fbpx

September 2, 2010

Torah dedicated in Lenin’s birthplace

A Torah was dedicated in the birthplace of Communist leader Vladimir Lenin.

More than 500 people gathered Tuesday to celebrate the completion of the first Torah scroll for the city of Ulyanovsk, Russia, according to Chabad.org.

A parade escorted the Torah scroll from the community’s theater to the synagogue.

“Everyone remembers how not long ago they had to hide their Jewish identity,” said Rabbi Yossi Marazov, a Chabad-Lubavitch emissary to the Volga River port city. “Now, on the very streets where communism [flourished], they are proudly parading as Jewish with the full support of the government.”

Torah dedicated in Lenin’s birthplace Read More »

With ‘The Town’ Ben Affleck aims for the A-list

Could Ben Affleck become for Boston what Martin Scorsese is for New York?

That seems to be the thought implied by a recent New York Times piece positioning Ben Affleck for a comeback. Not that Affleck, who is one of Hollywood’s most famous—and highly paid—faces needs any sort of popular resurrection. What he’s hoping for with his next film, “The Town”, which he co-write, directed and stars in, is to reassert his presence as one of Hollywood’s highbrow. That is, to make himself worthy of his Oscar-winning status; Affleck wants to be seen as more of an artist, less of a movie star.

“This is an emblem of the person I want to be going forward,” Affleck told the The Times about his new direction.

In the spirit of the upcoming high holidays, it’s the perfect time for an Affleck rebirth. His Jewish audience may even forgive his unimaginative work (as if any sort of repentance could compensate for the disastrous “Gigli” with J-Lo) if there’s reason to believe something better awaits. The real challenge for Affleck, it seems, is figuring out exactly what he wants to do. Now that’s he’s both movie star and family man, does Hollywood still hold allure? When he says he wants to do better, does he mean it?

Jewish tradition tells us that before one can move forward, it’s important to look back. If Affleck plans to recommit to his career, he might want to reflect on past mistakes. And since Affleck is rumored to be half-Jewish, that’s enough for us to suggest some teshuvah is in order.

Ever since he and pal Matt Damon won the screenwriting statue for “Good Will Hunting” in 1997, Affleck’s career took on a typical post-Oscar trajectory: boring parts and big paychecks. Here are five films we think he should apologize for:

1. Reindeer Games – Aside from the Charlize Theron shiksa appeal, we’re not sure how this movie got made.

2. Bounce – This film, co-starring Affleck’s then-girlfriend Gwyneth Paltrow (also half-Jewish by way of her father, Bruce Paltrow) not only dashed hopes for a rom-com revival, their subsequent breakup signaled the death knell for what could have been ridiculously good looking Jewish progeny.

3. Pearl Harbor – Historical narratives should not be left in Michael Bay’s hands. Period. But we give Affleck brownie points for going all biblical, marrying his “brother’s” lady and fathering his offspring.

4. The Sum of All Fears – Did anyone actually see this?

5. Jersey Girl – Not even the porno subplot could redeem this Kevin Smith rom com. You know it’s a bad sign when the leading man has better chemistry with his onscreen daughter than his lover, played by Liv Tyler.

A bright spot on Affeck’s resume appeared in 2007, with his turn as director in the acclaimed film “Gone Baby Gone.” Here’s to hoping his instincts as filmmaker win out over his proclivities as leading man.

[correction appended]

With ‘The Town’ Ben Affleck aims for the A-list Read More »

Rabbi plans to appeal court order to turn over Torah scrolls to widow

A superior court judge has given a Sherman Oaks rabbi 10 days to turn over four Torah scrolls to a widow, confirming a decision reached by a Los Angeles rabbinic court in May.
But an attorney for Rabbi Samuel Ohana says he will appeal the decision and Ohana will continue to use the scrolls at his synagogue, Beth Midrash Mishkan Israel, until the appeal has been decided.

Rita Pauker is the widow of Rabbi Norman Pauker, who ran a small storefront synagogue, Valley Mishkan Israel, from 1975 until he retired and closed the shul in 1996. Ohana says Rabbi Pauker gave him the scrolls when he retired, but Rita Pauker says her husband merely lent the scrolls to Ohana and they belong to the Pauker family. She wants them back to give to her nephews, who are pulpit rabbis in other cities. Pauker has been trying to get the scrolls back since her husband died in 2002.

