fbpx

January 26, 2011

Old eyes

Every aspiring actor in Hollywood should have a mother like Tamar Youssefian Josephson.

Typically, if you meet a Hollywood agent at a cocktail party who wants to flack a client’s work, he’ll give you the elevator pitch (“Schindler’s List” meets “Star Wars!”), do a little schmooze and then slip you his business card.

But Josephson is not your typical Hollywood agent. She’s a doting, loving, over-the-top enthusiastic Jewish mother who, if she ever met the Queen of England, would probably hand her a promotional leaflet for her daughter’s new one-woman play, “New Eyes,” at the Firehouse Theatre in Sherman Oaks.

She did more than slip me a leaflet and her cell number the other night when I met her at an American Friends of Likud event in Beverly Hills. This was one of those high-octane gatherings where there was zero daylight between the speaker (Tzipi Hotovely, the youngest MK in the Knesset and a rising star in right-wing circles) and the audience. By the time the gathering was over, we were all ready to fly to Hebron and man the barricades.

Not Josephson. She had a different trip in mind. She wanted me to fly to the San Fernando Valley to see her daughter’s new show.

“You have to see this show, Mr. Suissa! You have to see it!”

The thing is, I’ve always had a weakness for fiercely passionate mothers. There’s something primal about a mother fighting for her child. I’m not sure God has yet invented a deeper attachment. So it didn’t bother me that this Israeli “ima” par excellence was interrupting an intense conversation in order to rave about her daughter’s show.

Still, I’ve learned never to say, “Yeah, I’ll come,” if I don’t really mean it. So I was honest and said, “I don’t think I can come.”

For this relentless Jewish mother, though, the word “no” was simply a request for more information. She was determined to get me to write about her daughter’s new play, and there was no way she was letting me go without a more positive commitment. In a stroke of selling brilliance right out of “Glengarry Glen Ross,” she blurted out: “Oh, and it’s good for Israel!”

Good for Israel? Hmm, crazy me, I always thought that to be successful in show business when dealing with the Middle East, you either have to be pro-Palestinian or pro-reconciliation; that is, you either have to play up the underdog or show how enemies can end up loving each other.

But a play that is unabashedly pro-Israel and can still, as Josephson proudly noted, get good reviews in liberal publications like the LA Weekly? That I had to see.

I made the winding trek through Coldwater Canyon to Ventura Boulevard last Saturday night, and guess who greeted me as soon as I got to the theater? That’s right, Tamar Josephson, all beaming and offering to feed me.

Now that I had shown up, I could see that she was taking her schmoozing to another level: “I hope you will write a good article about the show,” she told me. “When do you think it will come out?”

At that point, all I was thinking was, “God, I love this woman. Let’s pray that the show is worth writing about. If not, she’ll be on my case until Maschiach comes, and maybe even after.”

Well, you might guess by now that “New Eyes” was worth writing about. The performance I saw was packed, mostly with Israelis, and Josephson didn’t lie. The show is good for Israel. Not because it’s propaganda, but because it shows Israel’s human face.

And that human face is Yafit Josephson.

Yafit, who grew up in Israel and recently graduated from the University of Southern California School of Theatre, is the soul of the show, and boy, can she act. At the beginning of her play — a coming-of-age story in which she struggles to reconcile her show-biz dreams with her Israeli identity, while playing 18 different characters, some hilariously — she says something to a casting agent that stuck with me.

When the agent asks her why she wants to act, she answers: “I’m tired of seeing the world through my own eyes. I want to see it through other eyes.”

It’s a grand, evocative line, one you assume will be the theme of the play. But it’s not — it’s clever misdirection. By the end of her journey, after a series of Hollywood encounters that reinforce her deep insecurities and a redemptive visit back to Israel, Yafit (her mother calls her “Yafiti”) discovers not “other” eyes but her own eyes.

She makes peace with her “very Jewish nose” that her mother tells her is “the most beautiful in the world” and, not least, with her Israeli identity that is as rooted in her as her nose. The “new eyes” of the title, then, are really old, ancient eyes. They are the eyes of her people and the eyes of her mother.

Those very eyes caught up with me as I was leaving the theater. Not taking any chances, the mother of all Hollywood agents whispered in my ear: “I know a Muslim man who saw the show last week and really loved it. Do you want to interview him for your story?”

