fbpx

July 26, 2010

Yemeni high court upholds death sentence

Yemen’s Supreme Court has upheld the death sentence of a Yemeni man who killed a Jewish fellow citizen after demanding that he convert.

The court on Saturday affirmed the sentence of death by firing squad levied by an appeals court on Abdel Aziz Yahia al-Abdi, 39, for the December 2008 slaying of Masha Yaish Nahari, a father of nine from Raydah. Abdi killed Nahari after saying that Yemeni Jews should convert or be killed.

An appeals court in June 2009 had overturned a lower court ruling that had ordered Abdi to pay blood money to the family; the Abdi family had appealed to the Supreme Court.

Abdi, who is alleged to have murdered his wife two years before he killed Nahari, is said to be mentally unstable, according to the Yemen Post.

Nahari’s children moved to Israel after the murder. His parents, wife and siblings remain in Yemen.

Fewer than 200 Jews still live in Yemen, down from about 60,000 in 1948.

Yemeni high court upholds death sentence Read More »

Rethinking Affirmative Action—It’s About Time

Last night I appeared on Fox 11 News to participate in a debate segment prompted by Community Advocates’ recent ” title=”Proposition 209″ target=”_blank”>Proposition 209 (which prohibits the state from discriminating against or giving preferences to anyone on the basis of “race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education or public contracting.”) unconstitutional, is warranted. He argued that the UC is simply not doing enough to enroll minority students whose presence at the university ought to mirror the demographics of California’s high school graduating seniors (presumably,  independent of their individual qualifications.

The most current data available from the state (2005) reveals that some 36.5% of the high school graduates in California are Hispanic, 39.6% are white, 7.5% black and 10.2% Asian. Those compare with admission rates to the University of California for 2010 of Hispanic 23%, whites at 34%, blacks at 4.2% and Asians at 37.4%.

By Guerra’s logic, Asian Americans are over-represented by a factor of over 300% while Latinos, blacks and whites are under-represented. His argument seemed to be that the university must insure that its enrollees (not just its admits) should track the high school graduation data.  It then follows that there would be a lot of disappointed Asian Americans who would be told they can’t go to the UC were 209 to be repealed.

Clearly, if one thinks about the implications of such a policy—- the mere fact of graduation from high school says nothing about qualifications for admission to the UC—it would be terrible public policy were that ever to be the measure for admission.

What was most interesting about the debate on Fox 11, and in the wider discussion which continues about the role of affirmative action today, is the facile acceptance of the notion that the allocation of societal rewards via affirmative action should benefit “all people of color.” In California, Hispanics would be the big winner.

It has long been assumed that it would be political suicide to question the inclusion in affirmative action programs of recent immigrants from Asia, Latin America and Africa—-as most programs do. It became conventional wisdom shortly after affirmative action was enacted in the 1960’s (it was created with African-Americans in mind), that it should apply to all minorities of color no matter whether they had a history of suffering at the hands of the United States government and American society, as blacks did.

Last week, James Webb, a Democratic senator from Virginia, authored a provocative Rethinking Affirmative Action—It’s About Time Read More »

Settlers protest outpost home demolition

Hundreds of Jewish settlers rallied at major junctions in the West Bank to protest the demolition of an outpost home built during the construction freeze.

The demolition Monday came a day after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he would not extend the West Bank building freeze.

Jewish settlers and Palestinians squared off Monday after a caravan home and a goat pen in the Givat Ronen outpost near the settlement of Har Bracha were demolished for violating Israel’s 10-month building freeze. Four settlers were injured by rocks thrown at them by Palestinians, according to Haaretz. Two Palestinians also were injured.

Settlers reportedly set a Palestinian field on fire south of Nablus in response, according to reports.

The residents of the demolished home and other settlers present during the demolition told Israeli media that security forces on the scene used excessive force.

On Monday evening, Jewish settlers and their supporters gathered at about 15 major road junctions to protest the demolitions. In some places the protesters blocked the roads and Boarder Guard officers reportedly removed them by force.