The four scrolls, hand-inked on vellum, are valued at around $100,000.

In January 2009, the Rabbinical Council of California Beit Din —onto which both sides signed for arbitration—ordered Ohana to turn over the scrolls, but Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Zaven Sinanian vacated the beit din’s award in April, after Ohana’s lawyer successfully argued that Rabbi Nachum Sauer should be disqualified from that beit din because he was interviewed in a Daily News story about the case. Sauer said he had answered a general question about scroll ownership and didn’t know anything about the case.

Sinanian sent the case back to beit din, and the two sides agreed to a one-judge beit din, rather than the standard three.

Rabbi Shalom Tendler, dean of the boys high school Mesivta Birkas Yitzchak and a longtime judge on rabbinic courts, heard the case in January 2010 and on May 18 ruled that the scrolls belonged to the now defunct Valley Mishkan Israel Congregation. He ordered the scrolls returned to Rita Pauker as the agent of the synagogue.
When Ohana refused to turn the scrolls over, Pauker petitioned the superior court to confirm the beit din’s arbitration award.

G. Scott Sobel, Ohana’s attorney, argued before Sinanian that Tendler had no authority to find the scrolls belonged to a third party – Rabbi Pauker’s defunct synagogue – when it was Rita Pauker and Ohana contesting the scrolls’ ownership. He further argued the beit din violated his client’s rights because it did not allow a second attorney to be present at the beit din hearing.

The judge rejected Sobel’s arguments, and confirmed the beit din’s finding.

Sobel plans to file an appeal, arguing the judgment exceed the parties’ contractual agreement.

Rabbi plans to appeal court order to turn over Torah scrolls to widow Read More »

From Myron Cohen to Jeffrey Ross: The origins of Jewish comedy

Myron Cohen was telling his greatest jokes to an audience of one:  me.  I had grown up in the 1950’s and ‘60’s watching him perform countless times on the Ed Sullivan show, and now, in 1978, the aging stand-up comedian was sitting down in his living room, clad in a bathrobe (it was a radio interview, after all), and doing shtick.

“I love telling the story about the U.S. Census Bureau conducting an actuarial survey on the Lower East Side”, he began.  “The gentleman from Washington knocks on a door, and there stands this nice little Jewish man in his 80’s.  He says, ‘Sir, we understand you’ve lived here for many years.  What is the death rate in this area?’  The man thinks for a moment and replies, “Vell, in mine opinion… don’t hold me to dis, but in mine opinion… I’m pretty sure it’s one to a person”.

(Rimshot, please!)

Although he thought the joke would work with any ethnic group and dialect, Cohen added, “The thing that makes us so wonderful as Jews is that we love to laugh at ourselves”.  He recalled honing his comic skills while working as a salesman in the schmatta business in the 1920’s and ‘30’s, and hosting bachelor parties.  “Nobody got married in the textile industry unless I was toastmaster at the stag party”.

I thought of Cohen and the other legendary comics I’ve known, mostly Jews, while watching Jeffrey Ross, the Friars’ Club “Roastmaster General”, at last month’s “Just for Laughs” festival in Montreal, the glorious annual two-week tribute to everything stand-up.  (Ross, the always-hilarious comedian known as a “one-man verbal assault unit”, told the crowd, “There were so many comics on my plane coming up to Canada that we had to go through an insecurity checkpoint.”).

I had the immense privilege, while growing up, of meeting many of the shapers of 20th century comedy, and later, as a reporter, of interviewing some of them.  My dad worked on Johnny Carson’s Tonight show in the 1960’s, and on one wall of my house are notes signed to me from Groucho Marx, Bob Hope, Jack Benny, George Burns, Milton Berle, George Jessel, Bill Cosby, and Henny Youngman.  Nearby are mementoes of my encounters with Buddy Hackett, Carl Reiner, Bob Newhart, Joan Rivers, Don Rickles, Carol Burnett, Alan King, Billy Crystal, Robert Klein, Eddie Murphy, Belushi, Aykroyd, and Seinfeld.  And if you call my house, you’ll often hear the message Jackie Mason once made for my answering machine.