David Suissa is the founder of OLAM magazine and OLAM.org. You can read his daily blog at suissablog.com and e-mail him at {encode=”suissa@olam.org” title=”suissa@olam.org”}.

Old eyes Read More »

Italy’s Berlusconi slams Jewish TV host

One of Italy’s most prominent Jewish figures is at the center of the latest round of scandals surrounding Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi.

Journalist, author and TV personality Gad Lerner, host of a popular late-night Italian TV talk show called “The Infidel” on the independent La7 channel, was berated live on air by the premier earlier this week.

Late Monday night, a furious Berlusconi called in to the show and let loose a barrage of insults against Lerner and the program, which had centered on Berlusconi’s allegedly improper relations with underage women. He blasted the show as “a disgusting program with vile, obscene, repugnant presentation. A bawdy-house.”

Berlusconi accused Lerner of “false, distorted suppositions, far from the truth” and defended his relationship with Nicole Minetti, a dental hygienist whom he launched into politics and who is now under investigation as part of the sex scandal inquiries involving Berlusconi. When Berlusconi insulted female studio guests as “so-called ladies,” Lerner called him a “boor.”

Lerner is well known as a writer and public figure on the political left. He has also written extensively on Jewish issues, including his search for family roots in Ukraine. His name appeared on a “black list” of influential Italian Jews posted earlier this month on the neo-Nazi Stormfront website.

Italy’s Berlusconi slams Jewish TV host Read More »

Kantor calls on E.U. to fight anti-Semitism

With anti-Semitism on the rise more than six decades after the liberation of Auschwitz, Europe should be fighting harder against hate, Moshe Kantor said.

Kantor, president of the European Jewish Congress, who spoke Tuesday in Brussels at a Holocaust remembrance ceremony hosted by the E.U. Parliament, brought this message personally to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, current president of the E.U. Council.

According to Kantor, who organized the Holocaust remembrance event, the two met earlier in the day to discuss how to deal with Hungary’s anti-Semitic, far-right Jobbik party, as well as Orbán’s controversial new media watch-dog law, which critics consider anti-democratic.

Dina Porat, head of the new Kantor Center for the Study of Contemporary European Jewry in Tel Aviv, said anti-Semitism was particularly problematic in Western Europe, which has a larger Muslim population than the central and eastern European countries.

“Most of them want to live their lives like anyone else,” she told JTA. But the radicals among them tend to pick up Christian anti-Semitic motifs. “And in democratic countries, where you have media freedom, such propaganda can proliferate,” Porat explained.

Democratic countries cannot afford to be “tolerant of intolerance,” Kantor said, adding that Europe should have “zero tolerance” for anti-Semitism.

“The European Union can fight it,” said World Jewish Congress President Ronald Lauder, addressing several hundred people at the ceremony.  “Every time someone says something ant-Semitic, we should stand up and fight back.”

Holocaust survivors and the son of a rescuer were among those to join in the ceremony, which also featured remarks by E.U. Parliament President Jerzy Buzek, former prime minister of Poland; Rabbi Israel Meir Lau, chairman of Yad Vashem, Israel’s Holocaust memorial; and Yuri Edelstein, Israeli Minister of Public Diplomacy and Diaspora Affairs.

Kantor calls on E.U. to fight anti-Semitism Read More »

Yad Vashem, Google announce joint archive project

A joint project between Yad Vashem and Google will make public access to Nazi-era documents and photographs easier.

Israel’s national Holocaust museum and archive and the Google search engine on Wednesday announced that they had made 130,000 photos and documents from the museum’s archive available online. The photos can now be searched directly from Google using regular key words.

Once the document is found, the searcher will be prompted to add his own stories to the Yad Vashem Web site, as well as help identify people and places in the photos, according to a Yad Vashem statement.

The project was announced on the eve of International Holocaust Day.

The release of photos Wednesday is a first step toward bringing the vast Yad Vashem archive online over time, according to the museum.

“We’re focused on finding new and innovative ways to make the enormous amount of data in our archives, accessible and searchable to a global audience,” said Avner Shalev, chairman of Yad Vashem. “Google is an integral partner in our mission, as they help us to reach new audiences, including young people around the world, enabling them to be active in the discussion about the Holocaust.”

