fbpx

August 4, 2009

Anti-Christian hate turns deadly in Pakistan

India and Pakistan—constantly at war. Lately, it’s been a battle of who can persecute Christians more viciously. From The New York Times:

The blistered black walls of the Hameed family’s bedroom tell of an unspeakable crime. Seven family members died here on Saturday, six of them burned to death by a mob that had broken into their house and shot the grandfather dead, just because they were Christian.

The family had huddled in the bedroom, talking in whispers with their backs pressed against the door, as the mob taunted them.

“They said, ‘If you come out, we’ll kill you,’ ” said Ikhlaq Hameed, 22, who escaped. Among the dead were two children, Musa, 6, and Umaya, 13.

The attack in this shabby town in central Pakistan — the culmination of several days of rioting over a claim that a Koran had been defiled — shows how precarious life is for the tiny Christian minority in Pakistan.

More than 100 Christian houses were burned and looted on Saturday in a rampage that lasted about eight hours by a crowd the authorities estimate was as large as 20,000 strong. In addition to the seven members of the Hameed family who were killed, about 20 people were wounded.

The authorities, who said the Koran accusation was spurious, filed criminal charges in the case late Sunday and apprehended at least 12 people. Officials said a banned Sunni militant group, Sipah-e-Sohaba, was among those responsible for the attacks, the third convulsion of anti-Christian mob violence in the region in the past four weeks.

Except for the Koran strawman this all does sound familiar. Remember this story about anti-Christian violence in India? Or how about the November report that Hindu extremists were being paid to kill Christians?

Extremist Hindu groups offered money, food and alcohol to mobs to kill Christians and destroy their homes, according to Christian aid workers in the eastern state of Orissa.

The allegations follow the British Government’s refusal to prevent members of two radical groups linked to the worst antiChristian violence in India since Partition entering Britain.

The US-based head of a Christian organisation that runs several orphanages in Orissa – one of India’s poorest regions – claims that Christian leaders are being targeted by Hindu militants and carry a price on their heads. “The going price to kill a pastor is $250 (£170),“ Faiz Rahman, the chairman of Good News India, said.

Yes, religious hate comes in all shapes, colors and doctrines.

Today, Pakistan’s Christians voiced their anger over the government’s inability—unwillingness?—to intervene Saturday. More at the Christian Science Monitor and the missionary wire Compass Direct.

Anti-Christian hate turns deadly in Pakistan Read More »

Heeb, Hitler and Roseanne Barr

Heeb magazine has never been known for it’s kosher advertisements and photo spreads. From Jonah Hill holding a bagel and a tube of lube to the Heeb swimsuit issue to the photo issue to a subscription card with a picture of Ariel Sharon that explained they’re still not dead—Heeb has never been afraid of offending more than just the alter kakers.

But … wow. Roseanne Barr with a Hitler mustache, pulling some charred gingerbread men out of the oven—that’s really pushing it.

Extra TV did a segment on the cover last week calling it “not funny” and shaming the controversial choice. But Heeb publisher Josh Neuman defended it, saying the cover was meant as “satire” and not done for “shock value.“

OK, you mean to tell me putting a Jewish woman on the cover of a Jewish magazine costumed as the man who burnt Jews in ovens (while she burns things in ovens) has no shock value? Since we’re being a wee bit insensitive to the remaining Holocaust survivors and their children, let’s at least call a spade a spade here, folks.

But if you’re mad, don’t blame Heeb. It was Roseanne who wanted to be photographed as Hitler. According to the magazine, she has a theory “that she may in fact be the reincarnation of Adolf Hitler,“ and thus requested to create a kind of Jewish Halloween nightmare in order to make a personal statement

Much more from Hollywood Jew, including what it’s like to meet Hitler—I mean, Roseanne—here.

Over at the Heeb blog, they’ve got a response from Roseanne, whose “tired of being misunderstood.” It goes a little something like this:

Hitler thought he was being really manly “cleaning Germany up” by burning people in ovens. I was making fun of him, not his victims. My caricature of him very aptly imitates the “man with a godly mission” pose that he struck in all the early photographs taken of him. I portray him being very proud of his burnt cookies, because in his last words, he was proudly congratulating himself for killing so many Jews, and encouraged the German people to carry on his mission against the “International Jew.” The guy actually thought that killing jews was a good thing!

Wow! I had no idea you were being ironic! Thanks for the history lesson, Roseanne.

Here’s my advice: Stick to what you’re not good at—comedy.