I’m no student of comedy, just a huge fan, and I’ve always been fascinated with the people who make us laugh, and their process.  How did those who started on the stage of vaudeville halls transition into the world of radio and TV, and how are today’s comics dealing with the seismic transformation wrought by digital media?

Speaking of seismic, Joe Smith of “Smith and Dale”, who teamed up in the late 1800’s, told me one of their early gigs was opening for the Marx Brothers in San Francisco.  When was that?, I asked.  “Oh, 1902.  Before that big quake and fire.  It was a beautiful city”.

Smith and Dale… born Sultzer and Marks… were the prototype for Neil Simon’s play and film, “The Sunshine Boys”, and when I interviewed the then-97-old funnyman shortly before his death in 1981, he commented on the playwright’s act of petty larceny.  “Neil Simon didn’t plagiarize us”, said Smith.  “He Simonized us”. 

Most of the New York City’s “places of amusement”, as Smith referred to them, featured Jewish entertainers at the turn of the 20th century.  “There’s something about the Jews that makes them love theater.  They’re great for humor”.

Smith recalled trying to save money while corresponding with his agent via telegram about when the team’s next appearance would be.  Since Western Union charged by the word, the agent’s message read “Nu?”  Smith’s reply:  “Shabbos”.     

The duo was best known for their Dr. Kronkhite routines (“Doctor, it hurts when I do that.”  “So, don’t do that!”), but Smith thought some of their best material came from the odd jobs they endured while trying to make it in show biz, such as working as waiters in a greasy spoon diner.

Dale:  What are we running here, a souvenir shop or a restaurant?
Smith:  What do you mean?
Dale:  Every time the customers get through eating here, they take knives and spoons.
Smith:  They should take medicine after eating here, not silverware!

That killed in 1910, and it’s still funny a century later.  Also working in vaudeville around that time were George Burns and Milton Berle (nee Nathan Birnbaum and Mendel Berlinger); I spoke with them both on their respective 85th birthdays.  Burns, born in 1896, told me if he’d started out in the age of television, he wouldn’t have made it.  “I was bad for 20 years, from 7 to 27.  I was a smalltime vaudeville actor, but there were lousy theaters that were worse than I was, so I could play those.  Today, a young comedian goes on TV, and the whole world sees them, and they’re a riot”.

Berle, a child actor in silent films, made his stage debut in 1916, conquered radio, then almost single-handedly popularized TV when his “Texaco Star Theater” moved to the new medium in 1948.  Sales of sets doubled after the show’s debut, and water levels in local reservoirs dropped drastically every week when the program ended, as millions of Americans went to the bathroom.

“We didn’t have tape then”, Uncle Miltie reminisced.  “If a joke died, it died.  You could stand there with egg on your face and count to a hundred.  You could drive a train through the silence.  Now, you have cue cards and teleprompters and laugh tracks.  Then, you had to know your material by heart, and you had to be good the first time.  It was real and honest”.

So what’s the connection between the old-timers and today’s comics?  I spoke with the 44-year-old Jeffrey Ross a few days after the Montreal extravaganza, and asked if they had influenced his work.  “I wasn’t old enough to watch them, but I lived with people who were watching them.  My parents, grandparents, aunts and uncles were all funny, and I felt that energy, that delivery, that timing, that sarcasm.  I heard it in the kosher catering hall in New Jersey where I grew up. All that stuff seeped into my brain.”

But Ross (whose original family name is Lifschultz) doesn’t see a direct line from vaudeville to Comedy Central.  “It’s not linear, and I barely think of it as a tradition.  It’s almost closer to a species, and I’m their offspring.  These guys stole from the same places I did.  I feel like we speak the same language”. 

Ross started early enough to have known and become friends with some of the Borscht Belt leftovers, and he even gave the eulogy at Buddy Hackett’s funeral.
(I told Ross one story he’d never heard:  how the highly-respected rabbi of the synagogue Hackett attended in Los Angeles once said, “I studied with the greatest scholars, worked myself up over decades from small congregations to finally become the spiritual leader of this magnificent temple, and yet, if you ask any of my members where they belong, they’ll inevitably answer, ‘Oh, I go to Buddy Hackett’s shul!’”).

