fbpx

May 25, 2000

Remembering Those Who Served

Memorial Day weekend will be especially poignant for Sephardic Temple Tifereth Israel, a congregation with a tradition of honoring war veterans and members of the Jewish War Veterans (Department of California). More than 100 people are expected to gather at Home of Peace to dedicate Los Angeles’ first monument for Jews who laid down their lives in the defense of our country.

“A lot of people say that Jews never fought. It hurts me when I hear this,” says Sephardic Temple board member Hy Arnesty. “So many Jews – men and women – have given their lives for this country.”The idea for the monument came to Rabbi Daniel Bouskila during a trip to Washington D.C. with a graduating confirmation class. Following a visit to the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, he took the students to the Tomb of the Unknowns in Arlington National Cemetery. “Some of the students wanted to know if there was a monument honoring Jewish war veterans,” says Bouskila, who served in the Israel Defense Forces in 1984.

Bouskila approached Arnesty, a veteran of two wars who had helped establish the congregation’s annual Veterans Day Shabbat dinner, with the idea of a establishing a memorial to honor all Jewish veterans. The monument will list all of the wars in which America has fought – from the American Revolution to Desert Storm – and bear the emblem of the 104-year-old Jewish War Veterans of the United States, the oldest veterans group in the nation.

The ceremony, to be followed by a catered reception, will take place Sun., May 28, at noon in the Garden of Maimonides at Home of Peace, 4334 Whittier Blvd. in Los Angeles. For more information, call (310) 475-7311.

Remembering Those Who Served Read More »

Memories of Summer Camp

My first and only experience at summer camp was magical, or so it seemed to me. I entered a world I had never known before, and by summer’s end had gained some recognition into who I was and who I was not. No mean feat at 13.

A city boy, I developed at camp a feel for the country, which meant the forests and lakes of upstate New York. The silence and solitude of canoeing across an open lake got to me immediately. I prevailed on one of the boating counselors to make me an assistant in exchange for doing some of the grunt work around the dock. Every day at dusk, before putting the boats away, the two of us would set out across the lake in silence. I thought at that moment the universe belonged to the two of us.

It turned out that I had a talent for cross-country running, not a popular activity at camp that summer. Mostly I liked the sense of being alone – away from counselors, rules (Lord, there were so many rules) and, yes, even from the other campers – and running a makeshift course through the woods was exhilarating. My mind could range free as I ran: First I would empty my head of everything, then conjure up images from particular books I was reading to an imagined future that lay just beyond reach waiting to be encountered or fashioned by me. It was only in midsummer that a singular recognition dawned on me: I was an only child who did not particularly like the press of living with so many other bodies and voices. Running cross-country was a way of escaping.

So was birding. I was an athletic kid, used to the rough-and-tumble of school yards and city sports. But when a nature counselor passed along a copy of Roger Tory Peterson’s “Field Guide to the Birds,” another new world opened for me. Later in the year, and indeed in the years after that, I would head off spring weekend mornings for Central Park, Van Cortlandt Park, the Bronx Botanical Gardens, binoculars and Peterson’s guide firmly in hand. Of course, this too was a separate world – and one, moreover, inhabited mostly by adults. They were different from my parents, and from my relatives too.

They were quieter, for one. And they extended me a courtesy I treasured; despite our differences in age, they treated me like an equal, a member of some loosely affiliated but unincorporated “club” of bird-watchers, rather than as some 13 or 14-year-old kid.

Once, my father, suspicious that I might be engaged in some unsavory activity, questioned me about what I did when I was out birding. I tried to describe for him the sight of several blue herons I had watched that morning. They were sitting, perched on a long, thick, low tree branch hanging over the sluggish Bronx River. Suddenly, first one, then the other lifted off the tree, cutting arcs and patterns over the water, then began circling upward across the sky. My father stared at me blankly for a minute, not sure whether I was teasing him, then turned away. It was not one of my more successful moments.

There were mishaps at camp, to be sure. Once I seriously miscalculated and overturned badly in a canoe far out in the lake. Luck and the quiet skill of the boating counselor (I wasn’t so foolhardy as to break the waterfront rules and canoe alone) saved my hide, meaning perhaps my life. Fortunately, at 13 immortality is assumed and it neither deterred nor dampened my enthusiasm for boats and canoes.

It was inevitable that I would antagonize a counselor. I was grateful only one had singled me out for “not being part of the camp.” I lacked team spirit and set myself apart, he told me. I was going to be his summer project. It was clear he did not much like me. Nor, truth be told, did I care for him.

I volunteered for overnight hikes andbetween those trips, working with the boats and hanging out with the nature counselor, I managed to stay out of his way. Most important of all, I avoided complaining about him. It was between the two of us, and I didn’t want him to hear me grouse, nor was I willing to have him prevail.

By summer’s end, it had settled on me that I was a contrarian and pleased to be one, though at the time I did not know the word, nor had ever heard it in conversation. That was not supposed to be the outcome for a boy away at summer camp, where learning to get along and go along were the defining and accepted rules of the game.

