fbpx

November 8, 2001

A Portion of Parshat Haye Sarah

Abraham had two sons: Yitzchak and Yishmael. Yitzchak was Sarah’s son, and Yishmael was Hagar’s son. Yitzchak would become the ancestor of the Israelites, and Ishmael would be the father of the Arab nations. Sarah sent Hagar and Yishmael away when the half-brothers were still boys. They did not see each other again until their father died. In this parsha, we are told that the brothers come together again at last in order to bury their father at the Cave of Machpelah in Hebron. In their sadness over their father’s death, they are willing to stop being enemies and share their sorrow together.

Do you have any friends or people that you are fighting with? Remember that there are more important things in the world than whatever you were fighting about, and try to make up.

A Portion of Parshat Haye Sarah Read More »

Rabbi Eliezer Shach, Religious Giant, Dies

"We won’t be seeing his likes again" is the kind of elegaic hyperbole one so often hears at funerals and reads in obituaries. Rarely is it a literal truth.

In the case of Rabbi Eliezer Menachem Shach, who died early last Friday and was buried the same day in Bnei Brak — his age estimated at anywhere from 103 to 108 — the statement is indeed fact.

A "late bloomer," Shach wielded power from the mid-1970s, when he was already elderly, through the mid-1990s, when he gradually succumbed to physical infirmity and withdrew from active public life.

On the broader political plane, Shach is considered one of the most powerful forces in the evolution of Israeli society.

His place in Israel’s political pantheon was achieved not only by his vigorous leadership of his own yeshiva world but by his leadership, during its formative period, of the Sephardic Orthodox Shas movement.

As a member of the Agudat Yisrael Council of Sages in the 1970s and early ’80s, Shach was consistently outspoken in his support of the grievances being articulated — at first diffidently, later with increasing vehemence — by young Sephardic Orthodox scholars and communal leaders.

The result was the creation of Shas, which exploded onto the Israeli political scene with four Knesset seats in the 1984 general elections.

Shach fell out with the Shas leadership in 1990, when Shas’ political leader, Aryeh Deri, teamed with Labor’s Shimon Peres to bring down the Likud-Labor unity government in what became known in Israeli history as "the stinking maneuver." The two were stunned when Shach refused to back the left-wing government they intended to set up.

Relations between Shach and Shas never entirely healed, and ended definitively with the 1992 elections, when Shach said Sephardic Jews were not yet ready for leadership roles and Yosef defied Shach’s wishes and brought Shas into the Rabin government.

Especially since he ceased most activity in recent years, Shach had become more important to the fervently Orthodox world as an icon than in any practical sense, according to Samuel Heilman, author of "Defenders of the Faith: Inside Ultra-Orthodox Jewry" — though that hardly diminished his stature.

"More than him personally, there is this sense that is dominant in the [fervently Orthodox] community that the great leaders and men are no longer with us," Heilman said. The attitude "is that the giants lived yesterday and we’re pigmeat today. The older one is, when he dies there’s a feeling that ‘woe is us, there are no greats to take his place.’" — David Landau and Julie Wiener, Jewish Telegraphic Agency

Rabbi Eliezer Shach, Religious Giant, Dies Read More »

Just the Right Size

This is a heartwarming story about a kidney.

The kidney in question belongs to Mike Jones. It used to belong to Patricia Abdullah.

Jones and Abdullah have very little, apparently, in common. Jones is an African American man. Abdullah is a female descendant of the Hawaiian royal family. Jones is Christian. Abdullah is Muslim. Jones lives in the city. Abdullah lives in the Valley.

They’re a perfect match. Sometimes you just have to stay positive. O-positive.

Jones and Abdullah met during a success seminar. When Jones announced he would have to be late to one session because of his ongoing need for dialysis, Abdullah and other classmates got involved. After five years of dialysis, Jones was desperately in need of a transplant.

For one assignment in their seminar, Jones and Abdullah learned how to successfully make what are considered “unreasonable requests.” During the in-class exercise, Abdullah shocked her partner: She said “I’m O-positive, Mike. Make an unreasonable request of me.” Jones, also O-positive, took a moment to realize what she had said, then put the seminar lessons to work and made an unreasonable request: “Will you give me one of your kidneys?” So she did.