Ross liked that one, and as we discussed the various people who’ve made us smile, Hebraic and gentile alike, I asked if the business of making people laugh has changed.

“I don’t know if I’m qualified to answer that”, he muses, “but I think it probably has.  We’re in a different culture.  Jokes are not as precious.  They’re flying out on Twitter a thousand times a day, spilling out on a million different channels.

Everyone’s got shtick, and it’s trickier to entertain people now.  Some paparazzi outside a restaurant last night asked me about my upcoming David Hasselhoff roast, and I bit my tongue.  If I had gotten a laugh, it would have been one less joke for the show”.

Ross is known for the over-the-top raunchiness of his roasts, and several of the last-century comics I’ve spoken to… no shrinking violets themselves… mentioned the change in language as perhaps the most glaring alteration in stand-up.  Berle commented “I don’t like things being censored, but I also think certain material should be done at the right time slot”.

Myron Cohen was more dismissive.  “The boys that are using foul language onstage, I could put ’em in my back pocket, when it comes to dirty jokes.
You know, Ed Sullivan always wanted me to repeat a story about the adorable 8-year-old girl who walks into a bakery shop and says to the baker, ‘My mommy found a fly in the raisin bread’.  The baker says, ‘So, bring me the fly, I’ll give ya a raisin’.”

“Like I told you”, he concluded, “I did all the stags for 25 years, so I used all the words and I know exactly how to say them.  But to be able to get a laugh with a raisin… you know, that’s something”. 

Yes it is, Myron.  And with a little editing, it even works as a Tweet.

Steve North is a broadcast journalist with CBS News

From Myron Cohen to Jeffrey Ross: The origins of Jewish comedy Read More »

Abbas, Netanyahu to meet every two weeks

Israeli and Palestinian leaders will meet every two weeks to advance peace talks.

George Mitchell, the senior U.S. envoy to the region, said the sides agreed to meet in the region Sept. 14-15, the first concrete outcome of renewed talks launched Thursday in Washington.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas met first with Mitchell and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton before moving into face-to-face talks.

In the first stage, Mitchell said, the sides would work toward a framework agreement ahead of a comprehensive agreement, which the United States wants to see within a year.

“The parties themselves agreed that the logical way to succeed, to tackle them, is to reach a framework agreement first,” Mitchell said.

“It is less than a full-fledged treaty. Its purpose is to establish the compromises necessary to enable an agreement and to flesh out the issues.”

Netanyahu has suggested that he does not want to make substantial concessions until an agreement is in place and security mechanisms exist that protect Israel from rocket attacks and terrorism.

Working on a framework agreement first would allow Netanyahu the room to postpone territorial concessions.

Abbas, Netanyahu to meet every two weeks Read More »

Abbas: Security is key

Mahmoud Abbas agreed with Benjamin Netanyahu that securing Israelis and Palestinians was the key to advancing peace.

“Security is of the essence, it is vital for both of us,” the Palestinian Authority president said on the first day of U.S.-brokered direct talks with the Israeli prime minister. “We cannot allow for anyone to do anything that would undermine your security and our security.”

Abbas also noted the role of PA security forces in pursuing terrorists who murdered four Israelis on Tuesday in an ambush near Hebron.

“We not only condemned them but also followed on the perpetrators and found the car that was used, and arrested those who sold and bought the car,” he said.

Netanyahu has said that establishing guarantees of security for Israelis—from rocket attacks and from terrorism—was his priority going into talks. Abbas has focused on ending settlement and on final-status issues such as borders, Jerusalem and refugees.

For his part, Netanyahu in recent days has recognized a Palestinian claim to the land and suggested a willingness to address final-status issues sooner rather than later.

Abbas: Security is key Read More »

Netanyahu, Abbas each give a little on first day of talks

Tell us what you want. Now listen to what your partner wants. Now tell us what your partner wants.

In slow, almost excruciating increments, talks between Israelis and Palestinians are taking on the dimensions of counseling sessions moderated by the United States.

