fbpx

May 25, 2011

Iran working on trigger for nukes, U.N. agency reports

Iran has conducted work on a trigger for a nuclear weapon and Syria “very likely” was building a nuclear reactor in 2007, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog formally concluded.

A report on the progress of Iran’s nuclear program issued Tuesday by the International Atomic Energy Agency said that Iran has conducted work on a sophisticated nuclear triggering device to be used to set off a nuclear weapon, The New York Times reported.

The information about the technology was part of a nine-page report on Iran’s nuclear progress. The report did not indicate where the information came from nor provide any details, according to the Times.

The report also indicated that Iran is recovering from the Stuxnet computer worm, said to have been designed and released by Israel and the United States, which stalled Iran’s production of nuclear fuel over the last two years.

An IAEA report, also issued Tuesday, said the Syrian project destroyed by an Israeli air raid in September 2007 was a nuclear reactor intended to make material for nuclear bombs, the Washington Post reported.

The findings open up the possibility that Syria will be sanctioned by the U.N. Security Council, since it did not declare the project to international nuclear inspectors as required.

The report cites physical and photographic evidence to back up its claim.

“It is very likely that the building destroyed at the Dair Alzour site was a nuclear reactor which should have been declared to the agency,” the report reads, according to the Post.

The report also criticizes Syria for blocking access to the site and giving false information about the site for much of the last three years.

The new allegations place even more pressure on Syrian President Bashar Assad, who has been working to quell a nine-week uprising, in which a reported 1,000 protesters have been killed.

Iran working on trigger for nukes, U.N. agency reports Read More »

Bibi’s Heckler: To Seize or Not to Seize

Halfway through Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech to a joint session of Congress on Monday I was confronted by a moral dilemma. A woman protester two seats away from me had infiltrated the speech, pulled out a red anti-Israel flag, and started hurling curses about Israel. The elderly gentleman to my right, whom I had been talking to just before the speech started, pulled the flag out of her hands, cupped his hands over her mouth, and assisted in subduing her. Should I help?

The night before at AIPAC, Bibi’s speech had been disrupted seven times with multiple protesters making it almost impossible for him to continue. This follows an extensive effort on campuses worldwide for Israel-haters to make it all but impossible for any Israeli official to speak by heckling so repeatedly that the speech has to be abandoned. Clearly these efforts make a mockery of the entire principal of free speech. Now, a protester had infiltrated not just a college gathering but the inner sanctum, the very repository of American freedom and representative democracy, the United States House of Representatives. Her intention was to deny the democratically elected leader of the Israeli people the right to address the elected representatives of the American people. She could have vented her venom in any one of countless open forums, but she chose to deny Israel its voice.

Should I have participated in muting her? I had a split-second to decide.

Flashing through my mind as hands grabbed her from all sides were all the protesters against Israel that I had encountered in my eleven years as Rabbi at Oxford University. Twice we hosted Bibi at the University and twice hundreds of Palestinian students had been bused in from all over the UK to disrupt his speech. As I walked the chamber of the Oxford Union with Bibi at my side, hundreds of agitators thundered, “Netanyahu you should know, we support the PLO.” Wow, it even rhymed. Netanyahu left his police cordon and walked over to the protesters and invited them in, promising that they would be called on to ask questions. A significant number joined us and he responded patiently to their pointed barbs.

When Ariel Sharon was my guest a huge throng of protesters arrived, a significant number of whom were Jewish. They made no noise. Rather, caked in fake blood they pointed at Sharon silently as he walked into the Union. He made the same gesture, walking over to some of the protestors, while never letting go of his wife’s hand, and inviting them in to participate. Once again, many did and Sharon made sure to call on them during questions. The exchanges were hard-hitting but civil and all who witnessed it felt it had been a victory on both sides for free speech.

But all that has changed now. The Israel critics on campus have become Israel-haters, interested not in voicing any view but in delegitimizing Israel utterly and rendering it incapable of defending itself.

My mind now raced back to the heckler from Code Pink, who turned out to be Jewish, right in front of me in Congress. She was now horizontal as various gallery attendees attempted to neutralize her disruption. The Prime Minister had stopped his speech. Should I intervene before security could get there?

I decided not to. Firstly, it seemed to me that the Capitol police had plenty of contingencies for this kind of scenario and were far greater experts than me. Second, I could just imagine the headlines the next day: “Rabbi accosts protester in Congress.” Or worse. “Author of Kosher Sex grabs woman in US House.” “Rabbi Shmuley all over woman in spectator gallery”(OK, I jest about the last two but you get the picture). I decided that the image of a Rabbi participating in grabbing a protester, notwithstanding the circumstances, was exactly the kind of image these protesters wanted. They want to delegitimize the Jewish people in general and the State of Israel in particular. They want to perpetuate their lie that rather than Israel and Jews being people of benevolence and goodwill who have been forced to defend themselves against repeated attack, the Jews are now the aggressors.

