fbpx

March 2, 2011

Report: Like Nixon, Julian Assange paranoid Jews are out to get him

A British magazine has published an article reportedly relaying the details of a rambling phone conversation with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. Among his complaints: The Jews are out to get him.

” title=”WikiLeaks responded”>WikiLeaks responded by claiming they have actually been the ones smeared as collaborators in a Jewish conspiracy, “as being agents of the Mossad or of George Soros.”

Report: Like Nixon, Julian Assange paranoid Jews are out to get him Read More »

Kirtan Rabbi spins into southern California

People twirl ecstatically, eyes closed, repeating, in a call-and-response fashion, chants led by Rabbi Andrew Hahn, who plays a harmonium while others play guitars and percussion instruments — repetitive, hypnotic sounds that seductively nudge the crowd, young and old alike, to sway and swirl and chant.

It looks like an Indian Kirtan, a participatory mystical-devotional practice in which Sanskrit mantras are chanted to dronelike musical accompaniment. But this Kirtan is different: Hahn, 52, chants in Hebrew, using traditional Jewish prayers. As his Web site says, Hahn’s “vocation is to make Torah accessible … in a way that is participatory and memorable.”

Based in New York, Hahn is touring Southern California shuls, as well as yoga studios and New Age centers. His main local event will be on March 5, at Temple Emanuel of Beverly Hills. Hahn’s Web site advises participants to “bring your open hearts, voices and dancing socks to a full band full-on rocking Kirtan.”

In an interview, Hahn talked about the remarkable process that took a self-proclaimed “academic pinhead” from his scholarly Jewish roots to become a leader of ecstatic participatory musical/spiritual events.

Early on, Hahn hoped for a career as a classical guitarist, studying music at Carnegie Mellon University and even spending time in Uruguay with a classical guitar master. Then, setting this path aside, he pursued an academic career, earning a doctorate in Jewish thought at New York’s Jewish Theological Seminary. And then, moving in yet another direction, he received his rabbinic ordination at Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion.

In 2003, as a freshly minted scholarly rabbi in his 40s, he set about looking for rabbinic work, imagining that he would be writing sermons. But it didn’t turn out that way.

“For reasons that are still mysterious to me, I couldn’t find a job, either in the academic Jewish world or in the rabbinic world,” Hahn said. “I just wasn’t fitting in anywhere. … You could say that God wanted me to do something different.”

Frustrated, Hahn moved to Colorado, where his brother lives. Feeling “down, really low, in the pits,” he started attending study sessions with the founder of the Jewish Renewal movement, Reb Zalman Schachter-Shalomi. Hahn was skeptical. “I wasn’t really a follower, more of a misnaged [opponent], really. But I just started going, and I was completely amazed by him and his ability with text. … My understanding of what Judaism could be was being expanded.”

At the same time, Hahn was exposed to Kirtan chanting in its Sanskrit form. Just as he had been skeptical about Reb Zalman at first, Hahn initially was unmoved by Kirtan chanting. When he first heard it, he said, “I was like a yeshiva bocher — I just didn’t get it.” But one day, feeling “depressed,” he listened to a Kirtan CD, and “it was very uplifting, that deep devotional chanting. It made me really happy.”

It was a transforming experience. “I ordered a harmonium,” Hahn said, “and started to go to Kirtans and observe and listen and become familiar with it and become a part of that community.”

Little by little, drawing on “the ecstatic energy of Shlomo Carlebach niggunim [melodies],” as well as the Hebrew chants he’d heard in New York’s B’nai Jeshurun Synagogue, Hahn made the connection between Kirtan chanting and his own tradition. “The part of Judaism that always grabbed me,” Hahn said, “besides the ideas, was the music and Shabbos and the singing around the table. … So I thought, ‘Wow, this would be amazing in Hebrew.’ ”

Using traditional Jewish liturgy, Hahn began to create Kirtan-style chants in Hebrew. “Eventually, I called synagogues,” he said, “and asked if they wanted me to do it. … I picked up a percussionist along the way, and it just started to grow.

“The form of call-and-response works very well in Hebrew … in Jewish liturgical music. I’ve done some research, and there was some kind of call-and-response chant or antiphonal kind of singing, probably in the Second Temple period, some of the psalms. There’s precedent for it in the Jewish tradition.

