fbpx

June 9, 2009

‘Obama proposed plan for peace deal within two years’

United States President Barack Obama has presented to Egypt and Israel a plan for a two-state solution to be finalized within two years, the London-based A-Sharq al-Awsat reported on Tuesday.

A source in Cairo told the newspaper that Obama raised the plan with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during the latter’s visit to Washington last month. According to the report, the plan envisions a Middle East peace deal by 2011 and would encompass an agreement for a Palestinian state. Read the full story at HAARETZ.com.

‘Obama proposed plan for peace deal within two years’ Read More »

A Fourth Day In June — Family Loses Son Named for Uncle Memorialized In Jewish Journal Article

On May 20, The Jewish Journal published “” title=”Read more here” target=”_blank”>Read more here.)

I was one of those teens. Dov gave me my first job in 1988, scooping ice cream at the Haagen Dazs in Century City, which he managed. He taught me not only to measure out a 4 oz. scoop, but to deliver it with the joy that befits premium ice cream.

Hundreds of people packed into Manny and Adaire’s small home one night this week as they finished their last night of shiva back in Los Angeles, after spending the week in Baltimore. Some of the visitors knew Dov, but all of them knew Manny and Adaire, beloved for the personal attention and help they offer to all who cross their paths. Adaire, the librarian for many years at the Simon Wiesenthal Center, also mentors people in the process of conversion. She was featured as a ” title=”click here” target=”_blank”>click here.

A Fourth Day In June — Family Loses Son Named for Uncle Memorialized In Jewish Journal Article Read More »

Tough economic times drive European voters to far right

Gains by anti-Semitic, xenophobic and racist far-right parties in June 4-7 elections for European Parliament were a reminder of how voters across Europe gravitate toward fringe parties and extremists during tough economic times.

As in the United States, Europe is experiencing levels of unemployment not seen since the Great Depression. The financial misery has given rise here to increased nationalism, skewing an election of representatives whose job is mostly to pass Europe-wide regulations on food and safety standards, the environment and internal market competition.

“As far as Jews are concerned, the election results are a warning that in a period of crisis people vote with extremists,” Serge Cwajgenbaum, secretary general of the European Jewish Congress, told JTA from Paris. “It doesn’t matter if it is left or right to angry voters, as long as it is extreme.”

For the first time since the 1930s, a neo-fascist group in Britain, the British National Party, received enough votes to enter a legislative body. Of the two representatives the party will send to the EU Parliament in Brussels, one is Nick Griffin, a convicted Holocaust denier accused of chanting “Death to Jews!” at a 1981 political rally in Leeds.

Krisztina Morvai, the newly elected Hungarian parliamentarian from the far-right Jobbik party, blogged earlier this month in response to accusations of xenophobia, “I would be glad if the so-called proud Hungarian Jews would go back to playing with their tiny little circumcised d—-s rather than vilifying me.”

Her party won three seats, marking Jobbik’s first entry into EU politics.

In Austria, far-right parties won 18 percent of the vote, a greater percentage than anywhere else in Europe. One of the parties, the Freedom Party, or FPO, campaigned with posters reading “FPO veto for Turkey and Israel in the EU.” With 13 percent of Austrian votes, the party more than doubled its share in the last European Parliament elections, in 2004.

The ascent of the far right amid record-low turnout of 43 percent of 388 million eligible voters was a message to European institutions that worries over immigration and anger over failed domestic policies take precedence over any pan-European agenda, analysts said.

About 30 of the 736 new European Parliament members come from extreme-right parties in countries such as Hungary, Italy, Britain, the Netherlands, Finland, Romania and Bulgaria—up from 23 in 2004. The strongest showing in the elections was for center-right parties, which took victories across Europe and trounced their Socialist rivals. The centrist conservatives have the largest voting bloc in the Parliament.

But apathy—national voter turnouts in Europe frequently are above 60 percent—and the perception that the vote was for a distant, insignificant legislature may mean that extremists will not do as well in upcoming national elections in individual European countries.

Clara Marina O’Donnell, an analyst at the Centre for European Reform in London, cautioned against interpreting the far-right gains as a major political upheaval.

“We have a growth in certain countries of extreme parties, but they only got a few seats and the growth is very much marginal,” O’Donnell said. “People feel the European Parliament does not count, so they feel more tempted to vote extreme, often electing candidates they would never think of choosing for their national parliaments.”

European institutions in Brussels comprised of country representatives have no unified foreign policy or jurisdiction over crucial national issues, such as immigration, education or health care.

But they occasionally make policy—such as when the European Parliament froze a planned upgrade of EU relations with Israel during Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza in January. They also may have a hand in setting European rules on shechita, Jewish ritual slaughter, which is banned in some European countries.

