fbpx

The Met nixes Russian art loan over Chabad archive

New York\'s Metropolitan Museum of Art reportedly has canceled plans for an art loan to a Russian museum in the ongoing dispute over a Chasidic archive.
[additional-authors]
August 16, 2011

New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art reportedly has canceled plans for an art loan to a Russian museum in the ongoing dispute over a Chasidic archive.

The Metropolitan Museum had planned to lend 35 items by fashion designer Paul Poiret to the Kremlin Museum in Moscow for a September show. A number of loans between the two museums have been affected by the dispute over the archive of religious books and documents, which a U.S. District Court in Brooklyn has ruled belongs to the Chabad movement.

Russian officials have warned their country’s museums that artworks traveling to the United States could be seized to force the release of the archive.

“It is going to be the policy of the museum that there has to be some equity for lending to be resumed,” Met spokesman Harold Holzer told Art Info.

The archive of 12,000 books and 50,000 other documents assembled by Rabbi Joseph Isaac Schneersohn was seized during the Russian Revolution and the Nazi invasion, and then later by the Russian army.

The Russian Cultural Ministry in contesting the ruling in the U.S. court claims that Schneerson had no heirs when he left Russia.

“One American organization made a completely illegitimate claim on this collection of books,” Russian Culture Minister Alexander Avdeyev told the Straits Times in January. “We have our own believers who respect these books no less.”

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

A Night of Gratitude Honoring Dennis Prager

Latest Articles

Torah Portion: Chayei Sarah

The Torah offers a comforting view of a life beyond this life. We aren’t told what it will be exactly — yes, it’s abstract and vague — but we are told it’s waiting for us as it was for Abraham.

Hatred Opened the Door. A Missed Victory Held It Open.

For me, the disaster isn’t that Democrats won or Republicans lost. It’s that politicians who demonize Israel, deny Jewish self-determination and explain away antisemitism are finding an increasingly receptive electorate in the world’s most important democracy.

The Jewish Dilemma

The central issue is not whether Jewish voters should support Democrats or Republicans. It is whether either party can demonstrate that Jewish security, Jewish identity and Jewish self-determination are compatible with its broader political agenda.

An Abdul El-Sayed Victory Would Be a Defeat for Democrats

An El-Sayed victory would send a dangerous message to Democrats across the country that inflammatory rhetoric, tolerance of antisemitism and alliances with extremists are not political liabilities but a viable path to national office.

Anatomy of an Apartheid State

Can Israel afford to have a Muslim politician who is agnostic about terror serve in the cabinet and attend security briefings?

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.