Yad Vashem, Google announce joint archive project Read More »

Saying Farewell to Debbie Friedman

Like many Jews, the foundation of my own Jewish experience stems from my time at Jewish summer camp. The weeks I spent surrounded by my Jewish peers living Judaism at ” title=”Debbie Friedman” target=”_blank”>Debbie Friedman, the musician who brought Judaism to life for so many, had died. I was fortunate enough to have seen Debbie Friedman perform while I was teaching at a reform congregation in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Her spirit and strength were truly inspiring.

I was surprised to see a mention of Debbie being a lesbian in the ” title=”Keshet ” target=”_blank”>Keshet about Debbie, her life, and her death.

Keshet joins the many thousands all over the world who mourn the loss of Debbie Friedman, zichrona l’bracha. There are no words to capture the transformative impact she had on contemporary Jewish life. Her open, accessible, and expansive approach to liturgy and Jewish music invited so many of us to connect with prayer and a sense of the divine. Debbie challenged us to be our holiest selves. She revolutionized the way we relate to ritual melody and ritual healing, and offered inclusive expression for everyone, LGBT and straight alike. As Saying Farewell to Debbie Friedman Read More »

Retract your mom claws

Amy “Tiger Mother” Chua might want to cover her ears right now because clinical psychologist Wendy Mogel has a message for parents that would likely send Chua into one of those shrieking fits she reserves for her daughters’ subpar piano practices, or a verboten A-minus.

Here goes:

Your teen may not be a genius-entrepreneur-athlete-altruist-artist.

He will probably experiment with drugs, drinking and sex. The small stuff — like rudeness, irresponsibility and utter obliviousness to the effort and money you put into his well-being — will test you daily.

And — take a deep breath, upper-middle-class Jewish parents — your teen might not get into Harvard. Or even UCLA.

But that’s OK.

In her latest book, “The Blessing of a B Minus: Using Jewish Teachings to Raise Resilient Teenagers” (Scribner, 2010), Mogel offers a counter-cultural, sometimes counter-instinctual approach to parenting that stands in stark contrast to the unbending so-called “Chinese” approach in Chua’s much-discussed new memoir/guidebook, “Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother” (Penguin Press). And if Chua has hit a nerve with parents who are as obsessed with their children’s academic success, Mogel offers both common sense and Jewish values as a counter-guide. Inadvertently timed to come out within weeks of one another, the reassuring tone of Mogel’s very sane book may be a life-saver to parents on the Chua-style edge.

Chua is a Yale law professor married to a Jewish Yale law professor; she describes with pride how she didn’t allow her daughters, now 18 and 15, to have playdates or go on sleepovers, watch television or play video games, or bring home anything less than in A in any class other than gym or drama. The girls had to practice hours a day to master both violin and piano, even on vacation. Any hint at deviation from Chua’s standards merited insults, punishment and harsher demands.

But well before an excerpt from Chua’s book appeared earlier this month in the Wall Street Journal, sending parents — and journalists and talk-show hosts — into a frenzy, Mogel, whose first book, “The Blessing of a Skinned Knee: Using Jewish Teachings to Raise Self-Reliant Children” (Scribner), came out 10 years ago, had been challenging parents to step outside the transcript-perfecting circus and acknowledge that there are dozens of paths to dozens of kinds of success — and those paths depend on knowing and understanding your child. She asks parents to set standards and then back off, to give kids space to err and stumble, and to allow them get up again — by themselves.

“Raising teens is the hardest thing parents have to do — it makes pregnancy and childbirth look like a picnic in the park,” said Mogel, who treats teens and children in her Larchmont Boulevard private practice. “Our instincts are to overprotect them, to overindulge them, to over-schedule them and to fight their battles for them. But that deprives them of the most critical learning they need to do.”

Mogel will be discussing her approach to raising teens at a forum sponsored by The Jewish Journal/TRIBE Media Corp. and the American Jewish University on Sunday, Jan. 30, at 2 p.m.

Indeed, in many ways, Chua and Mogel start from the same premise. Both believe Western parents over-coddle their children, demanding little of them but wanting everything for them. Both wonder at teens’ lack of respect for elders, and both fear for children whose half-baked efforts are breathlessly praised.