Border Guard officers told Ynet that they were attacked by settlers, who kicked and punched them, prompting one of the guards to use a stun grenade. Settlers again charged that the police used excessive force.

On Sunday, Benjamin Netanyahu told the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee that he did not intend to extend the freeze, which is set to expire at the end of September. Netanyahu said the freeze was put into place to encourage the Palestinians to enter direct peace negotiations with Israel, since “the slowdown was limited in time. It has not changed and that’s how it will be.”

Meanwhile, a unit of army reservists thwarted a terrorist attack Sunday night in the West Bank southeast of Nablus, the Israeli military said. The force discovered five Palestinians lying in wait at the side of the road to ambush the unit or passing settlers and surprised them. The Palestinians were carrying two homemade handguns, knives and Molotov cocktails, according to the Israeli military.

Settlers protest outpost home demolition Read More »

Out on a limb at a Jewish genealogy conference

Even before my ketubah was signed my soon-to-be mother-in-law, Shirley, calmly but proudly told me, “Edmon, my mother’s family, the Sheinbeins, are descendants of the Vilna Gaon.”

Maybe I was marrying into Jewish royalty, of a sort.

The Vilna Gaon, who lived from 1720 to 1797, was a Talmudic scholar, author and the major non-Chasidic Jewish leader of his age. Eliyahu ben Shlomo Zalman was so learned a rabbinic authority that he was known as “gaon,” a title meaning genius.

Many claim to be his descendants. It’s a common claim of yichus, of lineage, and an uncommonly difficult one to back up.

So at the weeklong 30th International Conference on Jewish Genealogy earlier this month in Los Angeles, I was among a thousand Jews who gathered desperately seeking not only Susan but Esther, Yankel and Morris. I went seeking Moishe.

Sheinbein, that is, the first person on a family tree created by Shirley’s cousin, Fred Sheinbein, and his wife, Judy.

“It’s a family story passed down from generation to generation,” Fred Sheinbein said of the Vilna Gaon descendancy. “We have a silver kiddish cup that we think belonged to the Gaon that has been passed down in our family from eldest son to eldest son. On Passover we use it as Elijah’s cup.”

To begin, I checked out the Gaon’s portrait. Looks can be deceiving, but staring back at me over the centuries were the same eyes, brows and nose familiar to me from our wedding photos of my wife’s grandmother, Sylvia Bierman, nee Sheinbein.

The family tree was several generations short of the Gaon’s lifetime. Moishe, also known as Morris, was probably born sometime in the mid-19th century and lived in Osova, Ukraine. He would be my starting point in finding a Gaon connection.

When looking for a Jew, consult with the Mormons. While seeking the unbaptized dead in their family trees, they have a branch up on genealogical research.

In the conference’s vendor room, I found Dan Schylter, a researcher with the Latter-day Saints research site, FamilySearch.com who specializes in Jewish genealogy.

“Start with researching the generations of your family, and maybe then you’ll bump into someone famous,” Schylter suggested. “Start with the town.”

Told Moishe was from Ukraine, Schylter pulled his lip.

“We don’t have good records from there,” he said.

As I learned, tracing a family’s lineage can depend on many things: readable records, geography, spelling and luck. The conference appeared to be a virtual hotbed of genealogical serendipity.

As a result of computer searches, sessions like “Social Networking: New Horizons for Genealogists” and even genetic tests, the conventions foyer was filled with plenty of newly found cousins talking and hugging.

“I just found a relative I never knew I had,” said Ellen Mark, the conference’s translator coordinator, who discovered that her maternal grandmother had a sister through a recent translation of a Russian letter she had long kept.

She and others suggested I dig deeper into the conference’s resource room.

I found a room where every computer was searching for someone—lost in the Holocaust or missing from the family tree. I turned to research expert Ina Getzoff of Delray Beach, Fla., for help.

