fbpx

August 3, 2000

Letters to the Editor

Right to Self-Defense Precious
Jane Ulman writes gracefully of her son Danny’s interest in joining the NRA (“Joining the NRA,” July 21). We both agree that our children not have toy guns and we both teach our children that if they see or find a gun, they should not touch it, point it or play with it. They know to leave the area immediately and tell an adult.

My son and daughter are trained in the handling of guns. They recognize that a gun is a tool which can indeed hurt people but whose greatest value lies in defense. The gun is the only way a weak person can expect to defend herself against a stronger one. My heart went out to those women in Central Park who, by the laws of their city, were forbidden any chance of defending themselves. Few people choose to carry guns even where it is legal, but the one-in-50 who does makes it safer for all potential victims.

My children feel safe and the gun issue is surely only a small part of that. But they also recognize that the right of self-defense is precious and all too easily given up in the name of safety.

Mark Bell, Northridge

Teach Children About Gun Safety
Nine-year-olds can often see through the nonsensical clouds that obscure their parents’ vision. Danny is right. With clear, undeceived logic, he has penetrated to the heart of the matter. Guns do protect the weak and the small.

Study after study has shown that armed citizens are the single largest deterrents to crime. Thirty-one states now have “shall issue” laws under which concealed carry permits are issued routinely to law-abiding citizens. Crime has fallen in those states, while violent crime has increased here in anti-gun Los Angeles.

Danny, in his innocence, understands what adults have trouble understanding. He knows that a nonviolent society is a utopian dream, an unfulfillable wish fantasy by adults. He knows that violence will not go away nor be mitigated simply by wishing.

This summer I volunteered a week of my time to teach a large number of 7-to-10-year-old children about gun safety and responsibility. We made use of the NRA’s Eddie Eagle program, which teaches, “Stop! Don’t Touch! Leave the area! Tell a responsible adult!” It is a curriculum which has been successfully used to teach safety and responsibility to some 12-million children and young adults.

Danny is eligible to join the Junior NRA and to learn about gun safety and responsibility. The toll-free membership number is (800) 672-3888.

David Lichtman, Northridge

Assuring Israel’s Religious Diversity
Thank you for sharing Rob Eshman’s story concerning the recent firebombing of Kehillat Ya’ar Ramot, the Masorti/Conservative synagogue in the Jerusalem suburb of Ramot (“The Fire This Time,” July 28). What is most disturbing about this act of hatred – the latest in a series of acts of vandalism against Masorti congregations and offices in Israel – is that it was probably committed by other Jews.

International leaders of the Conservative/Masorti movement, including members of our own community, have called on Jews around the world to condemn violence and hatred between Jews and to promote Jewish unity. Masorti synagogues and their educational institutions led by the Schechter Institute in Jerusalem are at the front line in this effort to promote religious pluralism in Israel and to bring secular Israelis back to Judaism.Angelenos have the opportunity to participate directly in the effort to assure religious diversity in Israel and to fight back against religious ignorance and intolerance among Jews. By giving generously to the Los Angeles joint Masorti Foundation/Schechter Institute campaign and attending the campaign dinner on Sun., Dec. 3, each of us has the opportunity to make our own individual statement in opposition to these horrible acts of desecration in the capital of our Jewish state and to help to put an end to outrages like the firebombing of Ya’ar Ramot.

For further information, please contact the Masorti Foundation/Schechter Institute campaign office at (310) 446-6474.

Lorin Fife, Joint Campaign Chair
Masorti Foundation/Schechter Institute

Denying Anti-Semitism
Anyone who shouts “Jew bastard” at a Jew is an anti-Semite (“Defending Hillary,” July 21). Do you doubt this? Then take this simple test: Imagine that someone – anyone – calls you a “Jew bastard.” Do you have any doubt that you would consider that person an anti-Semite?

Suzanne Zaharoni ,Beverly Hills

Corrections
In the July 28 Spectator (‘Taking Sides’), the address and contact information wasn’t included. “Taking Sides” is playing at the Odyssey Theatre, 2055 S. Sepulveda Blvd., Los Angeles. For reservations, call (310) 477-2055.

Letters to the Editor Read More »

Why the GOP Lacks Jews

For 20 years and more, political observers have been waiting for the day when American Jews will significantly shift their votes from the Democratic column to that of the Republicans.

They have waited in vain. Studies of electoral trends in the past two decades, polls and just plain political horse sense all point to yet another big win in the fall for the Democrats among Jewish voters in the presidential and congressional elections. Of course, that’s a sour thought for those Jewish Republicans who gathered in Philadelphia this week for the GOP convention.

1980 was GOP’shigh tide

What makes this fairly predictable result interesting is that a lot of smart people thought this was going to change. The tide was supposed to have started to turn in 1980, when conservative Republican Ronald Reagan took 35 percent of the Jewish vote in his run for the presidency, a huge increase over the previous desultory GOP turnouts.

But Reagan had a lot going for him in 1980 besides his incredible personal appeal. President Jimmy Carter’s clear tilt against Israel in the Middle East peace talks had alienated many American Jews. With the hard left at home and the Soviet bloc abroad being Israel’s most virulent opponents, conservatives and Republicans sensed a chance to capitalize on American Jewish devotion to the Jewish state.

At the same time, conservatives also had social issues working for them. Affirmative action plans aimed at helping minorities gain jobs and college admissions seemed to be working at the expense of middle-class Jews who had always risen via the merit system. This issue seemed to symbolize the sea change that was expected to convert Jewish Democrats into Republicans.

Leading the way for this change was an influential group of thinkers and writers labeled “neo-conservatives” – Jewish ex-liberals who had been turned off by the excesses of the radical left and its liberal apologists. The neo-cons seemed to have traditional liberals on the run.

Pundits thought Reagan’s win would be only the start for Jewish Republicans, but instead, the GOP would never again win that large a share of American Jewish votes.In 1984, Reagan’s Jewish vote percentage declined. It went down even further for George Bush in 1988 and hit rock bottom when Bush ran for reelection in 1992. Bush’s astonishing declaration that he was “one guy” standing up against “thousands” of Jewish lobbyists on the issue of voting loan guarantees for Israel in 1991 doomed him among Jewish voters.