More worrying to Jews and other minorities is that extremist parties who gained ground in the recent European vote show no sign of going away.

The Freedom Party, for instance, is already in the Austrian Parliament, with 34 out of 183 seats, and twice has been a junior partner in coalition governments. The possibility that Jobbik will win seats in Hungary’s Parliament in 2010 elections is no longer remote, given that the party captured nearly 15 percent of the vote in Hungary for EU Parliament.

In the Netherlands, the openly anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant Freedom Party—a far-right party that though supportive of Israel has been condemned by European Jewish groups—defeated the mainstream Socialists to finish a close second behind the center-right, with 17 percent of the vote.

“If on the EU level they do not stop this kind of extremism, it will get worse,” Cwajgenbaum said. “There is something wrong with how people are being educated, or not educated, in these countries.”

There are some positive signs, with the far right failing to garner almost any support in Germany, France, the Czech Republic and Poland.

In addition, the new extreme right members of the European Parliament are not expected to have much influence in Brussels because as nationalists, they will have difficulty coming up with a united position—as they demonstrated in their 2004 failure to form a voting bloc.

“Within the European Parliament, there are people who need to be quarantined,” said the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s director for international relations in Paris, Shimon Samuels, “and there are enough centrists who will make sure that happens.”

Tough economic times drive European voters to far right Read More »

Obama: two years ’til peace in israel

President Barack Obama has shared with leaders in Egypt and Israel an ambitious plan to bring a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict within two years. Talk about a tall order. This according to London’s Arab-language paper A-Sharq al-Awsat and via Israel’s liberal daily Haaretz:

A source in Cairo told the newspaper that Obama raised the plan with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during the latter’s visit to Washington last month. According to the report, the plan envisions a Middle East peace deal by 2011 and would encompass an agreement for a Palestinian state.

Netanyahu is expected to respond to the proposal within six weeks, a deadline set after Obama’s address in Cairo.

The Egyptian source said that Obama elaborated on the plan during his visit to Egypt last week in talks with Egyptian intelligence chief Omer Suleiman and Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit. The Egyptian officials were implored to respond as soon as possible.

The Sunday Times reported earlier this month that Obama had given himself a two-year deadline to reach a breakthrough on a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians.

The administration has been firm in its declarations that it would pursue a two-state solution and Obama has vowed to “change the conversation” with the Muslim world in order to widen the diplomatic circle involved in the peace process.

Read the rest here.

Obama: two years ’til peace in israel Read More »

National Jewish burial society tries to stem increased cremation

With cremation on the rise and more Jewish cemeteries accepting ashes for burial, a national organization of Jewish burial societies is trying to promote traditional in-ground burial among liberal Jews.

“We’re going on the positive offensive rather than the negative ‘don’t get cremated’ route,” said Rabbi Stuart Kelman, president of Kavod v’Nichum, a consortium of burial societies, Jewish funeral homes and cemeteries, and founding rabbi of Berkeley’s Congregation Netivot Shalom, which hosted the group’s seventh national conference June 7-9.

Conference organizers brought in rabbinic speakers to present traditional Jewish sources that teach the human body should be returned after death to the dust from which it was created. According to the Orthodox position, that means burying the body in its entirety, in anticipation of the revivification of the dead that will take place in the final Messianic Age.

Organizers and speakers pointed to the psychological wisdom of Jewish burial ritual, which places limits on the mourning period and forces mourners to face the finality of death by watching their loved ones be lowered into the ground.

“I can’t tell you the number of times people who have had close relatives cremated come to me and say it’s as if they just disappeared,” Kelman said. “There’s no closure for them.”

Many also brought up the burning of Jewish bodies during the Holocaust as a compelling argument never to engage in such a practice voluntarily.

Kavod v’Nichum’s executive director, David Zinner, hoped to leave the three-day gathering with a group initiative encouraging traditional burial, but that did not prove as easy as he had hoped.

“It seems like a simple issue, but we can’t push people before they are ready,” Zinner acknowledged.

Most of the 100 participants represented non-Orthodox congregations that are struggling with members’ rising demand for cremation.

While the Orthodox movement forbids cremation as a desecration, the Reform permits it and Conservatives take a middle ground, strongly advising against the practice but not forbidding rabbis from participating in funerals before the body is actually burned.

Rabbi Stephen Pearce of San Francisco’s Reform Congregation Emanu-El said more than 50 percent of the funerals in his congregation involve cremation—a number other participants found extremely high, although they all acknowledged that cremation was on the rise in their communities.

