fbpx

June 7, 2010

U.S. requests probe into citizen’s eye loss

The United States has asked Israel to investigate the protest in which an American Jewish art student lost her eye.

The request came through the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv, according to reports Monday.

Emily Henochowicz, 21, of Maryland, was hit in the eye on May 31 by a tear gas canister fired by Israeli troops during a protest at a Jerusalem roadblock against Israel’s interception of an aid flotilla headed for the Gaza Strip. Nine activists were killed during confrontations between Navy commandos and activists on board one of the flotilla’s ships.

Henochowicz, a student at Cooper Union in New York now studying at Jerusalem’s Bezalel Academy, had participated in other nonviolent protests against Israel’s presence in the West Bank.

Henochowicz, who had surgery at Hadassah Hospital Ein Kerem to remove her damaged eye, returned last week to the United States, where she will require more surgeries.

The Border Police’s internal investigation showed that the tear gas canister hit a wall and then Henochowicz, and that she was not targeted, according to Haaretz. The army is investigating the incident, the Israeli daily reported.

U.S. citizen Tristan Anderson, 38, lost an eye and suffered brain damage when he was hit in the head with a tear gas canister during a West Bank protest in March 2009.

U.S. requests probe into citizen’s eye loss Read More »

An Open Letter to Helen Thomas

Dear Ms. Thomas,

I read on numerous Web sites the remarks attributed to you (and I did not see any denial) that we, the Jews must “get the hell out of Palestine” and “go home” to Germany or Poland. I am convinced that you are aware of the events which took place during the years 1939-1945 but, to be certain, I think it appropriate to tell you a little about my parents and their families.

My mother was sent to Palestine from Germany in 1933 with the rise of the Nazis to power by her farseeing parents. The British blockade, which prevented Jews fleeing the Nazi horrors from entering, made it difficult for her and only the pretext of coming on a tourist visit enabled her to enter and remain alive. Her older sister, Sarah, her husband and three children aged 12, 10 and seven did not succeed in finding a way of coming to Palestine and were sent by the Nazis to Poland and from there, their journey to the Auschwitz gas chambers, was short. I understand that it is there that you wish to send me.

My father, who lived in Austria, also showed resourcefulness and immediately on the German invasion and sailed to Palestine. On the way – again the British blockade – he was forced to throw his passport into the sea so that, heaven forbid, they would not send him back to Austria, another country you wished I was moving to. His older brother and his wife, who did not go with him, were murdered by the Nazis and their collaborators.

My parents, who, as mentioned, with lifesaving initiative, fled from Europe before they were murdered, arrived in a desolated and barren country, worked in orchards, barely supported themselves and, by the way, were happy with their lot. In 1947 upon hearing of the UN resolution on the partitioning of the country, they danced in the streets, even though most of the area of Israel was torn from its sovereignty. For brands who survived the fire, it was enough.

The Palestinians and Arab countries, who gained most of the area, refused to accept the UN resolution and began a war to annihilate us. Only three years had passed since the liberation of Auschwitz and again we – the Jews – faced the danger of annihilation. To our joy, 600,000 Jews were victorious over millions of armed Arabs. It appears that justice has power and strength of its own.

IN THE 62 years of our existence, we have had seven wars, thousands of terror attacks, buses which have exploded in streets, firing into schools, mortars fired on kindergartens. Yet you wish to exile us back to the inferno, as if nothing happened 65 years ago in Europe, as if our hands have not been stretched out for peace since the establishment of the state?

We were victorious in the wars imposed upon us by Egypt and we signed a peace agreement with it after yielding all the territory and all the oil. We signed a peace agreement with Jordan. We yielded all the territory and much water. We withdrew from Lebanon to the international border and, in return, we received Hizbullah katyushas on our citizens. We left Gaza and in return, we received massive firing on our citizens in the South. Are you aware, Ms. Thomas, that many children from Sderot and the area around Gaza wet their beds until a late age out of fear of the Hamas missiles? And it is us that you wish to exile? Why? Because you think that we are weak or because it annoys you that we are not defeated?