In a search on Ancestry.com, I typed in Moishe Sheinbein. The site, an industry leader, was an example of how big a business genealogy had become. In 2009, Ancestry.com raised more than $100 million with an IPO.

“You never know what you’re going to find,” Gerzoff said as the results of the search came up.

Suddenly I was awash in Sheinbeins: Fred and his wife, other family members from the family’s base in the Midwest. Now there were too many Sheinbeins.

Adding Osova and a second place from the Sheinbein family tree, Kolki, also in Ukraine, produced nothing further.

Computer searches weren’t working. Sheinbein literally means something like “nice bones,” and I didn’t have enough to make a skeleton. Perhaps there was a book.

In the vendor room on a table staring me in the face was a huge book titled “Eliyahu’s Branches, The Descendants of the Vilna Gaon,” by Chaim Freedman. Excitedly I flipped to the back and found a cross index of more than 20,000 names of all known descendants. There was a Sheinfeld and a Sheingold, but no Sheinbein.

I sought other methods of proof.

“With changes in DNA testing and computer technology, Jewish genealogical research is more accessible than ever,” said Andrea Massion, a member of the convention’s organizing Los Angeles chapter.

Unknowingly, Massion pointed me toward a company that might hold the final chromosome of my search.

“All your relative would have to do is a cheek scraping and mail it in,” said Max Blankfeld, partner and vice president of FamilyTreeDNA. “In four weeks she has her results.”

The service, which costs $289, shows the quantity of shared DNA between two people and, using an algorithm, also would also show the degree to which
they are related, he said. The service provides a match’s name, too.

“Then my mother-in-law could look up the known surnames of Gaon relatives for a possible match?” I suggested hopefully.

“Yes, that might work, and new names are constantly being added,” Blankfeld said, adding that she could also leave a message on the site with the hope that someone might contact her.

I was just one swab away, yet I found myself leaving the conference without having the big-find moment so many others had experienced.

Walking down the hotel’s sunlit foyer, I stopped to examine a series of standing displays of early Los Angeles Jewish businessman researched by
the Los Angeles Jewish Historical Society.

A black-and-white photo of a truck caught my eye. Painted on the truck’s side was the name Hasson—my wife’s Sephardic maiden name. The 1928 vintage photograph showed Victor Hasson seated in a 1920s era open-air flower delivery truck.

An e-mail to my wife’s uncle, Lou Hasson, revealed, “Yes, Victor’s a relative, I remember him.”

For the moment, the search for the Gaon was gone, replaced with a bouquet from the past.

Out on a limb at a Jewish genealogy conference Read More »

European countries, Canada approve new Iran sanctions

European Union foreign ministers and Canada approved a package of stiffer economic sanctions against Iran.

The EU sanctions approved Monday in Brussels are similar to the new U.S. sanctions imposed last month. They target Iran’s petroleum, banking, shipping, insurance and transportation industries as well as nuclear-related industries. The EU sanctions are scheduled to go into effect immediately, according to the Washington Post.

The Obama administration had exerted pressure on the EU to put new sanctions into effect.

New sanctions targeting third parties that deal with Iran’s energy and finance sectors, as well as human rights abusers, were approved by the U.S. Congress last month.

The Canadian government’s sanctions, also announced Monday, include a ban on new investment in the oil and gas sector, and restrictions on exporting goods that could be used in its nuclear program.

B’nai Brith Canada commended the Harper government.

“To avoid the military option against the Iranian regime’s nuclear weapons program, Canada and her allies need to do everything in their power to sanction and isolate Iran,” said Frank Dimant, the group’s executive vice president, in a statement. “Targeting Iran’s most important lifeline, its oil and gas industries, as the Canadian Government has done, is a very welcome development.

European countries, Canada approve new Iran sanctions Read More »

Op-Ed: Conversion wars undermine Israel and its image

Who won the latest round of the conversion wars?

No one. In these wars, everybody loses.

To be sure, a broad-based coalition of American Jews, anchored by the federation system and the Reform and Conservative movements, succeeded in convincing Israel’s leaders to delay a vote on a controversial new conversion bill in the Knesset. This was a monumental accomplishment, averting the disaster that was certain to ensue if the legislation had been adopted.   