But the similarities end there. Chua’s response is to place impossibly high standards and demands on her children — she rejected her 4-year-old daughter’s homemade birthday card as a feeble effort. Chua picked up her children during recess so they could spend the time on more lessons, rather than waste it playing. She called them “garbage” to their faces when they under-performed.

Mogel also advises parents to place demands on teens — not just academically, but in the home and in society — and counsels parents to set standards and model values. But she views the process of raising offspring as much messier and nuanced than Chua’s black-and-white version, requiring a more moderate and compassionate approach modeled on the Jewish ideal of finding a path between two extremes.

It’s also a harder approach for parents to undertake. Mogel doesn’t lay out a neat list of dos and don’ts, nor does she offer blanket prescriptions, as Chua does. She instead offers information and ideas and asks parents to customize their skills and tactics as they learn about their own motivations and their children’s strengths and weaknesses. Her approach of moderation and resisting the urge to always fix everything requires work from parents. And not all parents will be up to the task.

Especially because teens can be so hard to understand.

Retract your mom claws Read More »

The Al Jazeera document dump and you

Map making seems to be an increasingly popular pastime in the Middle East these days.

The Palestinians claim they prepared their mapped vision of the two-state solution but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has refused to look at it. Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman is reportedly preparing maps that will give Palestinians an interim state on land they already control but no more. Now a leading Washington think tank has unveiled a series of maps detailing proposals for drawing Israeli-Palestinian borders.

The central question in all this cartography is what to do about nearly 300,000 Israelis living in some 120 West Bank settlements.

Documents released Jan. 23 by Al Jazeera show Israelis and Palestinians may have made more progress toward an agreement — at least with the prior Israeli government — than previously known, but the reality is the peace process is comatose, and each side is conditioning resumption of talks on terms it knows are unacceptable to the other.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas refuses to meet with Netanyahu until Israel freezes all settlement construction, which the prime minister has rejected by sanctioning a new building spree.

The Al Jazeera documents revealed Abbas appears much more flexible on that issue in private than in public, and that may land him in big trouble with the Palestinian public to which he has made unrealistically maximalist promises not only on settlements but also on refugees, borders, Jerusalem and security.

The Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) has published a report (see it at jewishjournal.com) by senior fellow David Makovsky detailing three scenarios for redrawing borders to allow Israel to retain the maximum number of settlers in a minimum number of settlements along with 1:1 land swaps that would give Palestinians the equivalent of 100 percent of the West Bank.

“Territory is not the only issue on the peace agenda,” said Makovsky, “but a breakthrough on this issue may open the door to progress on the others.”

He estimated it could cost nearly $1 million per family to relocate settlers to inside Israel’s new borders based on the 2005 Gaza withdrawal and on a family size of 5.3 (more for smaller families).

Any West Bank withdrawal will be more complex and more traumatic than the one in Gaza that saw radical rabbis ordering their followers to resist and IDF soldiers to disobey the orders of their commanders.

In September 2005, Israel evacuated 8,500 settlers from Gaza, plus another 500 from the northern West Bank, at a cost of $2 billion. Five and a half years later, an estimated 70 percent still do not have permanent housing.

West Bank evacuation for civilians will cost between $11 billion and $24 billion, depending on the extent of the land swap and the number of people affected. The cost of the army and the overall redeployment will be billions more.

Guess who’s expected to foot the bill. You. The American taxpayer. That could create a problem. Current U.S. law prohibits spending American aid beyond the 1967 border; it was written specifically to prevent using foreign aid for settlements.

Netanyahu recently forced the United States to withdraw an offer of $3.5 billion in advanced stealth planes and other equipment in return for a 90-day settlement freeze when he insisted on deal-killing conditions. Meanwhile, senior U.S. diplomats are in Israel discussing security needs in the event of a peace agreement.

Makovsky briefed top Israeli, Palestinian and American officials on the report but declined to characterize their responses.

The WINEP scenarios envision removing most West Bank settlements (77 to 88 out of 120) but only a minority of settlers (60,000 to 94,000 out of 300,000). That’s because most settlers live in the major settlement blocs near the 1967 border, which are expected to be annexed to Israel in a peace agreement.