But I knew I did not particularly care one way or the other about getting along, and I definitely resisted going along. It was astonishing to me that I had survivedthe camp experience, had not fallen afoul of more counselors who saw me as subversive, as someone who was not a team player and had therefore taken it upon themselves to straighten me out. But that had not occurred.

Nor was I singled out for being a nonconformist by some of the other kids. In general I was neither popular nor unpopular. Just someone who went through the summer camp unremarked, an outsider and yet not quite an outsider, for there was no active rebellion. I thought of myself as moving in a sidewards way, more aslant the others than in the same direction or in confrontational opposition.

Deep down I knew that I had begun, quite consciously, the difficult task of becoming my own person, and wanted time and space in which to sort things out. At camp, without much effort, I had that chance.

Memories of Summer Camp Read More »

Kissandra’s Complaint

Kissandra Cohen had everything going for her.A certified child prodigy with a sky-high IQ, by age 20 she had finished law school and was heading toward an MBA degree.

Early last year, while still at Loyola Law School, she was hired as a law clerk by the firm of Masry & Vititoe in Westlake Village.In September, while the results of her bar examination were still pending (she passed), partner Edward L. Masry raised her salary to $120,000 a year and sweetened the pot with a “fully loaded” 1998 Ford Explorer, a top-of-the-line cell phone, and other benefits.Masry enthusiastically described the state’s youngest lawyer as “brilliant,” adding, “I wouldn’t hesitate to give her any file in our office. I predict in 10 years she’ll be one of the premier trial attorneys in California.”

Today, Cohen is out of a job, can’t get a new one, and has filed a voluminous lawsuit against Masry and his associates. In it, she details incident after incident of sexual harassment, as well as religious discrimination.Masry has filed his own suit, accusing Cohen of slander.

Cohen’s suit, though laced with graphic language and descriptions of a workplace rampant with sexism, might have gone unnoticed by the media but for the fact that the hit movie “Erin Brockovich” opened on the nation’s movie screens about the same time.

Based on an actual case, the film stars Julia Roberts in the title role as a feisty young woman who is hired by Masry (played by Albert Finney) in 1992 as a file clerk.Though she has no legal training, Brockovich gets her teeth into a case which accused Pacific Gas & Electric of polluting the ground water near its plant in Hinkley, Calif., allegedly causing severe physical harm to some 600 residents.

Masry and Brockovich, working as a team, won a judgment in 1996 of $333 million, the largest penalty ever assessed in a non-jury trial.The real Brockovich has continued to work at the law firm and is now its director of environmental research and investigation.

The relationship between Masry and Brockovich plays a role in the two current opposing lawsuits and adds to the case’s complexity.Indeed, to talk to Cohen and Masry and to read their pleadings is to enter a kind of wonderland, in which even the simplest fact is spun into diametrically opposed testimonies.Cohen charges that during her 11 months at the law firm she was subject to constant groping, pinching, nuzzling, verbal innuendoes, obscene language and other forms of sexual harassment by Masry, citing more than 20 specific incidents.

The 21-year-old Cohen pictures the 67-year-old Masry as a man fixated on the female breast and who hired and paid women employees, including a Playboy model, according to their looks and other physical endowments.

In addition, Cohen filed 10 counts of sexual harassment against two other lawyers in the firm.At one point in her brief, Cohen says that “Brockovich and others had implied (to Cohen) or claimed outright at various times that Masry and Brokovich had had a sexual relationship.”

Masry and Brockovich deny the allegation and have filed a slander suit against Cohen.Cohen’s second set of charges deal with “Discrimination and Harassment Based on Religion.” She affirms that at Masry’s insistence, she was forced to attend a series of Friday evening sessions at the law office, despite her plea for a change of dates so that she could celebrate the Sabbath with her family.In separate interviews, Masry said that there were only two such meetings, and that in both Cohen left around 6 p.m. However, Cohen responded that there were close to a dozen meetings, generally lasting until 10:30 p.m.

Another complaint by Cohen revolved around last June’s Jewish Journal graduation issue, which pictured her on the cover. Cohen charges that James Joseph Brown III, a fellow lawyer at the firm, took the cover page and inscribed it with such remarks as “Jewish Princess,” “Cool and Kosher!! No pork on those gams!!!” and “But she looks real good in a SKIRT, hence our cover girl this year.”Cohen said she went to Masry a number of times to complain about the cover and Brown’s attitude, but that Masry laughed it off. Masry maintains that he never saw the defaced cover until later, when the pleadings in Cohen’s lawsuit were filed.

Cohen also charges that Brown, in addition to sexually harassing her, frequently called her a JAP (Jewish American Princess). In another incident, she says, Brown pointed to a star of David that Cohen wore around her neck, commenting “in a disparaging tone, ‘Why do you have to wear a Jewish star? Are you proud of being a Jew?'”

Brown says he was Cohen’s best friend at the office and meant his inscriptions on the cover picture “as a joke.”He denies that he sexually harassed Cohen, called her a “JAP” or made comments about her star of David. Brown says that after he left the law firm in October, Cohen retained him to represent a member of her family in a legal matter.