As someone, who throughout his adult life has been a member of the Israeli “peace camp,” notwithstanding you and your strange and angering views, my friends and I (and I hope also my government) will continue to turn over every stone and scour every corner to attain peace. Peace, which will enable us to the smallest extent to live and our neighbors, the Palestinians, to establish a country and to flourish and prosper. To achieve this, we are prepared to make great concessions, to give back all the territories gained as a result of wars which our neighbors forced on us. There is only one thing we want in return – life. A quiet life, a life without terror, a life without missiles, a life like the one you have in Washington and which I, in Israel, also deserve. – End of article

The author is Senior Advisor to Israeli President Shimon Peres.

An Open Letter to Helen Thomas Read More »

OPINION: Tom Friedman Wants to Raise Your Taxes

There are basically two views of the American people.

In one, we’re the patriots ready to do whatever it takes for our country.  If a crisis requires sacrifices, we won’t flinch when our leaders summon us to make them.  We’re the people FDR asked not only to fight and die for freedom, but also to pay higher taxes on profits, “to forgo higher wages” and “spending money for things that we want… which are not absolutely essential.” We rise to the challenge and ask what we can do for our country.

In the other, we cry bloody murder when anyone tries to take anything away from us.  We’re entitled to benefits, but we’re outraged by costs.  We’re the mob pointing fingers at everyone but ourselves, the sheep that demagogues herd toward outrage, the puppets that political candidates spend hundreds of millions of dollars to con with outrageous attacks on their opponents and preposterous promises of their own.

For 40 years, the arena where these schizoid embodiments of our nature have battled most ferociously has been energy policy.

In the 1970s, President Carter declared that America’s “intolerable dependence on foreign oil threatens… the very security of our nation,” and that “every act of energy conservation… is an act of patriotism.”  In the last year of his presidency, he advocated a course of “pain” and “discipline” including a fee on imported oil that would raise gasoline taxes 10 cents a gallon.  The reaction?  A hundred thousand copies of the Boston Globe hit the street the next morning containing an editorial about the speech under the headline “More Mush From the Wimp” before the prank was discovered and the title changed to “All Must Share the Burden.”  Take your pick:  Sacrifice is for wimps; sacrifice is for patriots.

At the start of the next century, Dick Cheney dismissed conservation as “a sign of personal virtue,” and in the days after 9/11, George Bush told America to go shopping.  In the decade since then, New York Times columnist and best-selling author Tom Friedman has pounded on the failure of that administration to use 9/11 to summon Americans to sacrifice and greatness. 

Bush blew a priceless opportunity to slam the brakes on America’s dependence on foreign oil and to stop financing terrorism with American petrodollars.  What he should have done, ” target=”_hplink”>he said at the end of 2008, “is Obama’s 9/11.”  Now the BP disaster has given Friedman a new peg for ” target=”_hplink”>columnists who also have signed on to that solution: David Brooks, Nicholas Kristof and Bob Herbert.

But so far, Obama hasn’t done that.  In a ” target=”_hplink”>interpreted as an endorsement of the alternative, complex-to-explain “cap-and-trade” system in the energy bill passed by the House last year.  The reason he won’t step up to a carbon tax, says Friedman, is political cowardice. 

Channeling Malia Obama, ” target=”_hplink”>Norman Lear Center at the martyk@jewishjournal.com.

OPINION: Tom Friedman Wants to Raise Your Taxes Read More »

Reuters under fire for removing weapons, blood from images of Gaza flotilla

The Reuters news agency has been accused of removing images of activists wielding weapons and bloodied and wounded Israeli naval commandos from photographs taken on board a ship headed for Gaza during deadly clashes last week.

Nine people were killed and dozens others, among them Israel Defense Forces soldiers, were hurt when the clashes erupted as IDF troops tried to board the Mavi Marmara ship in order to prevent it reaching its destination in Gaza.