In a land-for-land deal, each side gets something tangible, Makovsky said. It is “not realistic” for Palestinians to demand all settlers be removed.

The Washington Institute report does not deal with the nearly 200,000 Jews who live in East Jerusalem.

Some in Congress may question why Americans taxpayers should help foot the bill to remove settlements every president has said never should have been built in the first place.

On top of that, American taxpayers will be expected to increase the hundreds of millions already going to help the Palestinian build their state. Arab leaders will be expected to chip in, but so far they’ve been more generous with pledges than checks.

I’m not arguing against withdrawal. To the contrary, I think it is long overdue and in the vital interest of Israel’s survival as a Jewish, democratic state.

But it may not be realistic to think Congress and the administration, facing unprecedented budget shortfalls and intense pressure to curb spending, will serve as the new ATM for an Israeli-Palestinian agreement.

The longer both the Palestinians and Israelis delay, the higher the price tag of peace.

Douglas M. Bloomfield is a nationally syndicated columnist.

The Al Jazeera document dump and you Read More »

I speak Latin, therefore I speak English

Seeing an older lady at the grocery store today reminded me of my own Grandmother.  She came to the U.S. a few years after we did.  At 70 years old, she was eager to learn the culture, to try everything new, and to live the American dream.  My Grandmother had lived through the Holocaust, moving from town to town by horse and carriage to avoid getting caught by the Nazis, survived Communism, had all kinds of health issues, and yet she was the most positive person I have ever known!

She lived with us for a while, but always wanted a place of her own.  Being an incredibly social person, and always living in a metropolitan city, she was very depressed living in the Orange County’s suburbia.  So, when we found her a place in a big apartment building that was known to house quite a bit of Orange County’s Russian population, she was ecstatic.  Those were her requirements: big apartment building, Russians, if they are Russian Jews even better, but she was ready to tolerate any Russians.

As we were busy moving her in, she was busy making new friends.  By the end of moving day, she had already made friends with – her words exactly:  “the nosy red-head upstairs, the deaf one down the hall, the one in the wheelchair who has a nice looking husband, and the psychic professor who would like to tell me my future.”  My Grandma had a thing against people’s names, she only referred to them by their attributes, mishaps, or hair color.  As we found out later, apparently Grandma was using the wheelchair’s husband for rides to the Russian store, since she didn’t drive a car.  I don’t even want to know what she gave him in return.  As she liked to say quite frequently, “his wife doesn’t do anything, but complain and bitch, she won’t even have sex with him”, which was more than enough information that I needed to know.

When my Grandma passed away years later, going through her belongings we found a box that contained only what I can describe as: a lifetime supply of Condoms!  They were also Russian, Communist-issued Condoms that I spoke about in my earlier posts.  I believe that she was smuggling them from my parents!  Not only was she smuggling condoms every time we had her over, but somehow other things would go missing after she’d leave as well.  For example, rolls of toilet paper would be gone, and you know how big all Russians are on toilet paper!  After the sand paper we used back in the USSR, American toilet paper is like heaven to us…  I am not sure if she was re-distributing it between all the Russians in her building, or saving it for a rainy day, but a roll here and there was always missing.  We never understood why she wouldn’t just ask us for it, or have us buy it at the store, we never said no to her, always took her shopping.  Go figure…

Even though she didn’t have a car, somehow my Grandma got around to many places on her own.  We did take her grocery shopping at least once a week, and there was nothing more hysterical than watching her shop.  There were many times when I wanted to run out of the store out of sheer embarrassment, but held it together long enough to get her out of there.  My Grandma didn’t speak English, but she did speak Russian, Yiddish and knew sign language.  And when I say “sign language”, I mean literally using her hands to show, point, and demonstrate what she was talking about.  Even though I was always right next to her in the supermarket, she would go up to people in the store and start asking them where the certain items were!  And not just store employees either!  If she couldn’t find anyone that worked there, she would just walk up to random strangers.  Imagine a tiny, four-foot-ten-inches old lady coming up to you, waving her arms and hands violently in the air, pointing to random objects, meanwhile speaking Russian, Yiddish and her version of English!  Most of the people had a look that only said one thing: Terror.  The first time she did it, I explained to her that she shouldn’t do that, it scared people because they can’t understand her.  “Nonsense, she looks Jewish, she must speak Yiddish!”, was her usual response.  Or: “They understand my English when its accompanied by me pointing to items in the store.”  How can anyone argue with that?