Heeb, Hitler and Roseanne Barr Read More »

Chabon on circumcision: ‘mutilation is the only honest name’

Michael Chabon’s latest book, “Manhood for Amateurs,” is a memoir. And in it, the greatest Jewish author since Philip Roth makes a case to cut the circumcision tradition.

“Mutilation [is] the only honest name for this raw act that my wife and I have twice invited men with knives to come into our house and perform, in the presence of all our friends and family, with a nice buffet and Weekend Cake from Just Desserts,” Chabon writes in his memoir, “Manhood for Amateurs,” out in October from Harper. “We have been through all of the standard arguments—hygiene, cancer prevention, psychological fitness, the Zero Mostel tradition . . . and found they are all debatable at best.”

In the above video, watch my conversation with Chabon about “The Yiddish Policemen’s Union” and accusations that he was—no joke—an anti-Semite.

In previous circumcision news: “Circumcision wars: Christians opt for Jewish bris” and “Holy adult circumcision, Abraham!

Chabon on circumcision: ‘mutilation is the only honest name’ Read More »

The Young Married Man and the Sea

My wife woke up on the first morning of our honeymoon, turned to my

side of the bed, and I was gone.

That’s what they call a sign.

We were staying at an inn on the Mendocino coast.  It was a romantic

Victorian pile, perched on a cliff a hundred yards above a rocky

beach.  Our room—the Honeymoon Suite—overlooked the beach and

thousands of miles of ocean.

The bed was massive.  It was the very same bed used in the movie

Wuthering Heights.  I know that because there was picture of the bed

in the brochure that pointed out the fact, and the owner told us that

when we checked in, and a sign in the room proclaimed that where we

were about to lie down,  Lawrence Olivier already had.

Nomi slept late the next morning.  She awoke, where Lawrence Olivier

once did, to see that I was gone.  She called to the bathroom: gone.

She followed the sound of the crashing surf to the window, swung it

open, and looked far out at the horizon, at the endless expanse of

ocean, at the rugged, rock-strewn beach.

And at me.

“ROB?” she called down, then:  “ROB!”

When I turned to look up, a string of seaweed was hanging from my mouth.

“What are you doing?”

I was chewing seaweed.

Eating seaweed fascinated me.  It still does. I just never bothered to

tell Naomi that fact in our ten months of courtship and engagement.  And

she had never thought to ask, “By the way, do you have a seaweed

obsession?”

Sometime before our wedding, in anticipation of our honeymoon on the

Mendocino coast, I’d bought a small pamphlet, “Edible Seaweeds of the

Pacific Coast.”  It featured line-drawings and hand-lettering.  I

studied up before our trip, but there is nothing like carrying your

field guide into the field.

I woke up while Naomi was still fast asleep. Was it a bad omen to duck

out of our marital bed on the first morning of our honeymoon?  Well, I

figured, we spent the first night after our wedding at the Beverly

Hills Hotel, in the same room my parents had spent their wedding

night, and where my sister and brother had spent their first nights.

So technically this was our second married morning. And if that hotel

room worked for us like it did for my parents and siblings—70 married

years among them, at that point (and still going strong)—I didn’t have

to ration out the mornings so carefully.

Besides, it was low tide.

I slipped out of Lawrence Olivier’s side of the bed, pulled on my

shorts and a T-shirt, and grabbed the pamphlet. I followed a steep

path down to the beach, where seaweeds swirled and tangled among the

newly-exposed rocks. Just a few feet away, an otter head broke the

surface, and I swear his black marble eyes looked at me

coldly—Dude, you’re eating my salad.

I was.  I started with dulse, a wispy greenish brown leaf that floated

like the billow of a jellyfish against my calf. I compared it with the

picture in the book, lifted it pre-washed and pre-salted, and let it

slide down my throat.  It was as slick and bracing as an oyster.

Yum.

Hijiki was next: dark russet strands that my guide described as chewy

and high in iron. I plucked one from its anchor in a nearby rock and

sucked it down, chewing on it like a piece of al dente pasta. It was

halfway down my mouth when I heard Naomi call.

“Rob, what are you doing?”

She looked beautiful.  The early sunlight. Her face framed in the

window of a romantic Victorian.  And this is what she saw: her new

husband, a gash opened up on his stark white calf, blood seeping into

the roiling water, his old army surplus shorts soaked through, his T-shirt

weighted down with water and stuck to his spindly chest, and something

black and stringy hanging from his mouth—a rat tail? A braid?

