcaster RUV. “I now have the formal authority to declare our recognition of Palestine.”

The Icelandic parliament decided by 38 votes in the 63-seat house to back a resolution allowing for the recognition of a Palestinian state within the borders of the Six Day War of 1967.

“At the same time, parliament urges Israelis and Palestinians to seek a peace agreement on the basis of international law and U.N. resolutions, which include the mutual recognition of the state of Israel and the state of Palestine,” said the resolution, proposed by the foreign minister.

It also called on all sides to cease any violence and recalled the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes.

Iceland’s recognition, however, is expected to amount to a little more than symbolic step as the Palestinian Authority strives to get United Nations recognition. Its quest for a seat at the international body has so far failed.

Reporting by Omar Valdimarsson, writing by Patrick Lannin.

Iceland votes to recognize Palestinian state Read More »

In their off hours, El Al flight crews are now ‘ambassadors’

A good flight crew requires a certain amount of charm to keep passengers calm during turbulence, emergencies or pretzel shortages.

Five El Al Airlines flight attendants and a pilot put those skills to the test Monday at Rutgers University in New Jersey as they fielded questions on their personal lives and on Israel from an audience of more than 100 for nearly two hours.

It was the opening event for the El Al Ambassadors program, an initiative to put El Al crews to use during their U.S. layover time to create a positive image of Israel in the United States. The idea is to counteract the negative images of Israel in the news with the personal stories and faces of El Al pilots and flight attendants.

“This is a unique opportunity for a Zionist company in the private sector to do something meaningful,” said Alon Futterman, the program’s director and emissary development director at the Jewish Agency for Israel. “You have real people. You have people with families. You have people with the same range of ages talking about real life.”

El Al partnered with the Israeli Foreign Ministry, the advocacy group StandWithUs and the Jewish Agency to select 60 El Al crew members from hundreds of volunteers to take part in the pilot program (no pun intended). The event at Rutgers, which boasts one of the largest populations of Jewish undergraduates in the country, was organized by members of the university’s Hillel.

Organizers say the El Al volunteers were chosen largely for their eloquence and English skills, but it did not escape the notice of students that the El Al delegation was unusually diverse: two gay men, a Druze Israeli, a woman who sidelines as an aerobics instructor and a pilot who also is a yoga teacher. The six also happened to be particularly attractive.

Futterman said El Al crews already have received 20 invitations to speak at events across the United States in 2012.

“We weren’t specifically looking for diversity, but it came out that way,” said Daniel Saadon, vice president of El Al’s North and Central America operations. He described the six participants as “the civilian wings of Israel.”

The Monday talk largely kept clear of the Israeli-Arab conflict. Questions ranged from what life is like for gay men in Israel—“We live a normal life. The nightlife is better than New York,” said flight attendant Kai Elias—to balancing a flying career with university studies to dealing with ear popping upon descent.

The crew members also discussed headier topics such as Israel’s changing society, the tent protests that sprung up in Israel over the summer and the changing role of Zionism. Crew member Yuval Vershavsky, a 34-year-old father of two, said Zionism is now about making Israel “a more just, liberal and secular country.”

One of the gay flight attendants, Gilad Greengold, said the only time he had felt the subject of discrimination in Israel was when he and his partner were denied an apartment lease after the landlady consulted with her rabbi.

“It’s not very common,” he said. “It’s just something we’ll have to deal with and change.”

Fares Saeb, a newly married Druze flight attendant, told JTA that the program was an opportunity to share a unique perspective.

“You talk to people from around the world and you get to see how they see Israel, how local press covers Israel,” he said. “They have a narrow perspective, and we have an opportunity to show something personal, private and human. You get a larger perspective from the air.”

In their off hours, El Al flight crews are now ‘ambassadors’ Read More »

Michael Jackson’s personal physician sentenced to four years in prison

Dr. Conrad Murray, the physician who attended to Michael Jackson before the pop singer’s death, was sentenced to four years in prison and denied probation on Tuesday. Earlier this month, Murray was found guilty of one count of involuntary manslaughter of the late pop star who died in June 2009.

Murray was convicted for his use of the anesthetic propofol on Jackson, despite Murray’s argument that Jackson might have administered the lethal dose to himself. Murray treated Jackson during the months leading up to Jackson’s “This is It” concert tour.

Jackson’s death on June 25, 2009 was determined by a coroner to be caused by acute propofal intoxication.

Murray was given the maximum sentencing possible, and he will serve time in county jail.

