fbpx

March 7, 2002

Off to School

At his aufruf, Shana Kramer’s oldest son stood up in front of all his rebbes at Ner Israel Rabbinical College in Baltimore and said, "It would be impossible for me to thank everyone that I have to thank for bringing me to this point, but there is someone I have to thank publicly because she stood there and cried every time I left the house to go back to yeshiva." He was talking about his mother, and the experience of sending her son away for high school, was, as Kramer, 52, put it, "Like taking my heart out of me and stomping on it."

Hyperbole aside, Kramer’s experiences as a mother who sent her children away to high school are echoed by many parents in Los Angeles’ religious community. According to Rabbi Yaakov Krause, the principal of Yeshiva Rav Isacsohn Torath Emeth Academy, the largest ultra-Orthodox elementary school in Los Angeles, every year at least 15 percent of Torath Emeth parents will send their boys to out-of-town yeshivot for high school. A few years back, it was as many as 40 percent, and even though today more parents are opting to keep their children in Los Angeles for high school, there is still a significant number of students who leave the community to seek Torah learning in other places.

Members of the Orthodox community are quick to point out that the phenomenon of sending children away is an old Jewish tradition. "In the Bible, Isaac and Rebecca sent young Jacob away to learn for many years," said Rabbi Dr. David Fox, a clinical psychologist. "In the Diaspora, for hundreds of years in Ashkenazic and Sephardic countries, where many towns did not have schools and institutions, the parents had to send their children away." Fox, who is on the graduate faculty of USC and is involved in rabbinic education and service, has parents consult him on the issue of sending their children away nearly 30 times a year.

The reasons for sending children away are varied. Many parents want their children to attend their own alma maters. "We chose Ner Israel because my husband is an alumnus, and we knew many of the staff members," Kramer said.

Moreover, in the ultra-Orthodox world, there is a certain cachet attached to large rabbinic academies outside of Los Angeles — places like the Ner Israel Rabbinical College of Baltimore — and both parents and students want the prestige and the learning that is associated with those yeshivot. "Most of the time the desire to travel far is fostered by the student himself, who has his eye on a particular type of study," Fox said. "In the secular world, a child is motivated to get into Harvard, Yale or MIT. In the religious world, you will have a child who is attracted to a particular style of yeshiva or seminary."

While attending the Harvard of yeshivot is a draw, many parents also feel that the schools in Los Angeles — places like Yeshiva Gedolah of Los Angeles or the Calabasas Yeshiva — will not provide their boys with the yeshiva education experience that they need. Parents want their boys to have the experience of total immersion in Torah study, away from the luxuries and pampering of Los Angeles. "There is a degree of camaraderie and academic intensity that dormitory life in an out-of-town yeshiva or seminary can afford the young man which the home setting or local school does not always provide," Fox said.

"I think that people really want their boys to have the experience of living away from home in a yeshiva where there are no distractions," Kramer said. "For example, there might be a television in the home that the parents are carefully monitoring, but they want their boys to have a purely spiritual time, and to get away from the daily newspaper. If they really want them to have a total immersion, then a local yeshiva will not fit the bill."

Others think that although the yeshivas in Los Angeles are fine institutions, they do not have what it takes to keep the students in town. "What we need is a rosh yeshiva who has a proven track record with a national reputation that will be able to retain and to draw boys to a beit midrash [house of study]. That is what our goal is," said Benny Westreich.

Westreich, 49, is a lawyer, and although he and his wife chose not to send their boys away to yeshiva, he has been working for several years to try and attract what he calls a world-class rosh yeshiva to Los Angeles. "We do have a really terrible balance of trade, because we export really successful boys to high schools [out of town]," he said. "We have zero coming in, and we have a heck of a lot going out."

Rabbi Eliezer Gross, the principal of Yeshiva Gedolah of Los Angeles, believes that there is no real reason to send boys out of town to yeshiva. "I don’t think there is a difference in the quality of education that the boys receive," Gross told The Journal.

For the boys themselves, being sent out of town can be a maturing, stimulating, but often difficult experience, more so when they are sent away at a younger age. They often become homesick, and have trouble adjusting to life in the dormitories. For this reason Fox recommends that if parents have any doubt about the child’s maturity, they should keep him home as long as possible.

"I certainly do get consultative phone calls with regard to some Los Angeles students who are living in dormitories out of town," he said. "I get called by the principal or the dean saying that they are concerned about the way a youngster is developing. But in the past few years, many of the yeshivas have taken onto the staff a mental health consultant to oversee the curriculum and to help homesick or anxious youngsters adjust to the atmosphere. And, it is not as if we are talking about a Charles Dickens situation."

Elliot Mandelbaum, 18, is someone who believed that the Torah pastures were greener elsewhere. He left Yeshiva University High School Los Angeles (YULA) in 11th grade against his parents’ better wishes to study in Yeshiva Toras Moshe in Jerusalem. He was already in the highest shiur (class) at YULA, and he was ready for more intense studies.

"I felt that of the yeshivas that I was looking at for the way I wanted to go, this was the best one. In Israel, I am away from everything, with less distractions, and it is easier to learn," he said in a phone interview from Jerusalem.

Mandelbaum has a rigorous schedule in the yeshiva. The school requires him to learn 10 hours day, but in practice, he studies for 12 1/2 hours a day, often not leaving until after midnight.

But he suffers none of the anxieties that might plague other young yeshiva students, and he has no regrets about the choice he made to leave Los Angeles. "I am very happy with the decision I made to attend this yeshiva," he said. "I think it was the best decision."

Off to School Read More »

Your Letters

Daniel Pearl

“Yes I am a Jew and my father is a Jew and my mother is a Jew.”God Bless Daniel Pearl and his family (“A Voice Silenced,” March 1).

