fbpx

July 14, 2009

Hot Shots

The parents of post-bar or bat mitzvah children often display their photo album featuring moments from the big day — their child holding the Torah, posing with family, hanging on for dear life during the chair dance and mugging for the camera with friends. But these albums reflect how the parents see their child, rather than how the children see themselves.

Today’s teens live in the Facebook age. Their expectations exceed the traditional brag book gathering dust on a coffee table. They don’t remember a time before computers and multimedia, and a photo album — real or virtual — is often a visual statement about who they are and what they want to become.

Mindful of this trend, a new breed of event photographers offer services that allow for greater creativity during the celebration as well as provide added entertainment.

In addition to photo booth rentals, like those found in malls or amusement parks, photographers are also offering setups that resemble a fashion shoot, with props and green-screen backdrops as well as multiple wardrobe changes and magazine-inspired glamour. Family and guests get unique take-home souvenirs, effortless scrapbooking and instant gratification with photos that can be printed and shared on the Web — even before the bar or bat mitzvah is over in most cases.

While these photographers are also still preserving the bar or bat mitzvahs’ serious moments in elegant, conventional ways, they are adding fun to the celebration afterward through add-on packages that enhance both big-budget themed celebrations and more scaled-back events, with prices that start around $500 and can run more than $10,000.

L.A. photographer Jay Lawrence Goldman credits the rise in this innovative photography to the fact that today’s teens are savvier than ever when it comes to pop culture. He says that because the ways teens want to celebrate the big day is becoming more sophisticated, a byproduct of this shift is the implementation of photo booths and photo studio environments at the celebration.

“Bar mitzvah photography is becoming themed around the personality of the child, and an integral part of the party’s décor,” Goldman said.

The trends he sees at the forefront are shots that mirror popular magazine covers and iPod commercials.

Interactive photo companies with green-screen technology have been around since the late 1990s. As the technology and quality improved, along with the pricing, more providers began offering the service.

Traditional photography packages range from basic services starting at about $800 to photojournalism-inspired approaches that can run $3,000 to $10,000. Interactive packages, which can include photo booth set-ups, novelty video and other amenities, can run an additional $500 to $3,000.

Vivian Hurwitz hired Cliques Photo Booth for her son’s bar mitzvah earlier this year, and said it was a hit with both children and adults.

“Our guests were having such a great time with the fantastic backdrop and props,” she said. “They kept coming back for more.”

The company’s instant digital results enable kids to post the bar/bat mitzvah party highlights on their MySpace or Facebook page, while adults can visit the Cliques site to download their favorites for free to share with others.

Cliques’ pricing ranges from $1,500 for a basic package to more than $2,500 for elaborate packages using the latest interactive photo booth technology. Owner Dov Viramontes said all of his packages include photo booths or backdrops as well as a roving photographer to capture the day’s more serious moments, and he is planning to add 3-D backdrops in the coming year.

“Not only are we added entertainment, but we do formal shots of the child and his family, for use in traditional albums,” he said. “Because bar and bat mitzvahs are big on themes, we also work closely with families to model our booth to fit with the party’s personality as well as the child’s.”

Looking back on the experience, Hurwitz recommends consumers consider selecting something beyond the most basic package. Two hours “is not enough time, especially because kids and adults are going to be doing other things during the party. Those who miss out [on the photo booth] will leave the party disappointed,” she said.

Madison Bishop’s parents hired LA Photo Party after hearing a recommendation from friends. Similar to Cliques, the business attracts customers who have access to the city’s best photographers but want to try something bold and new.

After a sports-themed bar mitzvah for Madison at Dodger Stadium, his parents — including his mother, party planner Yvonne Wolf — said the LA Photo Party set-up impressed kids and adults alike.

“Not only did the kids have a blast and get literally hundreds of photos from the booth, but by the middle of the evening, as the red wine flowed, the adults all ventured over there,” said Richard Bishop, Madison’s dad and owner of Three Artists Management.

“As I was at the door saying good night at the end of the evening, probably 10 of my own friends came up to me proudly displaying their photos wearing top hats and Hendrix wigs.”

LA Photo Party’s Brian Miller described his portable set-up as being like a professional studio shoot.

With “so many girls watching shows like ‘America’s Next Top Model,’ we’ve devised a set-up with a fashion-studio feel but with the efficiency of a photo booth. Images are shot every five seconds and printed out instantly as glossy 4-by-6 photos,” he said.

While he wouldn’t discuss his pricing with The Journal, Miller said LA Photo Party is in line with what other companies are charging.

“A photo booth can produce a great souvenir for two people at a time, but this gets the entire party involved in souvenirs they can share and enjoy together,” Miller said. “The entertainment is also about instant gratification as guests can see the photos on a projection screen as they are being taken. People can also flip through photos on a flat screen monitor so they can choose their favorite shots, which are ready seconds later.” 

Miller said he is planning to add new technology to his offerings in the near future — Photosphere, a 360-degree panoramic photography format that captures the bar mitzvah and his guests from every angle.

“It’s our way of keeping up with the changing trends of event entertainment, and a way that we can offer repeat clients something brand new to really wow their guests,” he said.

While modern event photography is reaching some dazzling extremes, Miller said it’s the family and guests who are the subjects in the photographs, not the props or the other extras.

“The focus should be on the people in the photo,” he said, “backdrops should not take anything away from them.” 

Goldman echoed a similar sentiment.

“Though we offer the photo booth as an add-on, I am still hired to document the details of the party,” he said.

Goldman considers his job as part family historian, and he said entertainment photography should not take away from the importance of artistic, traditional photography.

“It is also extremely important to feature grandparents and other close relatives, as these photos are the ones that get passed down from generation to generation,” he said.

Photographers and Service Providers:

LA Photo Party
310-997-0019
” title=”www.cliquesphotobooth.com” target=”_blank”>www.cliquesphotobooth.com

Jay Lawrence Goldman
6139 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90048
323.954.7436   fax 323.954.7437
Hot Shots Read More »

When Howard Met Sacha

Sacha Baron Cohen was on the show yesterday. It was theatre.  Cohen as Bruno, Stern and Robin as his straight man and woman.  If you didn’t hear it, imagine a Sid Caesar sketch from “Your Show of Shows”—funny accents, stream of consciousness humor, one-liners—but imagine Caesar dressed as a flaming queen, reveling in incest and body functions. 

Oh to have a Time Travel machine and have Howard and Bruno on stage in front of Caesar’s audience.  At first they’d laugh hysterically—it’s the same beats, the same funny accents—then slowly it would dawn on them what’s being said, and their faces would fall, dead silence, then homicidal rage….

