fbpx

May 5, 2011

Baseball’s reluctant Jewish hero

Hyman (Hank) Greenberg, Major League Baseball player extraordinaire and subject of “Hank Greenberg: The Hero Who Didn’t Want to Be One” by Mark Kurlansky (Yale University Press, $25.00), probably would have disliked being included in the “Jewish Lives” series published by Yale University Press.

When most fans talk about most famous athletes, they don’t usually open the conversation by saying “Bill, that great Methodist center for the Boston Celtics” or “Johnny, that amazing Baptist quarterback for the Chicago Bears.” Yet when fans talked about Greenberg, they regularly referred to him as that Jewish slugger for the Detroit Tigers. What Greenberg wanted most was for fans and sportswriters and everybody else to consider him a great baseball player who happened to be born into the Jewish faith, not a Jewish baseball player.

Greenberg wished in vain, and the pressure on him as a symbol of an entire religious faith seemed stifling at times, especially given that he had not even reached his twenty-fourth birthday when he had to make the biggest decision of all: In 1934, the Tigers were contending with the New York Yankees for a league championship. Every game mattered, and Greenberg would often carry his team to victory with his batting prowess. Many Jews, however, were beseeching Greenberg to attend synagogue on Yom Kippur rather than play baseball that day. (Greenberg had decided earlier to play the game scheduled for Rosh Hashanah, a less solemn, more joyful holiday than Yom Kippur. On Rosh Hashanah, Greenberg hit two home runs to account for all the Tigers’ scoring in a 2-1 victory.)

As Kurlansky opens the biographical narrative, he writes “In 1934 Hank Greenberg observed Yom Kippur, possibly for the only time in his adult life. It defined him for the rest of his days, though this was not what he had wanted. To him it seemed absurd to be defined by his religious observance when he was utterly unobservant.” Even Greenberg’s parents, who wanted him to become more observant, felt unsure what their 6 feet 4 inch athletic son would decide. At least 30 other Jewish men had played Major League Baseball by the time Greenberg arrived in Detroit. Those previous players were not stars, however, meaning their private religious decisions usually remained private.

Context is vital to the craft of biography. Kurlansky provides excellent context over and over. What he offers about Greenberg playing or not playing on Yom Kippur constitutes valuable context about Judaism:

“…the entire debate was founded on a compromise that Jewish law had already made with America, because to a strict observant Jew, the most important holiday is neither Rosh Hashanah nor Yom Kippur but Shabbat, the Sabbath, from sundown Friday to sundown Saturday. This is the only holiday whose observance is one of the Ten Commandments. No baseball player has ever refused to play games on Shabbat, and it is doubtful that he could keep his job if he did. But Jewish practice is full of compromises, and by 1934 the debate over playing on Shabbat was long past and the burning question was: should a Jew play a sport—not least, one that would be the focus of national attention—on the two holiest days of the year aside from the Sabbath.” Given that 1934 arrived during perhaps the most anti-Semitic interval of American history, while Adolf Hitler consolidated power in Germany, the debate felt magnified.

The Tigers lost the Yom Kippur game with Greenberg absent. Because the Tigers did prevail over the Yankees at the end of the season, Greenberg’s decision to sit out did not affect on-the-field baseball lore. Off the field, however, “the decision resonated far beyond what [Greenberg] could have imagined,” according to Kurlansky.

Growing up, it would seem that Hank Greenberg would find no need to imagine the benefits and burdens of celebrity. Some of Kurlansky’s book embraces traditional chronological biography, including the birth of Greenberg during 1911 in New York City to David Greenberg and Sarah Schwartz, immigrants from Romania. The lower Manhattan neighborhood lacked open land for a baseball field, and few who resided there thought about the sport. Athletic Jews in that neighborhood at that time gravitated toward basketball and boxing.

When Hank was five years old, the family moved to the Bronx, where open space allowed for baseball; Greenberg fell in love with the sport. Tall and strong for his age, albeit somewhat gangly, Greenberg developed his skills by practicing with a bat and ball and mitt. He demonstrated little interest in his schoolwork, although later in life his intellectual curiosity would kick in.