“Hebrew is considered what is called a vibrational language, along with Sanskrit, meaning that the Hebrew language itself has certain vibrational sounds,” sounds that resonate with the senses. “Anyone who has sat around a Shabbos table knows that the Hebrew language is meant to be chanted.”

Hahn said that, in late 2006, “for the heck of it,” he telephoned a large yoga studio in New York, told them he was a rabbi and asked if they would host a Kirtan in Hebrew. They agreed, and a large crowd showed up. That studio has asked him back many times since then.

“My main mandate is to the Jewish world,” Hahn said, “to bring this kind of yogic, devotional, sometimes contemplative, sometimes ecstatic, totally participatory chant — and fun — to the Jewish world.”

At the same time, Hahn said, he brings “Torah and kabbalah and Jewish wisdom to the yoga world and the New Age community. So I have a dual track, and it’s quite a blessing.”

Hahn said that his road to becoming the Kirtan Rabbi evolved slowly but inexorably. “It’s become my way to be a rabbi, my rabbinate. It’s not like I left behind my Ph.D. or my rabbinic studies. [Kirtan] became my way to bring my background into my music. It was a return to music for me, because I’d started out, way back when, as a classical musician.

“The real lesson in life in all this is that nothing gets lost. You can have everything back again if you say, ‘Yes, I can do this.’ ”

For more information about the Kirtan Rabbi’s schedule, the CDs or to see videos of past events, visit kirtanrabbi.com or call (212) 663-4160.

Kirtan Rabbi spins into southern California Read More »

Brandeis University head cultivating L.A. support

Frederick M. Lawrence, the new president of Brandeis University in Waltham, Mass., came to Los Angeles and environs in early February for a dozen meetings with donors, alumni, prospective students and more. With about 1,800 graduate and undergraduate alums in Southern California alone, Lawrence had good reason to see this as fertile ground for fundraising and Brandeis consciousness-raising. Plus, the newly anointed president has ties to the region — his wife, historian Kathy Lawrence née Kurtzman, who happily dons the name “first lady of Brandeis” — is from Beverly Hills, having grown up at Hillcrest Country Club and in a house that once was home to Betty Grable.

The couple sat for a brief interview at Hillcrest before greeting some 300 guests who had come to meet the new president, former dean of George Washington University Law School and a civil rights attorney. An ebullient person, Fred Lawrence is expected to breathe new life into Brandeis, whose image was badly hurt by its last president’s decision a couple of years ago to sell the renowned campus art collection to help bail the school out of a cash crunch. “No art has been sold,” Lawrence was quick to reassure. That decision was made before Lawrence’s tenure began, but he’s not going to reneg. An arts enthusiast himself, he is a singer and has performed at Carnegie Hall and the Kennedy Center.

Lawrence said he plans to pump up the school’s film program (one of his stops was for a screening for Brandeisians of Errol Morris’ new film, “Tabloid,” at Creative Artists Agency’s headquarters). “We have a good program in film now, but we want to build on that,” Lawrence said, noting that nearby Boston has no film production facility, something that Brandeis might one day house.

He also talked of strengthening engineering offerings and enhancing the Jewish piece of campus life. Indeed, Brandeis was founded in 1948 as a nonsectarian, yet Jewish, school, specifically a place where Jews shut out of the Ivy Leagues by then-prevalent quotas could get a high-end liberal arts education. The university remains largely Jewish — some 50 to 60 percent of students are Jews — but although it offers a wide variety of courses in Jewish studies and has a kosher cafeteria, it has not been the first choice of many observant Jews.

Fred and Kathy Lawrence, themselves observant, say they hope to change that equation. “The vibrancy of the Jewish life at Brandeis is extraordinary,” Fred Lawrence said, pointing to the commitment of the school to tikkun olam and to Jewish studies, along with much else. “If I can get observant Jewish kids to come for one day of classes at Brandeis, I will convince them. This is not a place where being Jewish takes place at the corner of your life.”

Brandeis University head cultivating L.A. support Read More »

The solitude of the Arab soul

“This,” I thought, “is what the surface of Mars must look like.”