Dan Brodsky of the New Mount Sinai Cemetery in St. Louis said 19 percent of the burials in his cemetery involve cremains, whereas three years ago the number was in the single digits.

Nationally, Rabbi Richard Address, director of Jewish family concerns for the Union for Reform Judaism, said he has noticed “a slight” increase in cremation among the Reform communities he visits.

Pearce suggested the practice is more prevalent on the West Coast, largely due to ecological concerns—many Westerners feel in-ground burial is a wasteful use of limited resources.

In fact, according to Kelman, who is spearheading a project to create the country’s first “green” Jewish cemetery just north of San Francisco, cremation releases a great deal of carcinogenic material into the atmosphere and uses more energy than in-ground burial.

The high cost of traditional burial was cited as the main reason behind the Jews’ growing interest in cremation. A straw poll of the room yielded an average cost of $5,000 to $12,000 for a traditional Jewish funeral, including the cost of buying the plot, versus $1,000 or so for cremation.

Although the conference was unable to come up with a unified position statement opposing cremation, there was consensus that the greater Jewish community should do more to bring down those costs, including encouraging simple wooden caskets, before the organization could in good conscience promote in-ground burial.

Many Jewish cemeteries find themselves in a bind, as they may be owned by one congregation but are called upon to serve a wider Jewish community with varying religious standards.

Gary Webne, co-director of the Conservative-owned Richmond Beth-El Cemetery Corp. in Richmond, Va., said that many Jews in his community have asked why the cemetery will not bury cremains.

“There are people interested in saving land and resources, a rethinking that’s beginning to emerge,” he said. “Rules are not necessarily set in stone, and we need to take modern needs into consideration.”

Ralph Zuckerman, executive director of Clover Hill Park Cemetery in Birmingham, Mich., recalled the day he had to tell an elderly man that his wife of 40 years could not be buried with him because she had never converted to Judaism. Tears rolled down the man’s face.

“The unaffiliated are the majority, and most of them don’t know anything about the Jewish traditions around death,” Zuckerman said, adding that his cemetery, which is owned by a Conservative synagogue but serves Reform, Orthodox and the unaffiliated, will open special sections for cremains and intermarried families this summer.

“I can’t put my head in the sand and say it’s halachically incorrect,” Zuckerman said. “It’s going to happen, and we need to serve the entire community.”

But it shouldn’t be up to cemetery directors to make these decisions, he concluded.

Zinner agreed, saying it was up to local burial societies to educate their Jewish communities about Jewish views on death, mourning and burial.

Rabbi Dan Goldblatt of Beth Chaim in Danville, Calif., noted that those views are now in flux.

“At a time of such environmental concern, when kashrut is being reframed in terms of ethical kashrut, what is an ethical burial?” Goldblatt asked.

Rabbi Margaret Holub of the unaffiliated Mendocino Coast Jewish Community in Albion, Calif., was one of the few in the room who accepted cremation as a legitimate option—or at least was willing to admit to holding that position.

“I see it as a reasonable, thoughtful option,” she said. “It’s very difficult to tell someone to spend $6,000 to 8,000 or more for burial. I can understand why some Jews would do something else that still shows honor for their dead.”

National Jewish burial society tries to stem increased cremation Read More »

Can Bibi and Obama make it work?

Did you hear the latest? Bibi called Monday and said that next week he had some important things he wanted to get off his chest. Is he ready to commit or just being a tease? Will Obama show enough flexibility to make this thing work?

Those rushing to declare the fix-up between President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a flop after just one date should remember that a good relationship takes time. It’s been less than five months since Obama’s inauguration, and Netanyahu has been on the job for only two months.

Compare that to George W. Bush and Ariel Sharon. Nowadays everyone talks about their wonderful marriage, but their respective first terms in office had already overlapped for seven months when they had their first major blowup. In reality, it took several years—and several spats—before they found their groove.

In the early months, both before and after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, there were reports that the Bush administration was preparing to apply some pressure on Israel as part of a wider effort to short-circuit the second intifada and kick-start the stalled peace process. Sharon didn’t like what he was hearing and declared in a public speech: “Do not try to appease the Arabs at our expense. This is unacceptable to us. Israel will not be Czechoslovakia. Israel will fight terrorism.”

The outburst—widely interpreted as Sharon warning Bush that he was in danger of turning into a Neville Chamberlain-style appeaser—drew a stern rebuke from the White House. Only after several high-level phone calls, a public apology and heaps of praise did Sharon succeed in smoothing Bush’s ruffled feathers. And even then it took several years for their governments to hammer out a joint approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Bush eventually granted Israel wide latitude to fight terrorism and signed on to Sharon’s view that Yasser Arafat needed to be sidelined. Sharon signed on to the internationally backed “road map” peace plan, delivered on the clause calling for Israel to endorse the goal of a Palestinian state and accepted Bush’s calculation that Mahmoud Abbas, who went on to lead the Palestinian Authority, was kosher.