Cohen/Bruno gets the credit for provoking those responses, but Stern paved the way.  As I blogged earlier, Cohen is the heir to a brand of humor that Stern (and before him Caesar and the Marx Brothers) pioneered.  Consider this:

THINGS BRUNO DOES THAT HOWARD DID YEARS AGO

Ambush unsuspecting celebrities in fake interviews

Display his butt for comic effect

Talk openly and matter-of-factly about gay sex, anal bleaching, every possible bodily function

Spoof celebrities who adopt African babies

Create skits about off the wall gay characters

This isn’t meant to detract from Cohen.  His talent is for acting, for taking concepts and ideas Howard used and literally taking them to the street, fully developing them as movie concepts.

Clearly, Stern appreciates that—he said he loved the movie, and he seemed genuinely enthralled by Cohen’s in-studio performance.  Sure: he’s a proud dad.

Click here for Bruno’s 5 Top Jewish Moments.

 

When Howard Met Sacha Read More »

Chaos and Unity

Israel is not a great country for neat freaks. The place is all mixed up. The trivial mixes with the existential, the silliness with the deadly serious, the sacred with the irreverent.

Every impulse gets a hearing, and every hearing gets an argument.

This messiness was obvious to me during my two weeks in the Holy Land. And it was captured perfectly one morning on the front page of the Jerusalem Post. Study this page and you’ll understand Israel.

On the top left was a controversy over an annual “water fight” event in Tel Aviv — yes, people frolicking with water guns — right next to a story on the looming geopolitical battle between the United States and Russia.

The Tel Aviv frolickers were battling their critics, who were outraged that anyone would think of holding a water fight in a drought-ridden country. The frolickers countered that they would use only water from a public fountain to “prove that you can have fun while conserving water.”

Just below the water drama was a story about how Israel was preparing itself for a nuclear attack. “In Face of Iranian Threat, IAF to Train Overseas,” the headline blared. The story reported that “Saudi Arabia green-lights IAF flyover” (which Israel denied), as well as Vice President Biden’s statement that the United States “won’t stop Israeli attacks on nuclear facilities” (which his boss later contradicted).

Israel has a large Russian population, so it wasn’t surprising to see a story on “Decoding Russia: A Six-Step Plan, as Obama heads to Moscow.”

Right next to the Russian story was one on Israeli and Palestinian teens collaborating on a “song of peace.”

Below the fold were three stories on the Israel-Palestinian conflict. On the left was Prime Minister Netanyahu uttering to his cabinet, for the first time, the “two states for two peoples” formula, which Washington had urged him to do. But lest you get too encouraged by that news, another story on the far right reported that “new home buyers [are] still offered incentives to move to settlements.”

And lest you get too discouraged by that news, the story in the middle reported that Israel had approved the transfer of 1,000 Kalashnikov rifles to the Palestinian security forces to help them fight terrorism.

In all those stories, there were vigorous internal debates and disagreements.

Open the paper and the mess continues: A story on a petition filed by Peace Now calling for the dismantling of the illegal outpost of Migron, right next to one on the Palestinian Prime Minister saying that “Jews would be welcome in a future Palestinian state,” right next to a controversial decision not to send ambulances into Arab villages without a police escort.

By now you’re probably thinking: “Hey, there’s nothing new here. Israeli society has always been chaotic and full of contradictions and disagreements. Those are the hallmarks of a robust democracy.”

Well, yes. That’s why it was fascinating for me to see that, in Israel today, there is one thing that almost all Israelis agree on.

It has to do with President Obama.

Over my two weeks there, I talked to all kinds of people — cab drivers, peaceniks, right-wing hawks, religious and secular Jews, artists, academics, bellboys, rabbis and more — and asked them how they felt about Obama and the “conflict with the Palestinians.”

Just about everyone I spoke with is wary of the American president. They think his obsession with a settlement freeze has overshadowed much bigger threats (like a nuclear Iran) and much bigger obstacles to peace (like a terror state in Gaza). They see him as naïve at best and abusive at worst — abusing a friendly ally to curry favor with the Arab and Muslim worlds.

What I found most fascinating was that in a country that argues about everything, I couldn’t find anyone — not even opposition parties in the Knesset — who would argue that a radical settlement freeze should be the centerpiece of the peace process.

Many Israelis I spoke with aren’t pleased that Obama has ignored previous understandings with the Sharon government that allowed for “natural growth” in the settlement blocks. Even those who are against the settlements have seen how the relentless U.S. pressure on Israel has given the Palestinians the perfect excuse to be even more intransigent, and pulled the two sides even further apart.

Above all, unlike many Jews in America who are still under the Obama spell, Israelis understand that a total settlement freeze is extreme and absurd. How do you tell a family in Efrat that they need to get special permission from the leader of the free world if they want to add a bedroom or bathroom to their house?

By focusing on freezing Jewish bedrooms while a Persian madman is focusing on nuking 6 million Jews, Obama has frozen the hearts of Israelis. A recent poll in the Jerusalem Post backed up what I saw: Only 6 percent of Israelis consider him pro-Israel.

I’m sure the president saw something “neat” in pressuring Israel for a perfect freeze. But in his zeal to bring neatness to a messy conflict, President Obama has pulled off a double miracle — he has united the Jews and made things even messier.

David Suissa, an advertising executive, is founder of OLAM magazine, Meals4Israel.com and Ads4Israel.com. He can be reached at {encode=”dsuissa@olam.org” title=”dsuissa@olam.org”}.

Chaos and Unity Read More »

American Support for Israel Must Remain Bipartisan

Melanie Phillips has written a critique of me because I remain a Democrat and continue to support President Barack Obama, despite his recent statements regarding expansion of Israeli settlements and other matters relating to the Middle East conflict. Other conservative supporters of Israel, like Jonathan Tobin in Commentary, have joined her in attacking me as well.

“But just like the majority of American Jews, getting on for 80 percent of whom voted for Obama,” wrote Phillips, “he is a Democrat supporter who is incapable of acknowledging the truth about this President.”

She accuses me of being “blind” and says, “He doesn’t get it.”

Oh I get it all right. I just fundamentally disagree with her approach, especially when it comes to the United States. 

Phillips, for all her good work in Great Britain on behalf of Israel, has absolutely no understanding of American politics. She would turn Israel into a wedge issue, in which Republicans were seen as the supporters of Israel and Democrats as its enemy. This is precisely what has happened, with disastrous results, throughout much of Europe. In most European countries, the left-wing political parties are anti-Israel, often virulently so. The right-wing political parties are generally more supportive of Israel, though not nearly as supportive as they should be in many instances. Because young people tend to be more liberal than their elders, support for Israel throughout Europe has also become a generational wedge issue, with younger people opposing Israel far more than older people. 