It was late February, and we were driving on a two-lane highway that spiraled up like a dark ribbon across a barren desert, through red, desiccated plains, along mountainsides with red rock surface and no vegetation — an angry, desolate place with no sign of human life except, here and there, a gray, one-room hut dug into a cliff. We had left Eilat in the early morning, crossed the border on foot, mounted a large, fancy bus that was to take us on a four-hour drive through Jordan, 2,500 feet above sea level, to Petra on the slope of Mount Hor.

I hadn’t been to Eilat for many years, and I was (not so pleasantly) surprised to find that it now looked so much like Cancun, or even, God forbid, Las Vegas — all modern buildings and convention sites and hotels with names like Herod’s Palace and Magic Palace and Royal Garden and Orchid. But the real shock had come at the border itself, on the three-minute walk on a fenced pathway that led into Jordan. A small, weather-beaten billboard displayed a faded picture of King Abdullah II trying hard to look at once forbidding and friendly. Behind it, a pair of shiftless soldiers in crimped, baggy uniforms scanned the tourists with undisguised indifference. You could tell they didn’t like us and didn’t like the Israeli border guards across the way, but you could also tell they didn’t like themselves, or their job, or the baby-faced man on the billboard, either. They watched us cross in a few hundred feet the colossal distance that lay between modern Israel and their own —Third World — country, and you could tell they knew how strange we would find this other place, this country that had changed so little compared to its neighbor in the decades since Israel’s inception.

All the way toward Petra, I stared at the empty landscape outside the bus and asked myself when, if ever, the government of Jordan would build something — anything — within it. Our tour guide was a Palestinian man from Jordan with sarcastic eyes and a smoker’s blue-black lips. At a tourist stop in a “local” teahouse clearly built to cater to foreigners on their way to Petra, I asked him where he had learned to speak English so fluently. He said he had gone to college in the United States, studied English literature, returned to Jordan to marry and raise a family. At lunch in another “local” eatery, I watched as he sat with a few other tour guides, speaking Arabic and smoking Marlboro Lights. The menu consisted of chicken nuggets and penne Alfredo, and when I asked for tea, I was handed a cup of warm water and a Lipton tea bag.

“I mean real tea,” I told the waiter, and he, assuming I didn’t know the difference answered, “Yeah, tea, Lipton.”

My fellow American tourists were staring at me like I thought I was Paris Hilton stuck on the farm, asking for caviar when fish eggs had been served. The tour guide looked up from his corner and muttered something in Arabic to the waiter. I don’t know what he said, but his voice was tired and laced with resentment.

What’s it like, I wondered, to have a bachelor’s degree in literature, only to end up working as a tour guide? To come from an ancient, once-celebrated civilization, only to have to mediate disputes involving the definition of “real” tea? To know you are capable of so much and to be able to do so little? That no matter how well you raise your children, they’re not going to do any better than their parents?

Jordan, to me, is a metaphor for the great tragedy of the Arab experience: bordered by three other Arab countries plus Israel and the West Bank, comprising both the Fertile Crescent and the Great Arabian Desert, heir to many an ancient civilization, it is neither at odds with the West, nor at war with Israel. Its people are its greatest natural asset. Its king and queen are by and large popular with the nation. And yet.

And yet little has changed for the people of Jordan since the end of the British Mandate more than half a century ago. The battles they have fought, internally and otherwise, have been mostly against other Arabs. The financial assistance their leaders have relied on has been provided mostly by the West.

What’s it like to know, in your heart of hearts, where no one will hear you say it, that the great tragedy of your world is not what has been done to it by others, but what your own people, and your own leaders, have failed to do? Because this, I believe, is what ails the Arab world more than any other factor, what lies at the root of the rage — the sense of impotence, the outbreaks of violence that we have witnessed throughout the past half century: More than the looting and robbing of their resources by the West, more than colonization, more than the existence of the State of Israel and the loss of Palestinians’ land, the source of Arab anguish today is the awareness that they have been, repeatedly and in myriad ways, betrayed by their own.