So I stood as plain-clothed police immediately rushed in from every angle, grabbed the protestors, and pulled her right by me.

Prime Minister Netanyahu quickly recovered by mentioning that the idea of a protestor heckling in the Arab parliaments of Iran or Libya and surviving unharmed was impossible.

And it was ironically right there that the shared values of the United States and Israel and their special relationship became so evident. That one of the most powerful men in the Middle East can sit in front of the most powerful assembly on earth and be heckled and disrupted by a hate-filled agitator and simply make light of it as the woman was taken out of the chamber unharmed, spoke volumes about two incredible societies dedicated to the infinite worth of every human being, even a perceived enemy, and the infinite dignity of the human person to which both societies are committed. Even a person who would deny basic civility to Israel’s elected leader was still protected under the rule of law. She might be charged with an offense but she lived in a society that protected her rights.

In his brilliant and impassioned AIPAC speech House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Israel’s most able defender and greatest friend in the US government, made the point that it’s not the ’67 borders that separate the Palestinians and Israelis. Rather, the conflict is all about values, specifically the Palestinian’s’ growing culture of death versus the Israeli culture of life. The Palestinians name public squares after terrorists. Mothers ululate when their sons blow themselves up on buses, taking little children with them. They teach their children in kindergarten and schools that Jews are hook-nosed and wicked. But the government of Israel trades hundreds of killer terrorists just to bury their fallen soldiers with dignity, gives every Arab-Israeli citizen complete and full human rights, and has consistently traded massive amounts of land in the slim hope that the Palestinians will sincerely wish to make peace.

I am a Rabbi and a Jew that has forever fought Islamophobia and has repeatedly written and preached in front of tens of thousands of Jews and Christians that Islam is a great world religion that took Jews in when they were kicked out of Catholic Spain and Portugal. I am constantly inspired by everyday Muslims I meet in the US who observe Halal, fast on Ramadan, and take their religion seriously. So it is with great sadness that I am witnessing the growing emphasis on violence – especially against Jews – that is tragically becoming commonplace among far too many of our Palestinian brothers and sisters.

The chance of peace ever taking hold in the Middle East is contingent on what Golda Meir once said, that Palestinians have to learn to love their children more than they hate Israelis.

Perhaps one day the female protestor who was dragged away in front of me will love the Arabs more than she hates Israel and if so, we’ll see her directing her real protest against Arab societies that participate in honor killings against young women, hang gays, and deny our Arab brothers and sisters the basic right to protest without fear of death.

Shmuley Boteach, “America’s Rabbi,” is the international best-selling author of 25 books and is currently establishing The National Center for Universal Jewish Values. His most recent book is “Renewal: A Guide to the Values-Filled Life.” Follow him on Twitter @RabbiShmuley.

Bibi’s Heckler: To Seize or Not to Seize Read More »

The Onion’s quick swipe at the “Israel Lobby”

Under the headline “Government Official Who Makes Perfectly Valid, Well-Reasoned Point Against Israel Forced To Resign,” The Onion, a weekly publication that parodies the style of newspaper writing with often hilarious results, poked fun at the way that Israel’s critics can be left to hang out to dry.

In just 118 words, an uncredited writer for the New York-based comedic paper painted a satirical picture of the fallout that followed a fictional veteran State Department staffer’s “informed, thoughtful analysis” of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on CNN.

The piece came out on May 20, the same day President Barack Obama met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House.

According to the Onion, State Department staffer Nelson Milstrand implied “that Israel could perhaps exercise more restraint toward Palestinian moderates in disputed territories,” which led to his forced resignation.

The article included a made-up quote from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton distancing herself from the imaginary official’s comments.

“The United States deeply regrets any harm Mr. Milstrand’s careful, even-tempered, and factually accurate remarks may have caused our democratic partner in the Middle East,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in an unequivocal condemnation of the veteran foreign-service officer’s perfectly reasonable statements. “U.S. policy toward Israel continues to be one of unconditional support and fawning sycophancy.”

The fake news piece, which was reportedly mistaken for a true report of an actual event by some news aggregation sites, was welcomed by many left-leaning observers of the region, and particularly those who have drawn attention to what they identify as the outsized power Israel commands in Washington.