This is precisely the situation American supporters of Israel want to avoid. We do not want to replicate the horrible situation that currently exists in Phillips’ Great Britain. We want Israel to remain a bipartisan issue and an issue that does not divide generations. During the Bush administration, Republican support for Israel — which they linked to their failed Iraq policy — alienated many younger and more liberal voters who despised Bush, Cheney and their policies. 

Among the reasons that I supported Obama, having first supported Hillary Clinton, is because I believed, and continue to believe, that a young, extremely popular African American president who supports Israel, even if he disagrees with its policies regarding settlement expansion, would be far more influential with mainstream Americans and with people throughout the world than an old conservative Republican, who also supported Israel. That is why I gave, and continued to give, President Obama the benefit of the doubt in his dealings with Israel. I take him at his word that he seeks to bring about peace by means of a two-state solution pursuant to which all the Arab states recognize Israel’s right to thrive as a Jewish democracy, while agreeing that any Palestinian state must be demilitarized and incapable of waging war or terrorist attacks against Israel. 

I also take him at his word when he says the United States will not accept a nuclear-armed Iran, and I believe he has a better chance of achieving that goal through diplomacy — including sanctions if necessary — than would a tough-talking and non-negotiating Republican administration. 

I believe that although a military attack on Iran could have disastrous and far-reaching consequences, a nuclear-armed Iran would have far graver consequences. I do not know whether the Obama administration would, as a last resort, use military force to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Nor do I know whether a Republican administration would have engaged in military action against Iran, especially in light of its failed war in Iraq. Neither do I know whether the Obama administration would try to prevent Israel from defending its civilians against an Iranian nuclear bomb by preventively attacking its nuclear facilities, as Israel did to Iraq in 1981. In a recent statement, Vice President Joe Biden strongly suggested he believes Israel should have the right to take military action to protect its citizens, if all other options fail. I believe Dennis Ross holds similar views. The Bush administration, on the other hand, refused to supply Israel with the weapons necessary to implement a strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities, and according to press reports, it was reluctant to give Israel the green light to attack on its own. 

No one knows precisely what any administration would do under varying and unpredictable scenarios. As I have previously written, I would strongly oppose a United States policy of learning to live with an Iranian nuclear bomb, regardless of which administration supported such a dangerous approach. 

Recall that it was the Bush administration that for the first time announced its support for a Palestinian state — a position with which I agree, so long as it is completely demilitarized and incapable of aggression against Israel. Recall as well that it was the Bush administration that insisted on a freeze on Israeli settlements in the West Bank — a position with which I also agree, subject to humanitarian and pragmatic considerations. (This should come as no surprise to anyone who has read my writings, since I have opposed Israel’s civilian settlement policy since 1973. You can strongly support Israel’s right to defend itself without supporting its settlement policy.)

Let me say as well that there were parts of President Obama’s Cairo speech with which I disagreed, but there have also been parts of Republican speeches with which I have disagreed. I judge administrations by their actions more than by their words, though I wish President Obama had chosen some of his words more carefully. 

The major difference between Melanie Phillips and me is that I want Jews to remain Democrats — if they support, as I do, liberal principles such as a women’s right to choose abortion, the rights of gays and lesbians to equal justice and other progressive policies. I also strongly support the separation of church and state, a constitutional principle that has allowed American Jews to be first-class citizens and to reach greater heights in this wonderful country than they ever have achieved in Europe or anywhere else in the world, except for Israel. Republicans, in general, seek to lower the wall of separation, which would endanger the status of Jews in this country. 

I also want Jews who disagree with my liberal politics to remain Republicans, if they choose, and to exercise influence within the Republican Party. I want all supporters of Israel, whether they are Democrats or Republicans, to pressure their party and their government to protect Israel’s security and defend its right to continue to thrive as a Jewish democracy. 

It was clear to all perceptive Americans that Obama was going to win this past election in a landslide victory. The vast majority of Jews were on the winning side, and that is good for Israel. Recall the Republican Secretary of State James Baker’s infamous remark:  “F—- the Jews. They don’t vote for us anyway.” Recall as well that among Israel’s most virulent opponents are right-wingers such as Pat Buchanan and Robert Novak. 

Let me conclude by saying that because American Jews voted Democrat by and large and because the Democrats won, we have far more influence with this administration than we would if the majority of American Jews followed Melanie Phillips’ advice and voted Republican. When it comes to American politics, it is she who truly “doesn’t get it.” She should not be trying to influence the voting patterns of American Jews. We have done quite well, thank you, in maintaining widespread American support for Israel, because we understand the dynamics of the American political system. Instead, she should be trying to change the terrible situation in Great Britain, where support for Israel has never been lower — in part because support for Israel has become a liberal versus conservative wedge issue. I wish there were more liberal supporters of Israel in Great Britain as there are among liberal political figures in the United States. So please stop lecturing us from your perch in Great Britain on who to vote for in the United States. We apparently “get it” over here a lot better than you do over there! The reality is we each have our problems and they must be addressed somewhat differently in different places. 

So I will continue to give President Obama the benefit of the doubt, but if he does anything to weaken Israel’s security, I will do everything in my power to change his attitude and to use whatever influence we have in Congress and among the public to make sure that American never weakens its commitment to Israel’s security. That is my line in the sand — not the settlements.

Alan M. Dershowitz is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. He is the author of 27 fiction and nonfiction works and has also published more than 100 articles in magazines and journals.

American Support for Israel Must Remain Bipartisan Read More »

Surviving the Downturn

The Debtors
The small cafeteria at the Valley Storefront in North Hollywood is jammed with more than 50 people who have signed up for José (Joey) Alarcon’s clinic on the basics of bankruptcy law.

A sprinkling of Latinos, African and Asian Americans have come, including a fair number of young people, but the majority is white and middle-aged or elderly.

“I used to meet with people one-on-one, but now there are so many of them, I had to start these clinics to give them at least a beginning idea of what they can do,” said Alarcon, a 38-year-old attorney with Bet Tzedek (House of Justice), a free legal-aid service.

“In the past, I dealt mainly with the elderly, many with disabilities, but now I get pretty much a cross-section of the population,” he added.

In an even smaller room, which, judging by the weights and barbells, doubles as a workout facility, paralegal Nora Ghamari is meeting with seven families, all facing possible home foreclosures.

No one at Bet Tzedek or any other legal-aid group will give out clients’ names, for privacy reasons, but Ghamari agreed to outline one fairly typical case of a Jewish family, drawn as a composite of cases she’s seen recently.

The family, let’s call them the Goldbergs, consists of a retired small businessman and his wife, who own an $800,000 duplex in the Fairfax area and live there with their daughter and her husband.

Since the market downturn, the value of the house has dropped nearly 50 percent, but the Goldbergs still have to make a $3,000 monthly payment on the outstanding mortgage loan, with the interest rate likely to go up.