After several months of such friction, both Masry and Cohen agree that he phoned her on Sun., Dec. 26, and fired her, but the reason is, as usual, in dispute.According to Cohen, Masry called her at home and asked her to come to the office. She told him she was caught up with her work and he responded that he didn’t need her for work but wanted to see her. She declined, and within the hour, Masry called again and told Cohen she was fired.Masry labels Cohen’s version an “unequivocal lie” and said he fired her because she put in too few hours of work at the office, antagonized other employees, and, though she was paid an attorney’s salary, had failed to clear the paperwork with the California bar that would permit her to practice as an attorney.Cohen, in turn, describes this interpretation as a lie.

Since her termination, Cohen has applied for a position at several other law firms but has not been hired because, she says, Masry will not give her a letter of reference.Masry asserts that what incenses him most about Cohen’s lawsuit is the implication that he discriminated against her because she is Jewish.

He said he has assembled 60 witnesses from across the world to rebut Cohen’s allegations, and many of the key ones are Jewish.In addition, he volunteered that “my father was a Christian from Syria who came to the United States in 1912 because of repression in his native country. He was one of the first to give money to Israel in 1948. His sympathies were pro-Zionist, not pro-Arab.”

Kissandra’s Complaint Read More »

7 Days in the Arts

27Saturday

Two films in the month-long “Artificial Humans in the Cinema” series at LACMA explore the alternately dangerous and humorous effects of experimenting with perfection. First in this robotic double feature is cult classic “The Stepford Wives,” by master screenwriter William Goldman, taking the concept of the perfect wife to its logical conclusion. Next up, the search for the perfect man leads one woman to John Malkovich and his battery powered alter-ego in “Making Mr. Right.” 7:30 p.m. 5905 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles. For information, call (323) 857-6010; for tickets, call (877) 522-6225.

28Sunday

Laugh for a good cause at “Heidi Joyce’s Stand Up Against Domestic Violence”benefit show and CD-release party. The show features Joyce along with seven moreof L.A.’s funniest women, and benefits the Theatre of Hope for Abused Women (T.H.A.W.), which sends outreach arts and educational programs to women’s shelters. 2 p.m. $15. Bitter Truth Theatre, 11050 Magnolia Blvd.,North Hollywood. For reservations and information, call (818) 766-9702.

29Monday

For Memorial Day, take a look back at World War II through the uniqueperspective of teenagers. Set in a USO Canteen in 1942, “CAN’TEEN: Letters to the Front” is the rousing musical story of teens respondingto a world at war, told through letters to fathers, brothers, teachers and friends gone to fight. $12.50 (11 a.m. and 2 p.m. shows); $15 (7 p.m. show). The Other Space at Santa Monica Playhouse, 1211 Fourth Street, Santa Monica. For reservations call (310) 394-9779 ext. 2, or visit www.santamonicaplayhouse.com

30Tuesday

The Skirball Cultural Center in association with the 92nd Street Y Unterberg Poetry Center in New York City presents a special evening with author Robert Stone. A National Book Award winner for his 1975 novel “Dog Soldiers,” Stone’s latest book is “Damascus Gate”, a political thriller set in Jerusalem. The Boston Globe raves, “No other writer can capture so profoundly the human struggle for reason and mercy.” 7:30 p.m. $8 (general); $6 (members); Free (students with valid ID).

31Wednesday

The photography of James Casebere, at once compelling and ironic, gets its first Los Angeles retrospective in over a decade at Grant Selwyn Fine Art. Casebere builds intricate, small-scale models and then, using dramatic lighting effects, photographs the miniatures to achieve images which often blur the line between fact and fiction. The subject matter includes prisons, courtrooms, ghettos and hallways, yet despite this focus on public spaces, there is no human presence in Casebere’s work. The exhibition, a marriage of architecture and film noir style, runs through July 8. Tues.-Sat., 10 a.m.-6 p.m. 341 North Canon Drive, Beverly Hills. (310) 777-2400.

1Thursday

“At the End of the Century: One Hundred Years of Architecture,” a monumental exhibition exploring the history of architecture and urbanism in the twentieth century, features over 1,000 objects including original and newly commissioned scale models, photographs, furniture and artifacts. Presented thematically in 21 sections which examine how architecture has changed in response to cultural, political, and economic factors, the MOCA at The Geffen Contemporary exhibition also includes “The Unbuilt,” computer graphics films of four unrealized architectural projects. This is a museum show for anyone who has wondered how we arrived at the built environment in which we live today. Through September 24. Admission: $6 (general); $4 (students and seniors); Free (Thurs., 5-8 p.m.). 152 North Central Avenue, Downtown Los Angeles. (213) 621-2766.