Still, all did not run smoothly. But a fellow classmate, an administrator at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, helped work out insurance problems. Cedars-Sinai’s Dr. Gerhard Fuchs alleviated Abdullah’s concerns about missing weeks of work at her new job by removing the organ laparoscopically, requiring only small incisions. Dr. J. Louis Cohen transplanted the healthy new kidney into Jones.

And so a Muslim’s kidney is transplanted into a Christian’s body in a Jewish hospital. Both patients were recovered and healthy within three days, so the kidney doesn’t seem to mind. And according to Abdullah, “Both of our families are going to get together for a group photo. And that’s going to be our Christmas card.”

Just the Right Size Read More »

Holocaust Wins at the Emmys

Three television dramas with Holocaust themes won top honors in their categories at Sunday night’s 53rd Annual Primetime Emmy Award ceremony, proving once again the lasting impact of the Nazi horror in our popular culture.

"Anne Frank" on ABC was named best miniseries for its powerful, four-hour long exploration of Anne’s life, from her happy school days, through her two years in hiding during which she wrote her famous diary, and her final days at Bergen-Belsen.

"Conspiracy," a dramatic reenactment of the 1942 Wansee Conference, which drew up the blueprint for the Nazi extermination of European Jewry, won two awards for HBO: one for actor Kenneth Branagh, who portrayed SS leader Reinhard Heydrich, and the other for Loring Mandel, who wrote the script.

Brian Cox, in the role of Field Marshall Hermann Goering, won supporting actor honors for the TNT miniseries "Nuremberg," a dramatization of the 1945-46 trial of top Nazi war criminals.

Other Jewish winners:

  • Barbra Streisand earned her fourth career Emmy for the Fox special "Barbra Streisand: Timeless."
  • Television veteran Doris Roberts took home the award for best supporting actress in a comedy series for the CBS show "Everybody Loves Raymond."

The awards, held at the Shubert Theatre, had been twice postponed following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Actress Ellen DeGeneres hosted the show and drew the evening’s biggest laugh when she observed, "I’m in a unique position as host because, think about it, what would bug the Taliban more than seeing a gay woman in a suit, surrounded by Jews?"

Holocaust Wins at the Emmys Read More »

The Jewish Side of…

There was no red carpet or Hollywood glitz, but the first Jewish Image Awards, honoring outstanding work reflecting Jewish heritage in film and television, proved a lot shorter and funnier than the more celebrated Oscar ceremonies.

Veteran director Arthur Hiller ("Love Story," "Plaza Suite," "The Man in the Glass Booth") received the Tisch Lifetime Achievement Award. It was presented by the multitalented Carl Reiner, who spent most of the introduction pointing out why Hiller didn’t deserve the award.

The Cross-Cultural Award went to "Backstory: Gentleman’s Agreement," Kevin Burns’ documentary on the making of the groundbreaking 1947 film on American anti-Semitism, which aired on American Movie Classics.

Master of ceremonies Jeffrey Tambor revealed that he had auditioned for an alleged remake of "Gentleman’s Agreement," but was rejected as "too Jewish."

"They’re going for Denzel [Washington]," Tambor deadpanned.

The award ceremony, in the form of an early evening cocktail reception at the Beverly Hilton, was originally scheduled for Sept. 12, but was postponed to last week after the Sept. 11 terrorists attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon.

Howard Bragman and Alan Kannof served as the evening’s co-chairs.

Other winners at the event, sponsored by the Los Angeles Entertainment Industry Council of the National Foundation for Jewish Culture, were:

  • Outstanding Achievement Awards: "Rugrats 10th Anniversary."
  • Network Television Award: ABC miniseries "Anne Frank."
  • Cable Television Film Award: "Varian’s War" (Showtime).
  • Documentary Film Award: "Into the Arms of Strangers" (Warner Bros.).
  • Television Series Award: "The West Wing" (Warner/NBC)
  • Female Character in Television: Hannah Taylor Gordon in the title role in "Anne Frank."
  • Male Character in Television: Richard Schiff, who plays the president’s Communications Director Toby Ziegler in "The West Wing."
  • Female Character in Film: Rachel Weisz in "Enemy at the Gates" (Paramount).
  • Male Character in Film: Steven Weber in "Club Land" (Showtime).
  • MorningStar Commission’s Woman of Inspiration Award: Entertainment attorney Patti Felker.