Heading into a White House dinner Wednesday evening with President Obama and the Jordanian and Egyptian leaders, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas outlined their bottom lines: security and recognition for the Jewish state, settlement halts and final-status negotiations for Abbas.

By mid-morning Thursday, when they met in the upper reaches of the U.S. State Department beneath the watchful eye of a portrait of Benjamin Franklin, it was clear that some mediation had taken place in the cavernous room named for the first U.S. secretary of state.

Netanyahu was more forthcoming about final-status talks, if not settlements. Abbas was just as adamant about Israeli concessions but was more forthcoming about understanding Israel’s security needs.

A bit later George Mitchell, the top U.S. envoy to the region, took a break from talks with the two leaders to announce that they had agreed to meet in their home region in two weeks, around Sept. 14 or 15, and to follow up with meetings every two weeks.

Mitchell said the first goal was to reach a “framework agreement” that would outline the necessary compromises, and then work out the details that would flesh out a full agreement. Setting a cordial tone was key, he said.

“We have encouraged the parties to be positive in their outlook and in their actions,” Mitchell said.

In her opening remarks at a news conference Thursday morning with the two leaders, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made it sound as if half the battle was getting to the point of talking.

“I know the decision to sit at this table was not easy,” Clinton said. “We understand the suspicion and skepticism that so many feel, worn out after years of conflict and frustration.”

But Clinton pressed the parties to get quickly to the core issues—the fate of Jerusalem, the Palestinian-Israeli borders, the question of Palestinian refugees.

“We are convinced that if you move forward in good faith and do not waver on behalf of your people, we can resolve all of the core issues within one year,” she said.

That remains to be seen, of course. Critics have said that lip service and photo ops may be the only achievement to come from this summit and the negotiations that follow.

For the time being, merely holding a meeting to launch talks gives each leader something to take back home. Netanyahu can argue to the world and the Israeli public that he is interested in serious negotiations. If there are gains for the Palestinians, Abbas will be able to show the Palestinians that they can wring concessions from Israel by talking rather than by violence—the Hamas method.

Meanwhile, Obama will get credit for relaunching direct negotiations between Palestinians and Israelis after a two-year hiatus.

Netanyahu, who until now has insisted that security and incitement are his more immediate priorities, suggested that he is interested in more than the appearance of talks and is ready to tackle the more vexing core issues.

“The core issues that you described, Madame Secretary, are things we have disagreements on, but we have to get from disagreements to agreement,” Netanyahu said at Thursday’s news conference.

Netanyahu, who on Wednesday evening recognized a Palestinian claim to the land of Israel—a breakthrough for the scion of a family and tradition that for decades upheld an exclusive Jewish claim to the land—told Abbas that he “respects” the Palestinian right to sovereignty.

For his part Abbas, whose remarks at the White House dinner constituted a laundry list of Palestinian plaints, was expansive Thursday morning in acknowledging Israel’s security needs, especially in the wake of two terrorist attacks in two days that left four Israeli civilians dead, including a pregnant woman.

“We not only condemned them but also followed on the perpetrators and found the car that was used, and arrested those who sold and bought the car,” he said, touting the performance of a Palestinian security service he said was still “young.” “Security is of essence, it is vital for both of us. We cannot allow for anyone to do anything that would undermine your security and our security.”

At the same time, the leaders held their ground on significant differences that threaten, even at this early stage, to derail the talks.

Abbas has threatened to bolt the talks unless Netanyahu extends a 10-month partial moratorium on settlement building that expires on Sept. 26. Netanyahu has indicated that he will let the moratorium lapse and not reintroduce it until an agreement is in place.

Abbas gave no ground on Netanyahu’s demand that Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state, telling him that it was enough in 1993 that the Palestinians recognized Israel. Netanyahu holds that recognition of a Jewish claim is key to ending the Palestinian culture of incitement, which he says is a cause of terrorism.

“In this document we give enough to show our intentions are good,” Abbas said.

The meetings were launched Thursday with a meeting of the two negotiating teams. They then broke up into one meeting of Mitchell, Clinton, Abbas and Netanyahu in Clinton’s office, and another of the negotiating teams to work out the details of the mid-September follow-up meeting.