Nonetheless, there is no reason for satisfaction.

At this moment, Israel should be mobilizing her friends to confront the dangers posed by Iran. She should be responding to the outrageous anti-Israel actions of the United Nations. She should be working with the American government to advance the cause of peace.

Instead, Israel has spent several months engaged in an ugly battle with American Jewish leadership. American Jews committed to Israel’s welfare had no choice but to join a public lobbying effort aimed at Israel’s government.

The confrontation included new levels of nastiness. The sponsor of the legislation, David Rotem, was quoted in The New York Times as referring to American Jewish leaders as “absolute idiots.” Worse yet, if history is any guide, we will learn nothing from this experience and repeat the disastrous scenario next year or the year after that.

What’s going on here?

Israeli leaders vastly underestimated how sensitive American Jews remain about religious matters in the State of Israel. The first conversion crisis was in the 1950s, and it was assumed in Israel that the most recent dispute was nothing more than one more round in a long battle.

Yet conversions in America are far more frequent now than they were a generation ago. Jews by choice are to be found in every community, and Jewish leaders are infuriated by legislation in Israel that they see as challenging the status of so many American Jews.

In addition, American Jews dislike religious fundamentalists who attempt to impose their will on others. The danger of religious extremism throughout the world is endlessly discussed in the media. American Jews share the distress of all Americans that Israel, a democratic ally, has created a coercive religious monopoly that limits the religious freedom of its citizens.

When U.S. senators and members of Congress expressed their concerns about the bill, Israeli representatives here began to understand just how dangerous the situation had become. American lawmakers rarely speak out on internal Israeli politics, and if they were doing so now it could only mean deep concern on the part of their constituents.

Israeli advocates of the bill attempted to convince American Jews by confusing them. The legislation was very complicated and changed frequently. But a patronizing “You don’t understand” approach did not work this time.

True, few American Jews comprehended the bill’s intricacies. But one thing about this legislation was truly important: It fundamentally altered the religious status quo by granting significant new powers in the realm of conversion to Israel’s Chief Rabbinate. Such a change would reignite battles over conversion both in Israel and throughout the Diaspora. American Jews understood this very well and remained firm in their opposition.

It would have been preferable had Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu opposed the bill in the spring, sparing the Jewish world the sorry spectacle of the past few months. Nonetheless, his decision last week to cast the bill as disastrous for the Jewish people was welcome. The prime minister was wise, too, in calling on Natan Sharansky, the chairman of the Jewish Agency for Israel, to devise an acceptable compromise.

No one should harbor any illusions. The Israeli religious parties are intent on gaining absolute control over conversion, both in the State of Israel and in matters that relate to the Law of Return. Any arrangement that gives them less than full control will never win their support.

Still, I believe that a reasonable compromise is not out of reach.

As a Reform Jewish leader, I would like to see Israel’s religious monopoly swept away. I will need to accept that such a change for now is simply not possible. I do expect that additional support will be provided to Reform and Conservative schools and synagogues, but I recognize that this will have to happen within the confines of the existing structure.

At the same time, the leaders of three major non-Orthodox parties in Israel—Likud, Kadima and Labor—will need to agree that they will oppose conversion legislation and any other significant change in the religious status quo demanded by the religious parties or their allies.

Such an understanding should have been reached 30 years ago, of course, but each of the major parties has been reluctant to cede ground that might be exploited by its rivals in future coalition negotiations.

What is different this time is the terrible experience that we have just had. At a time when Israel is especially vulnerable, she has suffered through a period that has tarnished her image, upset her supporters, gladdened her enemies, played out in the general media and even reached the U.S. Congress, causing dismay to all who love the Jewish state.

Perhaps Israel’s political leaders will finally understand: Religious extremism must be rejected, the sensitivities of world Jewry must be respected, coalition politics must be transcended and Jewish unity must be affirmed. Neither the Jewish people nor the State of Israel can afford the heavy price of these ongoing religious crises.