2Friday

When the corruptions of intolerance and bigotry invade the sanctuary of family life, the pain of that conflict can destroy lives. Two short plays by Bertolt Brecht opening today at the Lee Strasberg Creative Center dramatize this sorrow and the damage done, both set in the earliest days of Nazi Germany. “The Jewish Wife” concerns a wealthy Jewish woman married to a German doctor, and her agonizing ambivalence about the marriage and her survival as a Jew. “The Informer” reflects the fear and paranoia a Lutheran professor and his wife feel when they suspect that their son, a member of the Hitler youth, is spying on them. As you leave the theater, past West Hollywood nightclubs partying on and nearby shops of the Fairfax District closed for Shabbat, the successes and continued urgency of the struggle with intolerance will be clearer than ever. Fri. and Sat. at 8 p.m., Sun. at 7 p.m., through July 9. $8. 7936 Santa Monica Blvd., West Hollywood. (323) 650-7777.

7 Days in the Arts Read More »

5 Steps to Choosing a Camp

Sure, there’s going to be bugs. And food that’s fun to make fun of. And a couple of bouts of homesickness. But camping, the experts agree, is good for children. “It’s a great equalizer,” says Arthur Pinchev, director of youth and family programming at the Brandeis-Bardin Institute, “It’s one place where kids can really be kids,” away from the pressures of school and family life.

But camps themselves are not created equal, and the challenge for parents lies in finding the camp experience that’s right for their own child. Here’s five steps the experts recommend:

1.Decide: Is your child ready? The usual age for sleepaway camp is about 8, when the child is preparing to enter the third grade, though some kids take far longer to accept the notion of leaving home. Pinchev feels it’s simple to know when a youngster is ready: “You ask the child, or the child will tell you.” Take into account your child’s personality and past experiences, says Mark Miller of the Wilshire Boulevard Temple camps. A kid who makes friends easily, likes getting involved with activities, and has spent holiday weekends at Grandma’s house will probably not have trouble. A loner can adjust nicely so long as he (or she) accepts boundaries and nonparental authority figures.

2.Make sure it’s accredited. Every camp on your list should be accredited by the American Camping Association. This national body, to which all of Southern California’s leading Jewish camps belong, sets strict standards of health and safety.

3. History and traditions: look into them. Think about what sorts of activities are important to you and your child, then make sure the camp has the same emphasis. Some camps reflect the outlook of a particular movement within Judaism. Even among day camps, there are major differences. Gan Alonim, a day camp sponsored by the Brandeis-Bardin Institute, schedules no trips to the beach or Disneyland. Instead, Gan Alonim campers spend their days entirely on the bucolic campsite in Simi Valley. Camp Ramah emphasizes Jewish study as well as Jewish fun. Several Ramah camps are proud of their nature trails and ropes courses. The day camps run through the Jewish Centers Association are experimenting with special interest sessions, such as sports clinics. JCA campers can also opt for the “town and country” program, which serves as a low-key introduction to sleepaway camping by combining day camp with a shortened stay at JCA Shalom.

4. Talk to the camp. Share with the camp staff any difficulty your child may be having, or any home circumstances (such as a pending divorce) that may create emotional stress. The current philosophy is that parents and camp directors form an important partnership on the child’s behalf. But staffers know that some parents help fuel their child’s adjustment problems by conveying the “fact” that homesickness is the norm.

5.Check it out … now! Parents should be looking into camps the summer before their child will be packing his duffel bag. By late autumn 2000, Southern California’s most popular camps will probably have few spaces left for the summer of 2001.

5 Steps to Choosing a Camp Read More »

To Break the Chains

Hollywood met Jerusalem this Mother’s Day, when the tennis court at the north Beverly Hills home of bestselling authors Jonathan and Faye Kellerman was transformed into a Tel Aviv rabbinic court hearing the ugly details of a divorce gone awry.

Three rabbis sat in judgment, 200 spectators vied for spots in the shade and a pair of advocates – the stars of the show – presented the halachic and personal arguments of Levy v. Levy.

The scripted dramatization, based on real cases with actual quotes from judges, showcased the women advocates, or toanot, who in the past few years have taken on the previously male role of arguing cases – specifically messy divorce cases – before rabbinic courts.

Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, the chief rabbi of Efrat who founded the program to train toanot in 1990, says the 60 women now out in the field are accepted in batei din, or rabbinic courts, across the country, with approval from Israel’s Sephardic and Ashkenazic chief rabbis, the Knesset and Israel’s High Court. The Rabbinic Council of America has agreed in principle to accept toanot, although none has yet argued a case in an American beit din. Riskin said the toanot have begun to correct an imbalance that has plagued many religious courts, which issue all Jewish divorces in Israel. “I do not believe there is any document in history that was more forthcoming in terms of women’s rights than the Talmud was 2,000 years ago,” Riskin said. But, he said, many of those favorable opinions of the Talmud and its early interpreters “are not expressed in many courts of Jewish law. That’s why our women advocates are so critical – because they have succeeded in bringing to the fore the aspect of Jewish law which protects women’s rights.”

Nowhere is this role more important than in cases of agunah, where the husband is withholding awrit of divorce out of malice or to extort financial or custodial concessions from his wife. Under Jewish law, the husband must willingly agree to issue the get, the bill of divorce, without which she cannot remarry. The term agunah means “chained woman.”The case presented last Sunday was rife with the kind of details seen in so many of these cases: physical and sexual abuse, emotional torment, financial control, infidelity and rabbinic insensitivity that causes cases to drag out for years.