Alon Steinberg, a cardiologist based in Ventura County, testified against Murray during the two-month Murray trial, appearing as an expert witness on October 12. Steinberg, who attends services at the Malibu Jewish Center and Synagogue and the Chabads of Ventura County and Malibu, gave an exclusive phone interview with the Journal on November 7, the day Murray was found guilty.

“Thank God the jury did the right thing,” Steinberg said that day.

Before his appearance in court last month, David Walgren, a representative of the prosecution in the Murray trial, interviewed Steinberg personally to determine if Steinberg was qualified to give testimony in the case. He determined he was.

In addition to his professional duties, Steinberg reviews malpractice cases for the California Medical Board, an agency that licenses medical doctors. “I always [try] to be fair as possible, to protect the patient and try to protect the doctor. Doctors work very hard and sometimes there’s a lot of false accusations,” he said.

In the case of Murray, there appeared to be enough evidence to support the accusations against him, specifically that he practiced gross negligence while treating Jackson. The prosecution team in the Murray said that on the night of June 2009, when Jackson suffered respiratory arrest in his home, Murray contacted members of Jackson’s security team instead of 911, tried to clean up some of the medicine he’d been treating Jackson before authorities arrived; didn’t properly monitor Jackson’s vital signs and performed inadequate CPR, New York Times says.

Murray’s defense argued that Jackson had begged Murray for propofol. The case, thus, raised questions about how much say a patient should have in his or her own treatment.

Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor handed down the sentencing of Murray today.

Michael Jackson’s personal physician sentenced to four years in prison Read More »

What country commits suicide?

The drums of war with Iran will be beating increasingly loudly in the three months leading up to AIPAC’s policy conference early next March. The Republican candidates for president (with the exception of Texas Rep. Ron Paul) will try to outdo each other in professing devotion to Israel coupled with calls to inflict more “crippling sanctions” on Iran, while pledging to keep the war option “on the table.”

The White House will dispatch deputies throughout the country to assure Democratic donors that the president is as hawkish on Iran as any Republican and that the war option is on his table, too.

The AIPAC conference itself, with more than half of Congress, the president, and members of his cabinet in attendance, will be all about the Iranian threat. Speaker after speaker will claim that Iran is on the verge of possessing nuclear weapons that will be used to finish the work Hitler began. (See this typical AIPAC speech by House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA), which hits heavily on the Iran/Holocaust theme.)

As I noted in a column a few weeks ago, the Iran war claque is comprised almost entirely of neoconservatives and right-wing “pro-Israel” activists and opinion leaders (from AIPAC and its associated organizations), joined by politicians seeking campaign contributions.

For a politician, being an Iran hawk can be very lucrative, while favoring diplomacy is a sure ticket to AIPAC purgatory. (Every candidate for the House and Senate must fill out an AIPAC questionnaire on attitudes toward Iran and the Palestinians. Providing the “wrong” answers or not responding means trouble.)

Writing in Salon last week, Gary Kamiya, longtime executive editor of the publication, noted that the people promoting war with Iran are many of the same people who led the charge into Iraq.

Kamiya asks how it is that anyone would pay any attention at all to people who not only were wrong about Iraq but fixed the intelligence (e.g., former Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith) to get the bloody result they wanted. Of course, Kamiya knows the answer:

If American politics did not contain an enormous blind spot, no one would pay any attention to what these discredited ideologues have to say. The Iraq war they championed turned out to be one of the biggest foreign-policy disasters in U.S. history. Their ignorant and Islamophobic view of the Middle East is as breathtaking as their bland willingness to commit America to yet another ruinous war against a Muslim country, this time one four times larger than Iraq and with more than twice as many people. They have a demonstrated track record of complete failure.

Yet these incompetent militarists are still taken seriously. And the reason is simple: They purport to be supporters of Israel. In American politics, you can get away with even the most cracked war-mongering as long as you claim to be “pro-Israel.” And the ultimate get-out-of-jail-free card for anything having to do with Israel is the Holocaust.

Kamiya also addresses the awful irony in the pro-war claque’s use of fear of a second Holocaust as a rationalization for war. That is because there is no evidence whatsoever that Iran’s development of a nuclear arsenal, if it even chooses to develop one, would physically jeopardize Israel. A regional war sparked by an attack on Iran, on the other hand, almost certainly would.

No country in history has ever committed national suicide in order to destroy another. And Israel, with 200 nuclear weapons and air, sea and land launchers, could easily destroy Iran if it were attacked.