This isn’t to exonerate the West of unabashed plunder of the East, or to overlook the wrongs that Israel, as an occupying force, is bound to make to the occupied. It isn’t to say that one culture is superior to the other. But suppose you get rid of the British stealing your oil, and you find that your own kings and colonels steal even more. Suppose you throw out the colonizer and replace it with a President for Life. Suppose you look around, at the experience of countries like Iran, and fear that the only alternative to the Son of the President for Life would be the Supreme Leader.

I think they know this in Jordan and Libya and Bahrain, just as they learned it in Shiite Iran after the 1979 revolution. I fear they may learn it again in Egypt and Tunisia, just as they learned it in The Islamic Republic after the 2009 elections: The greatest harm done today to the citizens of Arab nations is not by the West or by Israel — it is by their own lunatic presidents and delusional kings, the megalomaniacal mullahs and bloodthirsty generals. The greatest crimes committed by those leaders are not against other nations, but against the men and women who once believed in the promise of salvation, who prayed for the savior to come, paved the road for him with their own children’s blood.

So I follow the goings-on in Libya and the rest of the region, and I pray that history will not repeat itself this one time. I watch those young people baring their chests before police bullets, and pray that from among them, a leader will emerge whose first and ultimate loyalty is — not to God or the West or offshore bank accounts, but — to his or her own nation. Because that, as I see it, is the only way there will ever be peace within the Arab world and between it and others.

Gina Nahai is an author and a professor of creative writing at USC. Her latest novel is “Caspian Rain” (MacAdam Cage, 2007). Her column appears monthly in The Journal.

The solitude of the Arab soul Read More »

Innovation Israel tries innovative approach

Blame it on coinciding with the Grammys and the Jewish Federation’s annual Super Sunday, but only 15 people showed up at the Feb. 13 L.A. leg of the nationwide tour of “Innovation Israel: Shaping Israel’s Future. Today,” presented by the aliyah organization Nefesh B’Nefesh, and PresenTense, an incubator for ideas empowering the Jewish community. To the organizers, Israel’s stars are its social entrepreneurs solving social problems through innovative ideas.

Social entrepreneur Romi Shamai kicked off the event by blowing bubbles the size of beach balls into the small crowd. While earning his degree in physics, he developed a special soap solution for what he thinks is one of the happiest substances in the world: bubbles. His idea blew up into Baabua, a business that gets people blowing huge bubbles at events.

Baabua also created peula.net to help people post, share, track and rally letters of complaint and requests to businesses and to government offices.

“I started to think while studying, ‘How can I make a difference and help professional people act upon their social problems when they are busy with their professional life?’ ” Shamai said.

Another presenter, Elyssa Moss Rabinowitz, intentionally started her talk with a boring, text-heavy source sheet on a famous talmudic passage.

“I felt there was a strong disconnect between people sitting in the world of study, whether academic universities or yeshivas, and the rest of the Jewish world that doesn’t have that opportunity and access,” the Berkeley native and Bar Ilan University alumna said.

She co-developed Kol HaOt: Illuminating Jewish Life Through Art, an alternative educational institute and content provider aimed at making Jewish study a sensory experience through the arts.

Next up was Chaim Landau, an Israeli immigrant who observed how Americans studying in Jerusalem often get their opinions about the Arab-Israeli conflict from secondary sources — whether media or pundits. He developed Perspectives Israel, an apolitical organization that forges interactive encounters with people at the heart of the headlines, from peace activists to settlers.

“I want to give them an opportunity to go out and meet a variety of Israelis and understand the human dimension and many voices that you have in a healthy democracy like Israel,” said the bespectacled Landau.

But the organizers and speakers also wanted to get the crowd to visit Israel as the place to be for start-ups dealing with Jewish social change.

Landau concluded his story with, “Create your own story with us.”

Innovation Israel tries innovative approach Read More »

J Street needs another lane

I was watching the J Street convention on its Web site, and it reminded me a little of those underground meetings among religious settlers in the West Bank. That is, a constant flow of red meat served to the fervent and the like-minded.

In the case of J Street, this red meat can be boiled down to this: It is really, really, really, really important that Israel reach a peace agreement with the Palestinians.

One fervent speaker after another came down from the mountaintop to convince an already convinced audience of how really important this goal is. Whether it was Peter Beinart fearing for Israel’s democratic future, or Rabbi David Saperstein appealing to our highest Jewish values, or Sara Benninga finding her meaning in life by leading weekly demonstrations at Sheikh Jarrah, the theme was the same: Israel must make peace and end the occupation as soon as possible.