The daughter and son-in-law have been helping out financially, but she has contracted a chronic illness, and he had his working hours cut.

Unable to meet their monthly mortgage payments, the Goldbergs were desperate when they met a man who said he would stop any foreclosure for a $1,500 fee, which they paid, and urged the family to file for bankruptcy. Not surprisingly, the man turned out to be a scammer.

Then a friend of a friend recommended another “expert” to help the Goldbergs, who asked for a smaller upfront fee, brought in lots of papers to sign, but left the family in the same hole as before.

At this late point, the Goldbergs turned for advice to Bet Tzedek, which, like all other agencies receiving government funding, accepts all comers, regardless of ethnic or religious affiliation.

Ghamari estimates that 30 to 40 percent of her clients at the North Hollywood office are Jewish, and the proportion is probably higher at Bet Tzedek’s main office on Fairfax Avenue. She said that families like the Goldbergs would be far better off if they had sought reliable legal advice earlier, when serious financial problems first loomed — either through a paid attorney or by seeking help from a pro-bono agency like Bet Tzedek — instead of shelling out money to people who offer help for a fee and who may be scammers (see sidebar).

Alarcon said since no two cases are the same he adjusts his advice to each person’s circumstances and financial profile. For younger people, he projects that their financial fortunes may well improve in the future. For the elderly, the main concern is their peace of mind.

Over the last eight months, Alarcon’s clientele has roughly doubled. “I used to limit my clinics to 20 people, but now I take 40 or more,” he said, “and the people who come to me are more desperate than they used to be.”

Hard Numbers
In 2008, there were 1,117,771 filings in all U.S. bankruptcy courts, an increase of 31.4 percent over the previous year. For 2009, the American Bankruptcy Institute predicts 1.4 million filings.

By far the largest percentage jump from 2007 to 2008 in any geographical region, 93.5 percent, came in the Central District of California, which encompasses Los Angeles, Ventura, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties.

The most recent figures for the district show that between January and May 2009, more than three-quarters of all the filings were under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In very broad terms, Chapter 7 enables a petitioner to wipe out most of his debts by surrendering most of his assets.

During the first five months of 2009, filings under these provisions increased almost 80 percent over the same period in 2008.

Most of the remaining filings were under Chapter 13, which reduces some debts and extends the debtor’s time to pay off others. The procedure is under the supervision of court-appointed trustees and generally protects a personal home from foreclosure.

The Court
Bankruptcy Judge Richard M. Neiter has 68 cases on his docket this morning, but there are no petitioners or lawyers in Courtroom 1645 of the downtown Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse.

They are all in Riverside, linked to the judge, court recorder, bailiff and a visiting reporter in the Los Angeles courtroom via two large TV sets.

Neiter moves briskly from one case to another in the litany of misery, but he is unfailingly courteous and listens patiently to the occasionally convoluted stories.

This morning, most of the disputes are between banks and loan recipients, a relationship frequently plagued by miscommunications.

In one instance, the long distance repartee went roughly along these lines:

Blue-collar worker: The bank won’t return my calls.
Judge: I understand your frustrations.
Worker’s lawyer: We want a reduction in the loan principal.
Bank’s lawyer: He has rejected a loan modification. We are willing to stretch out the payment, but we won’t reduce the principal.
Judge: The court cannot reduce the principal.
Worker: All right, I won’t hold out for a reduction.

Neiter quickly enters the resolution of the case in his computer and moves on to the next item on the docket.

When the court recesses, Neiter takes a journalist for a quick snack at the cafeteria to talk a bit about his background.

He was born in 1937 in Boyle Heights, moved to the Pico-Fairfax area and has been on the bench for three years, following a successful private career in bankruptcy law.

“Since the economy went down, consumer and business bankruptcy filings have essentially doubled over the last year, and we have more cases here than in any other district in the country,” he said.

As for his courtroom style, “I like to solve problems,” he said. “Within the confines of the facts and the law, a judge has many opportunities to help opposing parties in settling their disputes.”

Outside his chambers, Neiter is deeply involved in Jewish community life, and his official resume includes: Former president of Temple Judea in Tarzana, chair of The Jewish Federation’s Valley Community Relations Committee and board member of the National Conference on Soviet Jewry.

There might be an as-yet unexplored link between serving as both bankruptcy judge and synagogue president, for out in Woodland Hills sits Judge Geraldine Mund, a former president of Temple Israel of Hollywood.

Of the 19 U.S. bankruptcy judges in California’s central district, five are Jewish and eight are women. Some of the judges are hardnosed and some, like Mund, are considered “nice,” but religion doesn’t enter into it.

“I’d be nice even if I weren’t Jewish,” Mund said.

All local bankruptcy judges are appointed by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, and on the basis of merit, rather than politics, Mund said.

She draws a salary of about $145,000 a year, while a state Superior Court judge earns somewhere between $160,00 to $170,000. The money sounds pretty good, but Mund said that she took a hefty cut when she went from her private law practice to the bench.

Women lawyers are particularly attracted to the position for its regular hours and job security.

For those in financial difficulties, filing for bankruptcy is a tool that “is not necessarily to be avoided,” Mund said, but the right professional guidance is key.

She also warns that if you find yourself sinking deeper into debt, “Time is not on your side. The worst thing you can do is to not react at all and ignore warnings from your bank.”

The Lawyers
Up until the 1970s, bankruptcy law was as Jewish a profession as kosher butchering, mainly because elitist white-shoe law firms, which hired only WASPs, considered bankruptcy cases beneath their dignity, leaving the field to the Jews.

“Bankruptcy was the leper colony of the legal profession, alongside personal injury and divorce law,” recalled Herman Glatt of the Stutman, Treister & Glatt law firm.

Glatt, 79, speaks from personal experience. In 1955, with a freshly minted Harvard law degree in hand, the only starting job he could find was with a small Los Angeles bankruptcy firm.

By the late 1970s and early ’80s, the de facto exclusion of Jews at prestigious law firms dissipated, partly due to the erosion of blatant anti-Semitism in the United States, and partly because white-shoe law firms discovered that bankruptcy cases could be very lucrative.

“Now I can’t think of any law firm that would reject a qualified applicant purely because he was Jewish,” Glatt said.

Ironically, in today’s economy, while attorneys at mega law firms are getting pink slips en masse, bankruptcy lawyers are thriving.

David A. Gill of Danning, Gill, Diamond & Kollitz in Century City, recalled an experience similar to Glatt’s when he looked for his first job in 1963.

“The only decent job offer I could get was from a bankruptcy firm,” Gill said. “I knew nothing about that field, but I had a wife, a baby and no money, so I took the job.”

Like Glatt, Gill deals with corporate bankruptcies and reorganizations, and he figures on having plenty of work in the years ahead. The corporate business sector is now facing something close to the real estate debacle, he said, and its problems will become worse before they get better.