Bob Dole, the GOP standard-bearer in 1996, did better than the elder Bush among Jews, but not by much. In addition, exit polls have shown that the Jewish vote for Democratic congressional candidates has remained steadily in the 80-percent range throughout the ’90s. This means the Jewish vote in 2000 is probably something of a lost cause for the Republicans.

What happened?

For one thing, the only time Israel can work as an issue for either party is when an Israeli government is being pressured by Washington to do something it doesn’t want to do, such as when George Bush was hammering Yitzhak Shamir or when Bill Clinton was bludgeoning Benjamin Netanyahu. But whenever Israel itself is rushing to make concessions instead of being pressured into them by an American president (as is the case at the moment with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak), Israel ceases to be a wedge issue for the American opposition party.

The decline in American Jewish interest in Israel also works against it as an issue. The Republicans have an excellent record on Israel (Bush senior was the exception), but few American Jews can any longer be considered one-issue voters when it comes to Israel. Domestic issues that conservatives thought would turn Jews off on the Democrats have also largely lost their appeal. Even though a strong case can still be made against affirmative-action quotas, the issue has ceased to interest Jewish voters, since few Jews appear to have suffered because of it.

Similarly, the tension between blacks and Jews over the statements of African-American leaders such as Jesse Jackson loomed as a problem for the Democrats for a while in the 1980s. Though the Democrats still toady to extremists such as racial huckster Al Sharpton, the Republicans are unable to capitalize on this because of their kowtowing to Christian conservatives.

On the other hand, some observers, such as scholar and American Jewish Committee official Murray Friedman, believe that despite the rotten national results, local elections show that the GOP still has a good shot at Jewish voters. Friedman pointed out in a recent article in Commentary magazine that in mayoral elections in New York City, Philadelphia and Los Angeles, Republican candidates did very well among Jewish voters, producing wins for GOP mayors Rudy Giuliani and Richard Riordan in New York and Los Angeles and a razor-thin loss for Sam Katz in Philadelphia.

These elections did show that Republicans can, with the right candidates, do well among Jews. But these results should not give George W. Bush, this year’s Republican presidential candidate, much encouragement. In each case, a liberal Republican running on local issues against a weakened Democrat was able to win a lot of Jewish votes.This trend will not help a candidate like W., because the key social issues that motivate large numbers of Jews are the protection of abortion rights and increased gun control, not the control of local crime. Whether these are truly Jewish interests or not – and I would contend that they are not – their primacy guarantees that the Shrub will not win any more Jewish votes than Dole did four years ago.

The triumph ofLiberalism

Contrary to the expectations of the neo-conservatives, the continued triumph of Jewish liberalism is firmly linked to the secular, liberal cultural values that remain sacred to most American Jews.

George W. Bush may have no interest in a kulturkampf, but in the eyes of many, if not most, Jews, the national Republican Party remains tied to the Christian right. American Jews may fret over Israel, but Pat Robertson still scares them more than Yasser Arafat or any other Palestinian terrorist ever did.

Issues that are linked to such cultural prejudices as the advocacy of gun control and abortion rights will keep the overwhelming majority of Jews in the Democrats’ pocket. As long as most Jewish voters feel this way, the GOP will have to win the White House without them.

Jonathan S. Tobin is executive editor of the Jewish Exponent in Philadelphia. He can be reached via e-mail at jtobin@jewishexponent.com

Why the GOP Lacks Jews Read More »

The Girls of Summer

During the girls’ softball playoffs of the 1992 Maccabi Games in Baltimore, the coach of the Seattle team stopped by the hotel room of L.A. coach Sandy Silverman to talk. Their teams were scheduled to face off the next day.

“I think we’ve got a problem,” the Seattle coach told Silverman.”Oh, yeah? What’s the problem?” asked Silverman, an easygoing sports fan who started the team in 1988.

“Well, my girls saw your girls play today,” the other coach said, “and they’re refusing to take the field.”

That’s how it’s been: one win after another. And this summer, barring some unforeseen act of nature, the L.A. girls’ softball team expects to take home the gold once again when the Maccabi Games meet in Richmond, Va., Aug. 13-18.

In 1982, the Jewish Community Centers (JCC) held their first Maccabi Games in Memphis, Tenn., to bring Jewish youth, mostly Midwesterners at that time, together to compete in a variety of sports. Three hundred athletes ages 13 to 16 attended the games that summer to play basketball, track and field, and soccer.

In 1984, L.A. became involved in the games when a delegation of 75 youths – organized by the L.A. Maccabbi Athletic Club, an Israeli American organization – attended the Detroit games. But it wasn’t until 1986, when the playoffs were held in Toronto under the auspices of Maccabi Canada, that the games really took off. Since then, the games have grown at a tremendous rate, according to Paul Soifer, the sports advisory chair of the continental governing body of the Maccabi Games in L.A. One city is no longer big enough to hold all the Maccabi athletes, he points out – this summer alone, five regional sites have been chosen to host the games.

With the sweet faces of teenagers and the muscles of Venus Williams, the girls on the L.A. Maccabi team take their softball seriously. For some of them, Silverman says, playing softball is all they do.

“We have a tremendous advantage: We can play this game the whole year round,” Silverman explains. “We usually dominate. We even try to pull down the scores … but we always try to get everyone in the game. We don’t want to lord it over anybody, but the girls are here to play ball too.”

Dental assistant Jackie Lucero, 26, this year’s softball coach, who played for Silverman in 1988 and 1990, is here to make sure the girls play ball too.

“I practice the girls to their capability, to the capability of the sport,” Lucero, who could easily pass for one of her players, says confidently. “We do 15 minutes of warm up, running, stretching, agility, 5-10 minutes of warming up the arms. Then we practice different plays – live plays, live batting situations. When we go to Richmond, we’re going to look like a really good team.”

One of the reasons that this year’s team is going to look dynamite is Shelly Maddock, 14, a freshman at Calabasas High School. Maddock pitches a mean softball that has been clocked at 61 m.p.h. Just to watch her delivery is staggering. She winds up and in a motion that is barely discernible, pulls her left arm down and slaps it against her thigh as her right arm is propelled forward, delivering a bullet over the plate. “The harder the left hand pulls, the faster the right hand comes down,” she explains.

