fbpx

August 3, 2015

U.S. Democrats see ‘fire wall’ holding to preserve Iran deal

U.S. backers of the Iran nuclear deal are increasingly confident of enough Democratic support to ensure it survives review by Congress, despite fierce opposition by majority Republicans and a massive lobbying drive.

By the time the House of Representatives recessed for the summer last week, no senior Democrat in the chamber had come out formally against the agreement and several central figures, including Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, were strongly in favor.

Pelosi said she was confident that if, as expected, Republicans pass a “resolution of disapproval” to try to sink the deal, a promised veto of that measure by President Barack Obama would be sustained.

At least 44 Democrats in the House and 13 Democrats in the Senate would have to defy Obama and join Republicans in opposing the deal to get the two-thirds majorities in both chambers needed to override a veto.

“More and more of them (House Democrats) have confirmed to me that they will be there to sustain the veto,” Pelosi told reporters.

The United States was the prime negotiator in the July 14 agreement between world powers and Iran to curtail Tehran's nuclear program in exchange for lifting sanctions, and its engagement is essential for implementing it.

In the last two weeks, the White House has rolled out its big guns at congressional hearings and private meetings to advocate for the deal, which Obama says is not perfect but is the best way to keep Iran from getting a nuclear bomb.

Powerful pro-Israel lobbying groups that believe it would endanger the Jewish state by empowering Iran have been especially active, although some pro-Israel factions support the deal.

Opponents had hoped influential Democrats would come out against the deal early, to give momentum before the recess.

But despite signs of skepticism, the few Democrats who did openly oppose it, including Representatives Grace Meng and Juan Vargas, are not among those considered influential on the issue.

“That shows the strength of the firewall we have here,” a senior Democratic congressional aide said.

At least 13 Democrats in the Senate and 44 in the House would have to join Republicans in opposing the deal to get the two-thirds majorities in both chambers needed to override a veto.

PRESSURE ON JEWISH LAWMAKERS

To date, no Senate Democrat has formally announced opposition, although many are undecided. A few influential leaders, including number two Democrat Dick Durbin, are strongly in favor.

The Senate recess begins on Friday and both houses return to Washington on Sept. 8. Congress then has until Sept. 17 to accept or reject the pact, which the White House considers one of the major foreign policy initiatives of the Obama presidency.

“I'm encouraged right now,” said Democratic Representative David Price, who has taken on the task of convincing lawmakers from both parties to back the deal. But he cautioned that it is still early in the process.

The pressure has been particularly strong on high-profile Jewish Democrats known as strong supporters of Israel.

The New York Post put Senator Chuck Schumer, the number three Senate Democrat, on its front page, under the headline: “Where's Chuck? Senator hides from Post's Iran questions.” Schumer says he has not made up his mind.

Other prominent Jewish Democrats say they are still undecided, including Representative Eliot Engel, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

“There'll be a lot of pressure on Democrats to support the president,” Engel told Reuters.

Engel met with Obama in the Oval Office last Wednesday, and Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer at the Capitol on Thursday.

He said it would be “very tough” to win over enough Democrats to override the president's veto. But when asked if he would vote to do so, Engel said, “I'm considering it.”

U.S. Democrats see ‘fire wall’ holding to preserve Iran deal Read More »

Jury keeps death penalty as possibility for Colorado movie gunman Holmes

James Holmes, the gunman in the Colorado movie massacre, could face the death penalty after jurors found on Monday that aggravating factors in the case counted for more than mitigating ones such as mental illness.

After deliberating for less than half a day, the panel of nine women and three men said they had concluded unanimously that the aggravating factors outweighed the mitigating ones. If just one juror had found that they did not, the 27-year-old Holmes would have received a life sentence with no chance of parole.

Jury keeps death penalty as possibility for Colorado movie gunman Holmes Read More »

Review: Windows 8 got you down? Try Windows 10! Or not.

Windows Vista came out right after my freshman year in college.

During my sophomore year at school, I learned to swear in Spanish with the color and vivacity of a constipated, drunken sailor.

You see, my housemate Carlos had Windows Vista (which he lovingly referred to as “****ing Vista.”)

Every single time I heard a string of expletives come from his room, I'd roll my eyes and think, “Dude. It's just a computer. It can't be that bad.”

Flash forward nearly a decade to me, sitting on the floor, hysterical, ready to throw my computer off the roof of the Glendale Hilton.