The Jewish Side of… Read More »

A Tough Match

Our parasha includes a description of possibly the first shidduch (arranged marriage) in history. With the death of his beloved Sarah, Abraham turns his attention to the future and sends his servant back to "the old country" Haran to find a wife for Isaac. The mission with which he charges the servant is clear:

1) Do not take a local woman for his wife;

2) Even if you find a wife in Haran, do not bring Isaac back there — she must be willing to uproot herself and live out her life in Canaan.

Upon arriving at Haran, the servant prays to God for help in completing his mission:

"See, I am standing beside this spring, and the daughters of the townspeople are coming out to draw water. May it be that when I say to a girl, ‘Please let down your jar that I may have a drink,’ and she says, ‘Drink, and I will water your camels too — let her be the one you have chosen for your servant Isaac."

The servant ignores Abraham’s instructions to find a girl who is willing to uproot and come to Canaan. Instead, he introduces a "hospitality test" which was never mentioned by Abraham. As we all know, his prayer was answered, his mission succeeded, and Jewish history was born — but why wasn’t the servant truer to his task?

There is yet a more troubling question about Isaac: Although the stories immediately preceding this one should have included Isaac in a central role, he is nowhere to be seen. From the time that Abraham is told to stay his hand and not slaughter his son on Mount Moriah, Isaac "disappears" from the text — he isn’t even present at his mother’s burial. It is only with the arrival of Rebecca that he "returns to the stage."

What happened to Isaac atop the mountain, bound and lying on top of the altar, that affected him so profoundly?

When we look back at God’s original directive to Abraham regarding Isaac, we find an ambiguous command: v’Ha’alehu sham l’Olah — which might be translated "take him up there as an Olah," meaning "offer him up." It might be understood as "take him up there for an Olah," meaning "show him how to perform an offering."

There is, however, a third way of understanding the phrase in question, which may explain Isaac’s "disappearance" in the subsequent narratives. Unlike other offerings, the Olah is given completely to God. No part of the Olah is eaten by people. Within the matrix of offerings, the Olah represents the dimension of our personalities that longs to be totally bound up with God, unconcerned with — and unfettered by — mundane issues.

Take a fresh look at the command: "Take him up to be an Olah," in other words, do not offer him up (i.e. slaughter him), but make him an Olah, an offering that is solely dedicated to God.

Indeed, Abraham’s hand is only stayed with reference to Isaac’s physical life, but, as the Mishnah would later dictate, once an offering has been brought up to the altar, it can never lose its sanctity.

From the moment of his binding, Isaac became the human, living Olah. His life was no longer one of earthly concerns and interactions — he became an otherworldly man. This may be why he didn’t really return from the mountain — because, in the greater sense of things, he never "came down." He was no longer a child of Abraham and Sarah, but his own separate, sanctified being. This is why he, alone among the patriarchs, was never allowed to leave the land — his expanded altar, as it were.

This is why Abraham appointed his servant to find the appropriate partner for Isaac. Abraham knew, from his own experience, that in order to carry on the mission of spreading God’s word, it would take another Abraham — someone who knows how to reach out to others, who can interact with this world in a sanctified manner. Isaac can no longer fulfill this task.

He sent his servant to find someone willing to leave home, separate from family and move west, to the land of the future and promise. His servant hears, in the directive given him by his master, a familiar refrain: "Go from your land, your birthplace and your father’s house to the land that I will show you."

The wise servant understood that his master wanted another "Abraham" as a daughter-in-law. He set out to find someone who exemplifies Abraham’s attributes and values — best typified by his enthusiastic hospitality; hence the "test."

A young woman who demonstrates Abraham-like kindness will be capable of working with Isaac, and together, they will continue Abraham’s mission of bringing people closer to God’s truth through kindness, love and hospitality. Rebecca passed the test with flying colors; she was the one who finally brought him back to the stage of history, building the next tier of the foundation of the great nation promised to Abraham.

A Tough Match Read More »

Uncle Mom

Have you ever wanted to be a Soccer Mom? If you’re not one, it looks like a pretty good gig from the outside: Leisurely lunches with the girls and shopping trips to the mall. Do a couple of errands, get the kids off to their after-school amusements, then pick up some take-out for dinner, and you’re done. All you need is a car, a cell phone and a charge card, no experience necessary. If you’re lucky, you’ve got a housekeeper to do the heavy lifting, and you never so much as break a nail on the job.