The ship was one of six vessels that made up the “Freedom Flotilla,” a convoy carrying aid that set out from Turkey in an attempt to break Israel’s blockade on the Gaza Strip. Five of the boats in the convoy were boarded by IDF troops without incident, while passengers on the sixth fought the troops as they came onboard. All six boats were towed by the Israel Navy to the Israeli port city of Ashdod.

Read the full article at HAARETZ.com.

Reuters under fire for removing weapons, blood from images of Gaza flotilla Read More »

Helen Thomas and the Open Season on Israel

Helen Thomas’s stomach-turning comments about the Jews returning to Germany and Poland, where six million were gassed and cremated into piles of ash, are striking for their racism and insensitivity. Whether she said them out of senility or anti-Semitism are beside the point. Either way she has no business working for any respectable media organization or sitting as the senior White House correspondent directly in front of the President of the United States. When Don Imus made racially charged statements against a woman’s basketball team, candidate Obama demanded he be fired. It will be interesting to see how President Obama, who could not offer a single word of support for Israel since the flotilla affair, will react.

One can only imagine the uproar against Thomas had she said that all blacks should go home to Africa, or illegal immigrants to Tijuana. It seems that Jews are the only group that you can attack with impunity because they are the only ones unwise enough to tolerate it. Better yet, we’re the only group often so filled with so much self-loathing that we actually initiate many of the attacks.

Few of us are surprised that it is a coterie of Jewish advisors to President Obama who have joined him in condemnations of Israel over Jews building in Jerusalem. This week the New York Times published an article by Michael Chabon arguing that many Jews are ‘blockheads’ and notions of Jewish intelligence are highly overrated.  He may be correct. But as I read this strange screed from one of America’s most celebrated Jewish novelists I wondered if, say, Maya Angelou would ever pen an article about how many black dumbbells there are. Attacks on one’s own seems to be an art form perfected specifically by Jews.

Helene Cooper wrote a column in the New York Times (funny that so many derogatory articles on Israel and Jews always appears in a Jewish-owned newspaper) asking whether Israel has become a strategic liability to the United State. She quoted many senior Jewish political advisers to the democratic party who advised that if Israel continues to embarrass the United States it might be time for the superpower to distance itself from the little Jewish irritant.  The criticism made for interesting reading, implying as it did that while Israel is an embarrassment to the United States, its relationship with such great human rights exemplars as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey ought to be sources of downright pride.

Turkey merits special mention because not only does its media accuse the American military of harvesting organs from helpless Iraqis, which it cites as one of the reasons for the American invasion, but because Prime Minister Erdogan sees fit to call Israel barbarous, lecture Jews about not murdering, and refers to Hamas as freedom fighters. Curiously, at the same time he was spewing his venom toward the Jewish state this past week, the Pope was in Cyprus where he was being publicly begged by Archbishop Chrysostomos II, the leader of the Orthodox Church of Cyprus, to stop the illegal Turkish occupation of Cyprus, now in its thirty-forth year, and protect Christians from growing attacks by Turks. Just prior to the Pope’s visit a Christian bishop had been stabbed to death outside his home in the Mediterranean port of Iskenderun. The archbishop said that Turkey had “barbarously invaded” Cyprus and “continues to carry out its obscure plan, which includes the annexation of the lands now under military occupation and then conquest of the whole of Cyprus. They wish to make everything Greek and Christian disappear from occupied Cyprus.” Of course, Turkey won’t even acknowledge its genocide of the Armenians, a position that President Obama has shamefully supported in order not to offend Turkey’s belligerent leader.

Of course, Cooper’s article quotes the ubiquitous J Street head Jeremy Ben-Ami whom journalists have come to appreciate because of his consistency and reliability in always saying something disparaging about Israel. In this case Ben-Ami is quoted as saying ‘he represents Jews who… are raising the issue of Israeli government actions as a strategic liability for the United States.’