Greenberg was plenty smart about his career, though, managing his earnings well and becoming an accomplished Major League Baseball executive after retiring as a player. Admirably, he played a significant role in integrating professional baseball across racial and ethnic lines. When he died during 1986, Greenberg was not remembered entirely for his Jewishness. He had transcended that label to become an accomplished human being in the secular world.

Steve Weinberg lives in Columbia

Baseball’s reluctant Jewish hero Read More »

Again constitutional, the National Day of Prayer returns

Last month, a federal ” title=”National Day of Prayer was unconstitutional” target=”_blank”>National Day of Prayer was unconstitutional. The order was just in time. Today is the 2011 National Day of Prayer.

I’m not sure what makes this year different. ” title=”USA Today reports” target=”_blank”>USA Today reports:

Congress established the day in 1952, but the president by law must proclaim a day in May every year.

This year, President Obama called on Americans to “pray, or otherwise give thanks, in accordance with their own faiths and consciences, for our many freedoms and blessings.”

“In prayer, we have expressed gratitude and humility, sought guidance and forgiveness, and received inspiration and assistance, both in good times and in bad,” the proclamation said.

This is different than the ” title=”Congress’ first "out atheist” target=”_blank”>Congress’ first “out atheist,” had his own response: Again constitutional, the National Day of Prayer returns Read More »

WSJ’s Paul Steiger in Karachi

Former Wall Street Journal managing editor Paul Steiger, who now runs ProPublica, was in Karachi today. I had the good fortune of meeting him, Joel Simon and Bob Dietz from the Committee to Protect Journalists on Thursday at a group discussion on safety for the media. It was when Steiger mentioned Daniel Pearl that it hit me that I was sitting in front of STEIGER!
He said it was his first time in Pakistan but unfortunately because I had to get back to the newsroom to finish the city pages, I never got to ask him that one question we love asking foreigners: So, what do you think of this place?
We talked about how Pakistan was the deadliest place for journalists in the world. Eight of them were killed last year alone and suicide bombings have injured scores others. The intelligence agencies hound and threaten journalists. On the pages today I’ve put up a PBS picture of Hayatullah Khan who was killed for uncovering sensitive material. I’ve never worried about my safety primarily because I’m a desk person, but as a city editor I worry about the reporters on our team.

WSJ’s Paul Steiger in Karachi Read More »

Senior Pakistan official: U.S. shot bin Laden in cold blood

A senior Pakistani security official said U.S. troops killed Osama bin Laden in “cold blood,” fuelling a global controversy and straining a vital relationship Washington was trying to repair on Thursday.

And Pakistan’s army, in its first comment since Monday’s raid, threatened to halt cooperation with its military sponsor if it repeated what it called a violation of sovereignty.

But U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Washington was still anxious to maintain its alliance with Islamabad.

Read more at Haaretz.com.

Senior Pakistan official: U.S. shot bin Laden in cold blood Read More »

And now, some good Israel news..

Have you ever heard of a school named for the biblical figure Hagar? Until last Shabbat afternoon, we hadn’t either. Now though, we’ll never be able to forget it.

This past Shabbat afternoon, our shul had the unlikely privilege of hosting Amal Alhjooj, who hails from a Bedouin family in the Negev, and Hagit Damri, a Ben Gurion U alum, who settled in Beer Sheva. Together they founded a school named for Hagar, an academically excellent, bi-lingual school in which equal numbers of Jewish and Arab kids learn and play together, and also learn about one another even as they are encouraged to fully embrace their own religious identities. A school that’s spawned an entire community of Jewish and Arab parents and grandparents who enjoy hikes and other outings together, who have, in a very organic way, established a model of mutual respect and cooperation. A school that’s growing by the year.  Maybe it was because we’ve become so overloaded with bad news and hopelessness, or maybe simply because our two guests were painting a picture of the way our deepest intuitions tell us the world should be, but a lot of us were crying through our smiles as we listened, enraptured.