“All good satire contains more than a kernel of truth,” wrote Harvard International Affairs Professor Stephen Walt in an email. Walt is co-author of “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy.” “Reasonable people can disagree about whether the lobby’s preferred policies are good for the United States or for Israel, but at least no serious analyst tries to deny that it exists.”

“I love this piece because it captures perfectly how the system works in the U.S. when it comes to talking about Israel,” Walt’s co-author John J. Mearsheimer, a political science professor at University of Chicago, wrote in an email. “Criticize Israel and the lobby will smear you and try to destroy your career, even if your criticism is smart and well-intentioned. While the piece is humorous, it is also a sad commentary on what blind support for Israel is doing to large portions of the American Jewish community.”

This isn’t the first time The Onion has made light of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. “Bin Laden Sends Belated Threat To Israel For 60th Birthday,” read a headline in a June 2008 issue of the paper.

Another news brief, from January 2009, reported that a New Jersey native was canceling his upcoming trip to Israel that summer because of “unfavorable exchange rates and the entirety of the Jewish nation’s 60-year existence.”

Clinton was also quoted in a news brief that appeared in the Onion in November 2009 about the progress of talks between Israelis and Palestinians.

The Secretary of State was encouraging the two sides to start with an relatively easy topic: the weather.

“ ‘They may not see eye to eye on every point, of course, ’” Clinton said, according to the Onion, “‘but the most important thing now is for both nations to just sit down and say that, yes, it looks like rain, and that, man, the traffic out there sure was a nightmare this morning, wasn’t it?’”

A media representative from the Onion declined to make a member of the editorial staff available for interview.

 

The Onion’s quick swipe at the “Israel Lobby” Read More »

Suspected Giffords shooter declared unfit for trial—for now

U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Gifford’s alleged assailant, Jared Loughner, has been ruled unfit for trial but will be reassessed in four months.

U.S. District Court Judge Larry Burns, ruling Wednesday in Tucson that Loughner does not “have a rational understanding of the proceedings” at this time, sent him to a psychiatric facility and ordered a new hearing for Sept. 21 to reassess his fitness to stand trial.

Loughner exploded with rage and had to be removed from the courtroom.

He allegedly opened fire Jan. 8 at a Tucson meet-the-constituents event hosted by Giffords (D-Ariz.), critically wounding the lawmaker. Six people were killed in the attack.

Giffords, the first Jewish woman elected from her state to a federal office, has been rehabilitating since the shooting and reportedly has made progress.

Suspected Giffords shooter declared unfit for trial—for now Read More »

Hi My Name is Chava, And I am a TV-holic

I’ve done it. It’s true. I am full of shame and unrelenting disappointment in myself. But after ten years of being TV free, I have finally caved.  The cable guy wore me down. Being in social conversations where I felt like the odd man out wore me down. Not getting the chance to see public humiliating statements made on live TV by seemingly heroic folks wore me down. Feeling guilty for not having enough empathy for tornado victims because I couldn’t see their pain in live coverage wore me down.  More importantly, not being able to sleep because my father died suddenly wore me down. That’s right, I’m going there. I’m playing that card too.  Because that’s what people who live with shame for bad behavior do, we throw out the “My father dropped dead card” every now and then in order to make the judge-full feel guilty.

I’m not going to lie, since I’m in full confession mode, Dancing with the stars and American Idol wore me down too.  Mainly it was about helping to curb my anxiety, and getting to watch the news. And commercials, I really like commercials, especially the ones that affirm my motherhood skills because I’ve chosen a healthy brand of paper towels that pick up everything in one full swoop therefore protecting my family against salmonella.  I am a great mom because I buy Brawny, finally some validation.

The first day I got the television hooked up, it took me forty hours to figure out how to turn it on. Mostly because it came with this over complicated remote control that had way more buttons than the old ones.  Back in the day it was relegated to on/off, channel up/ channel down, volume loud /volume low.  Now there’s a whole plethora of options like Tivo record, multi channel view, menu. Speaking of menu, I got excited with that one. I was hoping by pressing menu, a real menu with food options attached to the television ready to take my order for home delivery was behind that little button. It wasn’t.

After I figured out how to turn it on, I decided to flip through some channels, you know, just as a test run. Six hours later, as my eyes swelled with deep biting pain and my sofa collapsed from my bottom intruding in on the cushion for an un-G-dly amount of time, I finally dragged my overtired body to bed. It was four a.m.  I woke up Robbie.  Because that’s what good wives do to their husbands in the middle of the night when we can’t sleep. We wake up our husbands to report that there are over 900 channels waiting to be seized and watched in the living room downstairs behind a locked cabinet that shamefully awaits my return. 