Well, I’ve lived the fantasy, friends, and I’m here to tell you: it’s overrated. These children ain’t all they’re cracked up to be. I was pressed into service recently when my sister went to Europe, and somebody had to keep an eye on my nephew, Chris — who calls me Tio (Uncle in Spanish). I may not have been the first choice, but in a pinch, Tio would suffice.

I was delighted to do it. This was a perfect chance to hone my skills as a wannabee Jewish dad, bond with Chris and, as a happy byproduct, score some bonus points with the ladies. After a week, however, he did not live up to his promise as a babe-magnet for his surrogate bachelor-father. He’s supposed to draw women like mice to cheese, but they didn’t rise to the bait. The little punk hasn’t done a damned thing for me.

Which raises the question: What good are these children anyway? They don’t work, they don’t drive, and their table manners — don’t get me started. And, as if it wasn’t bad enough already, they want you to buy them clothes and records and videos and all kinds of things no sane person would be caught dead with. Of course, I could just be overreacting to the burping contest that took place in the car for 14 miles on the way back from downtown, between Chris and his pal, Justin.

My sister has referred all questions regarding vice and bad behavior over to me: Ask Tio. I’m a one-man vice squad, so Chris sent me the following letter from camp last summer:

“Dear Tio,

I’m really bored and really homesick at camp right now. I miss you a lot and hope you’re okay. Can you do me a favor? Can you send me a Playboy, cause all the little girls here look like dogs.”

Did I mention that he’s 11? This is what I’m up against. I’ve seen this same kind of sexual awakening going on with girls his age, too, but at least it’s usually accompanied by a karaoke performance of “Bye Bye Birdie,” or an interpretive dance. (Remind me: Is it wrong to send soft-core porn through the mail, across state lines, to preteens?)

Everyone develops an individual style of parenting. My sister is of the “sympathetic encouragement” school. By contrast, I am Tio the Merciless. “I’m in charge here,” I said, like Al Haig entering the situation room, as soon as Chris’ parents left for the airport. “My house, my rules.”

“But it’s my house,” he reminded me.

“Fine. Your house, my rules.”

I made him study more than he wanted, telling him that he’ll live out his days in dire poverty if he fails his science test. I felt pretty good when he came home with an 85, but they grade on a sharp curve at his school, and that only rates a C+. Could we have tried just a little bit harder? No, I knew that stuff cold! I could get a 92 in my sleep! Everyone knows the smooth muscles are slow to react and quick to tire, you idiot! I had to learn all this stuff for a C+? That little rat fink betrayed me. I had to flog him, but it was for his own good.

My main role in his education, however, was picking him up from school every day, angling to get a good spot in the “serpentine” of SUVs wending up the driveway. It’s amazing how time expands and contracts around the moment that school lets out. The hours he’s in school seem to go by in a flash, but the next six hours, from 3 p.m. to 9.p.m., are seemingly without end … and he needs to be fed constantly. I’ve been in loco parentis for less than a week, and I’m exhausted.

When he gets into the car with his 60-pound backpack, we start the conversation the same way every day: “What’d you do in school today?” I ask.

“Nothing.”

“That’s my boy!” Uncle Tio says. “Don’t let those horrible teachers try to put any ideas into that big, empty head of yours. You’re perfect just the way you are. Never change.”

J.D. Smith is available to babysit @ www.lifesentence.net.

Uncle Mom Read More »

Vengeance: It’s Part of Justice

Last month, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon touched off a brief war of words with the United States when he warned the West — and particularly America — not to forget the lessons of Munich 1939, when Europe’s democracies appeased Hitler by sacrificing Czechoslovakia. But there’s more than one "Munich" etched on the pages of history. And the one that occurred 33 years later may provide more apt guidance for our struggle against terrorism today.

During the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich, terrorists from the PLO’s Black September faction swooped down on the Olympic Village, and took 11 Israeli athletes hostage. Through a mixture of the terrorists barbarism and the fecklessness of the Germans’ armed response, the attack led eventually to the deaths of all 11 captives and five of the terrorists.

The particulars of those tragic days needn’t concern us here; but the Israeli response should.