I had Windows 8.

Carlos, if you're reading this post, I am so sorry for laughing at you.

While I never had the joy of coping with Vista, Windows 8 (hot corners and all) made me want to impale myself and my computer on the nearest object.*

Even when I was able to turn off the most egregiously awful settings (hot corners. Oh god…the hot corners) my computer was less than semi-functional.

It had McAfee built into the hardware–and this, along with no 'Start' button or menu bar was just too much for me to take.

I had reached my limit.  It was me or my computer. 

So I did what any semi-competent young adult whose job relies on a functional computer would do. I decided to find all the free software I could and successfully tricked my computer into thinking it was running Windows 7.

After spending many hours and tears (and beers) getting rid of any trace of McAfee security software, installing a pretty solid open source virus/malware program, and finding a fake 'Start button' program, I had my beloved computer back.

My headaches were less intense, my rage was now merely directed at bad drivers in my neighborhood, and I could have more than two tabs open at once without my computer crashing.

And then, albeit a bit too late, Microsoft released Windows 10. The collective swearing had been heard 'round the world and they promised to bring back a user interface that was, uh, usable.

I downloaded it this weekend, hoping it would have some advantage over my cobbled together Frankenstein's monster of an operating system.

So far, it's just about the same.

For people who have zero confidence in their ability to reprogram their computer, this upgrade is akin to going from riding a bicycle with flat tires to driving a lifted monster truck. It might be clunky, but it gets you where you need to go and doesn't require much effort.

A word of advice, though, to those who are waiting for the installation (it's being rolled-out over a few weeks due to high demand):

When it asks you if you want to install with 'Express Settings' DO NOT DO THIS. DO NOT. NO. DON'T. SERIOUSLY.

Just because the other settings are called “Advanced” does not mean they are complicated.

By choosing the express settings, you are allowing Microsoft to have access to lots of personal information, and make their programs your default music, search engine, photo viewing, etc. programs.

You do not want this. It will make you angry. The whole point of  upgrading to Windows 10 is to be less angry.

So please, please heed my advice and manually adjust the settings. You do not need to be very computer literate to do this, and it takes about 5 minutes.

For those of you who did what I did (and essentially gutted Windows 8), if you're happy with how your computer is running, I don't see any reason to upgrade to Windows 10 right now.

If you have another take on Windows 10 (or a Windows 8 horror story), please share in the comments.

*Anecdotally, someone very close to me actually DID kill their computer with their bare hands because of Windows 8, and then promptly found a 'new' used laptop with Windows 7.

Review: Windows 8 got you down? Try Windows 10! Or not. Read More »

On Adam Schiff and Iran

Arnold Steinberg is a political strategist and analyst, the author of graduate texts on politics and media, and an expert on political campaigns.’ He also has been involved in foreign policy and national security.

I have just read the statement by Congressman Adam Schiff in support of President Barack Obama’s so-called “deal” with Iran.

What bothers me more than his position is his disingenuous and tortured statement.

As the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff is taken seriously.

Indeed, in that position, he would have known that President Obama was provided briefings by the intelligence community on the likely rise of ISIS. President Obama either did not read those briefings (he often refused oral briefings) or did not take them seriously.

His gross miscalculation of ISIS is a matter of record, but obviously not a concern to the partisan Congressman Schiff.

I only mention ISIS because you would think Obama's clear incompetence would weigh on Schiff.

Congressman Schiff is not as stupid as some of his colleagues, some of whom are clueless on foreign policy.

Thus, his position is significant and increases the probability the Iran “deal” will go forward.

My conclusion, harsh as it sounds, is that he wanted to back this “deal” to solidify his position among the Democratic leadership in the House; and, after a song-and-dance to suggest good faith inquiry, he went for the inevitable conclusion.

President Obama’s policies, in general, and this Iranian policy, in particular, are contrary to U.S. interests.

Congressman Schiff is in a malapportioned district that favors him.

I have called Congressman Schiff’s office and politely left a message.

If any viable Democrat opposes him in the primary, or any viable Republican opposes him in the general, I will VOLUNTEER my services to try to defeat him.

I find him nothing short of an embarrassment.

In post World War II America, major agreements — whether SALT I under Nixon or or the Reagan-Gorbachev arms agreement — are supported on a bipartisan basis — both parties are involved.