Dr. Leland S. Shapiro, Simi Valley

Abe Foxman

As the present and past national chairmen of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), we are pleased that recent discussions between ADL’s former Los Angeles Director David Lehrer and the ADL have led to a mutually satisfactory resolution.

We want to publicly affirm the importance of our Los Angeles Regional Office and of ADL supporters in the community. We are proud of the fact that of our 30 regional offices, our Los Angeles regional office is home to the largest professional staff. We are also proud that in recent years, two of the past ADL national chairmen have been from Los Angeles.

We also want to publicly affirm our deep respect for our National Director Abraham Foxman. We who have worked most closely with him over the past 30 years have witnessed how his leadership has not only brought the ADL to the level of international prominence it enjoys today, but has also assured the finest local representation possible in communities across America.

Glen A. Tobias, , ADL National Chairman

Honorary Chairmen:

Howard P. Berkowitz, Kenneth J. Bialkin, Seymour Graubard, Maxwell E. Greenberg, Burton M. Joseph, Burton S. Levinson, Melvin Salberg, David H. Strassler

Price of Being Jewish

Thank you for your recent article by Nacha Cattan, (“The Price of Being Jewish,” March 1). As a single mother unable to afford a synagogue membership, let alone a Jewish education for my 3-year-old son, I find the rising cost of a Jewish education an alarming matter.

This dilemma is facing many middle- and lower-income families. If we are to strengthen the Jewish community, we must be willing to find some cost-effective means to address this urgent problem. We must be willing to make it possible for anyone who wants to participate in Jewish studies to be able to do so.

Dana Wynkoop, Los Angeles

Nebraskans Love J.D.Smith

I get The Jewish Journal (thanks to my daughter in Santa Monica) here in Lincoln, Neb., where all my friends enjoy reading your paper and love to read about the Jewish events and the great Jewish articles.

We especially enjoy reading the stories by J.D. Smith. He is funny and amusing and we get a chuckle at his tongue-in-cheek humor. I add that we are also in our 80s.

Sylvia Kushner, Lincoln, Nebraska

JCC vs. Knesset Israel

Ethel McClatchey (Letters, Feb. 22), a respected advocate for the Silver Lake-Los Feliz JCC , is perhaps unaware of the facts behind Temple Knesset Israel’s involvement with us disenfran-chised former members.

There are displaced members of the JCC. Our numbers include many members from the last standing JCC Board, before it was forced to dissolve. There is certainly nothing “premature” or “self-serving” in Harvey Shield’s support for those of us who feel abandoned by the Jewish Community Centers of Greater Los Angeles (JCCGLA).

The children’s play, sponsored by the JCC, has been a tradition for many years. However, as a result of the JCCGLA financial crisis, I was told there would be no play this year. So a beloved program that has served the community and built young character for years, was terminated because of someone’s bad accounting.

And then we met Shield. He certainly didn’t seek us — we came to him, asking for his help to keep the children’s theater program alive. Shield offered Temple Knesset Israel as a rehearsal site. Now 60-plus kids are rehearsing at the temple, parents are working on the production and we feel like a family again.

Several former JCC members are considering joining Temple Knesset Israel — and it’s not due to any solicitations. It’s because we have discovered a warm and welcoming site for Jewish discourse, fraternity and spirituality — as well as a fulcrum for community involvement.

“Sanctimonious,” “predatory” and “self-serving” are reckless words from passionate people in a heated situation. But words aren’t really necessary to defend Shield’s character — his actions, as a patron of the arts and a friend to our children and community, speak for themselves.

Broderick Miller , Former Executive Board Member Silver Lake-Los Feliz JCC

Chief Bernard Parks

“Should We Join the Fray?” (Feb. 15). What a meaningless question. Why do some amongst us have a need to inject race into an issue that should be determined only by the competence of the proposed officeholders?

We original liberals always preached that skin color should never be an issue. Sadly, since about the mid-’60s, the “liberal” banner has been hijacked by radical racists. You can support Parks or oppose him, but not as “we” Jews, or “we” blacks, etc.

He is the best or not the best and it is irresponsible for a major Jewish community newspaper to imply in a front page headline that the dispute may be a “Jewish” issue.

Leon Perlsweig, Calabasa

Conversions

Thank you for highlighting the issue of non-Orthodox conversions of Israel. This historic ruling was the result of a united effort between NA’AMAT, Israel’s largest family service agency, and the Masorati and World Union for Progressive Judaism.

The effort began in 1995 when a group of parents who had adopted children from abroad found that they could not convert these children to Judaism and, in desperation, turned to NA’AMAT, known as the place to go when families have problems. NA’AMAT arranged for Masorati conversions and, simultaneously, began the suit concluded last week.

NA’AMAT USA is proud to support this important legal work and will continue to work with our sister organization in Israel to encourage an open society that respects all streams of Judaism.

Miriam Hearn, Western Area Director NA’AMAT USA

Kids Page

I want to thank Abby Gilad for her interpretation of Parshat Terumah (“Hey Kids!” Feb. 15) in Jewish Journal section, “Hey Kids!” I am a recent convert, landscape designer and avid Jewish Journal reader. I found it very interesting that the Israelites were commanded to build the ark out of shita (acacia wood) and cover the completed ark with gold, both inside and out. This is so fascinating because most acacia varieties at this time of year have golden yellow flowers covering their branches. One variety in particular is completely covered with golden flowers — acacia baileyana.The acacia may be a reminder to us when in full bloom of the events that happened at this time of year according to Parshat Terumah.