Soon after the attacks, Israel unleashed a massive military response, primarily on targets in Lebanon and Syria. But then-Prime Minister Golda Meir decided that this was not enough. The result was Operation "Wrath of God."

Israeli intelligence compiled a list of individuals who had participated in, planned or knowingly assisted the plot. A super-secret team of Israeli intelligence operatives was then tasked with hunting them down and killing them.

No captures, no extraditions, no trials.

Each was to be hunted down and killed.

And over the course of the decade, with one exception, each was. The first of these reprisals came soon after the Munich hostage-taking; but they went on for years. The final assassination took place in 1979 in Beirut, when agents finally caught up with Ali Hassan Salameh, one of the masterminds of the Munich attack.

Today America’s first order of business is doing everything in our power to ensure that events like those of Sept. 11 never happen again. That means disrupting terrorist networks, shutting off their flows of money, and attacking states that aid and abet them. That is just what we are doing today, in the skies over Afghanistan and elsewhere. But this satisfies only the requirements of self-defense, not justice or vengeance. And our agenda must go further.

If the perpetrators of the Sept. 11 attacks will turn themselves in, or if they can be readily extradited, so be it. But if not, like the Israeli government after Munich, the American government should commit itself — secretly perhaps, but as a matter of national policy nonetheless — to hunt them down and repay them in kind.

In this case, self-defense and justice will often be indistinguishable. Hunting down Osama bin Laden is justified on the grounds of self-defense as well as justice. But as a matter of principle, at least, we should delineate the two goals.

We need to be clear that those who are responsible for this outrage ought to be hunted down — not simply as a matter of self-defense, but as a matter of justice and right. Our leaders constantly say — understandably, perhaps — that what we want is justice, not vengeance. But vengeance is an element of justice. And a critical one at that. Mercy is a virtue. But vengeance is not necessarily a vice. It becomes one only when it is acted upon indiscriminately.

Let’s take our time to discover who was involved, be careful to put internal checks in place, and then set about the task deliberately. It might take years — or even decades — to accomplish. But everyone involved in Sept. 11, even years from now, must know that it’s only a matter of time. It is vengeance; and it’s the right thing to do.

Vengeance: It’s Part of Justice Read More »

Business Wins in N.Y.

During New York’s mayoral campaign, Michael Bloomberg caused a minor ruckus when he seemed to advocate school prayer.

In an off-the-cuff remark, he said that reciting the Lord’s prayer in public school hadn’t been a bad experience for him as a Jewish child.

But Bloomberg, who won the mayoral election Tuesday in an upset victory over Democrat Mark Green, later said school prayer was unconstitutional.

"Whether or not I think it’s a good idea has nothing to do with whether or not it’s constitutional," Bloomberg, 59, said.

He repeated his insistence that the Lord’s Prayer was compatible with Jewish observance. "It comes from the ‘Kaddish,’" he said.

His office later released a copy of an e-mail from Rabbi Jacob Neusner, a theology professor at Bard College in Westchester, who said the prayer is "rooted in Judaic prayer."

The misstep — a rare error in an otherwise well-run campaign in which the self-made media billionaire spent more than $50 million — appears to highlight Bloomberg’s universalist view of Judaism.

In an interview with the New York Jewish Week during the campaign, Bloomberg said he supports Israel "as a symbol of my right to practice my religion. Israel should be a symbol to not just Jews but to everybody. We tend to focus and think it represents only the Jewish religion. I think it represents the right to believe what you want to believe."

Not that Bloomberg — who is divorced and has two daughters — isn’t involved in the Jewish world.

Although Bloomberg never released his tax return, his campaign released documents claiming he gave more than $100 million to charity in 2000, up from $46 million in 1999. Among the beneficiaries listed were the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish World Service, American Friends of the Israel Museum and other Jewish causes.

Criticized for having said that discrimination barely existed in the Northeast, Bloomberg said anti-Semitism had never been a factor in his life.

"I don’t know whether when I didn’t get an opportunity it was because of that or something else," he said. "But if there is anyone who has not been ashamed of their last name it’s me. We do business throughout the world and it has never been an issue, even in the Middle East."

Bloomberg recalled as a youth seeing his father turned away from a hotel that did not rent rooms to Jews. "You don’t see that anymore," he said.