The rare view into the proceedings powerfully demonstrated why a female advocate is so necessary for the wife to have a fair trial. Aside from researching and presenting the opinions in the corpus of halachic literature that protect women, the toenet, in Sunday’s case Avigayil Rock, is more likely able to elicit and present all the emotion-laden details – often sexual – that can help a case. “Because the toenet is a woman, she can more easily empathize with the pain of those women whose lives stand stranded before her,” said Susan Weiss, director of Yad Le’isha, a legal aid service run by the Monica Dennis Goldberg Women’s Advocate Program for the Israeli rabbinical courts. The programs are part of Ohr Torah Stone, Riskin’s empire of Torah study institutions that serve about 2,000 students.

Ohr Torah Stone is currently embarked on a $15 million capital campaign to finance a new campus. Sunday’s fundraiser also aimed at getting supporters to sponsor a toenet at $12,000 a year. John Fishel and Todd Morgan accepted an award for The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles, which was the first Federation to sponsor a toenet. A toenet studies for 3 years, then must pass a rigorous exam administered by the rabbinate.

Riskin believes the toanot will help alleviate some of the agunah problem – arguably the most vexing controversy before the halachic community today. His advocates have succeeded in procuring 100 bills of divorce in problem cases. Still, he wants to see things go further. In the past few months, Riskin has begun to present a halachic solution calling for annulment ina case in which the husband refuses to grant a divorce and in which he is behaving so negatively that the rabbinic authorities can determine that his actions take him out of the realm of kedat Moshe vi’yisrael, conduct “according to the laws of Moses and Israel.”

Riskin contends that the formula, uttered under the chuppah, makes the community and the rabbis partners in the relationship. Citing Talmudic precedents based on this reasoning, Riskin says the rabbinic authorities can declare the marriage invalid. It is a controversial position, but Riskin says he has begun to garner rabbinic support. He hopes more rabbis will come forward. “God must give courage and strength to rabbinic judges,” Riskin said, usinga verse from Psalms to illustrate his vision of justice. “God will bless his nation with peace and will make certain that women are no longer chained to impossible relationships.”

To Break the Chains Read More »

Building Toward a New Future

It’s a clear, sunny weekday in May. A man wearing a hardhat shaped like a Stetson materializes from a construction site. His name is Rodney Freeman, and he is a member of The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles’ Real Estate & Construction Division. He is also on the committee supervising the biggest enterprise ever undertaken by L.A.’s Jewish Federation – the refurbishing of the nonprofit organization’s 6505 Wilshire Blvd. headquarters.

At roughly $20 million, Freeman calls the new building “a phenomenal investment.” For many weeks, he and the planning committee, headed by capital campaign co-chairs Lionel Bell and Ed Sanders (both past Federation presidents) have been overseeing what is more of a reconstruction than remodeling. “The old building was in great disrepair,” Bell said. The committee spent three months of planning and design before embarking on the building’s 12-month construction calendar, set to wind down by summer’s end.

Serving as docent on this May day, Freeman leads a hardhat-wearing crew of core Federation execs – president John Fishel, co-chairmen Bell and Sanders, and capital campaign director Judith Fischer – on a private tour of the yet-unfinished edifice. Even as the group proceeded, communication lines were being installed, and interior systems such as electrical, heating and ventilation were being connected. Almost 300 construction workers are on the site on any given day.

By the time the dust settles in early September, Bell said, the building will boast “state-of-the-art communications systems – video conferencing, computer networking.” The current plan is for Federation staffers to move in on Sept. 4, with beneficiary agencies taking up residence by Sept. 15. And so far, according to Freeman, 6505’s reconstruction is right on schedule.

Originally built in the late 1950s, 6505 Wilshire Blvd. became the Federation’s headquarters during Sanders’ early 1970s presidency.

“We were located at 590 North Vermont,” recalls the former Federation head. “It had numerous disadvantages. Freeways were not a factor in the early days. It would take three or four hours out of your day just to assemble at the old place. There were a lot of people who wouldn’t come to meetings. And even in those days, that neighborhood was not a place where people wanted to go.”Despite naysayers, Sanders persisted in pushing for a new building, and the Federation purchased 6505 for $2.7 million. Sanders recalls his trepidation when the Federation, in an effort to raise $2.5 million, decided to approach 100 people and solicit $25,000 from each.

“After the building opened and everyone saw it, we were oversubscribed,” Sanders said with a chuckle. An additional $6 million was raised much later to remodel the building. Then came the 1994 Northridge quake, which caused internal structural damage.

“Because of the earthquake, the mandate was that we shouldn’t occupy that building,” recalls Bell.As a result, the Wilshire/San Vicente location has been substantially retrofitted with a two-and-a-half-foot concrete and steel foundation reinforcement extending around the perimeter of the building.From the get-go, the Federation’s interim 5700 headquarters was meant to be just that: transitional office space. The Federation signed a five-year lease with the intent of moving into a new building by 2000. Bell and company long mulled over ideas of either buying a building or buying land on the Westside before concluding, Bell said, that “it was best to return to 6505 after all.”