Sonny Estrada, Temple Israel of Hollywood

Correction

The photograph in the March 1 article “Abraham’s Legacy” was by Janice Kamenir-Reznik.

Your Letters Read More »

Riordan’s Primary

Say what you will about Richard Riordan’s abortive primary strategy, and the way he naively stepped into Gov. Gray Davis’ trap, but Riordan certainly understood one of his key customers: the Jewish electorate. Too bad we’ll never see the Davis/Riordan face-off that would have told us so much about ourselves.

I make no claim to understanding the doctrinaire conservative rank-and-file Republicans who gave millionaire Bill Simon, Jr. his Tuesday night victory. But, I do know a bit about the socially liberal voter who was the target of the former Los Angeles mayor: he was aiming right at people like me. (Too bad voters no longer have the open primary.)

In Los Angeles County, election results show Riordan led Simon 48 to 41.5 percent. Davis pummeled Riordan with $10 million in TV ads questioning his philosophy and accusing him of not being a good enough Republican. That’s exactly why Riordan won Los Angeles’ liberal heart. Whatever his managerial skills and his actual performance as a mayor, Riordan represents a kind of political tolerance that indeed has turned Los Angeles, and certainly its Jewish community, around.

I remember the shock waves that went through Jewish Los Angeles during the first Riordan campaign, against City Councilmember Mike Woo. To leave the liberal nest, Jews had to make peace not only with the memory of their parents and grandparents, but also with the new post-riot social reality that put public safety, not union affiliation, high on the political agenda. They accepted as their political ally a mayor who was good friends with the cardinal.

In this, Riordan is precisely the same kind of crossover guy as Rudy Giuliani. Riordan’s primary platform offered exactly that kind of opportunity to break down rhetorical barriers as had happened in pre-Sept. 11 New York: suburban interests shaping urban politics. It’s a kind of political calamity that Giuliani opted to befriend his former employee Simon, who worked for him in the Justice Department. Riordan’s message was risky and powerful (even if his timing was wrong): why can’t we disagree on social issues — abortion and the death penalty — while addressing the crucial problem of time — education. Not for nothing is Pat Brown Riordan’s favorite California governor.

I know many Angelenos who think Riordan’s legacy amounts to little, but he can take credit for creating the socially graceful political climate that has been Los Angeles for the last eight years. That matters, too.

The fact is, though I have never voted for a Republican candidate for governor, Riordan would have had a good shot at my support. Not living in the city, I missed a chance to vote for him for mayor. Breaking a barrier can be good for the soul.

At press time, Wendy Greuel was 55 votes ahead of Tony Cardenas to replace Councilmember Joel Wachs, who had represented the East Valley for more than 20 years. The 2nd District seat was once the heartbeat of the Valley Jewish community; as the district map is redrawn, this seat may be doomed to be a continuing battleground between competing Anglo and Latino interests. At Greuel headquarters, I heard smart people discussing whether it really is better to have districts that are all-city or all-Valley. Underlying that question is a bigger one: How can we use the wisdom of two great communities, Latinos and Jews, for our city’s best interests?

The race to fill the 40th Assembly seat (Sherman Oaks) now being vacated by Speaker Robert Hertzberg shows how even two Jews can have a dogfight. Lloyd E. Levine, 33, son of veteran political consultant Larry Levine, defeated Andrei Cherny, 26-year-old former speechwriter for Al Gore and Hertzberg’s heir designate by a little more than 1,200 votes. The bad blood between the two led to last-minute charges that Cherny had sent a mailer with racist overtones misrepresenting Levine’s record. Levine countered that Cherny was for privatizing social security, the third rail of American politics.

Politics offers a continual opportunity to rise above self-interest and bad behavior into leadership. One hopes for better in the months to come.

Riordan’s Primary Read More »

Cycle of Bloodshed

There is a new rhythm to the terror attacks against Israelis: They are coming in one-two punches, leaving the country staggering.

On Saturday, March 2, a suicide bomber killed 11 people in Jerusalem, and the following morning, a Palestinian sniper killed 10 soldiers and settlers at an army checkpoint in the West Bank. Then on Monday, March 4, a gunman sprayed bullets at a Tel Aviv restaurant, killing three people. The following morning, a bus bomber killed a man in Afula, and a sniper killed a woman driving in the West Bank. On Wednesday, two Israeli soldiers and seven palestinians were killed as the Israeli army retaliated for a Hamas rocket attack Tuesday in the Negev.

These one-two attacks follow blistering Israeli barrages on Palestinian cities and refugee camps in the West Bank and Gaza, which kill 15 or more Palestinians a day. Right-wingers in the Sharon government want to use the full force of Israel’s military superiority to simply devastate the Palestinians, their leaders and the infrastructure of their society — to wage a war of unbridled destruction. The Labor Party, on the other hand, is hinting that it will leave the national unity government if the war continues to escalate with no political solution in sight.

Meanwhile Prime Minister Ariel Sharon repeats that he will not "drag Israel into a full-scale war." Instead he steadily escalates Israel’s military assaults, and the Palestinians do the same.

There are war clouds over Israel. The somberness and tension on the faces of people Tuesday morning after the lethal attacks in Tel Aviv, Afula and outside Jerusalem, were reminiscent of the mood here on the eve of the 1991 Gulf War.

Israel Television military correspondent Ron Ben-Yishai reported that security forces were currently aware of 30 different terrorists on their way to attacks in 30 different spots. Army officials say that since the start of the intifada, about 10 percent of planned attacks have been "successful." The other 90 percent have been foiled by soldiers, police or alert citizens or have gone awry, usually because a bomb failed to explode.

As the saying goes, do the math: Three out of 30 terrorists can kill a lot of people.