Listening to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s rhetoric and watching the mysterious explosions that keep occurring near Iran’s nuclear sites, it has to be clear to the Iranian leadership that a nuclear attack on Israel would destroy Persian culture forever, not to mention the lives of tens of millions of innocent Iranian people. Against that is the absurd argument by the neocons that Iranians are innately suicidal, driven mad by their faith.

The Holocaust argument is absurd and offensive. Israel is here to stay and Iran knows it. Iran also knows, as we need to learn, that Israel’s ostensible fear of an Iranian nuclear attack is simply the understanding that a nuclear-armed Iran would limit Israel’s regional hegemony. At the moment, Israel has a free hand to do whatever it wants, whenever it wants to (like kill Iranian scientists with impunity or blow up suspected nuclear sites). But it would not be able to do all of these things, at least not as easily, if Iran had a nuclear arsenal.

As for a Holocaust, the main threat to Israel from Iran would come from the regional war that would inevitably follow any Israeli (or U.S.) attack on Iran. Every major Israeli city is within range of tens of thousands of Hezbollah’s missiles. How many innocent Israelis would die in a missile onslaught produced by Netanyahu and Barak’s obsession with maintaining Israeli hegemony? How many is it worth?

A war with Iran would end any possibility of Israel ever achieving peace with the Muslim world or any semblance of security. Forever. The dream of a secure Jewish homeland, a dream that took 1900 years to achieve, would be over.

It is hard to imagine that any Jew would wish that on Israel. But neocons are, to put it politely, an odd bunch, driven by hatred of Muslims rather than love for America, Israel, or anything else.

I’ll let Kamiya conclude this piece:

It is understandable that a people who suffered one of the most horrific genocides in human history would commemorate it, and vow never to allow it to happen again. But history is filled with ugly ironies, and sometimes the reaction to a trauma ensures that it keeps happening again.

A young Polish Jew named Ruth Grunkraut and her mother were shipped to Bergen-Belsen. Grunkraut’s mother died just six days before the Allies liberated the camp. Before she died, she told her daughter, “You must live. You must live for me.”

The annals of the Holocaust are filled with this same message: You must live.

An attack on Iran will be carried out in the name of the victims of the Holocaust. But that attack, rather than saving the Jewish state, will sound the death knell for it. Israel and its American supporters owe more to the millions of human beings whose last prayer, before their deaths, was that their children live.

In the name of the victims of the Holocaust and, even more, of their descendants, this war must be prevented.

What country commits suicide? Read More »

Hakoah soccer makes a comeback—in New Jersey

Even in the heavily Jewish neighborhood of Manhattan’s Upper West Side, Ron Glickman stands out with a navy hat and sky-blue jersey both adorned with Stars of David.

Glickman, 28, doesn’t always dress this way – his day job is in sales for El Al Airlines. But when he’s getting ready for a game, this is his uniform.

Glickman is one of the key players behind the New Jersey revival of a century-old legendary Jewish soccer club, Hakoah, which started in Vienna before World War I and was shuttered by the Nazis on the eve of World War II.

Now, more than half a century later, the Hakoah name has been revived by Glickman and his brother with SC Hakoah Bergen County, a team comprised of Jewish and non-Jewish players playing its first season in the North Jersey Soccer League.

Glickman, a native of New Jersey, first learned about Hakoah on a visit to the Diaspora Museum, Beit Hatfutsot, in Tel Aviv during a trip to Israel. The Hakoah athletic club was established in 1909 in the Austrian capital in part to dispel myths of Jews as physically inferior. Its teams competed in a variety of sports, including a renowned water polo team. At its peak, the Hakoah soccer club was a leading team in international play.

“I was shocked to find out that a Jewish club was so dominant in Europe in the 1920s,” Glickman said.

Ever since, Glickman dreamed of starting his own Jewish soccer team with the Hakoah name. He made aliyah after high school and served in the Israel Defense Forces but later returned to the United States.

About two years ago, Glickman began work in earnest to put together a Hakoah team. With guidance from his older brother, Dov, Glickman procured a field at New Jersey’s Farleigh Dickinson University. They navigated insurance, registration and other logistics for the North Jersey Soccer League, and procured sponsors to help defray costs. The iconic Hakoah Star of David crest that adorns the upper right corner of the team’s jersey also bears the logo of Glickman’s employer, El Al.

SC Hakoah Bergen County isn’t the first Jewish soccer team to play in an amateur league in New Jersey. From the late 1970s through the early ‘90s, a team called the Fair Lawn Maccabees played in the league, according to John Sealy, the league’s COO and a veteran player from around that time.

“From my recollection, they were always a team to contend with,” Sealy said.