Over time, Sharon and Bush even worked out an approach to the thorny issue of settlements: Israel dismantled all of its settlements in Gaza and four in the West Bank; Bush responded to Sharon’s disengagement plan by issuing a public letter acknowledging that Israel would end up with some of the territory it captured in the 1967 Six-Day War; and Bush offered a behind-the-scenes green light to limited Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank, despite the road map’s call for a full settlement freeze, including “natural growth.”

Now Netanyahu and Obama are seeing how far each can go in adjusting the terms without jettisoning the entire road map framework or creating a deep frost between Washington and Jerusalem.

The Israelis made the first adjustment, with Netanyahu refusing to affirm Sharon’s endorsement of a Palestinian state, even though one of Israel’s first obligations under the road map is to issue an “unequivocal statement affirming [Israel’s] commitment to the two-state vision of an independent, viable, sovereign Palestinian state living in peace and security alongside Israel.”

Next, Obama and his team made their adjustment, insisting through a series of escalating statements that not only does the administration stand by the goal of creating a Palestinian state, it also wants a full Israeli settlement freeze.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton delivered the firm public message last month that there was no wink-wink in the president’s position.

“He wants to see a stop to settlements,” she said. “Not some settlements, not outposts, not natural growth exceptions.”

Then, twice in recent days, Clinton delivered the official Obama rejection of Israeli claims on Bush-era understandings about allowing natural growth in some settlements.

“There is no memorialization of any informal and oral agreements,” she said last week. “If they did occur, which of course, people say they did, they did not become part of the official position of the United States government. And there are contrary documents that suggest that they were not to be viewed as in any way contradicting the obligations that Israel undertook pursuant to the road map. And those obligations are very clear.”

Clinton struck the same note in an interview that aired over the weekend on ABC’s “This Week.”

Obama, meanwhile, has played the good cop in several media interviews, stressing that the Palestinians also have obligations they need to meet—including fighting terrorism and stopping anti-Israel incitement—and stressing that Israel would continue to enjoy a “special” relationship with the United States. The president repeatedly has brushed aside questions about sanctioning Israel over the settlement issue, insisting that diplomacy takes time.

Obama’s Middle East envoy, former U.S. Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell, sought to articulate both halves of the tough love message in meetings Tuesday with Israeli officials. He told President Shimon Peres that the U.S. commitment to the security of Israel “remains unshakeable,” and insisted that “my meetings today with the president and other Israeli officials are discussions among friends who share a common set of objectives: peace, security and prosperity to all the people of this region.”

But there was no public backpedaling from what Obama has framed as a commitment to telling both sides publicly what he thinks needs to be done.

“The president and the secretary of state have made our policy clear: Israelis and Palestinians have a responsibility to meet their obligations under the road map,” Mitchell said.

Against this backdrop, Netanyahu has decided to deliver a “major diplomatic speech” next week to outline his government’s “principles for achieving peace and security.”

“I would like to make it clear: We want to achieve peace with the Palestinians and with the countries of the Arab world while attempting to reach maximum understanding with the U.S. and our friends around the world,” the prime minister said Sunday at the beginning of his weekly Cabinet meeting.  “My aspiration is to achieve a stable peace that rests on a solid foundation of security for the State of Israel and its citizens.”

It will be the most important speech of his second stint as prime minister and the defining moment in his relationship with the popular U.S. president.

That is, until the next one.

Can Bibi and Obama make it work? Read More »

Arab king calls Holocaust ‘wound to the collective memory of mankind’

It’s not every day that leader of a Muslim country stands up and draws attention to the horror of the Holocaust—particularly when it is not simply being compared to Israeli treatment of Palestinians. But King Mohammed VI of Morocco said in March at the launch of a Muslim-Jewish dialogue in Fez that:

“We perceive [Yom HaShoah] as a wound to the collective memory, which we know is engraved in one of the most painful chapters in the collective history of mankind. … In its depth as much as in its tragic specificity, this duty of remembrance strongly imposes ethical, moral and political standards which will, tomorrow, be the true guarantors of peace.”

This speech was picked up by Warren L. Miller, chairman of the U.S. Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad, in an op-ed for the Philadelphia Inquirer:

But in a few places in the Islamic world, there is now a willingness to look truthfully at the past and comprehend what befell European Jewry more than six decades ago. Last year, the predominantly Muslim European nation of Albania commemorated its first Holocaust Remembrance Day. And now King Mohammed has shown real leadership by publicly acknowledging the Holocaust. He should be emulated as well as applauded.