Israelis are reeling as terror attacks fall one after the other. People see that the government and the Army, while inflicting massive casualties and damage on the Palestinians, are not providing Israelis more security; the opposite is the case. Israelis want a solution, but they don’t want a solution that smacks of surrender, of suing for peace, because a cowering Israel would be defenseless against a Palestinian nation that smelled fear.

One sign of the unraveling of Israeli composure was seen in the pipe bombing of a Palestinian school in East Jerusalem, in which eight people, mainly students, were lightly injured. An unknown Jewish organization called, "Revenge of the Infants," claimed responsibility for the attack.

In the current situation, talk of "unilateral separation" — of withdrawing from Gaza and most of the West Bank, uprooting some 50,000 settlers and building a fortified border to keep Palestinians from entering Israel — has faded. Likewise, the recent proposal by Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah — that Israel give the Palestinians Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem in return for Arab recognition of Israel — isn’t being discussed seriously.

Still, few Israelis are prepared to assume control again for 3.5 million Palestinians. A majority favor land-for-peace, but in negotiations where Israel is dealing from a position of strength, or at least equality, not weakness.

Dr. Meil Pa’il, a veteran Israeli peace activist and military historian, proposes that the Army do what the right-wing wants — mop up the Palestinians, make them sue for peace but then negotiate a withdrawal from the territories. But while the current government might go along with the first stage of this plan, it is dead set against the second.

Israel’s gradual reentry into the territories is exactly what Yasser Arafat wants, says Ben-Yishai. Arafat’s strategy is to lure Israel into wreaking havoc in the territories, after which the international community would be compelled to send forces into the West Bank and Gaza to get between the two sides, thereby paving the way for the world to impose the solution it has long favored: a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem, with Israel withdrawing its settlers and soldiers from those areas.

Many on the Israeli left would welcome international intervention; they are convinced the Israelis and Palestinians are incapable of settling the conflict, or even containing it, on their own. But neither the United States, NATO or any other Western power is interesting in getting involved in the Israeli-Palestinian war, and the Sharon government is not interested in welcoming them in.

The intifada’s damage to Israel is not only in security. The Finance Ministry says it has cost the Israeli economy some $5 billion — the equivalent of half the annual defense budget, or nearly two years’ worth of U.S. aid.

For the Palestinians part, they see the intifada as their "war of independence," says Palestinian affairs expert Reuven Paz. Their role model, he says, is the Algerians, who ran France out of their country after a seven-year guerrilla war that ended in 1962. The French killed over 200,000 Algerians in that war, while losing some 20,000 French soldiers and civilians. In the 18-month intifada, Israel has killed fewer than 1,000 Palestinians, while losing some 300 soldiers and civilians. The history of modern guerrilla war is a great source of encouragement for the Palestinians and of foreboding for Israel.

Cycle of Bloodshed Read More »

Being Good Neighbors

When a suicide bomber walked unimpeded into a crowded supermarket in Efrat earlier this month and set off a small bomb, the explosion damaged a section of the store’s bakery. Miraculously, no Jews were injured by the blast, but the Arab casualties were believed significant.

Following the attack, the first to occur inside the settlement, Efrat officials reinstated a ban prohibiting Arabs from entering the community. During the past year and a half, several temporary bans have been imposed and then lifted.

On one occasion, Arabs were prevented from entering Efrat ostensibly for their own protection a day after a particularly gruesome terror attack elsewhere in the country. And throughout the year, residents have hotly debated the wisdom of maintaining an open community at a time of widespread violence.

That debate, says Efrat’s Chief Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, has now been resolved. Speaking to several hundred of the city’s residents who had gathered in the waning hours of Shabbat to give thanks that the attack had been thwarted without a single serious injury to Jews, Riskin announced that Arabs would not be allowed into Efrat. His announcement was greeted with loud applause.

This time, the ban is likely to remain in effect. The dozens of Arabs who come here every day to work in construction, municipal services and as handymen, gardeners and house cleaners for private individuals suddenly find themselves out of work.

"I always believed in coexistence, but to my sorrow, I have now reached the conclusion that at this point, there is no room for coexistence, as long as there is incitement on the other side," Riskin said following the attack in Efrat. "We are at war, and we have to show them that they cannot beat us. Only then can there be peace, and only then we will be able to rehabilitate the relations between us and the Palestinians."

It’s a tough pill for the 61-year-old rabbi to swallow. Efrat was founded in 1982, and early on, Riskin began efforts to forge meaningful relationships with the Arabs who live in villages scattered around Efrat in the Judean Hills south of Jerusalem, in the region known as Gush Etzion.

There is no fence around the community, and although there are security regulations, up to now they have been only lightly enforced. Arabs enter freely on foot, donkey or bicycle; shop in local stores, and knock on doors looking for odd jobs.

Last year, vandals entered one of Efrat’s synagogues in the middle of the night and damaged books and spray-painted anti-Semitic graffiti on the walls of the sanctuary. The perpetrators were never caught, but they left a message emblazoned on a wall trying to blame the act on residents of a nearby village. The link was never established, and many believe they were attempting to undermine the good relations between Efrat and its closest Arab neighbors.

In the months following the synagogue desecration, three residents of Efrat were killed in drive-by shootings on the road just outside the settlement. But until the bombing, there had not been a violent incident inside Efrat.

In a private interview held prior to the attack, Riskin spoke about the past 18 months of conflict. "We are fighting against the Palestinian Authority, not against the Palestinians as a people," the rabbi said. That remains a critical distinction for Riskin.

"My perspective, coming into contact with Palestinians everyday, is that the average Palestinian villager wants peace like I want peace. They want to watch their children and grandchildren grow up. They are bitterly disappointed by Arafat," he said.