And who’s the bad guy in all of this? Take a guess. With the J Street crowd, the underlying assumption is always that the major obstacle to peace is Israel. Palestinian obstacles to peace? They’re as likely to be mentioned at a J Street convention as Avigdor Liberman is of being invited.

Sometimes I wonder what it must feel like after three days of one of these J Street smugfests. How do you go from feeling absolutely certain that you are right to feeling even more certain that you are right?

I remember when Rabbi Michael Lerner of Tikkun invited me to speak several years ago at one of its peace conventions in New York City. I was glad that he did, because it gave me a chance to ask a few hundred peaceniks a question they likely rarely hear: “When is the last time any of you woke up in the morning and asked yourself: ‘What if I’m wrong?’ ”

No one raised their hand.

Yes, compassion is a great Jewish virtue, I told them, but so is humility. I confessed that, initially, I didn’t believe in the Oslo peace process (because I didn’t trust Arafat), but I asked myself, “What if I’m wrong?” and I ended up going along with it. So, I suggested, “What would happen if you all asked yourselves that same question?”

When I look at J Street now, I see some obviously good intentions (“We want peace!”), but not much humility. What comes across more than anything is an orgy of ideological self-confirmation toward pressuring Israel.

That’s disappointing. I expect more from open-minded liberals who claim to care for the “other side.” For one thing, I expect they would also care for the other side of an argument.

Have they studied, for example, the Palestinian Authority’s global campaign to undermine and demonize Israel and the corrosive effect this has had on the peace process? As a “pro-Israel” group, what kind of public pressure have they brought to bear on the Palestinians to end their glorification of terror and indoctrination of Jew-hatred that has made so many Jews reluctant to take more risks for peace?

Where was their public campaign to pressure the Palestinians to return to the peace table during the first nine months of a 10-month Israeli settlement freeze the Obama administration lauded as “unprecedented”?

To balance their countless speakers who advocate putting more pressure on Israel, why haven’t they included speakers like Itamar Marcus of Palestinian Media Watch, who has documented the continued anti-Semitic incitement in official Palestinian media, or an award-winning Mideast journalist like Khaled Abu Toameh, who makes a powerful case that the Palestinian Authority’s primary interest is not to make peace with Israel — but to delegitimize the Jewish state?

If the goal is to bring together two sides, isn’t it important to scrutinize both sides?

Why doesn’t J Street bring in experts to explain the danger of Hamas taking over a Palestinian West Bank and pointing 10,000 rockets at Israel’s nuclear installations, potentially creating a catastrophic meltdown in the Jewish state? Talk about fearing for a country’s democratic character.

J Street’s relentless focus on pressuring Israel isn’t only unfair, it’s also remarkably ineffective. A couple of years ago, Palestinian and Israeli leaders were negotiating directly as a matter of course. Now, in the face of the enormous and single-minded global pressure on Israel, Palestinians are negotiating in international forums on how best to demonize Israel. They won’t even consider talking to Israel until it commits to freezing all construction in disputed territory, including, I presume, freezing any renovation of the restrooms at the Western Wall.

We’ve seen that the greater the pressure on Israel, the faster the cockier-than-ever Palestinians have run away from the peace table. J Street’s reaction to all this is to bring 2,000 people together in Washington, D.C., to put even more pressure on Israel and urge the Obama administration to do the same.

In other words, after two years of generating bumper-to-bumper traffic on the failed road called “let’s pressure Israel,” J Street has decided that the best thing to do is to attract even more traffic to that road.

Maybe they ought to consider adding another lane to their congested highway and calling it “Let’s pressure the Palestinians to stop undermining Israel and return immediately to the peace table.”

In Los Angeles, we would call that the carpool lane.

David Suissa is a branding consultant and the founder of OLAM magazine. For speaking engagements and other inquiries, he can be reached at {encode=”suissa@olam.org” title=”suissa@olam.org”} or davidsuissa.com.