“Rob! What are you doing!?”

I thought of that scene in Wuthering Heights where Cathy despairs of

the man she truly loves:

“I shouldn’t talk to you at all,” she cries. “Look at you! You get worse every day.

Dirty and unkempt and in rags. Why aren’t you a man? Why aren’t you my

prince like we said long ago? Why can’t you rescue me, Heathcliff?”

But Naomi didn’t despair. She wasn’t even angry that I’d slipped out

of bed, or that I spent the second morning of our married life up to

my waist in seawater, scavenging for seaweed.

“Did you know,” I told her later, “there is no such thing as poisonous

seaweed? Every kind of seaweed is edible.”

Many years later, after the sushi craze hit big, after we’d had

umpteen bowls of miso soup with tofu and seaweed, after our daughter

Noa decided that the crispy nori seaweed at Whole Foods was her

favorite snack, Naomi must have realized I wasn’t so crazy, maybe I

was even a little prescient, the way I’d be with the backyard

chickens, the front lawn I ripped out to make way for a crop of

artichokes, the yerba mate I took to drinking long before it became

popular (okay, the last one hasn’t exactly caught on, but mark my

words).

I suppose, looking out that window, Naomi could have thought that she

really didn’t know this guy after all—wet, and bloody, and eating

seaweed.  But she chose not to assume the worst.  She listened to my

explanation, once I had come in and dried off and bandaged up.  She

listened some more as I read the descriptions from the book, though I

knew then and know now that there’s a part of her that wishes I’d be

the kind of guy to study Torah with her, not sea vegetables.

If I were strange, Naomi figured, I was strange in a way she could

recognize, if not exactly relate to: Naomi the wife might be appalled,

but Naomi the rabbi recognized religious fervor when she saw it. 

Because only two types of people go down to the sea in their clothes: those who

want to drown themselves, and those who want to be baptized. Naomi the

rabbi recognized a true believer when she saw one, and she could

appreciate it.  She was one too, after all. Her faith was in God—but

the joy on her face in synagogue mirrored the joy on mine that

morning at sea.

She hadn’t found a freak, she’d found a soulmate.

The Young Married Man and the Sea Read More »

Sidney Zion, columnist and activist, dies

Sidney Zion, a newspaper columnist and activist, has died.

Zion, a writer for some of the country’s top publications, died Sunday of bladder cancer in Brooklyn, The New York Times reported. He was 75.

Following the untimely death of his teenage daughter in 1984, Zion campaigned for reforms in the training of doctors that ultimately were adopted as state law five years later. He drew national attention to the workloads and supervision of medical interns in teaching hospitals.

Zion, a former attorney and federal prosecutor, was a reliable defender of Israel in his columns in the New York Post, the Daily News and others.

Sidney Zion, columnist and activist, dies Read More »

Police: Too early to assume gay club shooting was hate crime

From HAARETZ.com:

Police Commissioner David Cohen called on the public not to blame specific sectors of the community for the attack Saturday night on a gay community center in Tel Aviv in which two people were killed – Nir Katz, 26, of Givatayim and Liz Trobishi, 16, of Holon. Fifteen others were injured in the armed assault.

Cohen hinted that the attack may not have been a hate crime against homosexuals. At a meeting Monday assessing the status of the case, he cautioned against implicating segments of the society “regarding suspicions and possible directions [of the investigation].” Read the full story at HAARETZ.com.

Police: Too early to assume gay club shooting was hate crime Read More »

Chessed Begins At Home – Rabbi Barry Gelman

Olam Chessed Yibaneh – the world can be built through kindness”.  This statement sums up the great potential inherent in acts of kindness. 
We live in a community where many are deeply involved volunteer organizations of some sort or another. These activities fall under the category of chessed – acts of kindness that we do for others. Our tradition puts a high value on chessed. In fact, the well known rabbinic statement – “Derech Eretz Kadma L’Torah – Good Character comes before Torah” teaches that before the Jewish people could receive the laws of the Torah, the importance on good character, including chessed, had to be taught. According to some, this is why the Torah starts with the stories of our foremother and forefathers, stories that, by example, teach right from wrong.
At the same time, chessed that we do for those outside our immediate circle may impede our ability to do chessed for those closest to us.
The following is a question posed to Rabbi Shlomo Aviner regarding the balance required between doing acts of chessed for the general community and one’s responsibilities towards ones family.