Grandma always reminded us that she could read, write and speak fluent English.  You know why?  Because she was a Dentist back in the Soviet Union, which meant that she learned how to write prescriptions in Latin, which was basically English!  As much as we argued, and tried explaining to her that just because she learned some very basic Latin names for medications, did not mean that she could speak the English language, all to no avail…  It was useless, she was a very strong and independent woman and insisted on doing everything herself.  After a while, we just let her do her thing and just stood in the corner of the grocery store, waiting until the Manager announced: “Did anyone lose a Grandma that seems to be speaking a few foreign languages at once?”

I speak Latin, therefore I speak English Read More »

Israel must grant entry to asylum seekers

In 1939, sailing from Hamburg, Germany, 938 refugee Jews boarded the St. Louis to flee the Third Reich. They were destined for Cuba. We all know the end of this story. Anti-Semitism and xenophobia prevailed in Cuba; efforts were made for the St. Louis to divert to the United States, but the same exclusionary forces prevailed here. Americans and Cubans alike feared that the Jews would steal jobs and that relaxed immigration policies and quotas would hurt economic recovery; politicians were persuaded that these Jews would somehow bring down, or perhaps sully, society. In that instance alone, 938 Jews were sent back to Europe, most to face extermination in the Holocaust. It is commonly accepted that it is the story of the St. Louis and others like it that helped secure the world’s support to establish the state of Israel at the conclusion of World War II.

“Keep them out.” “They will destroy our country.” “They will dilute our religious values.” “They are thieves.” “They will take our jobs, take over our cities and bring down our economy.”

While these could be the words of the Cubans or Americans who rallied against allowing the Jews asylum in 1939, the irony is that these are actually words spoken in 2010 and 2011 by Israeli citizens in reference to people fleeing genocide in Sudan and violence in Eritrea. (See the Jewish Journal cover article “When Africa Comes to Israel,” Jan. 7-13, 2011).

Unlike Cuba and the United States in 1939, Israel did take in those African refugees who would have faced death had they been turned away. This is an amazing fact, given all of the complex existential and security problems with which Israel is constantly confronted. Indeed, from the national security perspective alone, it is especially amazing for Israel to receive Sudanese and Eritrean refugees at its borders, many of whom are Muslim, and all of whom have come from enemy states or states aligned with Israel’s enemies. This Israeli policy is surely based upon not only our modern experience as Jews who were reviled and rejected, but also upon the teachings of our Torah and our ancient heritage.

However, Israel’s practice of receiving asylum seekers escaping genocide could be threatened by the voices of many in Israeli society who are villainizing and spreading untrue vitriol about the behavior or intentions of the refugees. Most disturbing is that, according to a recent Jewish Journal cover story, some of the loudest xenophobic expressions in Israel are coming from among the extreme Orthodox community. It was reported that the local rabbis in B’nai Brak recently sent a message to their ultra-religious community “not to rent apartments to refugees or illegal foreign laborers”; how do those rabbis reconcile their directives with the words of Isaiah 1:17 — “Do right. Seek justice. Encourage the oppressed” Or, exactly how do those rabbis understand Leviticus 19:33-34, which says, “The strangers who sojourn with you shall be to you as the natives among you, and you shall love them as yourself; for you were strangers in the land of Egypt”?

Our own recent history, coupled with the core values articulated in the Torah, can and should be our guide as we consider today’s most perplexing and complex moral problems, such as giving asylum to those fleeing genocide and grave bodily danger. The founding core value of Jewish World Watch is found in Leviticus 19:16, “Do not stand idly by while your neighbor’s life s threatened …” I hope and pray that the government of Israel will educate and respond to the asylum detractors, and that Israel will continue to realize its responsibility as a modern developed nation to open its arms to those fleeing genocide and certain destruction. By so doing, Israel and the Jewish people will embrace the compassion and humanity that form the foundational core of the Jewish people.

Janice Kamenir-Reznik is co-founder and president of Jewish World Watch.

Israel must grant entry to asylum seekers Read More »