Part of it was also the stories that they told. Amal told us about her first bus ride in Montreal, to where she had come to do graduate work in the field of community development at McGill University. She spoke English, but the bus driver whose assistance she need, spoke only French. Frustrated and anxious, she then heard a woman a few rows behind her speaking Hebrew to her child. And for the first time in Amal’s life, Hebrew was not the language of the “other”, but a language she shared with the Jewish people. The language of someone whom she could turn to for help. Weeks later, in early September, Amal called her father back in their Bedouin village in a panic. She had just discovered that her graduate advisor was Jewish, and was worried that this would adversely affect the advisor’s feelings toward her. “Take an apple and some honey”, her father told her, “knock on her door and say Shana Tova”. Amal did. Her advisor received the gift, and began to cry. And lifetimes of walls came crumbling down.

Hagit recalled the time that she and her family took a wrong turn during a vacation in northern Israel, and found themselves in the middle of an Arab village. Nervous, she and her husband rolled up the windows in the car, and began to strategize with each other in English, employing that time-honored, but invariably futile tactic for “not scaring the children”. Hagit’s young son, a student at the Hagar School, said, “Mom, roll down the windows and ask for directions. Why are you afraid?” And they did. And sure enough they found friendly faces on the outside. “We adults learn from the kids”, Hagit observed.

Yes, there’s a long long way to go. And the dream of regional peace in the Middle East, peace for Israel and the Jewish people, still appears to be quite distant, and still faces obstacles that no one seems to know how to scale. But as we learned last Shabbat, there are dreamers out there. Dreamers who are also builders. Dreamers who have already accomplished the inconceivable, and who are just getting started.
And we cried through our smiles.

You can learn more about the Hagar school at www.hajar.org.il

And now, some good Israel news.. Read More »

Groups petition Israeli high court to annul Nakba law

Two Israeli human rights groups have petitioned Israel’s Supreme Court to overturn the so-called Nakba Law.

The law, passed in March, enables the state to fine local communities and other state-funded groups for holding events that mark what the Arab community calls the Nakba, which means catastrophe, referring to the creation of the Jewish state of Israel. Fines, deducted from a group’s operating budget, could equal up to three times the event’s sponsorship cost; repeat violations would double the fines.

Adalah, a legal center for Arab minority rights in Israel, and the Association for Civil Rights in Israel filed a complaint with the Supreme Court on Wednesday, less than a week before Israel Independence Day, which some segments of the Arab community observe as Nakba Day.

The complaint asks the court to issue an interim order suspending the implementation of the law until a decision is made, which would free organizations and communities to observe the Nakba Day next week.

The law is “unconstitutional and should be annulled, as it violates the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and equality, and severely infringes on the rights of Israel’s Arab citizens to preserve their history and culture concerning the Nakba,” the organizations said in a statement.

“This is an ideological law aimed against the national identity of Arab citizens in Israel and against their collective memory,” said attorney Sawsan Zaher of Adalah. “It harms their legitimate status as equal citizens and punishes them for having a different identity and being the ‘other.’ The incitement and racism against Arab citizens, and the alienation in Israeli society, stand to increase as a result of this law.”

Groups petition Israeli high court to annul Nakba law Read More »

How should Jews respond to bin Laden's death?

When the news of Osama bin Laden’s death at U.S. hands hit the airwaves Sunday, America breathed a collective sigh of relief. Spontaneous celebrations broke out in front of the White House, as crowds gathered to wave the Stars and Stripes and chant their delight.

But how should Jews respond when an evil-doer meets his end?

There is no easy answer, leading rabbis say.

Even asking the question is very Jewish, writes Rabbi Tzvi Freeman on Chabad.org.

“It’s so typically Jewish to feel guilty about rejoicing,” he opined.

A number of prominent rabbis spoke to JTA on the subject, sharing their conflicted reactions borne of a tension within Jewish teaching itself.

“As the president said, justice was done,” said Rabbi Eric Yoffie, president of the Union for Reform Judaism. “Bin Laden was an evil man. He preyed on the weak. He killed in the name of God.”

“But,” the rabbi continued, “I was not comfortable with the celebrations. Thoughtful discussion and thoughtful remembrance of recent events are to be preferred to dancing in the streets.”

There are examples within Jewish tradition of celebrating an enemy’s death, of asking God for their destruction.

Consider the Purim story, where the Jews feasted after slaying those who were, admittedly, arming to slay them. Or God’s command to King Saul to obliterate the entire house of Amalek for its wicked ways: “Do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey” (I Sam. 15: 2-3).