Question: “My husband devotes many hours each day to learning Torah, communal activities and spreading Judaism at stands. At home, he is spent. When I am speaking with him, he falls asleep… He does try to stay awake but without success. “

Answer: “Tell your dear husband in your name, in my name, in the Name of the Master of the Universe, and in the name of human conscience that “the poor of your house takes precedence.” Even though you bring great benefit to humanity, and it is your glory, your wife takes precedence over the rest of humanity. Remember the story of King David, who refused to accept the kingship, as long as not everything was arranged with his wife Michal. All humanity is important, but it has other saviors. There were those who were concerned about it before you and there will be those who will be concerned about it after you. But your wife only has one savior: you. She therefore takes precedence. She relies on you. Do not betray her. All of this is written in the Ketubah, which is read under the chuppah, that you will cherish her and all sorts of other things. Before we add stringencies, one must fulfill his basic obligations. This is the general rule: your wife takes precedence. And, of course, I also say to you: your husband takes precedence.”

The examples given in this particular instance are simply those that relevant to the questioner. There are other family related responsibilities that should take precedence over our communal action. Making spending time with children a priority over communal responsibilities is one that comes to mind very easily.

There are many good reasons to be involved in communal affairs. In fact, if our community did not have so many dedicated volunteers we would simply not be able to function. This is why it is so important to find the proper balance to make sure that while we do volunteer our time for our community; our family is not being neglected. It goes without saying that communal responsibilities should never be taken on or extended as a way to avoid family obligations.

The Torah does not wish our love for those in the wider circles of our life to be built up at the expense of our omission of our obligation to those nearer to us. Nechama Leibowitz, writing about the biblical commandment to give Tzedakah, teaches: One who goes beyond his natural circle, into which he was born (family, birthplace, nation) and flies to distant climes to heal the misfortunes of humanity, the downtrodden and wretched of remote communities, whilst his own home, neighborhood, city and homeland cry out for assistance, ignoring them in the conviction that their plight is too circumscribed and petty for him to bother about… – charity begins at home.”

Chessed Begins At Home – Rabbi Barry Gelman Read More »

Barak: Israel should accept U.S. peace plan

Defense Minister Ehud Barak said on Tuesday that the United States would present a Middle East peace plan within weeks and that Israel should accept it.

“In the coming weeks, their plan will be formulated and presented to the parties,” Barak said, according to a spokesman for Israel’s parliament who briefed reporters on the defense chief’s remarks to the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee.

“I believe that Israel must take the lead in accepting the plan,” Barak was quoted as saying. Read the full story at HAARETZ.com.

Barak: Israel should accept U.S. peace plan Read More »

Screech not invited to ‘Saved by the Bell’ reunion

Well, you’re definitely not going to find Waldo in this photo.

So why wasn’t Screech invited to the “Saved by the Bell” reunion?

Could it be that People magazine is staffed full of anti-Semites? Not likely. What is more likely is that Dustin Diamond’s ungodly fall from geekdom into porno “acting”—yes, more so than Jessie Spano’s “Showgirls”—and smut publishing cost him some good will with the “Bell” crew.

Was it because of his upcoming tell-all book? His gross-out sex tape scandal? His “Celebrity Fit Club” meltdowns and financial troubles?

Yes, yes, yes and yes, according to RadarOnline, which reports that Diamond was purposely excluded by his former castmates.

“Cast members were not comfortable with including him,” a spokesperson for People told the Web site.

Diamond’s much-anticipated “Bell” memoir is the reason his old pals’ defenses are up, the rep says. As Radar notes, Mark-Paul Gosselaar openly slammed the tome in a recent issue of Newsweek.

“What is he going to say?” Gosselaar asked sarcastically. “We were (bleeping) groupies at 14? I can’t wait to read his book, because I don’t have a memory of a lot of the shows. Maybe it was because I was doing lines off of the audience members’ a——. I’m sure he’s going to write something crazy like that. So he’s writing a book, I’m not really afraid of what he has to say. There are not too many skeletons in my closet.”

More from the New York Daily News here.

 

Screech not invited to ‘Saved by the Bell’ reunion Read More »

Netanyahu’s proposed ban on NGO funding raises questions for U.S. groups

Larry Garber remembers the last time he was living in Israel and someone wanted to cut off foreign government funds to human rights groups that discomfited the political establishment.