Kenneth N. Klee spends four days a week as a law professor at UCLA and one day at the law firm of Klee, Tuchin, Bogdanoff & Stern, which specializes in corporate reorganization, insolvency and bankruptcy law.

He has literally written the book on bankruptcy law and played a key role in rewriting the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in 1978.

“There is still some anti-Semitism at a few law firms, but in any case, I wouldn’t want to be at any firm that discriminates,” he observed.

Klee’s avocation is the study of Jewish mysticism and he is enrolled in a rabbinical program at the Academy for Jewish Religion, California. “I haven’t given up on the idea of becoming a rabbi,” he confessed, “not as a pulpit rabbi but as a spiritual counselor.”

Drawing on his present, and possibly future, professions, Klee illustrates one difference between Jewish and secular law.

“Let’s say a person has borrowed $100, $200 and $300 from three different friends, for a total of $600. It’s time to pay back but he has assets of only $300,” Klee said.

“Under our civil law, each creditor would get 50 cents on the dollar, thus $50 for the first friend, $100 to the second and $150 to the third. But under Jewish law, each man would get $100, because, in effect, you deal from the bottom up,” he said.

But in practice, the primary rule is that a Jew has to obey the law of the land in which he resides.

Halachah (Jewish Law)
The Torah has some very precise rules on the relationship between creditor and debtor, as summarized in the Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion.

“The Bible insists that a creditor refrain from embarrassing his debtor or acting in an exacting manner toward him. Debts were dissolved every seventh year. All Israelites who had been sold into slavery to pay off debts were released or redeemed in the jubilee (50th) year.”

Following the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 C.E. and the dispersion of Jews to other countries, sages of the Rabbinical Period, from the second to the 10th centuries C.E., creatively adapted and softened some of the biblical strictures.

Since Diaspora communities took it upon themselves to care for the poor in their midst, talmudic laws, morality and economic self-interest all dictated that all members of the community work and that as few as possible fall into poverty or debt.

It is not merely a semantic difference that the word “charity” comes from the Latin word for “love,” while the Hebrew term “tzedakah” denotes the more compelling concept of “justice,” said Rabbi Elliot Dorff, rector and Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at American Jewish University, who also serves as co-chair of the Jewish Family Service’s Task Force on the Vulnerable.

Unlike Calvinists and others, who considered debtors as sinners and clapped them into prison, Jews are commanded to help their brethren who have fallen on hard times, Dorff said.

Today, Los Angeles Jews who wish to resolve a dispute according to halachah, or Jewish law, can plead their cases before a beit din (house of judgment), whose decisions are enforceable in secular civil courts.

The beit din of the Rabbinical Assembly (Conservative) is headed by Rabbi Ben Z. Bergman and the beit din of the Rabbinical Council of California (Orthodox) by Rabbi Avrohom Union.

The Union of Reform Judaism does not have a similar formal structure, but leaves it up to the individual rabbi to resolve conflicts.

Each beit din consists of three rabbis who convene once a week. They deal primarily with family and personal relationships, particularly, said Bergman, in granting a get (bill of divorce) to couples who have already obtained a civil divorce, but in which one or both partners require a get in order to remarry Jewishly.

Those appearing can bring lawyers, or a to’en, a pleader familiar with Jewish law.

In one case dealing with a business partnership dispute, Bergman recalled, one lawyer was Armenian and the other a Lebanese Christian, who kept addressing the rabbi as “Father.”

Actually, the lawyer was not that far off base, since the presiding rabbi of the beit din carries the title of av, or father.

In such instances, Bergman, who also has a law degree, gives the lawyers an instant course in Jewish law.

Bergman has been a member of the local beit din since its founding in the early 1950s, and the Grand Forks, N.D., native has been continuously on the job for nearly 59 years.

Sometimes, a beit din must interpret halachah creatively, to fit changed realities. For instance, biblical law forbids a Jew to charge interest on a loan to another Jew, but this has been circumvented by the legal fiction of heter iska, literally a permission of business, in which the creditor-debtor relationship is transformed into a business partnership.

Bergman himself has added to the body of law by writing a legal responsum that permits a synagogue to issue interest-bearing bonds for the welfare of the congregation.

His beit din holds “a couple of hundred” hearings a year, predominantly divorce cases, from all parts of the West Coast. The fee is $1,000 per day ($400 per hour at the Orthodox beit din), with the costs evenly split between the opposing parties.

Rabbi Union, the rabbinical administrator of the Orthodox beit din, cited another example of applying old halachic strictures to modern circumstances.

“The Torah commands that a creditor cannot take from the debtor the tools needed for his livelihood,” he said. “In today’s Los Angeles, this rule can be extended to prevent the creditor from taking away the debtor’s car, which he needs to drive to work.”

In this instance as in many others, Jewish tradition responds not just to the legal technicalities of losing one’s livelihood or home, but the human and ethical ripples. Immediate and extended family, social service networks and community structures all are affected by and must respond to the financial, emotional and social strain of economic meltdown.

The organized Jewish community, mainly through The Jewish Federation and its affiliated agencies, as well as synagogue communities, has developed a number of services and programs to help address these problems. In a subsequent installment next week, The Journal will examine the human toll of the economic crisis and the safety net the Jewish community is striving to maintain.

Debt Mounting? Don’t Panic —Take These Steps First

Although each case of bankruptcy, foreclosure or debt differs in details, Bet Tzedek experts agree on a few basic rules and precautions:

  • Read the fine print on any loan or contract before signing anything.Most people do so only after they start getting into trouble.
  • Do not pay anyone who promises to fix your problems for an upfront fee. Instead, consult a free agency, such as the L.A. County Department of Consumer Affairs, Los Angeles Neighborhood Housing Services, Bet Tzedek or Jewish Family Service.
  • Don’t let debt collection agencies harass you. If you send the collector a letter telling him to stop contacting you by mail or phone, he must do so under the law.
  • Contact the lender to see if the terms of the loan or contract can be modified.
  • You cannot go to jail for bad debts, even if someone files a lawsuit against you.
  • Before committing yourself to a repayment schedule, be sure you can meet the terms in the future.
  • Contact a free legal-aid agency at the beginning of a financial crisis. Most people, especially older ones, wait too long, held back by shame, fear or the hope that somehow things will work themselves out.
  • Be realistic about weighing your options and understand the long-term effects of your actions.

Surviving the Downturn Read More »

The Federation’s Search for a New Leader

Wanted: Visionary leader and strong community-builder with a knack for reinventing century-old organizations. Tasks include directing a $50 million annual fundraising campaign, leading 20 social service agencies through a major change in how they are supported by the organization and strengthening relationships with well-heeled donors across a vast territory. Must have charisma, a strong Jewish identity and nonprofit experience.