Several key motivations had a hand in that decision. One was the difficulty The Federation experienced in finding an acceptable building in West L.A. that was within their budget. Sanders explains another: “We’d lose at least a couple of million dollars from FEMA because we didn’t repair.”

The capital campaign for 6505’s refurbishing was launched during Lionel Bell’s recent administration. Freeman credits Bell for having the foresight to “open up generational lines” in the capital campaign, encouraging people of disparate generations to contribute.

He promises that the new and improved 6505 will achieve a “significant reduction in overall operating costs.” A lot of space was created by knocking out old staircases, for example. By putting the mechanical rooms on the roof, Freeman says, the building gained nearly 9,000 sq. ft. And some ceiling consolidation has given offices nine-foot instead of eight-foot ceilings. Overall, the building has increased its square footage from 102,000 to 136,000 square feet to better accommodate its 30 tenants.

Federation employees and visitors will surely benefit from the extra space and ample window design, which will allow for a lot more natural light than the building used to admit. Jerusalem stone will run down the length of the building’s Wilshire Boulevard exterior. And Freeman points out that the new building will meet American Disabilities Act standards and is the first construction project that meets the structural standards of the city’s revamped 1997 building code. The reconstruction also updates the building’s emergency and security functions.

Space in the building has already been earmarked for executive suites and agencies. Most of 6505’s 12 floors will house Federation agencies and affiliates, with the11th floor containing the Federation’s executive offices. The lobby level will include a northwest corner executive board room that is 30 percent bigger than its older counterpart. The rest of that floor will be devoted largely to family, housing the Zimmer Discovery Children’s Museum of Jewish Community Centers and a children’s library.

Bell said that when 6505 reopens, it will not only benefit the roughly 350 employees that will move into the building but will serve the entire community in more ways than ever before. A public opening is tentatively scheduled for December. And while more than $17 million has been amassed so far, Campaign 2000 will continue to raise big money with naming opportunities throughout 6505. Early in 2001, the Federation’s capital campaign will shift, branching out with a community-wide campaign to solicit contributions for its completion and maintenance. “The new building makes a very strong statement of the health and well-being of the local Jewish community,” Bell said.

Sanders seconds that notion, delighted to be championing 6505 again.”I’m doing this again because I’m emotionally attached to it,” Sanders said. “It was a great move in those days, and I was proud to lead the march. Now I’m proud to play a role and lead the march again.”

Building Toward a New Future Read More »

Ramah’s Begins Lishma Summer

Last year, as summer approached, Julie Pelc was moving towards a master’s degree in education, with plans to go on to rabbinical school. Andrew Weitz was serving as the northeast field representative of the United Jewish Communities, working with Jewish student leaders on outreach and social action projects. Jonathan Dorff was finishing up his first year of medical school. All three of these young Jewish adults found themselves faced with the luxury of a free summer, what Dorff calls, “my last summer off ever.” All chose to take part in Lishma, the six-week egalitarian yeshiva-study program newly inaugurated by Camp Ramah in California.

Lishma, whose name suggests “Torah studied for its own sake,” is a joint project of Camp Ramah and the Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies at the University of Judaism. It was developed by Ramah’s Brian Greene, the Ziegler School’s then-dean Rabbi Daniel Gordis, and rabbinical student Daniel Greyber, with major support from the Jewish Community Foundation (which gave $25,000 in start-up funds) and the Covenant Foundation (whose $72,000 grant has provided full scholarships and stipends to all participants). Greyber explains that young people from liberal Jewish backgrounds frequently “thirst for meaning. They want to encounter the Jewish tradition not exclusively as an historical or intellectual venture, but as a religious one” that can help guide them through their lives. Lishma’s goal is to introduce potential Jewish leaders to sacred texts and ritual in an atmosphere that values individual perspective while also respecting traditional practices. The first summer’s 18 participants (ranging in age from 18 to 25) combined serious text study with spiritual introspection, social action, and outdoor fun at Ramah’s serene Ojai campsite.

Lishma is not for everyone. Rabbinical student Rachel Lawson Shere, who directs Lishma along with Dan Greyber, compares its appeal to that of another program geared toward young adults, the Brandeis-Bardin Collegiate Institute. Lishma, she says, “is about falling in love with Jewish texts and Jewish observance, instead of falling in love with Judaism.” Those who gravitate to Lishma are already in love with Judaism – or with Israel – but want to take their spiritual involvement to a higher level.Dorff, son of a prominent Los Angeles rabbi and a Jewish educator, notes that “most of us have experienced Judaism as an obligation. This was our first opportunity to experience Judaism as a privilege.” He saw Lishma as a chance to make adult Jewish choices before the rigors of medical school caused him to neglect the spiritual side of his life. Dorff’s fondest Lishma memory is of the Shabbat the group spent camping on one of the Channel Islands, davening out in the woods under the stars.For Julie Pelc, the social service projects were a highlight. The group cleared trails in a state park and served meals in a homeless shelter, thus reinforcing the concept that Torah Judaism requires action as well as study. Andrew Weitz, approaching Talmudic learning for the first time, thrived on his interaction with his study partner, with the scholars in residence, and with directors Greyber and Shere. As he puts it, “They’re extremely inspiring. They have such a palpable passion for [Judaism]. … They glow from it.” Their example has proved contagious. In 2001, Weitz will enter the Ziegler School to study for the rabbinate.