J Street needs another lane Read More »

Why Israel should support Arab democracy

Sitting with Israeli policy makers during the protests in Tunisia and then Egypt, I could feel the anxiety and alarm as senior officials from across the political spectrum attempted to decipher the implications for the Jewish state. Cries of panic have increased as the upheaval spread throughout the Arab world. My frank, if trite, comment that Israelis and American Jews should be applauding the Arab streets’ attempt to throw the bums out during one meeting in Jerusalem was immediately discounted as ignoring the unproven hypothetical that without “strong” leadership, Arab countries will democratically elect Islamic radicals committed to pushing Israel into the sea. 

Yes, the long road to democracy in the Arab world, like in the West, will be messy with many chances for landmines, static defenses and roadblocks. It will take years, if not decades, to develop and institutionalize real reforms, during which time newly vocal stakeholders from across the political spectrum, including liberal and conservative political Islamists, will vie for the prevailing position. And, yes, the average Arab in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Yemen and elsewhere believes in a more hard-line position than that of his dictatorial rulers. This will, no doubt, mean that regional governments will take a more strident position in bilateral talks with the United States and in multinational forums such as the Arab League and the United Nations. However, there are many net positives for Israel (and the United States) that outweigh the negatives. 

First, by and large, Arabs want what everyone else wants, a chance to better their lives and those of their children. The lack of opportunity and no political channel to relieve the pressure over the past two decades fed into political and religious extremism. Enhanced democracy brings enhanced prosperity, economic opportunity and civil society activity, which in turn degrade the allure of the extremism. The angst, insecurity and hopelessness that come with living in corrupt authoritarian societies can be channeled away from violence and prejudice in a world that offers economic and political opportunity as well as a more active and open civil society in which differing or minority opinion can be debated rather than violently suppressed. The teachings of tikkun olam should, at the very least, allow for an appreciation that Arabs are, at long last, attempting to repair their own world.

Second, we need to recognize that the protests are not transitory. Structural changes in the region are happening. This is a watershed in the region that will usher in drastic change, for better or worse. Better to acknowledge this reality in order to better prepare for the new Arab world than keep our heads in the sand. Israel should recognize that the revolutionaries’ platform focuses on the need for institutional reform and respect for rights in their own countries. The issues of the Middle East peace process and Israel’s existence are not currently on the list of grievances. 

Third, the institutional changes can limit rather than encourage relations with the real boogeyman of the Middle East, the radical Iranian regime. The majority of Arabs fear the Iranian mullahs above all else. The Shia communities in the gulf countries and Lebanon may hold some religious affinity for Iran, but their primary issue is state-sponsored discrimination by Sunni-led governments. More fair treatment of the historically poorer Shia minorities will not eliminate the possibility of siding with Iran in future conflicts but will alleviate to a significant degree their disagreements with their own Arab-led governments. Importantly, the hope for change that is currently moving into Syria will give voice to the majority of Syrians that resent the Assad regime’s pandering to Tehran. Most Syrians suffer from the massive intrusion into their country by Iran. A more legitimate regime in Damascus will no doubt be less accommodating to Iran and, thus, significantly weaken the Iranian-Syrian-Hezbollah axis.

Finally, more egalitarian and tolerant governments will be forced to de-escalate hate speech aimed at Israel. They will be forced to be responsive to their own constituents rather than attempt to scapegoat their own corrupt self-serving behavior by blaming Israel. 

James Prince is president of the Democracy Council and a leading expert in democracy and civil society in the Arab world.

Why Israel should support Arab democracy Read More »

Zenga Zenga

On Sunday, I posted a blog about a video on YouTube that had captured the attention of the Libyan resistance movement and become the unofficial anthem of its youth.

“Zenga Zenga” takes Libyan crackpot Muammar el-Qaddafi’s bizarre Green Square speech of Feb. 26, puts it through Auto-Tune, re-edits it to a disco beat and fills out the frame with a gyrating go-go dancer. At the time I first wrote about it, the homemade music video had 500,000 YouTube hits. As of Tuesday, it has nearly 2 million.

What many Libyans didn’t know at first was that the video was created and posted by a 31-year-old Israeli Jew in Tel Aviv named Noy Alooshe.

As that fact became known, the comments section on Alooshe’s post became a founding document of the new Middle East, the history being refashioned each day before our eyes, the one very few policymakers, pundits and Jewish activists seem to get.