That’s not the verbatim job listing for the position of president and CEO of The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles, but those are the criteria around which The Federation is building its search for a new professional leader — six months after John Fishel announced he would be stepping aside after nearly 18 years as head of the umbrella organization.

“We’ve got 10 or 15 very worthy applicants who are worth sorting through by the search committee. We are right on schedule,” Federation board of directors chair Stanley Gold said. “Half are local, half are national. I’d say 20 percent are from the federation system and about 80 percent are from the nonprofit world.”

Although no one is talking on the record, multiple sources say people who have been approached include Robin Kramer, chief of staff for L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa; David Lehrer, president of Community Advocates and former head of the local branch of the Anti-Defamation League; Jay Sanderson, CEO of the Jewish Television Network; and David Suissa, a marketing consultant and columnist for The Journal.

Another name in the mix is that of Jack Weiss, the former L.A. city councilman who in May lost his bid to become city attorney. Weiss is a seasoned fundraiser with a strong Jewish identity and an outspoken commitment to Israel. He’s also currently unemployed.

But whether these names are on the working list is unknown.

Gold said last week that he had yet to share the list of serious candidates even with the search committee, and those mentioned above either aren’t talking or couldn’t be reached for comment. But speculation abounds.

To assist in the national search, The Federation hired Development Resource Group, a nonprofit headhunting firm based in New York. The firm’s president, David Edell, first flew to Los Angeles to meet with The Federation’s staff and volunteers and then returned last week to speak with the search committee.

Over the next few months, Edell and his staff will measure the caliber of each candidate against the job description, and from there the search committee will thin the field. Edell said there has been a strong response to early queries.

Gold, whose two-year chairmanship ends Dec. 31 and who has been intent on redirecting The Federation before he leaves, said the search was not leaning toward a federation veteran or a Jewish nonprofit wiz or a business stud. What matters, he said, is that the person has a “broad view of Jewish life,” the voice to inspire new Federation supporters and the ability to help reinvent the 98-year-old organization.

“There continues to need to be change at The Federation for it to be relevant. We’ve taken a step in that direction, but we need to continue on that path,” Gold said. “It’s not that we’re not relevant to some people — we’re very relevant — but we need to broaden that to a wider group of Jews within our community.”

The next Federation president will face a tattered economy that has resulted in dramatically reduced funding to the social service agencies it helps support, along with a substantial spike in requests for assistance. And he or she also will have to work with The Federation board to determine just what the future Federation should look like.

The Federation is no longer the main funder of most its agencies — Jewish Family Service, Jewish Free Loan Association and Jewish Vocational Service among them — which now, instead of receiving unrestricted and guaranteed funding, compete with other Jewish nonprofits in the community for program-specific dollars. Many of these agencies’ rent, subsidized for space located inside Federation headquarters, is also increasing; this year agencies pay 25 percent of market rate to remain in the building; they will pay 50 percent in 2010 and 75 percent in 2011.

In the process, the role of The Federation is evolving, and many questions will greet any new leader. “Should Federation be only fundraising? Should it be providing programs? Should The Federation act as the primary planning body, as a coordinating organization?” asked Rabbi Elliot Dorff, rector at American Jewish University and a member of The Federation’s board, on which he co-chairs the committee on the vulnerable. “I would hope that the new CEO would be able to think in these kinds of philosophical terms as to exactly what is the mission of Federation now.”

If running The Federation is a big job providing some big opportunities, it also comes with a big salary.

In 2007, the most recent year for which the L.A. Federation’s 990 tax forms are available, Fishel earned $416,000 in annual salary and benefits; in that same year, he also received a onetime payout of $690,000 as deferred compensation from his housing allowance, which had accumulated during the previous 15 years.

The salary and benefits package for the incoming CEO are not yet known. Chief executives at other major Jewish federations provide some guidance: South Palm Beach, Fla., pays $419,000 for its leader, and Philadelphia $434,000, for example.

“We will pay whatever is necessary to get the right person,” Gold said. “If we get the right person, we haven’t paid enough, and if we get the wrong person, we’ve paid way too much.”

The Federation’s Search for a New Leader Read More »

Britain Imposes Partial Arms Embargo on Israel

The British Foreign Office informed Israel that it will not supply replacement parts and other equipment for the Sa’ar 4.5 gunship because the fleet participated in Israel’s military offensive in the Gaza Strip, Haaretz reported Monday.

After reviewing 182 licenses for arms exports to Israel, Britain decided to cancel five, according to the Israeli daily. The review was announced in April.

The embargo follows efforts by British lawmakers and human rights organizations to impose a complete arms embargo on Israel.

The British Embassy in Tel Aviv said there had been no change in policy, according to Reuters.

“We do not believe that the current situation in the Middle East would be improved by imposing an arms embargo on Israel,” the embassy said Monday in a statement. “Israel has the right to defend itself and faces real security threats.”

The statement adds: “Future decisions will take into account what has happened in the recent conflict. We do not grant export licenses where there is a clear risk that arms will be used for external aggression or internal repression.”

Demjanjuk Indicted in Germany
Convicted Nazi guard John Demjanjuk was formally charged with being an accessory to the murder of 27,900 Jews.

The Munich State Prosecutor on Monday issued the indictment accusing Demjanjuk of being an accessory to the murder of 27,900 Jews at the Sobibor death camp in Poland. No date has yet been set for a trial, but Demjanjuk’s attorney has suggested it will not take place before the end of September.

The 89-year-old retired autoworker, who spent most of the postwar period as a United States citizen, was extradited to Germany in May and is being held in a Munich prison.

According to the German Press Association, Demjanjuk was formally accused of having been a guard at Sobibor, where he allegedly drove thousands of victims into gas chambers. Among the evidence against him is an SS identification. His name is also on a 1943 list showing that he was transferred to Sobibor, the press group noted.

Earlier this month, Demjanjuk was declared medically fit to stand trial, but medical experts said he could not be on the stand longer than three hours per day, broken up into two segments.

Demjanjuk, who was born in Ukraine, has claimed that he was a Soviet prisoner of war in a German prison camp.

He reportedly was later trained to be a guard, and was transferred from an agricultural posting to Sobibor, where he stayed for seven months before being transferred to the concentration camp at Flossenbuürg. After the war he was labeled a “displaced person” and in 1952 immigrated to the United States.

Germany was able to apply for his extradition after Demjanjuk was stripped of his U.S. citizenship for lying about his Nazi past.

Sentences of Halimi Accomplices Appealed
France’s justice minister requested an appeal of the prison terms given to gang members who abetted the murder of a French Jew.