Good neighborliness, said Riskin, is an idea both Jews and Arabs should be able to understand. "Both the book of Proverbs and the Quran teach, ‘A good neighbor is better than a far-away brother.’"

Among the outreach programs that Riskin has spearheaded is creation of a special humanitarian fund, which he distributes to needy local Arab families. When Yasser Arafat pressured local Arab leaders not to accept money from Jews, Riskin intervened and wrote a letter to Arafat, asking him to allow the aid to continue.

Some residents of Efrat criticized Riskin, accusing him of maintaining diplomatic ties with Arafat while he incited violence against Jews. But Riskin held his ground and the fund continues to operate.

In addition to financial support, many doctors in Efrat have provided medical services to the local Arab population without charge. Riskin also helped local villages to form soccer teams and paid for their uniforms. Perhaps most significantly, Riskin said, Efrat’s security personnel have received warnings of possible attacks.

"Many real friendships have developed," Riskin said. And despite pressure from the Palestinian Authority, "those friendships still exist."

Riskin wears two hats: as chief rabbi of Efrat, home to 10,000 people and 21 synagogues, and as president of Ohr Torah Stone educational network, with more than 3,000 students in its high schools, colleges, graduate programs and rabbinical college.

He also writes a popular syndicated Torah column, which appears in 40 newspapers each week. "What’s constantly amazing to me is that the Torah always seems to speak to our present situation. It’s timeless, but at the same time a very timely Torah."

A column he wrote about the Torah portion of Jethro in January illustrates his point: "Israel is entitled to live in freedom — and must be willing to wage battle against autocratic, Amalek-like governments which themselves utilize terrorism against innocent citizens and which harbor, aid and abet terrorists. And Israel must establish Jethro-like partnerships with those who, although they may still follow their individual religions, recognize the overarching rule of the God of justice, compassion and peace."

As the violence continues throughout Israel, Riskin continues to deliver a tough message about maintaining a strong commitment to life here: "We’re living in very fateful times. If we are called upon to express commitment, even to the point of committing one’s life, in our generation, the Jewish state and the Jewish homeland are worth that kind of commitment.

"It’s difficult to be here, but it’s a privilege, and I wouldn’t trade places with anyone. Whatever happens in Israel is a chapter heading to history. Whatever happens in Diaspora is at best a footnote. And if we have one life, I want to be a chapter heading."

Being Good Neighbors Read More »

Federations Send Aid to Argentina

The United Jewish Communities has pledged more than $40 million this year for the rescue and relief of the Jews of Argentina.

Most U.S. federations say they are committed to meeting the goal that the umbrella organization has set to aid Argentine Jews, whose country has been hit by a severe economic crisis in recent months.

"There is a broad recognition that responding to the crisis of the Jewish community in Argentina is precisely the reason why the federation system exists — to be able to make certain that people have food and medicine and to make certain that those who want to leave can do so," said John Ruskay, executive vice president of the UJA-Federation of New York.

Of the $40 million pledged for this year, $35 million will be allotted to the Jewish Agency for Israel to manage aliyah (immigration to Israel). The figure is based on an estimated 5,000 Argentines making aliyah to Israel this year.

The remaining funds will be directed to the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (JDC) to provide food and medicine. There are approximately 200,000 Jews in Argentina, thousands of them now reported living in poverty.

"The entire situation is very fluid," according to Richard Bernstein, co-chair of the UJC’s Argentinian Response Task Force.

An increase in dollars to meet an increase in demand is entirely possible, he said. The task force will monitor the situation to adjust the budget accordingly and create new budgets each year for at least the next few years.

"If we do the job right with the first families that come to Israel, more will come because the situation in Argentina isn’t going to get better for a very long time," said Stephen Hoffman, UJC’s president.

Despite the situation in Israel, Hoffman said, "aliyah is a real viable alternative for people to consider."

Local federations have until the end of the calendar year to turn over what has been designated as their "fair share" of the total. Each federation’s percentage will be determined by the size of its annual campaign as it relates to the sum total of all of the federations’ campaigns — a figure that is approximately $900 million.

Chicago, for example, based upon a campaign last year that raised $67.2 million, is expected to contribute nearly $3 million to the Argentine fund.

Around the country, federations are just beginning to determine how to raise the money. Some reported that they will conduct separate campaigns for the Argentine Jews, while others will take the money from their regular campaign funds.

Chicago, which is being asked to contribute the second largest amount after New York, plans to fold the Argentina package into its annual campaign drive. The city is already 15 percent ahead of its mark last year, according to federation officials, and plans to dedicate all the funds that top its goal to, "all the special needs Israel is encountering," which includes the Argentine aliyah.

While most federations expressed full support for the amount pledged by the UJC, some had questions. Martin Abramowitz, vice president for planning and agency relations of the Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston, expressed some concern over the UJC calculation.

Although Abramowitz said his federation "will respond in some positive way" to the request and expressed deep respect for the work of the UJC’s overseas partners — the Jewish Agency and the JDC — he said Boston required a "better understanding of the Jewish Agency’s prediction" of costs.

He specifically questioned the Jewish Agency’s projection that it would cost $7,000 for each person to arrive in Israel and be absorbed — and how that figure relates to the package of benefits that the Israeli government is offering a family of four.

David Sarnat, executive vice president of the Jewish Agency’s North American section based in Atlanta, cited some specific costs, including $1,950 for employment training, $1,630 for transportation to Israel and $235 for health care. He said it cost $6,000 to bring each Ethiopian to Israel 10 years ago, when Israel conducted a major program specifically for them.

Sarnat said the UJC approved the numbers after a fact-finding mission to Argentina last month and study of the costs.