The federal commission I head works to preserve the memory of the Holocaust – both the cultural legacy of the thousands of communities that were destroyed and the historical record of what happened to them. We try to preserve the lessons as well as the evidence of the event, so modern societies will understand that allowing prejudice and hatred to flourish can only lead to barbarity.

In both of these areas, King Mohammed’s speech presents an important opportunity. It provides a starting point for Morocco and its neighbors to explore more fully the fate of Jews across North Africa during World War II. Some officials in the region still maintain that the Holocaust did not affect their countries. Although Jews in North Africa largely avoided the genocide their people suffered in Europe, they faced painful persecution.

King Mohammed’s grandfather, Mohammed V, managed to diminish application of the Vichy government’s racist laws toward Moroccan citizens of Jewish faith. But thousands of Jewish refugees from Europe were placed in French-controlled detention and slave-labor camps in Morocco, as they were in Algeria and Tunisia. Many of these Jews, as well as some Arabs and Berbers, were forced to work under cruel circumstances, with insufficient food and in unbearable climatic conditions. The nations of North Africa must come to terms with this legacy.

In the wake of President Obama’s speech in Cairo, during which he both called on Muslims and the U.S. to work together for peace and gave a strong rebuke to Holocaust deniers like that little man in Iran, King Mohammed’s speech was sent to The Jewish Journal by the advocacy group supporting the Moroccan government, which suggested that we “consider covering the unique relationship between the Moroccan government and Jewish community.”

I’m not really sure what that relationship is. Before the founding of Israel in 1948, some 250,000 Jews lived in Casablanca, Fez, Rabat and other major cities. Between 5,000 and 15,000 remain today. Despite the population decline, it sounds like Jews in Morocco are doing better than their brethren in, say, Yemen. From the Jewish Virtual Library:

Nonetheless, before his death in 1999, King Hassan tried to protect the Jewish population, and at present Morocco has one of the most tolerant environments for Jews in the Arab world. Moroccan Jewish emigres, even those with Israeli citizenship, freely visit friends and relatives in Morocco. Moroccan Jews have held leading positions in the business community and government. The major Jewish organization representing the community is the Conseil des Communautes Israelites in Casablanca. Its functions include external relations, general communal affairs, communal heritage, finance, maintenance of holy places, youth activities, and cultural and religious life.4

“The Jews no longer reside in the traditional Jewish mellahs, but intermarriage is almost unknown. The community has always been religious and tolerant….The younger generation prefers to continue its higher education abroad and tends not to return to Morocco. Thus the community is in a process of aging.

After the jump, the text of the Moroccan king’s comments, read by the minister of religious affairs, at the launch of the Aladdin Project:

Arab king calls Holocaust ‘wound to the collective memory of mankind’ Read More »

First Black Female Rabbi Ordained…L’Chaim!!!

An Ohioan on Saturday became the first African-American woman rabbi ordained in the United States.

Alysa Stanton, of Blue Ash, Ohio, was among 14 rabbis ordained at a ceremony at the Plum Street Temple in Cincinnati. She will serve as rabbi of the predominantly white Congregation Bayt Shalom in Greenville, N.C., beginning this summer.  Read the full story at HAARETZ.com.

Read our past coverage of Alysa Stanton here.

First Black Female Rabbi Ordained…L’Chaim!!! Read More »

Jon Voight calls Obama a ‘false prophet’

In addition to being Angelina Jolie’s father, Jon Voight is a pop culture legend. His name, albeit with an “h,” convinced George Constanza to buy a used LeBaron and 40 years since “Midnight Cowboy,” his Joe Buck remains an iconic character in American cinema.

“How are you comparing Liam Neeson with Jon Voight?” George asked in “The Mom & Pop Store.” “Jerry, we’re talking about Joe Buck. If you can play Joe Buck, Oskar Schindler’s a cake walk.”

Voight is also a stalwart supporter of Israel, a proud friend of the American Jewish community and a die-hard conservative. And he’s apparently no fan of President Barack Obama.

Emceeing a GOP fundraiser last night, at which he was joined by Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin, Voight said “we are becoming a weak nation” under “this Obama oppression” and called the president a “false prophet.”

Depending on the context, that could be akin to being called the Antichrist, a smear that also has been thrown at Obama. But, in this situation, I think Voight’s fear is more worldly.

After the jump, the opening credits of “Midnight Cowboy”:

Jon Voight calls Obama a ‘false prophet’ Read More »