After that, Mitchell reported, Abbas and Netanyahu went into a face-to-face meeting.

Netanyahu, Abbas each give a little on first day of talks Read More »

Video of the Week is Back

Thanks to Yuval Klein for sending this in.

Video of the Week is Back Read More »

The Curious Case of Hitler’s Signed Copy of the Nuremberg Laws

Hitler’s Copy of the Nuremberg Laws

The announcement that the Huntington Library has given its copy of the Nuremberg Laws personally signed by Adolf Hitler to the National Archives raises some interesting questions.

Recall that this document was taken by General George Patton, who was a notorious antisemite, as part of his personal war booty and given to the Huntington Library, which at the time shared his sentiments regarding Jews, where it was stored in a safe for decades and unavailable to the public. Peculiarly, it was not even noted among its archival holdings.

A word of history: Two laws promulgated at the annual Nazi party rally in Nuremberg on September 15, 1935—the Law for the Protection of German Blood and the Reich Citizenship Law—became the centerpiece of Hitler’s anti-Jewish legislation. Those laws, which were soon known throughout the world as the Nuremberg Laws – not to be confused with the post-war Nuremberg Trials—restricted citizenship in the Reich to those of “German or kindred blood.” Only citizens, racial Germans, were entitled to civil and political rights. Jews were merely subjects of the state. In order to “protect German blood and honor,” the marriage of Jews and “citizens of German or related blood” was forbidden. So too were sexual relations between Jews and Aryans. Women under the age of 45 could not work in Jewish households. Jews could not fly the German flag. Categorization had consequences. Definition was the first step toward destruction. Patton took Hitler’s personal signed copy of the Laws, which he found in Hitler’s Munich apartment and for almost three scores years the public did not know that such a document existed.

To the credit of the current staff once the copy was discovered the Huntington lent it to the Skiball Cultural Center, which promptly put it on display. It was shown at the entrance to their small but ever so moving memorial to the Holocaust 6 photographs of Jews who were killed in the Holocaust with a stark inscription “6 of 6 Million.” The Skirball exhibited it adjacent to a mandatory “Emergency Exit” sign, perhaps without quite being aware of the irony: unless Jews found an emergency exit from Europe, they became part of the Six Million, murdered during the Holocaust.

Still questions must be asked:

Why did the Huntington gift this historic document to the National Archives and not maintain it on display at the Skirball?

Why did it not give it to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, the American national memorial institution dedicated to the victims of the Holocaust?

Why did it not give it to museum dedicated to the Holocaust such as the Los Angeles based Museum or Tolerance, or even to Yad Vashem, the Jewish National Memorial to the Holocaust.

Mind you, in a sense this document is coming home. Patton took the Nuremberg Laws either illegally or inappropriately. All such documents captured by the US military at the end of World War II should have been turned over the Army War Records which are now stored in the National Archives .By giving it over to the National Archives, the Huntington is reuniting the signed copy of the Nuremberg Laws with millions of other documents captured by the US Army in after the defeat of Nazi Germany. Yet the National Archives will not display this document as any of these other institutions would most certainly have. It will be buried among their collections rather than be seen by the public.

I suspect that the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum will – most certainly it should – request the document on loan for display in the Museum as part of its exhibition on the Nuremberg Laws, but still one wonders why the leaders of the Huntington gave it to the Archives and not a Holocaust institution.

The Curious Case of Hitler’s Signed Copy of the Nuremberg Laws Read More »

Proxy Baptism Controversy: The End

“You know, there are no people in the world who understand the Jews like the Mormons.” – David Ben Gurion to U.S. Secretary of Agriculture (and future LDS Church President) Ezra Taft Benson
—————
For Mormons who love Jews, yesterday’s headline on the LDS Church’s website couldn’t have been better: “Church and Jewish Leaders Resolve Concerns Over Baptisms.” “Mormons, Jews in New Pact on Baptisms” was the header for The Jewish Week editor Gary Rosenblatt’s upbeat assessment of a final agreement between the Church and the American Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors and Their Descendants concerning LDS proxy immersions for the dead. I have included my recent blog post on this issue for those needing a little background: Proxy Baptism Controversy: The End Read More »