Rabbi Eric Yoffie is the president of the Union for Reform Judaism.

Op-Ed: Conversion wars undermine Israel and its image Read More »

Israeli military helicopter crashes in Romania

An Israeli military helicopter crashed in central Romania during joint military training, according to reports.

Six Israeli soldiers and one Romanian soldier were on board the CH-53 transport helicopter, which was flying at a low altitude for a search, rescue and medical evacuation exercise when it lost radio contact Monday afternoon, The Associated Press reported.

There have been no reports about casualties, though local media have reported fatalities, according to the BBC. The Israel Defense Forces told the AP that it was looking into reports of the crash.

Israeli and Romanian troops are participating in a drill called Blue Sky 2010, an 11-day exercise to train troops to fly at low altitudes for certain missions.

Initial reports said that U.S. soldiers also were on board the helicopter, according to the BBC.

Another Israeli transport helicopter reportedly crash landed at the beginning of the exercises last week.

Israeli military helicopter crashes in Romania Read More »

One of ESPN’s first female producers dead at 43

 

Leah Siegel, one of ESPN’s first female producers, has died after a battle with cancer. She was 43:

She was diagnosed with stage 4 breast cancer in August 2008, shortly after the birth of her third child, Oliver. That fall, she was featured in a front-page story in The Dallas Morning News. The story of her battle inspired thousands of strangers to write her. Over the past two years, nearly 50,000 visits were logged to her web page.

Siegel also inspired dozens of her Lakewood neighborhood families to show their support in the annual Komen Dallas Race for the Cure. The group was among the top fundraising teams.

“Leah loved Eric and her kids and her work,” said ESPN reporter Ed Werder. “In the end, I agree with a colleague who told me today that she would rather we remember the good times rather than wallowing in sadness and dwell on our inability to fathom the damned unfairness of this sad ordeal.”

This story was sent to me by a Jewish friend. I can’t determine whether Siegel was, in fact, Jewish. But if so, she would have been, as a woman and a Jew in field of covering professional sports, truly a stranger in a strange land.

One of ESPN’s first female producers dead at 43 Read More »

Oliver Stone blames Jewish control of the media for misunderstood Hitler

Mel, who? Oliver Stone just became the new enemy of the Jewish establishment.

The controversial Oscar-winning film director told the UK’s Sunday Times he believes Jewish domination of the media has prevented honest discussion about the Holocaust. He also said he thinks Hitler is a misunderstood figure, and hopes his upcoming film about the German dictator will present a more nuanced view of the WWII villain “in context.”

Apparently, the director is peeved that six million Jews get all the attention when Hitler killed a lot more Russians. “Hitler did far more damage to the Russians than the Jewish people, 25 or 30 [million killed],” he told the Sunday Times.  Now that’s context.

Stone was equally generous in his praise of AIPAC (though he doesn’t mention the organization by name), complaining that the lobby has had too much influence over American foreign policy. 

“There’s a major lobby in the United States,” Stone said, “they are hard workers. They stay on top of every comment, the most powerful lobby in Washington.”

Although Jewish control of the media is an old refrain, it feels especially strange coming from Stone, who is half-Jewish and was almost named Oliver Silverstein. According to a 1997 profile of Stone in The Washington Post, “William Oliver Stone was born into a well-connected world of privilege and polish, in New York City.” His father, the Jewish stockbroker Louis Stone changed his name from Silverstein before matriculating at Yale, and married Stone’s mother, a French girl and a baker’s daughter named Jacqueline Goddet.

But Stone’s childhood was anything but refined. In his 1997 novel “A Child’s Night Dream,” Stone draws upon the psychic damage of his upbringing to reveal a family life that was lonely and bizarre, full of strange demons. Plenty of Jewish boys have mother issues, for instance, but Stone’s took on an unhealthy Oedipal degree: “The Oliver Stone of the novel,” writer Lloyd Grove wrote, “is suicidal, sadistic, wounded, fragile and sexually obsessed with his mother.”