Michèle Alliot-Marie said Monday that she asked the public prosecutor’s office to appeal some of Friday’s sentences of members of the so-called “gang of Barbarians” responsible for helping torture 23-year-old Ilan Halimi to death in 2006.

A French court ruled Halimi’s killing was partly motivated by anti-Semitism, and the leader of the Barbarians gang, Youssouf Fofana, received the maximum sentence of life in prison and 22 years without the possibility of parole.

Other gang members, however, were handed prison terms shorter than those recommended by the prosecuting attorney.

Alliot-Marie asked the city public prosecutor for a retrial of the convicted accomplices.

Jewish organizations, the Halimi family and their lawyer over the weekend criticized the lighter sentences given to Fofana’s accomplices. They planned a Monday protest.

Ruth Halimi, the victim’s mother, told the French daily Le Parisien on Sunday that the shorter sentences “didn’t serve as an example” or show that “anti-Semitism is not just a miscellaneous news item.”

However, Christophe Régnard, president of the judicial union USM, said that Alliot-Marie’s decision to appeal the Halimi verdict was “rather dangerous and worrisome for the future” because, like other leading French judges, he believed it was the result of political pressure, the French news agency AFP reported.

“Politics reasserted itself over justice,” Régnard told AFP. “I find that rather sad.”

He added that appealing a sentence because of a couple years’ difference meant that “one would have to appeal three-fourths of penal cases.”

The Jewish umbrella group CRIF congratulated Alliot-Marie’s call for an appeal.

Low-Income Senior Housing Opens in Long Beach
The Menorah Housing Foundation has opened up its newest facility for low-income seniors in Long Beach.

The City of Long Beach unveiled the 66 housing units, as well as the facility’s community rooms and outdoor decks, on June 22. The complex is located near shopping areas, public transportation, the Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Veterans Memorial Park and the Burnett Neighborhood Library. 

The Long Beach Redevelopment Agency and the Long Beach Housing Development Company worked in partnership with the Menorah Housing Foundation — an affiliate of The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles, which owns and manages affordable senior housing units. The foundation currently operates 16 senior housing apartment buildings throughout Los Angeles County. 

For more information about possible openings or to apply for the waiting list, call the Menorah Foundation leasing number at (310) 477-1476. — Lilly Fowler, Contributing Writer

Briefs courtesy Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

Britain Imposes Partial Arms Embargo on Israel Read More »

Not-Quite Farewell

Way back in 1965, an actor named Chaim Topol, unknown in America, arrived in Los Angeles, staying at the cheapest possible hotel with fellow Israeli Ephraim Kishon, the popular satirical writer.

The two had put together a film called “Sallah Shabbati,” later shortened to “Sallah,” about a middle-aged North African Sephardic immigrant and his large family, who came to Israel in the 1950s with nothing but his native wit to confront the formidable Israeli bureaucracy, rigid kibbutz ideology, sleazy politics, high-class Ashkenazi yekkes (immigrants from Germany) and other facets of Israeli life.

Hardly anyone here knew there was such a thing as Israeli movies, and the American rights were bought for a pittance by a New York immigrant furrier who perhaps hoped to make a couple of bucks showing “Sallah” at synagogue socials.

To everyone’s amazement, “Sallah” was picked as one of five foreign-language films nominated for Oscar honors, a rare instance of Academy perceptiveness. In the views of many critics, this one included, “Sallah” is the best and funniest film ever to come out of Israel.

In short order, the furrier, his mishpoche, Topol and Kishon, all equally clueless, arrived in Los Angeles to “promote” their baby.

Topol was then 29 years old, but looked like a graduate student, and he knew just one person in L.A.—Dan Almagor, an Israeli playwright and translator of Shakespearean and contemporary plays into Hebrew, including “Fiddler on the Roof.”

Dan took over as budget-less campaign manager, and some of his stunts to bring “Sallah” to public and media knowledge are still legendary.

As a close personal friend, he “hired” me as press and PR director, and while we all had a lot of fun, “Sallah” didn’t win an Oscar. I collected all of $50, after threatening to sue the furrier, but the experience was priceless.

Well, 44 years later, Topol is coming is coming to town again, on the final leg of a 20-city American tour of “Fiddler on the Roof,” which is opening July 21 at the Pantages Theatre.

In a phone call to Chicago, I asked Topol how many times he had played the role of the immortal Tevye on the stage, and the actor paused to think.

“I stopped counting after 2,500 performances,” he said, “Probably 2,700 is about right.”

After all these nights and years on the world’s stages, how does the now 73-year old actor keep each performance fresh and challenging?

“That’s the job of an actor,” he replied. “Whether I play the same role 40, 1,000 or 2,500 times, I have to convince you that the line or song just jumped into my mind at this very moment.

“Of course, in different periods of my life, I look at the part in different ways. When I first had Tevye ask his wife Golde, after 25 years of marriage, “Do You Love Me?,” I myself had been married for 10 years, and I thought, ‘25 years of marriage, that’s a very long time.’

“Now we’ve been married for 52 years and I think, ‘what’s 25 years? We were children then.’”

Topol recalls another example. “When Tevye’s daughter marries, and he has to give her away to a stranger, the first time I did this, I had an 8-year old daughter and had to imagine an experience that was far in the future.

“Now my lovely little daughter is 51 years old; she’s been married 25 years, and I now know exactly how I felt when she was under the chuppah, I don’t have to imagine it.”

Besides his 2,700 stage appearances, uncounted viewers in just about every country in the world have seen Topol in the 1971 film version, for which he won a Golden Globe and was nominated for an Oscar.

It can be argued that Tevye is the best-known Jew in the world (perhaps in a tie with the late Albert Einstein), and that Topol is the world’s foremost expert on the character of Tevye.

What then, I asked, accounts for Tevye’s universal appeal in places whose inhabitants have never heard of a shtetl, let alone Anatevka?

“Tevye is made of the genes of my grandfather and of my grandfather’s grandfather,” he responded. “Many times, when Tevye talks, I think, ‘That’s what my grandfather would have said.’

“Furthermore, Tevye is a well-constructed character. I’ve seen him performed in high schools, or by amateur groups, and he always comes across. I’m not being modest, but you have to be a real schlemiel to ruin that part.”

But perhaps the real key to Tevye’s universal appeal is that in most countries, people do not see Tevye as a Jew.

“I’ve played Tevye in Japan, in English, and the Japanese come up to me afterwards and tell me that Tevye reminds them of their uncle or grandfather. Middle-aged men say the play reminds them of arguments with their daughters or with a difficult neighbor,” Topol recalled.

“To a Croatian audience, the anti-Semitic Cossacks become Serbs and to a Greek audience they are Turks, and so on.”

On some people, the impact of Tevye is even deeper and more personal. “I’ve had people come up to me and tell me that after seeing the show, they’ve converted to Judaism, and some non-practicing Jews who said that they have returned to the fold.”