"It’s a satisfactory accounting that leaves no questions unanswered," Hoffman said. The Jewish Agency submitted its analysis of past and future funds, and the UJC will be sharing those details in the coming weeks, he said.

Ruskay said this year’s request, which will cost the New York federation nearly $7 million, is a substantial but moderate one. The real test will be if the numbers continue to grow, which would suggest that the requests for aliyah in January and February were only a blip after December’s economic crash, he said.

In Cleveland, federation officials have already built the Argentine crisis into their campaign. "The bottom line is we are committed to this," said Michael Bennett, spokesman for the Jewish Community Federation of Cleveland. "It’s just what we do as Jews — help Jews who are in trouble," he stressed. "I don’t see this being any different."

Federations Send Aid to Argentina Read More »

Sharon Fights Time

A surge in violence this week cost more than two dozen Israelis their lives — and put Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s political life increasingly at peril.

A year after Sharon took office with a pledge to restore security, Israelis were besieged with terror that seemed to come from every direction and with almost every weapon — suicide bombings, sniper shots, Kassam missiles and stabbings.

Sharon’s response? Hit the Palestinians again, and harder.

On Monday, Sharon said the Palestinians must be dealt a blow so severe that they will finally understand that terror damages their cause.

Only then, he said, may the Palestinians be convinced to abandon violence and return to the negotiating table.

Israelis, however, are increasingly dubious that Sharon can lead them out of the present impasse. Public opinion polls show Sharon’s approval ratings plummeting from the highs he enjoyed for most of his first year in office, with a majority of respondents now saying they do not have confidence in his leadership.

In addition, a Saudi Arabian peace initiative, endorsed on Tuesday by Syria, threatens to expose the gap between Sharon’s goals and the Bush administration’s vision of Mideast peace, setting up a potential confrontation between Jerusalem and Washington.

Never formally presented but gathering steam nonetheless, the Saudi initiative calls for the Arab world to make peace with Israel in exchange for a complete Israeli withdrawal from all land captured in the 1967 Six-Day War.

Washington has welcomed the initiative and is exploring it, while Sharon said this week said that a return to those borders — which leaves Israel just nine miles wide at its most populated point — would endanger the country’s security.

U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell criticized Israeli policy earlier this week at a Congressional hearing. "Prime Minister Sharon has to take a hard look at his policies, to see whether they will work," he said.

On Wednesday, President George Bush met with Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak , but offered no new plans for U.S. intervention.

With the death toll rising precipitously this week, an opinion poll by the influential Tami Steinmetz Center at Tel Aviv University showed a steep drop — from more than 40 percent to just 26 percent — in the number of Israelis who agree with Sharon that "Israel can change the situation by the use of more military force."

At the same time, however, only 27 percent believe that diplomacy can resolve the conflict, as Labor Party Foreign Minister Shimon Peres proposes.

If those messages seem contradictory, it’s no accident.

After nearly 18 months, the increasingly bloody Palestinian intifada shows no signs of abating, and more people on both sides are describing the deteriorating conflict as outright war.

At a Security Cabinet meeting last week, differences among the country’s top policy-makers became starkly evident.

Sharon reiterated his determination to strike hard at the Palestinians, but he had to shelve a proposal to send Israeli tanks back to besiege Arafat’s office in Ramallah in the face of strong opposition from the defense minister and Labor Party leader, Benjamin Ben-Eliezer.

The quarrels around the Cabinet table are compounding the worry and despair that is permeating the Israeli public.

Political commentators predict that the longevity of the unity government is in doubt as the violence spirals.

On top of the unrelenting security crisis that stalks the streets of every Israeli city, citizens this week had to contemplate the daunting prospect of political instability — and, possibly, early elections.

The interministerial disputes also exacerbate a widely held concern that the politicians, both in the unity government and in the opposition, have no workable policy to offer.

Sharon himself, in a series of briefings and comments Monday, told Knesset members and reporters that there is "no diplomatic outlook at this time, only a military outlook."

The explicit denial of any diplomatic strategy could help Sharon fend off the remorseless pressure he faces from the right — led by former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — that wants him to topple the Palestinian Authority and root out the terrorist infrastructure it has cultivated in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

In recent weeks, Arafat’s mainstream Fatah movement has emerged as the principal terrorist group in the Palestinian areas, carrying out most of the attacks in the West Bank and inside Israel proper.

That drops the pretense of moderation that Fatah cultivated during the peace process, when it routinely was contrasted to the "militants" of Hamas and Islamic Jihad that Arafat claimed he sought vainly to control.

Increasingly, the barrenness of Sharon’s diplomatic field ups the pressure on the Labor Party to secede from the unity government.

The Bush administration has been loathe to intervene as the violence escalated; its admonishments of Israel have been distinctly low-key, while it consistently has blamed Arafat and the Palestinian Authority for not doing enough to curb terror.

By midweek, however, there were signs of growing American unrest.

The Ha’aretz newspaper reported that Powell discussed with Sharon the possibility of sending the U.S. peace envoy, retired Gen. Anthony Zinni, back to the region. In Washington, State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said Tuesday there was nothing new to report on Zinni. "He will go back when it’s appropriate and useful," he said.

American policy-makers also want Israel to allow Arafat to travel to an Arab League summit in late March in Beirut, where the Saudi Arabian proposal may be discussed. If Israel prevents Arafat from going, his absence likely will become the focus of the summit, to the advantage of the more hard-line Arab states.

Building up its military and diplomatic forces for a possible showdown with Iraq’s Saddam Hussein later this year, Washington is anxious that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict not spiral even further out of control and spread to other fronts.