He recently quit several exclusive clubs, including two founded by Jews, whose memberships are not diverse. Asked if he would have done so were he not running for office, Bloomberg responded candidly.

"I don’t know the answer to that," he said twice. "I think I might not have focused on it, but over the last few years I’ve tried to get them to change."

He declined to chastise the clubs.

"My actions speak for themselves," he said. "I’m not here to criticize anyone’s right to get together."

Born in the Boston suburb of Medford — where his 92-year-old mother still lives — Bloomberg grew up in a Conservative family but now attends a Reform congregation, Temple Emanuel on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, where he resides.

"I like some of the symbolism of the more Conservative, but I think it has more to do with who the rabbi happens to be and whether you like his or her values," he said.

A former Democrat who switched parties to avoid a contentious primary, Bloomberg cast himself in the mold of centrist Republicans such as New York Gov. George Pataki, former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman and New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani.

"Fundamentally I’m a fiscal conservative and a social liberal," he said.

Bloomberg made his business acumen and his purported ability to rebuild the city after the Sept. 11 terror attacks a focal point of his campaign.

Bloomberg said he was not opposed to recognizing gay marriages.

"I don’t plan to spend a lot of my time performing marriage ceremonies," said the divorcee. "When I got married I chose to marry a woman. I do not, however, think it is my business who you marry."

During a series of questions on conservative issues, Bloomberg said incorrectly that so-called partial-birth abortions are illegal in New York.

"I am very much pro-choice," he said. "But partial-birth abortion is illegal here. Next."

Abortion rights advocates say the practice is rare, but some legislators have tried in vain to outlaw it in New York.

He also mistook a recent law that would more severely punish hate crimes with a bill pending in the Legislature that would protect gay rights.

Asked if he supported the hate crimes bill, which many Republicans opposed, Bloomberg said, "I certainly have no objections to passing it" and have lobbied Senate Majority Leader "Joe Bruno to do so."

On vouchers for parochial school tuition, Bloomberg was noncommittal.

"The evidence as to whether they work is mixed," he said. "Vouchers and charter schools and privatization all have enough credibility to be tried."

Charter schools already exist in New York.

It is widely believed that Bloomberg benefited from the support given by New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, whose popularity has soared since Sept. 11. In the interview with the Jewish Week, however, Bloomberg distanced himself from Giuliani on several issues of concern to the Jewish community.

He would dismantle Giuliani’s so-called "decency panel" on publicly funded art, Bloomberg said.

And he said he would have a better relationship with the city’s African American leaders than Giuliani has.

"I think the mayor should meet with anyone that represents a group of people," Bloomberg said. That includes the Rev. Al Sharpton.

"He represents a significant number of people, and these people are citizens of New York," he said.

"There are very few things Al Sharpton has said or done that I agree with," he added. "I think the Rev. Sharpton has not walked away from Louis Farrakhan the way Jesse Jackson did. My hope would be, my attempt would be to convince him to be more understanding of the Jewish community and other communities."

Bloomberg said the mayor made a mistake by ejecting Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat from a city event in 1996.

"I don’t disagree with the mayor’s feelings, but if you’re going to have the United Nations here, you can’t do that," he said.

Would Bloomberg meet with Arafat?

"He does not represent a large group of people here, so my inclination would be not to do it."

Business Wins in N.Y. Read More »

Jewish Identity Crisis

A new study reporting decreased identification with Judaism and rising intermarriage rates is generating concern, but not shock, in the Jewish community.

Instead, many leaders see the new findings, released last week, as a continuation of trends reported in the 1990 National Jewish Population Survey. Rather than viewing the study as a call to radically change course, most see it as a signal to step up existing efforts to strengthen Jewish continuity.

For some, that will come through day school education and making synagogues more spiritually meaningful to people. For others, it means support for nonreligious forms of Jewish expression — such as social action and the arts — that will appeal to people not interested in studying texts or going to synagogue services.

The American Jewish Identity Survey 2001 is an unofficial follow-up to the 1990 survey, conducted by three researchers who were involved in the original study. Preliminary findings were released last week. The researchers — Egon Mayer, Ariela Keysar and Barry Kosmin — are still analyzing the data and expect to offer more details in coming months, particularly about intermarriage and how children of intermarriages are raised.

The study is part of a larger examination of religion in America.