Chaim Topol, a Tel Aviv native, got his first taste of the limelight during his military service in an army theater group, where, among other parts, the 19-year played the title role in “Othello.”

He has frequently returned to his Shakespearean beginnings, playing in the Hebrew versions of “King Lear” and “The Taming of the Shrew,” again in “Othello,” this time in English in front of British audiences.

After his army service he founded a satirical theater group, called The Spring Onions, and later the Haifa Municipal Theatre, where he portrayed Azdak in Bertolt Brecht’s “The Caucasian Chalk Circle” and Jean in Eugene Ionesco’s “Rhinoceros.”

His film resume lists 30 American and Israeli films, starting with “Sallah,” whose success led to an invitation in 1967 to open “Fiddler” in London’s West End, which, in turn, got him the lead in Norman Jewison’s film version of the musical.

Asked to look back on his impressive career, Topol ruminates a few seconds and says, “I’ve been very lucky, but I’m also a hard worker. I can stand on the stage eight times a week and carry a difficult part,” quickly adding, “Poo, poo, poo, kineahora,” the magical incantation to ward off the Evil Eye.

What Topol really wants to talk about is the Jordan River Village (www.jordanrivervillage.org), located in the Lower Galilee, between Haifa and Tiberias, and scheduled to open next year.

The Village will provide free services for youth, ages 8-19 years, with chronic or life-threatening diseases such as cerebral palsy, cystic fibrosis, hemophilia, neurological disorders and rheumatic and heart diseases.

Topol, who serves as the project’s chairman of the board, said he was inspired and mentored by the late Paul Newman, who six years ago took the Israeli actor on a tour of his Hole in the Wall camps for severely ill children.

The Village will annually accommodate some 4,500 children of all faiths and nationalities, including, Topol hopes, kids from Jordan, Lebanon and Iraq. The Israeli government provides 20 percent of the Village’s budget.

“Fiddler’s” current seven-month tour is billed as Topol’s “North American Farewell Tour,” but the actor begs to differ.

“I’m now on my second or third ‘farewell tour’,” he notes. “I hope when I’m 80, I’ll be back.”

“Fiddler on the Roof” will open at the Pantages Theatre in Hollywood, with two preview performances on July 21 and 22. The July 21 show is billed as “Matchmaker Night” and is co-sponsored by JDate and The Journal. For this performance only, go to ” title=”www.broadwayla.org” target=”_blank”>www.broadwayla.org, or phone Ticketmaster at (800) 982-2787.

Following the Los Angeles run, the musical will move to Costa Mesa for an Aug. 11-23 run at the Orange County Performing Arts Center.

Not-Quite Farewell Read More »

The Value of a Bad Breakup

On July 22, 2001, between 7 p.m. and 9 p.m. EST, a “cataclysmic, earth-shattering” event took place over melting ice cream at the Serendipity restaurant in Manhattan: “I got dumped,” screenwriter Scott Neustadter said in an interview. After wallowing in pain to the requisite gloomy rock music of The Smiths, Neustadter impulsively quit his film development job, moved to London and almost immediately met a new flame.

“She was perfect,” he recalled. “Six months later, she dumped me.”

His new film, “(500) Days of Summer,” co-written with Michael H. Weber, tells the story of those relationships — or at least, his perception of them — with added material inspired by Weber’s dating woes and those of the film’s director, Marc Webb. Tom (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) and Summer (Zooey Deschanel) meet at work and spend the next 499 days embroiled in a tempestuous romance, which jumps back and forth in time and is told strictly from Tom’s (read: Neustadter’s) point of view.

The movie is one of the most anticipated independent films this summer, having already earned its authors a spot on Variety’s 2008 list of 10 screenwriters-to-watch. Especially satisfying is the way Tom and his friends hyper-analyze every nuance of Summer’s behavior: “The Hollywood myth is that guys don’t talk about their relationships, which is bulls—-,” Weber said when the writing partners met with a reporter to talk about their work recently at the Casa del Mar hotel in Santa Monica.

In real life, Weber actually was the friend Neustadter confided to at work the day after his first girlfriend broke up with him; the one he commiserated with, cubicle-to-cubicle. Her parting words — that she was the “Sid” to his “Nancy,” meaning the punk rocker Sid Vicious and his heroin-addicted lover Nancy Spungen — are repeated verbatim in “(500) Days.”

Neustadter and Weber, both in their early 30s, are the kind of old friends who finish each other’s sentences. They relish the stories each tells about his bar mitzvah: Neustadter’s took place at the Atlantic City casino where his parents worked, Weber’s at the Long Island Reform synagogue where he had repeatedly been kicked out of Hebrew school. They also dish about their mutual obsession with the films of Woody Allen, their appreciation for old-school Jewish romantic leading actors, like Elliott Gould and Dustin Hoffman, as well as the new wave, like Seth Rogen and Gordon-Levitt.

Neustadter points to aspects of popular culture for some of his youthful naiveté about romance — specifically the cliché, perpetuated in melancholy films and pop songs, that love should have the dizzying highs and nauseating lows of a roller-coaster ride. He especially cites one of his favorite movies of all time, Hoffman’s breakout film, “The Graduate” — or rather his own misreading of that film — for his pursuit of unattainable women while in his 20s.

“I had this lame notion that romance meant yelling and running and histrionic nonsense, and that everything in life would be great if I could just get this one person,” he said.

The writers met when Neustadter hired Weber to work as his development intern at Robert De Niro’s production company in Manhattan in 1999. They liked De Niro, or “Bob,” as they call him, but they didn’t much enjoy their jobs, so they poured their frustrations into writing an “angry death comedy,” which they sent out to prospective buyers under deliberately WASPy pseudonyms. “It didn’t go anywhere,” Weber said. “But people liked the script and laughed at it, and that gave us the idea that maybe we could be screenwriters.”

“(500) Days of Summer” was conceived when Neustadter e-mailed Weber in the middle of the night about his London breakup. “Writing it was better than therapy,” Neustadter said. But he was initially reluctant to have others read the highly autobiographical script for fear he would be ridiculed for his over-the-top angst.

Neustadter’s Hollywood story has a happy ending, however. Fox Searchlight eventually bought the movie; he and Weber are now in demand as screenwriters, and Neustadter lives in Santa Monica with his long-term girlfriend, a nice Jewish girl from New Orleans.

Even so, “(500) Days” opens with a written caveat: “Any resemblance to people living or dead is purely accidental. Especially Jenny Beckman. Bitch.”

“That was us saying to our exes, ‘Sorry but this story is about to unfold, and you’re going to have to deal with it,’” Neustadter quipped, as Weber laughed.

“(500) Days of Summer” opens July 17.

The Value of a Bad Breakup Read More »