The lack of any Republican support for this agreement does not indicate Republican partisanship, but Obama’s arrogant recklessness.

Years from now, I hope people remember the political courage of those Democrats who stand up to Obama and Pelosi, and the cowardice of those Democrats, like Schiff.

Schiff's position will be part of his legacy.

Let him explain it to his children and grandchildren.

As time goes on during the 60-day period, there will be more disquieting information about this Iranian “deal.” That’s really a good word, rather than agreement, which is too dignified.

Obviously, Congressman Schiff felt the need to support it as soon as possible, to give it momentum.

Too bad he could not have been more deliberative and thoughtful, as he had earlier implied.

There will be opportunities in the coming weeks for Congressman Schiff and other impetuous supporters to reconsider.

Let’s see if he and others show the wisdom and courage to do the right thing.

He can still rehabilitate himself.

On Adam Schiff and Iran Read More »

Study: N.Y., Boston and Miami are America’s 3 most Jewish cities

New York, Boston and Miami are the three most Jewish cities per capita in the country, according to a new analysis of data gathered last year by the Public Religion Research Institute.

Eight percent of New York City residents are Jewish, followed by Boston at 6 percent and Miami at 5 percent, according to the data. Philadelphia and San Francisco each are 4 percent Jewish, and Chicago and Washington are 3 percent Jewish.

Nationally, 2 percent of all Americans are Jewish, according to the study. Los Angeles, which by raw numbers is believed to house the country’s second-largest urban Jewish population, is just 2 percent Jewish, the analysis found.

Ranked by state, New York and New Jersey tie as the most Jewish, with 6 percent of residents in both counted as Jews. Next are Massachusetts (5 percent) and Maryland (3 percent), followed by California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, New Mexico, Pennsylvania and Vermont each with 2 percent.

Ranked by region, the Northeast is 4 percent Jewish; the Midwest, South and West each are 1 percent Jewish.

The analysis is based on data collected in some 52,741 telephone interviews conducted in 2014 as part of the Public Religion Research Institute’s American Values Atlas.

Overall, the largest urban religious group is Catholics, who are No. 1 or tied for the top spot in 15 of America’s top 30 metropolitan areas. Religiously unaffiliated make up the top “religious group” in 10 of those metro areas, and white evangelical Protestants are the plurality in six of the major metro areas. Atlanta is the only major metro area with a different group at the top: black Protestants.

Nationwide, Nashville, Tennessee, has the largest percentage of a single religious group, with 38 percent of all residents identifying as white evangelical Protestant.

The least religious city appears to be Portland, Oregon, where 42 percent of respondents identified as religiously unaffiliated. Two percent of the city’s residents are Jews.

Study: N.Y., Boston and Miami are America’s 3 most Jewish cities Read More »

A Lesson in Tolerance

When it comes to my country, I am usually the first one to brag and show-off. Israel is a High Tech world-leader, with the most startups per capita than any other place in the world. Israel is also a leading country when it comes to women’s rights, and at the forefront of morality and respect for human rights in military actions. This week, however, I couldn’t be less proud. In fact, I am ashamed of my country.

Yesterday, the skies were dark in the morning, even though we’re in the midst of August’s heat wave. It was probably due to the massive wildfire in Jerusalem from the day before, but to me, it was mostly symbolic. I felt like the sky represented our aching hearts after a very painful weekend. In 2 days, two terror attacks occurred in Israel and shook us to the core.

The first one was on Thursday, when an Ultra-Orthodox man named Yishai Schlissel stabbed 6 people at the Jerusalem Pride Parade. Schlissel was released from prison just several weeks prior to the parade, after serving 10 years in prison for his last attack at similar circumstances, which wounded three people. On Sunday, it was published that one of the people stabbed by him, 16 year old Shira Banki who attended the parade to support her friends, “>A Palestinian infant was killed and his family members wounded after their house was set on fire by Jewish terrorists. The baby, Ali Dawabsha, was buried while Israeli doctors attempted to rescue the rest of his family.

Over the weekend, people gathered in support of the two communities who were wounded, yet again, by hatred. In beautiful acts of solidarity, rallies were set, hugs were handed out, and Facebook posts filled our Feeds. The Prime Ministers strictly condemned the two terror attacks, the government laid out a new set of rules aimed to A Lesson in Tolerance Read More »