Plenty of comments attacked Alooshe for being Israeli, but more defended him and his video. Anyway, the majority of the Arab comments said, the point is that Qaddafi is a fool and a tyrant, and if “Zenga Zenga” can help bring him down, they’re all for it.

Something is happening here: The Internet’s astonishing power is breaking down borders and “flattening” the Middle East. Years ago, it took months of expensive long-distance phone calls, circuitous third-party interventions, and snail-mail letters to get Israelis and their Arab neighbors together. Now, with YouTube, Facebook and a quickly improving Google Translate, the connections are instantaneous. The implications of this force us to take a fresh look at what is possible in the region.

Consider what happened a  few days before the “Zenga Zenga” phenomenon, when Rabbi Donniel Hartman of the Shalom Hartman Institute in Jerusalem posted online a “Letter to the Egyptian People.” The rabbi laid out his hopes for future understanding and cooperation with Egyptians.

“We don’t know, first and foremost, who you are,” Hartman wrote. “You see, for the last 30 years it seems, we never got a chance to talk. We spoke with your leaders, but as you so aptly proved, they don’t speak for you anymore, if they ever did.”

Hundreds of Egyptians wrote back.

Typical of the many responses was this one from “Hisham — An Egyptian”: “I appreciate your wishes for us. Let’s keep in touch and work together to resolve our differences and build upon achievements of the past.” 

And yes, there were “flames” too:

“abdsalam, cairo” wrote: “WE DON`T NEED YOUR ADVICE , YOU ARE NOT FREIND YOU ARE JUST UNWANTED NEIBOUR.”

OK, the last place to go looking for kumbaya is the comments section following any blog. But the exchange shows the importance of beginning the process of winning hearts and minds.

I ran my theory by Yigal Palmor, a spokesman at Israel’s Foreign Ministry, the branch of government in charge of the country’s branding efforts. 

“Reaching out to the Arab world is particularly difficult in the case of Israel,” Palmor e-mailed me from Jerusalem, tossing wet hummus on my enthusiasm. “Anything Israeli is systematically distorted when reported in the Arab media, with painfully few exceptions.”

Palmor said the Ministry tries to connect to Arabs through official social media outlets — an Arabic-language Web site and a Facebook page. But he said that the results of these efforts have been negligible. 

“Fear of backlash from neighbors or government prevail,” he wrote. “We haven’t seen any signs so far that the widespread use of social media in the Arab world makes for a more open-minded approach to Israel.”

Palmor might want to recalibrate his pessimism slightly in view of the “Zenga Zenga” reality. What he said is true if the idea of connectivity is limited to state-sanctioned or pro-Israel activist Web sites. Those money pits of communal dollars don’t get traffic or interest from most Jews I know, much less Arabs.

Plenty of pessimists look at what’s happening in the streets of Cairo, Tripoli and elsewhere and point to failed revolutions past, from 1917 Russia to 1979 Iran, to make a point that after liberation comes just one election, then another tyrant. But what’s different this time is that two revolutions are going on simultaneously: real and digital. 

For most of human history, we knew people first by their place of origin. My own last name derives from Oshmyany—a town near Vilnius where my ancestors once rolled cigars and stole horses. On the Internet, countries still matter, but less than values and interests. It occurs to me as I glance over my list of Facebook friends and Twitter followers that I couldn’t tell you for certain what country many are from, much less what state or city.

As social networks improve and deepen, and if the Internet stays open in the Middle East, Arabs and Jews will identify first through interests, values and “Likes,” rather than through nationality. Some 24-year-old Libyan DJ will find he has more in common with Noy Alooshe in Tel Aviv than with the religious kook down the block. What I’m talking about is the unofficial, user-to-user connections, the social network, if you will. The Internet has overwhelmed the old model of “top-down-only” official contact with “all-at-once” unofficial, unfiltered contact.  

It is the frequency, intensity and quality of these connections that can break down barriers and help Israel finally integrate into the Middle East. If that happens, Mark Zuckerberg will take his place in Zionist history, right beside Theodor Herzl. Thanks to him, the free flow of information will open up the blind alleyways of hate.

Oh, the word for “alleyway” in Arabic? Zenga.