I lived in England for 11 years and was sickened by the regular abandonment of Israel by some of the most high-profile Anglo-Jews whenever Israel’s actions became controversial. For those wondering why a floodgate of anti-Semitism has opened in Britain over the last few years, look no further than the fact that Israel’s greatest haters can often point to Jewish critics as being much more strident than them. And still it continues, with even high profile Jewish leaders like Chief Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks remaining mum on Israel even while it was assailed by countless countries for enforcing a blockade against a terror organization that has fired 10,000 rockets against it.

Still, I never believed that American Jewry would emulate this cowardice. But President Obama’s public abandonment of Israel is directly traceable to the small price he pays among American Jews. On my radio show on WABC in New York many callers contend that President Obama is an anti-Semite. I condemn such character-assassination in the strongest possible terms. Obama has elevated Jews to some of the highest positions in the land, including his most recent nominee for the Supreme Court, Elena Kagan. Rather, the President inability to condemn Hamas and support Israel, which is a stain on his presidency, results from his considerable moral confusion and a misguided sense of right and wrong. Under Obama America has retreated substantially from President Bush’s policies of promoting democracy and human rights and has reverted to Kissingerian realpolitik, ready to make deals with tyrants so long as it promotes an artificial sense of peace.

But Obama can get away with it because American Jewry has become so silent and so weak. Whenever Israel undertakes controversial action, American Jews begin writing op-eds in The Atlantic and The New Yorker about how the once-moral nation has lost its way. Funny how those same writers do not condemn President Obama’s policy of Predator drone strikes against Taliban leaders that inevitably involve considerable civilian collateral casualties.

Sorry guys. Israel is going to remain controversial, as one might expect from any country under a constant existential assault from nearly all its neighbors. When threatened by Hitler Britain leveled whole German cities. The United States did the same to the Japanese. Israel has never even pondered such actions, even as thousands of its citizens have been blown to smithereens.

The Jews who were murdered in Germany and Poland cannot speak out in support of a Jewish state. The rest of us, however, have absolutely no excuse.

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach is founder of This World: The Values Network. His new book, ‘Renewal: A Guide to the Values-Filled Life,’ has just been published by Basic books. Follow him on Twitter @RabbiShmuley.

Helen Thomas and the Open Season on Israel Read More »

Helen Thomas resigns after making controversial statement about Jews living in Israel

Veteran White House reporter Helen Thomas resigned today, after saying during an interview at the White House Jewish Heritage Celebration on May 27 that the Jews “should get the hell out of Palestine” since the Palestinians “are occupied.”

The video of the interview, posted on RabbiLIVE.com and YouTube, was widely seen. In the same chat with Thomas, the interviewer—Rabbi David F. Nesenoff of RabbiLIVE.com—asked Thomas where the Jews living in Israel (or Palestine) should go if they were to leave.

They should “go home,” Thomas said, to “Poland, Germany…and America and everywhere else.”

Her remarks promoted Rabbi Marvin Hier of the Simon Wiesenthal Center to say that her statement “shows off her bigotry.” Hier expressed his views on Thomas at a pro-Israel rally in Los Angeles on June 6, which was held to counter international condemnation of Israel in the wake of the flotilla crisis.

On Thomas’ resignation, Hier, during a phone interview today, said, “It was the only thing to do, whether she was resigned or pushed out – whatever it is, it’s great to see her go and I hope that she spends her time now that she’s out of it, thinking about the consequences of the bigotry she expressed.”

Thomas will turn 90-years-old this August and her resignation comes despite her apology on June 4, when she said her previous statements “do not reflect my heart-felt belief that peace will come to the Middle East only when all parties recognize the need for mutual respect and tolerance. May that day come soon.”

Following Thomas’ departure from her position, a statement released by the White House Correspondents Associations says, though “We do not police the speech of our members or colleagues…the incident does revive the issue of whether it is appropriate for an opinion columnist to have a front row seat in the WH briefing room.”

Below, watch the video of Thomas making the controversial statement during the May 27 interview.