It was 2000 and Garber, who then ran the U.S. Agency for International Development mission in the West Bank and Gaza, was meeting with Hasan Asfour, a Cabinet minister in Yasser Arafat’s notoriously corrupt Palestinian Authority government.

Memories of that experience resurfaced last week when Garber, who now directs the New Israel Fund in Washington, was reading The Jerusalem Post and saw the same old arguments—but this time from a senior Israeli official.

According to The Jerusalem Post story, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government is contemplating legislation that would ban foreign government funding for groups such as Breaking the Silence, which solicited claims from Israeli soldiers about army abuses during the recent Gaza war.

Ron Dermer, Netanyahu’s senior political adviser, was quoted as saying that funding from foreign embassies for the group amounted to “blatant and unacceptable” intervention in Israel’s internal affairs.

“Just as it would be unacceptable for European governments to support anti-war NGOs in the U.S.,” Dermer said, “it is unacceptable for the Europeans to support local NGOs opposed to the policies of Israel’s democratically elected government.”

The proposal is being praised in some corners of the Jewish community as a necessary step to block foreign governments from unduly undermining the will of Israeli voters. But some Jewish organizational officials counter that a ban on foreign government support of NGOs is more characteristic of a dictatorship, and would undermine U.S. efforts to support NGOs in Iran and other countries with poor human rights records.

One senior official at a centrist Jewish organization said such an initiative was profoundly counterintuitive, considering how much the Israeli and Jewish establishments had reaped from Western government backing for NGOs assisting Jews in the Soviet Union during the Cold War—and how such support continues today in Iran and the former Soviet Union.

“It’s a little surprising,” said the official, who spoke anonymously to avoid embarrassing Israel’s government. “All over the world, NGOs are accused of taking other governments’ dollars and being tainted by that—the National Endowment for Democracy, the National Democratic Institute, the National Republican Institute, the National Endowment for Democracy. If the Israeli government says we’re going to only let certain human rights groups operate, it makes it harder to make our case” elsewhere.

Mainstream pro-Israel groups quietly back U.S. government funding for pro-democracy groups in Iran and have been supportive of moves in Congress to shift some of the assistance Egypt receives from military aid to funding for human rights NGOs.

Abraham Foxman, the national director of the Anti-Defamation League, backed the Netanyahu government’s initiative. Foxman said that foreign support for NGOs was simply a means for foreign governments to effect through the back door what Israelis have already rejected.

“There’s too much mischief through Israeli NGOs to try and achieve domestically through foreign money what could not be achieved through the democratic process,” he said.

Another official at a pro-Israel group says the difference is that Israel is a first world democracy—democracies meddling in the business of other democracies is inappropriate.

“We oppose undermining and meddling in democratic allies,” said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Additionally, the groups Dermer was targeting, such as Breaking the Silence, were identified with a specific political camp, on Israel’s left, he said.

“There’s a difference between civil society institute, and politically motivated and politically charged groups,” the official said.

In response to such arguments, Garber said that government funding for human rights groups in democracies was not at all unusual. Prior to his stint dealing with the West Bank and Gaza, he spent seven years at USAID negotiating the prickly issue of funding such groups in nascent democracies such as Russia.

Furthermore, under the umbrella of groups such as the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, a process exists of democracies monitoring one another—the Helsinki groups of legislators who track human rights in each others’ nations is an example. The U.S. Helsinki Commission, for instance, routinely tracks discrimination against Roma and Jews in democracies such as Romania and the Baltic states.

“Democracies can work together,” Garber said. “How do you strengthen electoral systems? This is part of what we are as democracies.”

But Garber, whose New Israel Fund raises funds principally from foundations and private donors, agreed that a case could be made against foreign governments funding Israeli NGOs if only because Israel’s status as an industrialized nation meant that its NGOs already enjoyed an indigenous fund-raising base. Israeli NGOs also were adept at raising funds from private donors overseas.

“Both on developmental and political grounds, you can make the argument [that Israel] shouldn’t be receiving” funds from overseas governments, Garber said.

However, he wondered how Netanyahu’s government would draft such a law; describing an NGO as “political” casts a broad net, Garber suggested. For example, he noted, the U.S. Senate just approved funding for Israeli universities. Think tanks attached to those universities—including those that tilt to the right—might be ineligible for the funds if Netanyahu’s initiative bears fruit.

“The government would be hard-pressed to designate ‘political NGOs’ without including organizations the government would like to see continue receiving funds,” he said.

Netanyahu’s proposed ban on NGO funding raises questions for U.S. groups Read More »