Not that all Lishma participants are expected to become rabbis. Those involved agree that one strength of Lishma lies in the diversity of its participants. Says Pelc, “I learned that the Torah is open enough for everyone to come in.”

For more information on Lishma, call (888) CAMP-RAMAH or (310) 476-8571, or visit lishma.org

Ramah’s Begins Lishma Summer Read More »

Reform Needs Standards

The Reform rabbis’ recent resolution on same-gender officiation affirms two mutually contradictory actions: It supports any Reform rabbi who wishes to perform a same-sex ritual, including, though not so specified, marriage; and it supports any Reform rabbi who refuses to perform same-sex rituals.In an important way, there is nothing new in this resolution. A Reform rabbi could always have performed a same-sex commitment service. Nothing in Reform Judaism would have prevented Reform rabbis from doing so 10, 20, or 50 years ago, because there are no religious standards in Reform Judaism (this is not criticism, it is description). Reform rabbis can do anything they want ritually. So a Reform Jew can celebrate Shabbat on Tuesday. Indeed, for decades many Reform synagogues held Shabbat services on Sundays.

When I asked one Reform rabbi what binds his colleagues to each other and to their denomination, he replied, “Union dues,” only partially in jest.Reform Judaism is very important to the Jewish people. It has served as a way back into Judaism for many Jews who would not set foot in a Conservative or Orthodox shul. It is also a wonderful vehicle for experimentation with the tradition, especially the services, and as a result some of the most beautiful services in Jewish life take place in Reform synagogues.But because as a movement Reform has no religious standards, it is entirely understandable why movements based on standards (i.e., Conservative and Orthodox Judaism) would find it theologically difficult, if not impossible, to regard Reform rabbis as necessarily the religious equals of their rabbis.

This same-sex officiation resolution is a good example of Reform’s lack of standards. What are Reform Judaism’s standards regarding religious same-sex marriage? There are none. They are whatever a Reform rabbi wants them to be. And the same is true about every other Jewish religious issue. The Reform rabbi or temple may have standards, but the Reform movement does not.

Those in the Reform movement who push for having Judaism obliterate any distinction between opposite-sex sexual love and same-sex sexual love regard their position on homosexuality as, more than anything, “progressive.” The irony here is that it is not progressive, but regressive. Homosexual behavior was regarded as religiously and morally no different from heterosexual behavior throughout the ancient world. Ancient Egyptian men prayed to copulate with the buttocks of male gods. Ancient Greeks had sex with their wives in order to produce children and with males for pleasure. Nowhere in the ancient world was homosexual behavior regarded negatively. Only the Torah did, listing it as one of the practices of ancient Canaan that Israel must desist from. The elevation of male-female sexual love as the human ideal was the work of the Torah, and it resulted in a profound elevation of the status of women from baby-machine to co-equal of men.

Reform Judaism’s primary self-image is as a progressive movement. The truth, however, is it has often been a follower of the spirit of its times, precisely when it most regarded itself as progressive:

  • Reform Judaism thought it was progressive when it dropped kashrut and served shellfish at a banquet of the Hebrew Union College in the late 19th century. Yet it was only imitating the larger gentile world, and today Reform embraces mitzvahs such as kashrut, and many Reform rabbis refrain from eating shellfish.
  • Reform Judaism thought it was progressive when many of its congregations changed Shabbat from Saturday to Sunday. Yet, it was only imitating the Christians among whom the Reform Jews lived.
  • Reform Judaism thought it was progressive when it fought furiously against establishing Jewish day schools. Today Reform has rescinded this opposition, and there are now Reform Jewish day schools in most major American cities.
  • Reform Judaism thought it was progressive when it alone among Jewish denominations opposed Zionism. Yet it was Zionism that was progressive, and today it is difficult to imagine there being even one anti-Zionist Reform rabbi.
  • Reform Judaism thought it was progressive when it dropped virtually all Jewish religious rituals and Hebrew at its services. Yet, it was only making its services more like those of the Protestants among whom Reform Jews lived. Today, most Reform services have more Hebrew than English, and it is increasingly rare to find a Reform rabbi who does not a wear a yarmulke during services.
  • And now Reform Judaism thinks it is progressive in equating homosexual and heterosexual behavior. Yet, again, it is only imitating the larger world – the liberal secular world in which Reform Jews live.

Having said allthis, the reader might be surprised to learn that I attend a Reformsynagogues almost every Shabbat and deliver the weekly sermon at its minyan. I also love visiting and lecturing in Reform synagogues around North America; I love the services that freedom has enabled many Reform synagogues to produce.