In fact, this isn’t the first Hakoah team to play in America; the original Hakoah team from Vienna came to the United States on a tour in 1926. Glickman later learned that his great-grandfather was among the tens of thousands of fans who turned out to see Hakoah play during that visit.

“Finding out my great-grandfather was one of those people who went to the Polo Grounds to see Hakoah when they came on tour here in New York, and knowing how big of a soccer fan he was, it just felt right,” Glickman said of his starting a Hakoah team. “It felt like destiny.”

By the 1920s, Hakoah had become so famous that President Coolidge received the squad on its U.S. visit. Ironically, the U.S. visit was blamed for the team’s dissolution, as some star players left Europe for more lucrative offers in the United States. Some of those players helped assemble the New York Hakoah team.

The original Hakoah club in Europe was formally shut down by the Nazis in 1938.

In recent decades, Hakoah clubs have cropped up in several countries, including Israel, Argentina, Switzerland—and Austria. But the international prestige of the original club’s heyday has not been matched.

That hasn’t stopped Glickman from taking his role on SC Hakoah Bergen County seriously. For Glickman, it started with the choice of a league—he did not want to play in a Jewish league but in one with more challenging competition—and extended to recruiting.

First, Glickman tried to woo expats from Israel’s professional leagues, albeit unsuccessfully. Glickman caught a break when Harel Nahar, a former player for Israel’s Hapoel Herzliya, noticed a recruitment flyer for Hakoah in Tenafly, N.J. Nahar’s ballhandling skills and success recruiting a few other Israelis to the team earned him team captain honors.

Glickman then went in search of Jewish college talent, looking for Israeli or Jewish family names on college rosters. That’s how he found forward Omri Lifschitz of Hunter University in New York.

“My father grew up in Ramat Gan, and Hakoah Ramat Gan was his club,” Lifschitz told JTA. “His friends used to play there. Most of my friends, their parents used to be Hakoah supporters, so it’s like I’m keeping the tradition. It’s very sweet for me.”

Another recruit was defender Joshua Pransky, a recent Yeshiva University graduate.

“I actually went to Yeshiva so I could play NCAA sports. Once I left the NCAA,” Pransky said, “I wasn’t really interested in just playing around, I wanted to play in something more serious, and this is it.”

Despite the team’s obviously Jewish character, half its members are not Jewish. Among them are Saeed Sulemana-Baba, a Saudi-raised Ghanaian midfielder who played Division I soccer for Western Michigan University, and Saah Hali, a devout Christian and a Liberian refugee whose family’s story was detailed in a 2006 article about his half-brother, NFL linebacker Tamba Hali of the Kansas City Chiefs.

Seven languages are spoken among Hakoah team members: French, Hebrew, Norwegian, Swedish, Arabic, English and Spanish.

Still, the team does not play on Jewish holidays and Shabbat, unlike its Viennese namesake, which played matches on Saturday.

However eclectic, the team gels well on the field. In a recent game against Emeralds FC, Hakoah teammates were quick to identify their opponents’ weaknesses, scoring in the fifth minute. Capping off a 6-2 victory, the players reveled in a light-hearted exclamatory post-huddle “Shabbat Shalom!”

Advancing to the highest level of the league, the World Division, would require Hakoah to finish at the top of its current U.S. West Division or win the league’s annual cup. In the league cup tournament, Hakoah had a strong showing, tying World Division team Ramapo FC 3-3 after overtime before the game had to be suspended during penalty kicks because the stadium lights went out.

Now that the team is doing well, Glickman is thinking about his next big undertaking.

“After I moved to the Upper West Side,” he said, “my mom gave me an ultimatum: two years to get married.”

Hakoah soccer makes a comeback—in New Jersey Read More »

Amar’e Stoudemire thinking about opening a Hebrew school

According to the New York Daily News gossip page, Amar’e Stoudemire of the New York Knicks “is interested in opening a Hebrew school, which would focus on teaching the language and Jewish history. The insider says the idea appears to be on the back burner for the time being but that Stoudemire has discussed it seriously.”

Another source told the Daily News that Amar’e is “always looking for ways to improve education and resources for all children,” but “no school of any kind is currently in the works.”

A Stoudemire Hebrew school wouldn’t be as surprising as it sounds. Amar’e visited Israel last summer, has a Star of David tattoo and dressed up as King Solomon for Halloween this year.

Amar’e Stoudemire thinking about opening a Hebrew school Read More »

Unintended consequences… or not

In his zeal to punish Mahmoud Abbas for assorted affronts real and imagined, Benjamin Netanyahu may be Hamas’ most important benefactor.