That might deter more moderate Arab states from supporting, or at least condoning, American action against Iraq. The worsening security situation therefore could trigger some intervention by Washington ahead of the Arab summit. Possibly, some observers here say, both bloodied protagonists want that to happen, though only the Palestinian side will admit it publicly.

Sharon Fights Time Read More »

World Briefs

Syria OKs Saudi Proposal

Syria’s president backed a Saudi plan for an Israeli-Palestinian peace accord. After making negative comments about the plan earlier in the week, Bashar Assad gave his approval during a visit to Saudi Arabia on Tuesday, when he was given assurances by Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah that Syrian and Palestinian interests that a complete withdrawal from the Golan Heights and the “right of return” for Palestinian refugees would be included in the plan. The initiative, floated by Abdullah last month, offers Israel ties with the Arab World if the Jewish state withdraws to the boundaries that existed before the 1967 Six-Day War.

Death Toll Rising

Two Israeli soldiers and seven Palestinians were killed Wednesday as the army retaliated for a Hamas rocket attack a day earlier on a Negev city. Three other soldiers were wounded. At least seven Palestinians were reported killed in a series of Israeli air, sea and ground offensives in Gaza that came in retaliation for the missile attack on Sderot in which three Israeli children were wounded. Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat’s home in Gaza City and a U.N.-run school for the blind were damaged in the air strikes. Israel also launched attacks at Palestinian security targets in the West Bank. In a West Bank village, three Palestinian students were wounded when Israeli soldiers fired toward villagers. The army said the convoy had come under fire.

Pearl Memorial Held at Wall

A memorial service was held on Tuesday at the Western Wall for Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. Among those attending Tuesday’s service were members of Pearl’s family, Religious Affairs Minister Asher Ohana and Deputy Foreign Minister Michael Melchior. Pearl’s grandmother said during the ceremony that Pearl had a warm Jewish heart. “All he really wanted to do is mend the world,” she said.

Holocaust Conference Planned

The Third International Conference on “The Legacy of Holocaust Survivors” is planned for April 8-11 at Jerusalem’s Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial, organized jointly by Yad Vashem and the Center of Organizations of Holocaust Survivors in Israel, and with the support of the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany. Over 600 dignitaries, scholars, survivors and educators from around the world are scheduled to attend. The conference will focus on the moral and universal messages of the Holocaust, the legacy of the survivors and their contribution to society, with 120 educational workshops planned.

Nixon, Graham Knock Jews

Former President Richard Nixon believed that Jews had too much influence in government. Nixon called Jews “untrustworthy” and decided to reduce the number of Jewish political appointees in his second term, according to excerpts from hundreds of hours of tapes recorded in 1972 and recently released by the U.S. National Archives.

The president complained of a “terrible liberal Jewish clique” and said, “Look at the Justice Department, it’s full of Jews.” Nixon also was convinced Jews had control of the media, claiming that 95 percent of reporters were Jewish. The Rev. Billy Graham apologized last Friday for a 1972 conversation with Nixon in which he said the Jewish “stranglehold” of the media was ruining the country and must be broken. “Although I have no memory of the occasion, I deeply regret comments I apparently made in an Oval Office conversation with President Nixon,” Graham said in a statement released by his Texas public relations firm. “They do not reflect my views and I sincerely apologize for any offense caused by the remarks.”

Rabbi Pleads to Porn Charges

Atlanta-area Rabbi Juda Mintz pleaded guilty to having child pornography on his temple computer, according to The Associated Press. Mintz, 59, faces more than two years in prison for possessing at least 10 computer files containing photographs of minors engaging in sexual acts. Mintz allegedly had the files while serving as spiritual leader of Mount Freedom Jewish Center in Randolph, N.J. Mintz’s lawyer told the AP that Mintz will never serve as a rabbi again and is now working as a clerk in a convenience store.

Briefs courtesy of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

World Briefs Read More »

The Kollel Community

When, as a young woman, Rebbetzin Yehudis Fasman met Chaim, her husband-to-be, he laid out his life plan and made sure that she agreed with it. His plan was not to become a millionaire or to spend hours in the office shooting up the corporate ladder. Nor did he want to become a pulpit rabbi of a large congregation. Instead, his ambition was to simply sit and study. He wanted to devote at least five or six years of his life after marriage to full-time Torah learning in kollel (an institution that supports married men who want to spend their lives studying Torah fulltime) and after that to work in avodas hakodesh (holy work) on behalf of the Jewish people.

Rabbi Chaim Fasman now holds the position of rosh kollel (head) of Kollel Los Angeles Bais Avrohom, the largest of six kollels in Los Angeles, with 15 full-time learners.

Funds raised from the community provide a small stipend for these men — known as avreichim (fellows) — and their families to live on, and all the men have to provide is the stamina, determination and mental acumen to sit and study for at least 12 hours a day.

The rise of kollels in America is attributed to Rabbi Aaron Kotler, who arrived in the United States in 1941 from Poland and established a kollel called the Beth Medrash Govoha in Lakewood, N.J. Lakewood grew to be one of the preeminent Torah centers in the ultra-Orthodox world, attracting thousands of learners, and since its establishment, kollels have mushroomed across America. Today, while the largest kollels are found in the big cities, such as New York and Chicago, one will also find kollels in such unlikely places as Des Moines, Iowa; Dallas and Phoenix.

It is a curious ambition that drives the kollel avreich. Learning in kollel means that you will be spending the vast majority of your waking hours studying texts, but the study itself will confer no degree. Nor will your research ever provide the social acclamation that comes with such endeavors as looking for a cure for cancer or attempting to solve the problems in the Middle East.