And I love those Reform Jews, rabbinic and lay, who, though free to do nothing, have embraced Judaism with all their heart, all their soul and all their might. It is also critical to add that Jewish life must embrace Jews who are gay. They are as much our brothers and sisters as any heterosexual Jew, and, needless to say, created every bit as much in God’s image.

But this latest resolution, an attempt to undo Judaism’s awesome contribution to the world – making man-woman monogamous love society’s ideal – should make it clear that we need standards-based Jewish denominations. This means that for those Jews who are willing to change talmudic law, but not Torah principles, there is no denomination. Maybe this resolution will be the catalyst for the creation of such a movement – perhaps a Torah-based Reform Judaism.

Movements have started over much lesser issues than the definition of marriage.

Dennis Prager’s paper on this subject, “Judaism, Homosexuality, and Civilization,” may be obtained through the Web site www.dennisprager.com, or by calling 800-225-8584

Reform Needs Standards Read More »

A Super Cyberconnection

When Hillary Zana lived in Israel in the late 1970s, her moshav had only one phone line, making communication with her friends and family in the United States extremely limited. Today, however, schoolchildren in Israel and California can become best friends over the Internet.

Zana, along with Judy Taff, now coordinates the pairing of Heschel Day School with Tel Aviv’s A.D. Gordon School through the twin-school program sponsored by The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles. Taff and Zana have relied on up-to-the-minute technology to create a link between students at the two schools. When a group of eighth-graders from Heschel recently traveled to Israel to stay with their Gordon counterparts, the bond that had begun in cyberspace developed into strong friendships.

At first, Heschel middle-schoolers communicated with their assigned partners at Gordon via snail-mail and the occasional e-mail message. For some it worked: seventh-grader Rachel Williams developed a close rapport with her Tel Aviv partner, Noa Morag, that will culminate when the girls meet for the first time this summer. But, says Zana, “there were some relationships that never got off the ground. I wanted to open it up, so kids would feel that they’re part of a whole community.”

Zana’s solution was eCircles, an Internet site that provides a framework for chat groups andbulletin boards. Now students from the two schools exchange views about pop music and hobbies, but they also come together in guided discussions orchestrated by Zana, who explains, “I look upon it as a classroom of kids, although they stretch over two continents and two languages.”

In the past year, Heschel and Milken students have logged onto eCircles to create a recipe book and a virtual museum. They have mutually become involved in social action projects, joining Amnesty International’s letter-writing campaign to protest the living conditions of Brazil’s street kids. (This effort took on new urgency when one of theIsraelis, born and raised in Rio, contributed a first-hand description of Brazilian poverty.) They have discussed books that all of them have read as class assignments.

And they have responded with candor to one another’s concerns, as when Ben from Tel Aviv posted a newspaper photo of a wounded young soldier in the arms of his friend. The photo elicited lively comments about the realities of war and the hope for peace. Stacey from Los Angeles suggested, “I think that you sent this picture to show what you will be doing in a couple of years.”

When Heschel students Avi Horn, Joel Kort, Marion Said, and Mollie Vandor gathered to discuss their two-week visit to Tel Aviv, it was clear that the electronic connection between the two schools had greatly enhanced their stay. For one thing, they could connect from Israel with their classmates back home and even participate in a live Internet chat. Said Avi, “I could picture their faces and see how they looked. So I really wasn’t homesick.”

But the issues first broached in cyberspace took on new dimensions when youngsters from two very different cultures met face to face. The eighth graders of both nations all had read Uri Orlev’s “The Sand Game,” in which a young Holocaust survivor joins the fight for Israel’s independence. It wasn’t until they were on Israeli soil that the Americans fully comprehended that the Holocaust has a different meaning for their Tel Aviv partners, who view it as a prelude to the founding of a Jewish state. Issues of personal safety also took on a new reality in Israel. As they walked on the beach late at night, Mollie marveled that her Tel Aviv partner, Anael Berkovitz, had no sense of possible danger. Anael’s response was: “In Israel the problem is bigger, and we fight it as a country. When you’re walking alone, you’re walking with your country.”

In exchange for this new perspective, Mollie was able to bring to her partner a new appreciation for Jewish ritual. She shared her bat mitzvah pictures, inspiring the wholly secular Anael to attend services for the first time. Such instances of Heschel students introducing their brand of religious Judaism to their Tel Aviv counterparts cause Judy Taff to exult, “These are ordinary kids … but they are going to change the face of Israeli culture.”

Now that the twelve Heschel students have returned home, their Internet relationships have become more meaningful than ever. They approach their eCircles with new zest, and at home their electronic mailboxes are always full. Avi has invested in AOL instant messenger software so that he can readily chat with the boy he calls “my new best friend.”

Mollie explains that before she went to Israel, e-mail exchanges with her partner held little interest for her. That was because “you can’t just be friends with a computer. You have to make friends face to face.” Now, however, “there’s a face in the computer.”

A Super Cyberconnection Read More »