Allie Rattet, 15, a center and right fielder, is another reason. Rattet has all the qualities of a good outfielder – super quick, able to read the ball off the bat and familiar with all the plays. Watching Rattet swoop down on a ball and throw it home faster than the speed of light brings to mind the legendary outfielder, James “Cool Papa” Bell. Hall of Famer Paul Waner said of Bell: “That man was so fast he could turn out the lights and be in bed before the room was dark.”

Then there’s Kim Weinstein, catcher, who is only 13. Her older sister played ball for the Maccabis, and now Weinstein is following in her footsteps. She is amazingly poised at the plate, catching what ever comes her way. Weinstein may still be in middle school, but she catches like a seasoned pro.

And more reasons: Christina, Amy, Rachel, Corey, Jenna, Natalie, Rebecca and Nicole. They are all in top form and professionally assured; Lucero has no doubt that any one of them could hold her own in an Olympic softball tryout.

For Lucero and her team, softball is nothing less than life affirming. “In softball, you learn basic instructions in life,” Lucero says. “That’s where I learned about friendships and relationships and commitments, and everything else. When you have that, you have everything wrapped up in one big ball: You’re an All Star player.”

The Maccabi games are organized under the umbrella of the JCCs of North America, in partnership with Maccabi USA/Sports for Israel; Maccabi Canada; and Maccabi World Union. Dr. Jerry Bobrow serves as chair of the L.A. organizing committee. For information about the games and tryouts, call Jeff Kaplan at (818) 464 3269, or log ontowww.jccmaccabi.org

The Girls of Summer Read More »

The Power of Words

When John woke up that Sunday morning and could neither move nor speak, he realized that something terrible had happened. Somehow during the night he had suffered a stroke. He struggled in a panic to get out of bed and succeeded merely in rolling off and landing in an awkward sprawl on the floor. The sound of his dead weight hitting the wood startled his wife from her sleep and straight into the waking nightmare that has persisted to this day.

Later that afternoon I arrived in the ICU at UCLA Hospital to see him. It was the eyes that got me the most. His body was propped up in the bed, and was barely moving. But his eyes were steadily roaming up and down, right and left, seeming to be moving in several directions at once – actually, staring in several directions would be more accurate.

He became so affected that he seemed like a caged animal, giving off an intense restlessness without making a sound. But still, it was the intensity of those eyes that was most chilling.

I sat with him that day and then nearly every day for the next two weeks as he slowly regained some limited mobility. I watched as his brain began to wind its way through the complex pathways of its inner space and one step at a time, piece by piece began to put its house back in order. Well, almost back in order; his speech has never fully recovered. Those first few days were filled with such intense sadness, such naked fear, such passionate pain and suffering – for John, for his wife Ann, for his two kids, for the rest of his family and friends – that it is difficult even for me to recall without a welling of tears. For John, the immense frustration of his tragic situation was nearly unbearable. Every time I was with him, he would try unsuccessfully to speak, then fall back in frustration and weep.

In the midst of his suffering, I was reminded by John during the days we spent together in the hospital of one of the most powerful lessons of the human condition: that perhaps the greatest gift that we have ever been given by God is the simple ability to communicate with another human being. Without that ability, without that window opening from our soul to another, we are trapped in a solitary confinement more terrible than “the hole” in the darkest prison in the world.

It was John who eventually told me that he experienced more terror at his inability to speak than from his inability to walk and move his hands and legs as he chose. It was John who confided that his greatest fear was that he would never be able to say, “I love you” to his wife, “I’m proud of you” to his children, “I need you” to his family. His silence was deafening, terrifying, debilitating, and when he realized he could not speak, all he could do was cry.

It is primarily through speech that we communicate our hopes and dreams, our longings and joys to those we love. Words are our lifeline to touch the souls of others. And that is why the name of this week’s Torah portion, which also gives its name to the entire fifth book of the Torah is so powerful.

Devarim, the name of both the portion and the book, means “words” in Hebrew. Eleh hadevarim asher diber Moshe: “These are the words that Moses spoke to all Israel…” In a remarkable irony, Moses, who is introduced to us at the burning bush with the words “Oh God, I am not a man of words” (Exodus 4:10), is here expounding the entire Torah not only “to all Israel” but (according to the midrash) in the 70 languages of the rest of the world as well.

Think about the power of words this week and the precious gift that they truly are in your life. Your words can heal. Your words can inspire. Like Moses, your words can make a difference in the life of another, perhaps an entire people, perhaps the entire world.

Steven Carr Reuben, Ph.D., is senior rabbi of Kehillat Israel, the Reconstructionist congregation of Pacific Palisades.

The Power of Words Read More »

Is Religious Diversity a Threat?

At the beginning of this month, 70 Conservative, Reform, Reconstructionist and Orthodox rabbis from North America took part in a two-week Torah study program at the Shalom Hartman Institute. Throughout the period of intensive study and learning, little attention was paid to the fact that they were Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or Reconstructionist rabbis. The denominational labels by which they are identified in America were overshadowed by their common concern with studying Torah in Jerusalem.

I watched with joy and admiration at the way rabbis representing such different Jewish religious orientations could become so absorbed in Torah study. I could not help but ask myself: Why is the Orthodox rabbinical establishment in this country so terrified by these people? Why can’t they relate to these rabbis with dignity? Why can’t they make these people – as religious leaders of the Diaspora – feel welcome in Jerusalem? Must all rabbis share the same theological beliefs and commitments as Orthodox Jews in order to take part in a Jewish discussion about Torah and Jewish life? Is serious Torah study and learning only possible among people who share identical religious dogma and foundational commitments?What motivates the Israeli Orthodox rabbinate to adopt an attitude of aggressive indifference to Conservative and Reform rabbis as spiritual leaders? Why are they viewed as a threat to Judaism and the Jewish people, as dangerous elements whose acknowledgment would undermine the foundations of Jewish identity and continuity?