The truth is I hate having a television in our home. I feel like my very holy sanctuary has been intruded by the outside world filled with fighting housewives who have no shame and don’t mind talking about one another behind each other’s backs and overcomplicated recipes and fancy cake shows, thereby proving once again my less than competent skills in the kitchen.

The first day after my night marathon with this box of shame, I came home from my morning run and walked into my quiet house that reminds me how my kids are getting older and how little time I have left being a full time mom, and I realized that, that, that- I have TV!  “Don’t do it!” I said to myself. Just walk away. Have a little self-discipline.  You have writing to get done. You have projects to work on. Don’t do-

And then I did it. I turned it on. I flipped through the channels for the next six hours. Ya, I folded laundry throughout my day, and convinced myself “I was productive.” Robbie came home after working really hard that day. “How was your day Chava, what’d you do?” I gave him one look like a deer caught in headlights. He nodded his head and then followed it with, “Oh no you didn’t.” 

Remorse kicked in. I was caught with my hand red handed.  And so began the walk of shame that has bestowed me for the past ten days.  Although I have refused to turn on the TV again during the day hours since that first frightful incident, I have watched several hours each night and have gotten caught up on enough shows to be able to hold shallow conversations. 

Oh there has been that moment here and there that has justified this new decision, like getting to watch Bebe Netanyahu address congress live and finally getting the tornado scoop and the Middle East latest.  It has lessened my own personal tension and allowed me to zone out when my mind starts racing with fear, regret, and frustration.  However, I still walk in shame and feel like this was probably a very bad mistake. A very seriously bad mist-

Wait what time is it?
I gotta wrap this up; we’ll talk about my issues with shame next week…..
The last Oprah’s on in thirty minutes. 

(I know I said I wouldn’t watch TV during the day, but this is different. It’s research. Being a writer, I can play that card as well.)

Hi My Name is Chava, And I am a TV-holic Read More »

S.F. archbishop raps proposed circumcision ban

San Francisco’s Catholic archbishop expressed his opposition to a city ballot initiative that would ban circumcision for minors.

Archbishop George Niederauer condemned the initiative in a May 23 letter sent to the San Francisco Chronicle, his archdiocese’s newspaper reported.

“Although the issue does not concern Christians directly, as a religious leader I can only view with alarm the prospect that this misguided initiative would make it illegal for Jews and Muslims who practice their religion to live in San Francisco—for that is what the passage of such a law would mean,” he wrote.

“Apart from the religious aspect, the citizens of San Francisco should be outraged at the prospect of city government dictating to parents in such a sensitive matter regarding the health and hygiene of their children.”

The initiative garnered enough petition signatures to appear on the city’s Nov. 8 ballot. Jewish groups have condemned the proposed ban and have been joined in their opposition by the San Francisco Interfaith Council.

S.F. archbishop raps proposed circumcision ban Read More »

Austrian town strips Hitler of honorary citizenship

An Austrian town has revoked the honorary citizenship that it bestowed upon Adolf Hitler during the Third Reich.

The Town Council of Amstetten voted Tuesday to take away the honor. Two council members from the far-right Freedom Party abstained.

A council member from the Green Party, Raphael Lueger, raised the issue of Hitler’s honorary citizenship.

Lueger told the Austrian Press Agency that Hitler had been granted the honor when he visited Amstetten in 1939, a year after Nazi Germany had annexed Austria, the country of Hitler’s birth.

Austrian town strips Hitler of honorary citizenship Read More »

Zoo director’s home to be museum to righteous couple

The house where the Warsaw Zoo’s World War II-era director Jan Zabinski and his wife, Antonina, sheltered Jews from the Nazis is to become a small museum dedicated to their heroism.

The museum dedicated to the couple will open this fall, according to a report Wednesday on Polish Radio.

Yad Vashem recognized the Zabinskis as Righteous Among the Nations in 1965.

Zabinski, who was allowed to enter the Warsaw Ghetto as a municipal official, helped get Jews “over to the Aryan side, provided them with indispensable personal documents, looked for accommodations, and when necessary hid them at his villa or on the zoo’s grounds,” according to the Yad Vashem website.

With the Zabinskis’ help, according to the website, many Jews found temporary shelter in the zoo’s abandoned animal cells, “until they were able to relocate to permanent places of refuge elsewhere.”

In addition, the couple, aided by their son, sheltered nearly a dozen Jews in their two-story private home on the zoo’s grounds. According to the Polish Radio report, when Nazis officials visited, Antonina Zabinski would play a certain piece on the family piano to warn Jews in the house that they should hide.

Zoo director’s home to be museum to righteous couple Read More »