Conversely, one of the best-known rituals of the Passover seder is spilling 10 drops of wine when mentioning the Ten Plagues to symbolize a lessening of our own joy in the face of Egyptian suffering. In Sanhedrin 39b, God admonishes the angels for rejoicing when the Egyptian soldiers drown in the Red Sea, saying “The work of My hands is drowning in the sea, and you want to sing?”

“I don’t think we ‘celebrate’ a death,” explained Rabbi Julie Schonfeld, executive vice president of the Rabbinical Assembly, the professional association of Conservative clergy.

In the case of bin Laden there is, she said, “a sense of relief, an affirmation of God’s justice has been carried out.” Such an event, however, “is a time for sobriety, not celebration.”

Nevertheless, Schonfeld added, one needs to distinguish between an ideal, religiously inspired response and the reality of human nature.

“Sept. 11 was a day of tremendous trauma,” she said, and the raucous street celebrations can be viewed as a kind of catharsis. “What we’re seeing is a reminder of how personally people were affected. It’s an understandable human response that we as Jews are blessed to elevate to a Jewish response.”

Rabbi Basil Herring, executive vice president of the Rabbinical Council of America, the professional association for Orthodox clergy, also distinguished between the ideal and the real.

“In an ideal world, we serve God because we want to do His will, not because he rewards us or we fear punishment,” he said. “But we’re human, we’re not angels. We live in a world where people need reinforcement, need a sense that it’s all worth it in the end.”

The Jewish way is not to gloat, Herring said. It is appropriate to rejoice when evil doers get their just reward, but the rejoicing should be because we are witnessing God’s power and justice. It shouldn’t come, he said, from “a self-satisfied smug sense of ‘Yes, I’ve been proven right.’

“It’s an affirmation that God is not just an abstract idea, a Creator, but part of our lives,” Herring continued. “God cares. God loves us. That’s an essential article of our faith, that God rewards the righteous and punishes the wicked. We rejoice because our faith is borne out.”

Rabbi Arthur Waskow, a Jewish Renewal rabbi and director of Philadelphia’s Shalom Center, said he would have preferred that the Navy SEALS had brought bin Laden back to the United States to stand trial.

Just as Israeli agents didn’t kill Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann when they found him in Argentina a half-century ago, but tried him in Jerusalem to expose the true horror of the Holocaust and give its victims a chance to speak their truth, so would putting bin Laden on trial have been an opportunity to uncover the real face of al-Qaida, he said.

“That would have been an extraordinary act in support of upholding the values we claim make us different,” Waskow said.

Pointing to the story of Moses, Waskow quotes the Midrash as saying that one reason Moses was not permitted to cross the Jordan and enter the Promised Land was because in his youth he killed an Egyptian overseer without permitting him a trial.

Trying bin Laden “would have been messy,” Waskow acknowledged, “but in the long run I’m sure it would have been better.”

How should Jews respond to bin Laden's death? Read More »

Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron calls on Hamas to recognize Israel

British Prime Minister David Cameron during a meeting with his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu called on Hamas to recognize Israel’s right to exist and join peace negotiations.

Cameron and Netanyahu met Wednesday night; the Israeli leader traveled to France on Thursday.

According to a statement released Wedneday night by Cameron, the two leaders discussed the Fatah-Hamas unity deal.

“Prime Minister Cameron said that any new Palestinian government must reject violence, recognize Israel’s right to exist and engage in the peace process, and that Britain would judge it by its actions,” the statement said.

Netanyahu has said that he will not negotiate with a Palestinian government that includes Hamas.

A report in the British newspaper the Guardian cited an unnamed senior diplomatic source as saying that Britain would recognize a unilaterally declared Palestinian state if Israel does not take part in substantive peace negotiations with the Palestinians leading to two states.

Meanwhile, The Jerusalem Post reported that British Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks told the House of Lords on Wednesday that Israel cannot make peace with Hamas.

“Peace is more than a resting place on the road to war,” Sacks reportedly said. “I cannot make peace with one who denies my right to exist.”

He said pace must begin with “unequivocal recognition” of Israel’s right to exist.

Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron calls on Hamas to recognize Israel Read More »