The argument often cited in defense of the rabbinical establishment’s attitude is that welcoming these leaders as rabbis is tantamount to legitimating their theological and halachic world views. This implies that feelings of respect and regard toward others presuppose agreement; that you cannot genuinely respect other people unless you share the same beliefs and commitments.

This, however, is far from being the case. Although the chief rabbis of Israel welcomed the Pope with respect and were willing to engage in discussions with him, no one would claim that the chief rabbis thereby acknowledged the validity of the theological foundations of Christianity! Few Jews felt that Judaism was being undermined by such public encounters. On the contrary, many Israelis felt greater pride in their Judaism and in their rabbis.

Believing in and arguing for the truth of one’s own convictions is not necessarily antithetical to showing and feeling respect for those who hold alternate or rival convictions. If the rabbinate believes that the Reform and Conservative understandings of Torah are mistaken, then it should opt for discussion and debate, for reasoned arguments explaining why its understanding of Jewish history and Torah is more plausible and meaningful and more capable of providing a compelling vision of Judaism for the modern world.

Another argument often used to justify the delegitimization of Reform and Conservative rabbis is that fundamentally they are responsible for the alarming rate of assimilation of Jews in North America. They are thus blamed for the alienation and indifference of Jews to their Jewish heritage and identities.

This too is a specious argument. The Conservative and Reform Jewish movements in America did not invent liberal secularism! They did not create Jewish indifference and ignorance of their tradition. The attractions of modern secularism and of open pluralistic societies are what draw people to assimilate, to abandon particularistic traditions and loyalties and to discard the past in favor of current standards and life style.

The tragic irony of this unfounded allegation is that it is the Conservative and Reform movements, more than any other groups in America, that need – and deserve – the emotional, intellectual and spiritual support of rabbinic leaders in Israel for their work in preventing the rampant assimilation and secularization of the Jewish people in the Diaspora. Reform and Conservative rabbis are on the front lines of the battle against assimilation. Their congregants do not live in protected intellectual and spiritual ghettos but are fully exposed to the powerful and compelling options available in Western secular society.

Many of these rabbis are heroic fighters against assimilation. Their struggle is to maintain Jewish continuity, to enliven the sense of Jewish peoplehood in the face of the self-indulgent, communityless ambience of much of American society. I have visited Reform and Conservative synagogues where Torah was being studied seriously, where communal prayer services and the celebration of Shabbat and the chagim have become live spiritual options.

How dare we accuse those fighting at the forefront of the battle against assimilation of causing the very problem they are struggling to overcome! It is as absurd as blaming Conservative and Reform rabbis for having invented modernity. The fact is that their communities have been and continue to be influenced by the modern world. And, therefore, they need to draw inspiration from Israel rather than feel constant suspicion and hostility. Yet Israel – the most important center of Jewish history today – continues to reject and delegitimize them as Jewish spiritual leaders.

After spending two weeks with these rabbis I can only wonder why the religious establishment remains so blind to the reality of Jewish life in North America. Perhaps people in Israel are more concerned with guarding the purity of their religious convictions and dogmas – the spiritual purity of their individual selves and communities – rather than dirtying their hands helping rabbinic teachers who are struggling to revive Jewish identity and the connection of Jews to Torah, Israel and Jewish history.

The diversity of the American rabbis who gathered at the Institute in Jerusalem inspired us to believe that Jews can join together as a people only if we can regain the sense of our being a text-centered community. The Torah and the Talmud must be made accessible to all Jews, without demanding prior acceptance of the normative beliefs and practices of traditional Judaism. In this difficult and uncertain period in Jewish history, when we are in danger of losing millions of Jews to assimilation, we must not turn the “leap of faith” into a pre-condition for Torah study.

What threatens Judaism today is not different rabbinical orientations toward how Torah should be studied but rather the widespread apathy and indifference of Jews to Torah study. Radical and different interpretations of Torah do not threaten our future. Apathy does.

Our rabbis taught us that all arguments l’shem shamayim, for the sake of true understanding, will endure. The characteristic multiplicity of arguments and the diversity of voices in our tradition have kept Judaism vital and compelling throughout history. Those who insist on consensus and crush disagreement in Israel and abroad are the ones who threaten the future of Judaism.

David Hartman is founder and director of the Shalom Hartman Institute, Jerusalem.

Is Religious Diversity a Threat? Read More »

The Convention Comes to Town

The story goes that a young man gets an entry-level job with the Democratic National Committee in the nation’s capital and for his first assignment is told by his boss to buy Christmas decorations for the upcoming office party.”I’m not sure whether I’m the right person,” protests the young man. “You see, I’m Jewish.”

“So is everybody else,” says the boss. “Get the decorations.”Slightly exaggerated, of course. When the Democrats meet for their national convention Aug. 14-17 at the Staples Center, best guesstimates are that around 10 percent of the delegates will be Jewish, but the curve rises sharply among party leaders, and even more steeply among big financial contributors.

Besides offering party politics and political parties, the convention will serve the useful purpose of bringing together many of America’s most influential Jews for the first time since the unsuccessful Camp David negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians. “They’ll have plenty to talk about,” says well-connected activist Donna Bojarsky.

The chain starts with venture capitalist Eli Broad and music mogul David Geffen, two members of the three-man team that brought the Democratic convention to Los Angeles.

Co-chairs of the convention are California’s two Jewish senators, Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer. Guiding much of the proceedings will be Democratic Party chairman Edward Rendell, the former mayor of Philadelphia.

Among Al Gore’s closest advisors is Leon Fuerth, the presumptive nominee’s longtime national security aide, who is considered a sure bet to fill the post if Gore becomes president.

Influential foreign policy advisors are Los Angeles attorney Mel Levine and Marc Ginsburg, who co-chair Gore’s Middle East advisory committee, and Joan Spero, an expert on international economic policy. Veteran publicist Steve Rabinowitz is a Gore consultant.