Zenga Zenga Read More »

Letters to the Editor: Metro, Jewish Activists, Hollywood, Bill Link

Mass Transit Conundrums

John Mirisch’s critique of L.A.’s current transit plans (“Just What Is Jewish Mass Transit?” Feb. 25) is contradictory and uninformed. On the one hand, he faults Metro’s failure to provide sufficient park-and-ride lots for the Westside subway extension. On the other hand, he decries “big brother’s stick of eminent domain.” Mirisch can’t have it both ways: If you want more parking you may have to encroach on somebody’s property, which of course is perfectly permissible under the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth Amendment if the taking is compensated. As a city councilman, he should be aware of the takings clause, a long tradition in American constitutional law and urban planning. Mirisch seems to be looking for any excuse to put the brakes on transportation reform in a region that badly needs it.

Peter L. Reich
Professor of Law
Whittier Law School


Joel Epstein’s article (“All Aboard: The case for an all-pervasive Metro,” Feb. 25) misstates critical information, while attempting to slander Beverly Hills residents as NIMBYs.

He ignores, as John Mirisch points out, that Beverly Hills supported the subway from the beginning and will have two stations within its borders. But when Metro — after years promoting one alignment — switched to go beneath Beverly Hills High School, Metro awakened an entire city including every single member of the City Council and Board of Education (not just “a handful of Beverly Hills opponents,” as Epstein would have his readers believe). Is there a real risk to a school with 2,500 students and teachers that Epstein chooses to ignore? There have been four subway construction accidents in various countries using up-to-date technology during the past few years, each one of them causing buildings to collapse and people to die. When there is a completely viable alternative at Santa Monica Boulevard, which would not require tunneling under a city’s only high school and only disaster center, why not take it, especially when it would save $60 million in cost (Metro’s numbers, not mine)? And all to move the station one block from Santa Monica Boulevard to Constellation Avenue!

Ken Goldman
via e-mail


Arab Countries, Not Israel, Victimize Muslims

Rachel Roberts in her article (“Muslim Criminals, Jewish Activists?,” Feb. 18) decries that she has been called “naïve, self-hating and a traitor” — perhaps so because it is true.

Brigitte Gabriel, the Lebanese American activist who promotes understanding of the Islamist threat to the world, who, as a youth, had witnessed the horrors of Islamist radicals in her homeland, cautions parents, especially Jewish parents, to educate their children about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict before sending them off to college. If they fail to do so, they may be surprised when they return home, after a thorough indoctrination by their leftist Palestinian sympathizing professors, condemning Israel, supporting boycotts of its products, and worse. If Ms. Roberts’ parents were not negligent in this responsibility, their daughter certainly ignored their counsel.

Charles Lefkowitz
via e-mail


                                   
Let’s Hear About Jewish Accomplishments Beyond Hollywood

As a longtime reader of The Jewish Journal, I feel that you give far too much coverage to Jews in the entertainment industry. Where are the stories about Jewish artists, writers, academics, scientists, doctors and musicians, just to name a few areas, in Los Angeles? The Los Angeles Philharmonic has dozens of Jewish principal players, but your readers would never know this.

Why cannot your publication give similar coverage to, for example, Jewish doctors and scientists at UCLA, USC, Caltech or the City of Hope who are working on cures and treatments for diseases such as cancer or Alzeimer’s?

We really deserve a more balanced coverage of the interests and accomplishments of members of the Jewish community in Southern California.

Michael B. Farber
via e-mail


Bill Link Story Fascinates

Thank you so very much for the fascinating article about Bill Link — we enjoyed every word (“‘Colombo’ Creator Solves His Own Family Mystery,” Feb. 25).

Bill is a true American entertainment treasure.

We have been fortunate to know Bill and Margery for years and it was such a pleasant surprise to see Bill’s picture in The Jewish Journal.

Thanks for covering something cheerful and upbeat.

Fran Morris Rosman
via e-mail


Kaplan Rocks

Great piece (“ ‘The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street,’ ” Feb. 25)! I will take a look at your Journal for more gems.

Evelynn Culver
via e-mail

Letters to the Editor: Metro, Jewish Activists, Hollywood, Bill Link Read More »