His father, whom Stone portrays as a cynical narcissist, was equally influential. “In the book, Lou Stone is an emotionally detached man who relies on scotch and call girls, and when it comes to women he instructs his son: ‘Find ‘em, [expletive] ‘em and forget ‘em,’” Grove wrote. Stone was a young 15 when his parents divorced, and the news – delivered secondhand from his boarding school headmaster, devastated him.

But his parents’ impact lingered long after their split. In 2008, Stone told AMC’s Movie Blog, “The main motivation to make Wall Street was my father.” In the interview, Stone describes a disapproving parent who ridiculed his choices and disparaged his lack of business acumen. “He thought I was a bum,” Stone said, explaining, “When I was working on ‘Wall Street’, I felt my dad was sort of around in a ghostlike form, watching over me and laughing, because here is the idiot son who doesn’t know anything about the stock market, who can barely add and subtract, doing a film with the grandiose title Wall Street.” 

Even if he disappointed his father, Stone is still a veritable force in today’s Hollywood. And as a major filmmaker, he should know that the current media world is not controlled by individual moguls the way Hollywood once was, but by massive and competitive media empires. So savvy as many Jews are, the notion that one group could dominate the landscape is somewhat untenable.

Besides, most Americans would disagree with Stone. According to a 2008 poll released by the Anti-Defamation League, most Americans no longer believe Jews control Hollywood. On the contrary, the poll found that 43-percent of respondents said they believe there is an organized campaign by the national media to “weaken the influence of religious values.” Not exactly the best evidence for swelling Jewish political control.

Earlier today, ADL National Director Abe Foxman condemned Stone’s comments, saying the director has “shown his conspiratorial colors.”

“His words conjure up some of the most stereotypical and conspiratorial notions of undue Jewish power and influence,” Foxman said.

Two years ago, while I was interviewing film director Brett Ratner, the writer/director James Toback aired his belief in the decline of Jewish control of Hollywood:

“Jews used to run Hollywood,” Toback said. “But what we see now is the diminishing of Jews in power.”

Toback proceeded to rattle off the names of media moguls.

“Rupert Murdoch, not a Jew; Bob Iger, not a Jew ….”

(For the record: Iger, head of The Walt Disney Co., is a Jew.)

“Walt Disney hated Jews,” Ratner said.

“Sumner Redstone is a Jew, but he’d probably like not to be, since his real name is Sumner Rothstein, but he is a Jew, so that’s one, but then Kerkorian—well, Kerkorian is out of the business now. There are so few f—-ing places with Jews left. Oh and Sony,” Toback added.

I mentioned Amy Pascal, co-chair of Sony Pictures Entertainment.

“I’m talking about the corporate control,” Toback fired back. “Amy Pascal is an employee—the people who can fire Amy Pascal.”

“The Jews have lost ownership of the movie business,” Toback declared.

Let’s not jump to conclusions, though: As long as Oliver Stone keeps working, we’ve got at least one Jew right where we need him.

 

Oliver Stone blames Jewish control of the media for misunderstood Hitler Read More »

Massive Jerusalem fire burns forests

Haredi Orthodox youth are being blamed for accidentally starting a massive fire near Jerusalem that nearly led to the evacuation of Hadassah Hospital.

The fire, which broke out Sunday afternoon in the hills surrounding the hospital’s Ein Kerem location, burned about 250 acres of forest and resulted in the evacuation of hundreds of residents of three nearby moshavs. Twenty-three cars in the hospital parking lot were damaged by the fire.

Some 30 firefighting units and five firefighting planes worked to control the fire.

One teenager was taken in for questioning and several others could be arrested, according to reports. The teens, from a Jerusalem-area haredi school, were hiking inside the Aminadav Forest when they allegedly started the blaze.

A second fire also started in the forest on the same afternoon, according to reports.

Massive Jerusalem fire burns forests Read More »