Key campaign strategists at the Democratic National Committee in Washington and Gore headquarters in Nashville include general election campaign chairman John Giesser, Josh Wachs, Laurie Moskowitz, Eric Kleinfeld, Debbie Mohile and research director David Ginsberg.Contributing or raising the really big bucks on the West Coast are the DreamWorks trio of Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg and Geffen, ex-MCA chief Lew Wasserman, TV mogul Haim Saban and Westwood One founder Norman Pattiz. On the East Coast, some other heavy hitters are David Steiner of New Jersey, New Yorkers John Tisch and Steve Ratner, and Jack Rosen, president of the American Jewish Congress.

Patrolling the Jewish beat for the party is the National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC), whose executive director, Ira Forman, is sanguine that 75 to 80 percent of Jewish voters will mark their ballots for Gore in November.The council’s deputy executive director, David Harris, sees a Jewish edge for the party on three main issues: Israel (“George W. has no record on Israel, and Dick Cheney has a poor record,” he says), church-state separation, and reproductive rights.

Closer to election time, NJDC plans to mail up to 500,000 voter guides to Jewish households, targeting some 35 districts with competitive House and Senate races.

Jewish activists were also strongly involved in last week’s deliberations of the platform committee in Cleveland, among them Howard Welinsky, chairman of Democrats for Israel. His amendment to the Middle East plank, warning against “a unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood,” was adopted.

Parties are a Los Angeles specialty, and Jewish hosts aim to hold their own. The largest blowout will be on Sunday, Aug. 13, the day before the convention opens, when more than 1,000 people will celebrate at Sony Pictures Studios.

In a remarkable display of Jewish unity, the affair will be co-hosted by the NJDC, the pro-Israel lobby AIPAC, United Jewish Communities, representing all Jewish federations in the United States, and the Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles.

“This is the first time we’ve had such across-the-board sponsorship,” says AIPAC spokesman Ken Bricker. “It’s a great way to express Jewish unity on Israel.”

AIPAC will hold other events between Aug. 12 and 16: a private party honoring Los Angeles activist Ruth Singer; a reception for Democratic candidates running for open House seats; a luncheon with the Black Congressional Caucus; a breakfast with the Democratic Leadership Council; a reception for Leon Fuerth, Gore’s national security advisor; a luncheon for Democratic governors; a break-fast with the Hispanic Congres-sional Caucus; and a luncheon with U.S. senators.

In addition, the NJDC will host receptions for Democratic Party chief Edward Rendell and for young leaders, while the American Jewish Committee plans events for Congressional leaders and for heads of ethnic and religious groups. In a tangential event, Dr. Steven Teitelbaum will hold a fundraiser for First Lady Hillary Clinton on Aug. 13 to aid her U.S. Senate race in New York state. Contributions are $1,000 per person. For information, phone Amy Hayes at (917) 613-6419

Speaking of really big parties, the City of Los Angeles, not always treated kindly by the East Coast press, will throw a $1.5 million affair for an expected 15,000 thirsty members of the world media.

The presence of this massive media phalanx, all looking for action as relief from the talking heads at the convention podium, has attracted a variety of protest groups and fringe parties.

Overlapping the Democratic Convention will be the following announced gatherings: People’s Convention (for progressive groups), Reform Party Convention, Mothers’ Convention (welfare reform), North American Anarchist Convention, Homeless Convention, and Youth Convention.Promising the most fun is the Shadow Convention, conceived by feisty columnist Arianna Huffington, which is scheduling interludes for satire and humor at its daily sessions.

The serious part of the agenda, spotlighting “the corrupting influence of money in politics, poverty and growing inequalities between poor and rich, and the failed war on drugs,” is attracting a considerable contingent of liberal Jews.

Stanley Sheinbaum, a longtime Democratic stalwart and financial angel, will bypass his old comrades in favor of the Shadow Convention.

So will progressive activist Rita Lowenthal, who is incensed at the jailing, rather than medical treatment, of nonviolent drug users, and Ralph Fertig, a freedom rider of the 1950s, who is particularly concerned about the widening gap between rich and poor. He will also march in a demonstration drawing attention to the plight of Kurds in the Middle East.

The Arbeter Ring/Workmen’s Circle, the Sholem Community and the Progressive Jewish Alliance will participate in a rally in the garment district to protest worker exploitation in sweatshops, an issue that is drawing heavy Jewish support.

Police and public officials are predicting that some 50,000 protesters will descend on downtown Los Angeles. Spokesmen for the protest movements say these estimates are vastly exaggerated, mainly because organized labor, which provided most of the bodies for the World Trade Organization protests in Seattle, is staying on the sidelines in Los Angeles.

The loose coordinating body for the convention protests is D2KLA, whose main march on Aug. 14 will proceed under the slogan “Human Need, Not Corporate Greed,” says spokesperson Margaret Prescod.

Another major protest force will be the Berkeley-based Ruckus Society, which has been training its adherents in civil disobedience tactics and nonviolent resistance.

Prescod and Ruckus program director Han Chan are in close agreement that between 10 to 20 percent of their adherents are Jewish, with a somewhat higher percentage in the leadership ranks.

That’s well below Jewish participation in the civil rights and anti-Vietnam war protest movements of the 1950s and ’60s, which frequently ran as high as 30 to 40 percent and considerably higher among the leadership of such organizations as the radical Students for a Democratic Society.

“I think the difference is not that there are fewer Jewish protesters than in the past, but proportionately they are less significant because of the upsurge of other activists, mainly Latinos and Asian-Americans, who were largely absent in the 1960s,” says James Lafferty, executive director of the National Lawyers Guild, the legal support group for the Los Angeles protesters.

Tom Hayden, a leader of the street protests that almost paralyzed the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago and now a California state senator, detects another difference between Jewish activists then and now.

Hayden, who is of Irish descent, believes that “the Jewish kids active in the 1960s, though they may have been alienated from their parents, were consciously Jewish in their approach to politics, citing Scripture and Jewish social tradition to explain their activism. This kind of underpinning didn’t surface during this year’s Seattle protests, and I see little of it now.”Finally, the Washington-based Arab American Institute will host its traditional public reception on the evening of Aug. 15 at the Figueroa Hotel. The event, this year themed “Meet Us at the Casbah,” generally downplays politics and attracts Jewish, Israeli and other connoisseurs of Middle Eastern cuisine.

