Trump, the voyage of the St. Louis and the haunting spirit of the damned

May 31, 2017
MS St. Louis. Photo from Wikipedia

“What’s past is prologue,” wrote Shakespeare.

As the Trump administration works to bar the admission of individuals from Muslim-majority countries without regard to their individual backgrounds or fears of persecution in their homelands, we should remember the tragic fates of those aboard the ocean liner, the MS St. Louis, as they fled the persecution of Nazi Germany. The willful failure of the United States to offer refuge to those on the St. Louis is a lesson for us on how a great democracy, founded on the humanitarian principle that all people are created equal, but constrained by a prejudiced public and leaders without fortitude, may turn its back on frightened souls yearning to be free.

On May 13, 1939, the St. Louis departed the port of Bremen, Germany, filled with 937 persons, the overwhelming majority of them Jews. Some were German citizens from Eastern Europe, and others were categorized as stateless. All of the passengers held Cuban entry visas, and most hoped that after landing in Havana they would continue to the United States and settle there. However, unbeknownst to the passengers, the Cuban government had revoked their visas a week earlier, asserting with little evidence that their entry documents had been obtained fraudulently. (Sound familiar?)

When the ship arrived in Havana, only 29 of the passengers were allowed to disembark. The captain of the St. Louis, Gustav Schroder, a decent man sympathetic to his charges, steamed his ship toward South Florida. Meanwhile, Jewish organizations lobbied the U.S. government to admit the remaining passengers from the St. Louis as a humanitarian exception to the immigration quotas then in effect under U.S. law. Nevertheless, the U.S. State Department refused to lift the quotas, an isolationist Congress rejected the idea of special legislation and President Franklin Roosevelt declined to issue an executive order allowing the Jews to enter the United States.

Passengers on the St. Louis claimed they could see the lights of Miami as the ship turned back toward Europe, where the ship docked on June 17, 1939, at Antwerp, Belgium. In the end, 288 passengers were allowed entry to the United Kingdom, and 224, 214 and 181 were admitted to France, Belgium and the Netherlands, respectively, where they were soon caught in the Nazi invasion and occupation of those three countries. By the end of World War II, 254 of the Jewish passengers from the St. Louis had been murdered. Their blood stained the conscience of our country.

The tragedy of the St. Louis and the repressive and mean-spirited policies of the Trump administration are not identical, but they are chilling enough to give us pause. When the St. Louis was turned away from the U.S., 83 percent of Americans polled by Fortune magazine opposed the admission of Jews and others fleeing Nazi persecution. In March of 2017, the Denver Post reported that 52 percent of Americans polled supported greater restrictions on the admission of refugees into the United States.

While the recent figures appear to reflect a great improvement in public attitudes, it should be remembered that a majority of Americans today are concerned about a further mass influx of refugees that is unlikely to occur: Germany, for example — yes, Germany, the nation that murdered so many from the St. Louis — has accepted more refugees in the past year than the U.S. in the past 10 years. President Donald Trump’s Draconian efforts to stop individuals, including would-be asylum seekers, from entering the U.S. from blood-soaked, war-torn Syria, Yemen and other Muslim countries is an excessive restraint on immigration, where detailed vetting of would-be refugees and visitors already exists, and where there is no evidence that a tidal wave of foreigners is set to besiege America’s airports.

Indeed, the fear (or pretense) of the administration and many in Congress that without a travel ban — contested and found legally wanting in the courts — we are on the verge of an invasion of dangerous Middle Easterners is belied by the fact that virtually all of the Islamist terrorists who have murdered and injured Westerners were homegrown, including very recently and tragically in Manchester, England. Furthermore, the demagogic statements from many of our political leaders about the possible invasion of our country by dangerous foreigners sound eerily similar to the rhetoric of anti-Semites in and out of government who opposed the post-World War II admission of Jewish refugees from the Holocaust because of the lie that the would-be immigrants were criminals and Communists.

History may not repeat itself, but it often rhymes. As we approach the 78th anniversary of the tragic odyssey of the St. Louis, we should be mindful that the presidential and political paranoia about today’s immigration challenges needs to be overcome by common sense and compassion, lest the ghosts of the passengers of the Voyage of the Damned haunt us forever.

BRUCE J. EINHORN is a retired federal judge, a law professor and the founding chair of the Committee for the Persecuted and Enslaved, a nonprofit refugee assistance organization.

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

A Walk to Tel Aviv

May we have the awareness to notice and give thanks for the blessings already here. May we have the resilience to trust that better days will come again.

The Real Danger of AI

If you can’t tell the difference between authentic, profound human expression and machine-produced writing, then the fault lies not in the machine but in us.

More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.