It means that your professional life will be taken up with work that will never offer a substantial financial reward, no matter how many years you slog away at it. Even the most accomplished kollel avreich leads a Spartan lifestyle, with none of the trappings that most people associate with success — the fancy cars and houses, healthy stock portfolios and large bonuses at the end of the year.

So why would a person choose to learn in kollel? The pay is poor, the hours are long and the studying difficult. "It is their fulfillment as Jews," Fasman said. "There is nothing more meaningful in today’s world than learning."

"The people that chose to learn in kollel see Torah as the main and perhaps only objective of their life," said Rabbi Shlomo Holland, the director of development at Bais Avrohom. "That means they are going to dedicate their life to learning and studying and to conduct their life according to this Torah. The more they are steeped in this knowledge and the more they have a grasp of its true meaning, the more they are able to live this type of truthful life. It is a dedication — not to a profession, but a way of life."

It is also intellectually stimulating. "I guess a person finds fulfillment in that total engagement in study," said Rabbi Yehoshua Kohl, 31, the rosh kollel of the Valley Kollel. "People definitely find something attractive in the experience of being engrossed in study, and they are enthralled with the challenge, intellectually and emotionally, of what they do."

For many, learning in kollel is the apex of a yeshiva career. "Most people [learning in kollel] have been through the day school system and have gone through a yeshiva high school and have spent a number of years learning in the [post-high school] yeshiva beit midrash [house of study]. Learning in Kollel, is in a sense, the final step in the world of being able to learn full-time," Holland said.

The yeshiva background is necessary not only for the skills required learning Talmud all day, but also for the mindset it provides. Kollel avreichim are expected to have a fundamentalist approach to life, eschewing the secular world so that their immersion in Torah studies is total. "We expect certain kinds of proper and personal qualities that people would expect from a ben Torah [son of Torah]," Fasman said. "No one in our yeshivish circles today would go to movies, or have a TV in the home. In the traditional Orthodox world, that is not accepted."

Most Ultra-Orthodox men will learn in Kollel for some period of time — at least a year — after they are married. Many will do it in the large Kollels on the East Coast or in Israel. Most men will not be in Kollel forever, eventually leaving the kollel to take positions in the community as teachers or Rabbis. "Of the 45 alumni of Kollel Los Angeles, all but three have positions in Avodas Hakodesh," said Fasman. "They are either Rabbanim, or principals, or teachers." The same is true for Kollel wives, with many of them taking positions as principals or teachers in the religious day schools across Los Angeles.

Shifra Revach, 30, is married to David, an avreich at Bais Avrohom. "There is nothing imposed, but there is a certain code of conduct that one would assume you undertake when you become part of an institution," she said. "It is a matter of personal integrity, and I think it is understood that in order to be an integrated person, you need a set of values that is consistent with what you are doing.

"If I were to introduce the values of the surrounding culture into my lifestyle, to me that would be an inherent contradiction, because those are values that I do not espouse, and I see myself as a counterculture to those values," she explained.

Those who learn in kollel see their role as tremendously important and vital to the survival of the Jewish people as a whole. "This is a contribution to the Jewish people on the highest level," said Rabbi Nachum Sauer, the rosh kollel of the Yeshiva University Los Angeles (YULA) Kollel. "Those who learn in Kollel are preparing themselves to be educators and rabbanim, which is so critical to the Jewish people," he said. "The real weapon of the Jewish people in battling our enemies is Torah learning, and these are people who are providing that weapon. If someone wants to become a surgeon, they need years of training. Similarly, you need years of training to become a Torah scholar. "

Valley Kollel, Bais Avrohom Kollel and YULA Kollel are community kollels, which means that the avreichim will spend hours each day teaching classes and learning with members of the community. This is seen as enhancing the community that supports the kollel.

"The kollel creates a nucleus for the community that radiates a certain amount of spiritual growth, and it does wondrous things," Revach said. "Learning is one of the ways to connect to God, and when you have a venue to do it, it gives the community focus."

Those who espouse the kollel lifestyle speak reverently of the joys it has bought them, and it seems that it is a lifestyle that can do no wrong. Although the men bring in salaries that are not very high — those interviewed for this article declined to give exact figures, though Sauer did say that the avreichim in the YULA Kollel receives more than $35,000 a year — the financial pressures that might otherwise undo a marriage dissolve in the context of the bigger picture.

"One has to struggle financially, and one has to learn a contentment on a much simpler level of having physical goods and possessions," Holland said. "But I see this as less of a strain and more as a unifying factor in the marriage. The wife wants this [lifestyle] as much as the husband does, and this creates a tremendous united effort."

Revach is similarly contented. "People see it as a sacrificial lifestyle, but it gives us a tremendous sense of spiritual values and focus," she said. "I feel very fortunate, and I feel very privileged that this is my life."

The Kollel Community Read More »

A Portion of Parshat Vayakel-Pekuday

Bezalel helps the Israelites build the mishkan (tabernacle). They are returning a favor that God did for them many years earlier. God built the world so that humans would have a place to live. Now the Israelites are building a mishkan so that God will have a place to “live” on earth. The word mishkan comes from the Hebrew word shachen (neighbor). God and the Israelites are like good neighbors. Have you ever moved to a new neighborhood?

I hope that your new neighbors came to greet you, maybe bringing an apple pie, cookies or a toy. Now it is your turn — if a new neighbor moves in, or if a new kid comes to your school, you can also be a good neighbor. Greet them and make them welcome in your home. And one more thing: Bezalel (whose name means “in the shadow of God”) was chosen as master designer because he knew his stuff. So when you give your new neighbor a present, think first of what you are really good at: Baking? Building bird houses? Use your talents to make your present.

A Portion of Parshat Vayakel-Pekuday Read More »