The Convention Comes to Town Read More »

Eating and Praying Near Downtown

Where to Pray

There are no established synagogues serving the immediate downtown area, but among the major movements, the shuls closest to Staples Center are:

ReformWilshire Boulevard Temple 3663 Wilshire Blvd.Los Angeles, CA 90010Phone: (213) 388-2401(Large and grand, built during and for the era of movie palaces)

Beth Chayim Chadashim6000 W. Pico Blvd.Los Angeles, CA 90035Phone: (323) 931-7023(Small and haimish, with an outreach to the gay and lesbian community)

ConservativeTemple Beth Am1039 S. La Cienega Blvd.Los Angeles, CA 90035Phone: (310) 652-7353(Offers daily morning and evening minyans, plus multiple Shabbat services)

OrthodoxA large concentration of Orthodox shuls not far from downtown Los Angeles is in an area radiating from the intersection of La Brea Avenue and Beverly Boulevard. To find a congenial Orthodox worship service, start with these organizations:

Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations: (310) 777-0225Chabad Lubavitch West Coast headquarters: (310) 208-7511

Where to Eat

Kosher Restaurants

The Persian, Moroccan and Tunisian Jewish influx into the garment industry has given rise to a crop of good kosher meat restaurants in the downtown area. Most of these places close on weekends, so call ahead for precise hours. There are numerous kosher restaurants about 15-20 minutes west of downtown on Pico Blvd. between La Cienega and Doheny and on Fairfax between Beverly Blvd. and Melrose Avenue. Check www.jewishjournal.com for listings.

Afshan Restaurant306 E. 9th St.Los Angeles, CA 90015(213) 622-1010

Classic Restaurant108 E. 8th St.Los Angeles, CA 90014(213) 623-6234

Cohen Restaurant316 E. Pico Blvd.Los Angeles, CA 90015(213) 742-8888

Pasha Café112 W. 9th St.Los Angeles, CA 90015(213) 622-7578

Sharon’s II306 E. 9th St.Los Angeles, CA 90015(213) 622-1010

Solomon’s Place934 S. Los Angeles St.Los Angeles, CA 90015(213) 623-0094

And while downtown, don’t neglect Langer’s Deli at Alvarado and 7th, home to what many consider the best (non-kosher) pastrami sandwich in America, or Brooklyn Bagel at 2217 W. Beverly Blvd. near Alvarado for some of LA’s best bagels.

Eating and Praying Near Downtown Read More »

The Mating Game

Sherry Singer, a kinetic redhead with a personal philosophy that includes a strong reverence for the influence of fate and karma, believes that she was destined to be a matchmaker. The 36-year-old shadchan has been fixing up white-collar singles for the past 15 years. Six years ago, she opened her own matchmaking service, Meet-A-Mate, with the help of her mother, Eva Singer.

Sherry, who was swept up into matchmaking after she finished a radio internship at the age of 21, recently returned to the air with “The Mating Game,” an hourlong show devoted to helping people find their soulmates. Armed with an in-depth knowledge of dating dos and don’ts, Sherry advises lovelorn Angelenos on Saturdays from 11 p.m.-midnight on KRLA.

“I love radio so much,” says Sherry. “It’s a way of life for me.”

Sherry also lectures on and is writing a book about relationships, and her matchmaking service is the subject of an upcoming Learning Channel documentary, “The Mystery of Mating.”

The mother-daughter team say they are responsible for more than 300 marriages. The majority of their clientele are lonely professionals who work long hours and don’t have the time or patience for “meet markets.” Meet-A-Mate clients who marry are sometimes so impressed that they recommend the service to single family members in search of their beshert.

“Ten or 15 years ago, going to a matchmaker was taboo,” says Sherry. “Now everybody is doing it.”

The family-owned business, which attracts secular, Reform and Conservative Jews, offers a traditional form of matchmaking. No videotaped biographies. No computer matches. Sherry or Eva meet one-on-one with potential clients and talk for two or three hours to get a better idea of, well, personality and identity. Eva, who puts a lot of stock in physical chemistry and pheromones, claims that her nose knows. She says that she will often smell potential clients when she greets them with a hug.

But not everyone who walks through the Meet-A-Mate door becomes a client. The Singers reject a few applicants each week.

“We’re very selective about who we take on,” says Eva. “Other people aren’t so stupid to turn money down, but in the long run people respect us.”

They look for people who are genuinely nice and say that kissing up to them won’t improve your chances of being accepted. They’ll see right through it.

“We work by intuition,” says Eva, a Hungarian-born Holocaust survivor. “There’s a perception that nice people finish last. Here they come in first.”

The Singers say your love affair starts with them. A client will often send an unconditional token of esteem – a small gift or card – soon after the interview. The Singers don’t ask for them, but these gifts from the heart seem to help inspire their matchmaking muse or give fate a little nudge.

“The bottom line on all of our successful matches is that it’s all done by miracles, and through unconditional love and giving,” Sherry says.

Sherry and Eva like to think of themselves as friends for hire. They go to unusual lengths to help their clients, often looking for negative habits in a client’s life that they can help break to make the person a better catch.

“I can’t guarantee marriage, I can’t guarantee love, but I can guarantee that I’ll do whatever it takes,” says Eva. “We work with people until they’re married.”Sherry says that people often sabotage potential relationships through a variety of missteps: not calling the day after a date, being too cheap, obsessing about past relationships and trying to change people.

“People choose to be unhealthy,” Sherry says. “There’s a lot of victims out there.”But the biggest hindrance to a successful relationship, according to Sherry, is low self-esteem.

“I don’t care what they look like,” Sherry says. “More people would be in healthier relationships if they would just love themselves.”

“The Mating Game” is on Saturdays, 11 p.m.-midnight, on KRLA, 1110 on the AM dial. For more information about Meet-A-Mate, call (310) 914-3444 or visit www.meetamate.com

The Mating Game Read More »

Political Realities

1. The Convention of Politics: Israel

A poll this week within Israel indicated that a majority (54 percent) ofthe voters would have voted directly for Shimon Peres as president (inthe main, a ceremonial role). The determining vote, however, was castnot by the voters but by the Knesset, where a coalition of Likud,religious and Russian party supporters backed his opponent, MosheKatsav.