 

Helen Thomas resigns after making controversial statement about Jews living in Israel Read More »

Helen Thomas retires … from what?

Helen Thomas’ comment that Jews should get the hell out of Palestine “led” to her decision to retire today.

Thomas, who was considered the dean of the White House press corps, had come under fire since late last week when a YouTube video surfaced showing her saying that Israel should “get the hell out of Palestine,” and that the Jewish people should go home to “Poland, Germany … and America and everywhere else.”

In a posting on her website last Friday, Thomas apologized for her remarks. “They do not reflect my heart-felt belief that peace will come to the Middle East only when all parties recognize the need for mutual respect and tolerance. May that day come soon,” she wrote.

But the apology was not enough to silence critics who began a rising chorus of calls for Thomas either to be terminated or suspended by Hearst.

I’m sure plenty will find in this a Jewish conspiracy, though you can imagine the same consequences if Thomas had made an analogous comment about another minority group.

None of this should really matter much. I mean, when was the last time Helen Thomas was relevant? She’s like a caricature of old, crotchety liberal journalism. Joel Stein, whom I once competed against for a spot on “The Apprentice,” said it best:

Helen Thomas retires…. from what? Sitting through White House press conferences? Has anyone ever read a Helen Thomas story?

Helen Thomas retires … from what? Read More »

Helen Thomas quits

Helen Thomas quit her job with Hearst in the wake of mounting outrage over her assertion that Israeli Jews should “return” to Poland, Germany and the United States.

“Helen Thomas announced Monday that she is retiring, effective immediately,” said a statement issued Monday by the Hearst Corp. “Her decision came after her controversial comments about Israel and the Palestinians were captured on videotape and widely disseminated on the Internet.”

Thomas, 89, was asked by Rabbi David Nesenoff on May 27 if she had “any comments on Israel.”

“Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine,” she said. Thomas has been reporting since 1960 and was considered the doyenne of the Washington press corps.

Nesenoff, who was attending the first Jewish American Heritage Month event at the White House, asked where Jews should go.

“Go home,” Thomas said. Asked to elaborate, she said, “Poland, Germany and America, and everywhere else.”

Nesenoff did not post his video to his website, RabbiLIVE.com, until last week. Subsequent to its release a number of Jewish groups and figures asked for Thomas’ removal, if not from Hearst as a columnist then from her front-row center perch in the White House press room.

Thomas has since apologized for the comment, but some critics said the apology was evasive.

“I deeply regret my comments I made last week regarding the Israelis and the Palestinians,” said the apology posted on her website. “They do not reflect my heart-felt belief that peace will come to the Middle East only when all parties recognize the need for mutual respect and tolerance. May that day come soon.”

Helen Thomas quits Read More »

Jewish cultural center dedicated in Odessa

A new Jewish cultural center was dedicated in Odessa.

The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee and the Odessa Jewish community on Monday formally dedicated the Beit Grand Jewish Cultural Center.

The center was renovated and expanded with funds from the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany and philanthropists Nancy and Stephen Grand.

Beit Grand is home to the city’s Hesed Shaarey Tzion Welfare organization and its Jewish Family Services program, as well as Hillel and the Odessa Regional Association of Ghetto and Concentration Camp Survivors.

The JCC also includes an extensive library and community gym, as well as an arts studio, a Jewish writers club and a course for Jewish Odessa tour guides. The campus
also includes a new Montessori-style Anavim Jewish kindergarten. It is also home to Jewish renewal programs and a youth club.

In addition to local Jewish community leaders, government representatives from Ukraine and Israel, a delegation from JDC’s board of directors joined JDC staff, a Claims Conference delegation and other international guests for the dedication.

“The dedication of Beit Grand is a remarkable moment in the great history of Jewish life in Odessa and speaks volumes about the role JDC has played in the miraculous renewal of Jewish life in this city and across the former Soviet Union,” said JDC CEO Steven Schwager.

Jewish cultural center dedicated in Odessa Read More »