The Islamic terror organization has many friends– Iran, Syria, Hizbullah – but none is doing as much to expand its power and popularity from the Gaza Strip to all of the West Bank as the Netanyahu government.

It finally dawned on Netanyahu that he may be making a mistake – to say nothing of violating signed agreements—by withholding upwards of $100 million in funds that actually belong to the Palestinian Authority and is needed to pay salaries for government officials and security forces, yet another move that seemed almost designed to weaken Abbas and strengthen his Hamas opponents.

Finding himself under pressure from all sides, the prime minister has hinted he might release the funds. Immediately his ultranationalist foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, denounced the move as “irresponsible” and declared his “adamant” opposition.  But he backed away from an earlier threat to bring down the government.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon have been pressing Netanyahu to adhere to Israel’s commitments and release the funds.

The most persuasive opposition to the freeze comes from Israel’s security establishment.  It maintains that a fully functioning PA is in Israel’s interest.  It doesn’t want to see the PA collapse or give Abbas an excuse to carry out his on-and-off threats to shut it down.

Look for Netanyahu to try to save face by declaring victory, claiming that Abbas has “calmed down” in the wake of failed “unilateral moves” at the UN, pulled back applications to join other UN agencies and failed in his latest effort to reconcile with Hamas.

The mercurial Abbas doesn’t help matters himself with his repeated threats of resignation, dismantlement and reconciliation plus his refusal to talk peace with Israel until his conditions are met.

The biggest danger facing both Netanyahu and Abbas is that they may get carried away with their own politically motivated rhetoric and step off the proverbial cliff.

When Abbas raised dismantling the PA at a Fatah Revolutionary Council meeting last month, Council members responded by forming a study committee.  They knew he was bluffing again and they understood the risks of going through with it, according to diplomatic and media sources.

A decision to shut down the PA could prove disastrous for Palestinian aspirations for statehood because it could easily be interpreted by many as an admission they are not ready to govern themselves.

“It’s not a realistic threat,” said Robert Danin, the former head of Tony Blair’s Jerusalem Quartet mission.

“The PA won’t dissolve itself because Palestinian leaders don’t want to deprive themselves of the tax revenues that the PA generates and they have too strong a vested interest in preserving power.”

For Israel the PA eases the burden of occupation. Without it Israel would have to assume all the aspects of occupation as it did prior to the 1993 Oslo accords, including a return of the civil administration that was responsible for everything from garbage collection to administering municipal governments.

The IDF doesn’t want to send its solders back to patrolling the mean streets of the West Bank like cops on the beat.  But most important, it is pleased with the job PA security forces are doing in enforcing public safety and especially in preventing terror attacks from the West Bank.

If the PA cannot pay salaries of its employees and security forces it loses its standing in the eyes of the people, and that only benefits Hamas.

“It is inexplicable why Israel is hurting [Palestinian Prime Minister] Salam Fayyad more than anyone,” Danin said.  “He’s the one person who has brought fiscal responsibility and transformed the security forces from two dozen undisciplined rival groups to a unified professional force answerable to civilian rule.

“Why endanger this guy by withholding Palestinians own funds that Israel is not entitled to? It doesn’t serve Israel’s or the PA’s interest; the only beneficiaries are those who want the PA to fail,” he said.

Abbas and Netanyahu don’t trust each other, and the Palestinian leader has lost the confidence of President Obama as a result of his refusal to engage in unconditional direct talks.

Israel is unhappy with Abbas’ demands for a total settlement freeze and acceptance of the 1967 lines as a starting point for negotiations. Relations are further strained by the PA’s efforts to challenge Israel in international forums, by seeking unilateral recognition by the UN and by getting membership in UNESCO.

“Clearly Israel has a desire to exert leverage over the PA,” said Danin, a former senior State Department and National Security Council Middle East specialist.  “But freezing funds only creates an unnecessary linkage.”

Netanyahu’s anger and frustration with Abbas not only led to the freeze but also contributed to the decision to boost Hamas’ popularity by releasing 1,027 of its followers in exchange for a single Israeli soldier. One unintended consequence of the prime minister’s action could well be a Hamas victory in next year’s elections.

It’s not out of the question that would not disappoint Netanyahu because it would give him the excuse he thinks he needs to avoid negotiations.

The Netanyahu government’s reactive approach has failed to meet the challenges posed by the PA’s diplomatic offensive by producing creative and daring initiatives of its own. 

“The whole history of Israel has been one of taking the initiative, not playing defense, and that is what makes the current situation so hard to understand,” Danin said.

Unintended consequences… or not Read More »