Katsav is a nearly invisible politician and Likud loyalist. He was givenlittle chance of being elected — until the anti-Barak sentiment withinthe Knesset picked up steam following the Camp David meetings. Inessence, the political parties in the Knesset chose Katsav over Peres.What the vote shows, among other things, is that Israel’s currentpolitical system has created a disjunction between the broad publicvoice(s) and the individual political parties with which many voters arealigned. Israeli elections function in the following way: Voters castballots directly for the Prime Minister, who leads the nation. They thencast separate ballots for their preferred political parties, each ofwhich has compiled a list of selected party candidates for seats in theKnesset. The candidates owe their position, and hence their loyalty, tothe party leaders. It is a bit like the old machine politics in Americancities, where political bosses reigned (nearly) supreme.

The new political rules were approved in 1993 but not put into effectuntil 1996 when Binyamin Netanyahu defeated Shimon Peres. They weredesigned to make the head of state directly responsible to the peopleand thereby free, or at least freer, of control by the multifariousparties in the Knesset. Previously the party or parties dominating thelegislature elected the Prime Minister, somewhat like politics in GreatBritain. It was a tight, closed enterprise, with more power vested inthe legislature and the voters given a somewhat indirect voice.

Presumably, all that was to have changed when direct elections were putinto place. Power to the people. But it has not quite worked out thatway. Now there is an awkward break between party politics, whichdominates the Knesset, versus a direct public voice, which supportsand/or opposes the Prime Minister. The public voice of course can befickle, ever-changing and undisciplined — somewhat like democracy inaction.

The stalemate — and that is what looks like has occurred in Israeltoday — has been given a respite, almost by accident. The Knessetadjourned this past week for a three-month break. That is just aboutenough time for Prime Minister Barak to work out a solution (or fail todo so) with Yasser Arafat before the September 13 peace negotiations’deadline.

It seems clear that the Knesset will have no truck with Barak or hissolutions. In the autumn, when the Knesset reconvenes, it will probablyvote to dissolve itself and the Prime Minister. New elections will becalled, and a new government will come into being.

There is no guarantee, however, that the results will be any different.They might be, but then again, they might not. It is all reminiscent ofFrench politics in the mid-1950s, when a succession of crises –conflicts in Vietnam and in Algeria, for example — caused one regimeafter another to stumble and fall. Political paralysis was the result,until something like a bloodless coup ushered in General Charles deGaulle. He changed everything (I would say for the better), but hispolicies almost led to a revolt by the military and the far right, whofelt betrayed by one of their own.

No one is predicting just how the political stalemate in Israel willplay out in the next three months. One fact is certain: Eventually thepolitical system will change. Given the present crisis, Israel has fewother options.

2. The Convention of Politics: America

We in America find ourselves in the midst of national politicalconventions that appear to have antagonized everyone except thedelegates themselves. The delegates come across as excited, pleased,perhaps thrilled by the simple fact that they are conventionparticipants. The same can be said for the speakers — one of whom wasour own Rabbi Marvin Hier, the founder and dean of the Simon WiesenthalCenter, who was slated to speak for 3 1/2 minutes at the Republicanconvention Wednesday evening. Of course cynics on the outside mightdescribe the delegates as being only members of the audience, applaudingand celebrating the scripted performances on stage. But there are perks,namely invitations to a weeklong series of parties. Who could complain?Apparently a great many people. For one, those groups and voices thatfeel they have been frozen out of the convention platform are furious.National conventions may be described as democracy in action by partyleaders, but the present system is designed to eliminate discussion,argument and dissident voices.

Unity, conformity and agreement was the order of the day in Philadelphiaamong the Republicans this past week as it will be in Los Angeles in tendays, when the Democrats arrive here in full force. In short, all thedecisions have already been made. Neither critics, nor outsiders, normalcontents have been invited to the party.

All of which in part explains the presence of the protesters. Theybelieve their interests have been bypassed or ignored. They can vote inNovember for a presidential candidate, but the issues they hold dearhave been not too subtly swept aside, all in the interest of avoidingcontroversy.

Those small special party interests that, say, are reflected within theIsraeli political system are missing, at least by the time a candidatehas been selected to run for president. By convention time there are nodisparate voices allowed in the hall, among Democrats as well asRepublicans, on issues that are important, even visceral, for many ofus: abortion, gun control, capital punishment, local jobs.

There is also, at times, a parental factor present. To some of thoseprotesting and disrupting on the outside — “the spoiled white kids,” asone delegate in Philadelphia described them — the convention hall looksas though it is filled precisely with the parents they have struggledagainst during adolescence. Their freedom and separation from familyhave come at considerable cost; and, in many cases, have not been wonat all.

Now these same parents, with whom the young are no longer living, areout to chart the rules and laws within America itself. The rage ispalpable and directed against all authority: city officials, the policeand the delegates.

The streets, then, have become the convention hall for thosedemonstrating. In some large measure the television cameras and the newsphotographers have helped make all this possible. They verify theprotests and link the demonstrators to us, the other audience. Oneresult is that the convention process has evolved into a two-stepaffair: First the controlled event, more spectacle than politicalhappening, more public relations than political dynamics; and, second,the protests in the streets and the alternate forum halls, where outsidevoices are heard.

Indeed, the convention has become so artificial and unreal that manyofficial political contributors and media stars have themselves opted tobe outside. Enter the Shadow Convention, organized in Los Angeles byArianna Huffington, a political writer with outlets in many newspapersacross the country, and as well a frequent political commentator ontelevision. She is being joined here next week by other media stars, aswell as by such political contributors and activists as Warren Beattyand Stanley Sheinbaum.

Their Shadow Convention is in its own way a reflection of their refusalto be part of the audience with all the (powerless) delegates. They wanta more prominent role in the proceedings. And, at the very least, theyare making an effort to bring to the convention something like adialogue that touches our lives and affects our political interests.More power to them.

Political Realities Read More »

A Delegate’s Guide to Jewish Downtown

When not busy on the convention floor or at parties, delegates and media representatives can take a quick tour of the sites of Jewish interest near downtown. The Journal asked Jerry Friedman-Habush, who runs regular tours of Jewish Los Angeles, to compile a self-guided one. For more information on Habush’s guided tours, contact him at (818) 994-0213.