As Jewish leaders analyze the new study, many say its importance depends on how one determines who is Jewish. The study’s estimate of 5.5 million American Jews — of whom 1.4 million identify as members of another religion — includes people who say they are Jewish or of Jewish upbringing or parentage.

Some observers say it would be less surprising for a person with one Jewish parent and who was raised with no religion — or even raised as a Christian — to reject Judaism than for a person who was raised Jewish. Such distinctions are impossible to make from the findings reported so far.

But the study does report that even among people who identify Judaism as their religion, 42 percent profess a secular outlook and 14 percent say they do not believe in God. In contrast, only 15 percent of Americans describe their outlook as secular.

It also finds that while only half of American Jews are affiliated with a synagogue or Jewish community organization, most identify with a stream of Judaism. Thirty percent identify with the Reform movement, 24 percent with the Conservative movement, 8 percent with Orthodoxy, 1 percent with Reconstructionism and 1 percent with Secular Humanism.

Six percent used self-generated labels like "liberal" or "atheist," and 20 percent declined to identify with any label or branch of Judaism.

Yet the findings are contradicted by other measures that would seem to show that interest in Judaism is higher than ever.

Enrollment at Jewish day schools is up, and scores of new schools have been founded in the past few years. Sales of books on Judaism are up.

Adult Jewish education courses — including structured text-study programs that require two-year commitments — are proliferating. Jewish summer camps have long waiting lists of prospective campers.

In addition, the Reform movement — which once rejected many customary Jewish practices — is increasingly embracing traditional ritual and observance.

L.A.’s Rabbi David Ellenson, president of the Reform movement’s Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, said the findings of the survey do not contradict the other evidence.

Modern American life, Ellenson said, has had a dual effect on Jewish identity. On the one hand, acceptance has triggered high rates of assimilation and intermarriage, but it also has "caused other Jews to seek identity and community.

"[There] is a return to tradition, but against a backdrop of American religiosity, where individuals construct their own sense of meaning and look to tradition not as commanding, but for resources to seek meaning in their own lives," Ellenson said.

Jonathan Woocher, president of the Jewish Education Service of North America and the chief professional of the Jewish Federation system’s Renaissance and Renewal Pillar, agreed with Ellenson that there is "nothing surprising" in the new study.

"This is what one would have expected, given everything else we’ve seen in what’s happening in Jewish life," Woocher said. "There’s nothing here that says, ‘Whoa, we’re really on the wrong track,’" he said.

Instead, he said, the findings point to a "diverse population" and illustrate the need for a variety of approaches to engage Jews in Jewish life.

Rabbi Nina Cardin, director of Jewish life at the Jewish Community Center of Greater Baltimore and author of two guides on Jewish observance and rituals, said the findings — particularly the low rates of organizational affiliation and religious views — show the need to broaden outreach efforts beyond day schools and synagogues.

While education and synagogues remain important, Cardin said, the organized Jewish community needs to step up support for Jewish social action, environmental and cultural activities.

These arenas are "begging for our increased attention, [and attract] a lot of Jews who will not walk into a synagogue or Torah study class," Cardin said.

Rabbi Norman Lamm, the president of Yeshiva University, called the findings "tragic," saying they show the need for more Jewish education.

Lamm called for strengthening the commitment of Jews already involved in Jewish life by spending more money on Jewish day schools, so the schools can accommodate more students and pay better salaries.

The study’s funder, Felix Posen, said it suggests that secular Jews and those not affiliated with synagogues are a significant segment of the community, and cannot "be dismissed as if their number were insignificant or vestigial."

However, not all are convinced that findings of a low level of Jewish religiosity are so significant.

Jack Wertheimer, provost of the Conservative movement’s Jewish Theological Seminary, said that members of other faiths may have different definitions of what it means to be religious, and that Jews may say they are secular or have a secular outlook simply because they are not Orthodox.

Often, people will say they are secular, but "if you press further and ask ‘Do you attend synagogue? Do you pray?’ — some of these secular people will answer yes," Wertheimer said.

"I don’t know of anybody who has written off secular Jews. That’s not the issue," Wertheimer said in response to Posen’s comments. "What came out of the 1990 population study was very powerful evidence that secular Jews who do not participate in organized religious life of the Jews are the least likely to successfully transmit strong Jewish identity to their children."

Jewish Identity Crisis Read More »