1. Start at the Los Angeles Biltmore Hotel (506 S. Grand Ave.), travel south to Sixth Street and then east two blocks to Broadway. Broadway, from Third Street to Olympic Boulevard, was once the foremost row of movie palaces in the West and all were designed by Jewish theater architects, Arthur Landsbergh or S. Charles Lee, and were “saved” by Bruce Corwin – whose family still owns most of them – and Ira Yellin.

2. Travel north on Broadway and slow at Third Street. The Grand Central Market is on the site of the Jewish-owned City of Paris, L.A.’s first department store in 1880. Beside it are Sid Grauman’s “Million $ Theater,” built in 1918, before he built the Egyptian and the Chinese theaters in Hollywood, and the Victor Clothing Company on the northeast corner, where you’ll see huge, incredible murals. The Victor family is Jewish.

3. The next structure north of Victor’s is the L.A. Times employee parking structure, where walkers can locate a sidewalk plaque marking L.A.’s first synagogue – the first site of Congregation B’nai B’rith (now Wilshire Boulevard Temple), where is stood from 1872-1895, until it moved to Ninth and Hope (1895-1928).

4. From there, drive north to Cesar Chavez Avenue (formerly Brooklyn Avenue), then turn right (east) and drive across the river into Boyle Heights. At Breed Street, one block before Soto Street, turn right. The Breed Street Shul (419 Breed St.) was once the biggest Orthodox congregation west of Chicago. Completed in 1923, the huge brick structure, closed since 1992, is now, finally, under the administration of the Jewish Historical Society of Southern California. It’s hoping to raise $5 million to renovate the shul into reuse. Boyle Heights had 70,000-80,000 Jews from the 1910s through the 1950s.

5. Take Soto Street south to Olympic Boulevard and turn right (west). Turn left at Valencia Street and drive two blocks south to 12th Street. On the northwest corner is the first site of Sinai Temple (1909-1925). Since 1925 it has been the Welsh Presbyterian Church. There are still huge Stars of David still in the windows and above the interior ceiling chandelier. Organized in 1906, this was first Conservative congregation in Los Angeles and the first Conservative synagogue built west of Chicago.

6. Drive back to the Harbor Freeway (110), which runs next to Staples Center, and take the freeway northbound to the southbound Hollywood Freeway (101). Take the first exit, Temple Street. Turn right (west) on Temple Street and then right (north) on Beaudry Avenue. Turn left (west) on Sunset Boulevard, which will take you to the entrance for Chavez Ravine and Dodger Stadium. Once inside , turn right on Stadium Way and up the steep hill on Lilac Place (the first street on the left next to the Dodger ticket office parking). Continue up the hill and around to a prominent, tall cypress tree, where a four-foot high vertical plaque can be found marking the first Jewish site in Los Angeles, the Hebrew Benevolent Society Cemetery (1855-1910), from which all bodies were disinterred and moved to Home of Peace in East Los Angeles.

7. Return to the Sunset Boulevard entrance, turn right (west) on Sunset and then left (south) on Douglas Street. Further up the hill, at East Edgeware, turn left. The second street after the curve is Carroll Avenue. Welcome to Angelino Heights. The two blocks of beautiful Victorian homes are well worth the trip up the hill alone, but at 1335 Carroll stands a two-story home with red-and-yellow “fish scale” walls and a turret on top. This was the one-time home of Kaspare Cohn Hospital (1902-1910) – the first site of what is now Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. From 1902-1905 it was a home for tuberculosis sufferers from Eastern sweat shops, until rich neighbors forced them out.

8. Go the to end of the block and turn left on West Edgeware. Drive down the hill to Bellevue Avenue and turn left (east). Turn right on East Edgeware, go over the Hollywood Freeway back to Temple Street, and turn right. The West Temple Street area (1910s-1920s) was once heavily populated by immigrant Jews (and called “the Westside” to Boyle Heights’ “Eastside”), but there are no buildings or markers to indicate this.

9. Continue west on Temple and turn left on Alvarado Street (south) to get to Langers Deli – considered by The New York Times, Los Angeles Times and The Jewish Journal to offer the best pastrami sandwich in America – across from MacArthur Park at 704 S. Alvarado St. If you want bagels right out of the oven, drive north on Alvarado Street and turn left (west) on Beverly Boulevard to visit the Brooklyn Bagel Company at 2217 W. Beverly Blvd.

10. Continue west down Beverly Boulevard to New Hampshire Avenue – one block past Vermont Avenue – and turn left (south). The intersection of New Hampshire Avenue and Fourth Street is where the huge second site of Sinai Temple (1925-1961) still stands as the Korean Phila-delphia Presbyterian Church. Huge menorahs, Ten Commandment tablets and the cornerstone make it obvious that a major synagogue once occupied this site.

11. Continue south on New Hampshire Avenue to Wilshire Boulevard. Turn right (west) to Wilshire Boulevard Temple (3663 Wilshire Boulevard), the third site of what was once Congregation B’nai B’rith. If you’re there on a weekday or for services, go inside to see the sanctuary and the terrific exhibit on Jewish L.A. history in the hallway. Built to emulate a Florence synagogue, it was the central address of L.A. Jewry from the time it opened in 1928 to the 1970s, when it was eclipsed by Stephen S. Wise Temple in Bel Air.

12. Continue west on Wilshire to La Brea Avenue. Turn right (north; you’ll pass a plethora of Orthodox shuls and schools), at Melrose Avenue turn left (west), and turn left on Fairfax Avenue. Between Melrose and Beverly you’ll find kosher butchers, groceries, bakeries, Hebrew book and record stores, the fabled Canter’s Deli and other signs of a vital, ever-changing Jewish LA. Take Fairfax south to Wilshire and turn left (east) to see the new Jewish Heritage Center at Ogden Avenue, across from the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. The old and soon-to-be-new-again headquarters of the Jewish Federation can be found a little to the west at 6505 Wilshire Blvd.

A Delegate’s Guide to Jewish Downtown Read More »