Homeless on Pico— Natalie Levine Update: Day 6

Natalie Levine did not sleep on the street last night. We were able to place her in a temporary facility about an hour from Los Angeles. This is a reprieve that will, hopefully, buy time for a longer term solution. Lots of people and experts have reached out to help, and they are invaluable. As you might expect, the bureaucracy is just that, a bureaucracy. We experienced it first hand yesterday, when we bounced around looking for a shelter or any place that would take her.

I don’t want to sound like an easy critic of bureaucracy. The homeless problem is extremely complicated and it’s compounded by other issues, like mental health and life traumas. I got a little taste of this complexity over the past week. Maybe at some point, I will write in greater detail about it.

For now, our immediate goal was to keep Natalie off the streets, even for just a few more days. The amazing team at Cedars Sinai Hospital helped save the day—and the night.

I think one of the reasons many people in the Jewish community have rallied to Natalie’s cause is her Jewish neshama. In this short video clip, as we were waiting for a case worker, I asked her to go down her Jewish memory lane.

City Voice: Condo conversions cause casualties

Late one afternoon, I visited an apartment house in Pico-Robertson, where the tenants are uneasily contemplating a fate increasingly familiar to renters – the
conversion of their building to condominiums.

I talked to Mary Ellen Satterfield, Brenda Lara and Rachel Minkove, who rent apartments in the building and will have to move if it turns condo.

They are perfect examples of how the middle class is being squeezed out by the wave of condo conversions sweeping through the city, particularly in areas with large Jewish populations. Larry Gross of the Coalition for Economic Survival, which represents tenants, said the highest rate of conversions are occurring from Pico-Robertson through the Westside and in the southwest San Fernando Valley. These areas are the heart of Jewish Los Angeles.

Satterfield is a portfolio administrator for a financial company. Lara is assistant principal in a Los Angeles public elementary school in Echo Park. Minkove is a fifth-grade teacher at Harkham Hillel Hebrew Academy. Their rents range from $850 to $1,680 a month.

“It’s affordable housing,” said Lara, about what they can afford. She’s lived there 13 years, Satterfield 10 and Minkove one.

The apartment house, located on Holt Avenue just north of Pico Boulevard, is a Los Angeles classic known as a “dingbat.”

You’ve seen them. Perhaps you even live in one. The dingbat is so typically Los Angeles, that in 1971 it attracted the attention of the famous architectural scholar Reyner Banham, who wrote of them in his book, “Los Angeles: The Architecture of Four Ecologies.”

He described the form as “a two-story walk-up apartment block developed back over the full depth of the site and stuccoed over…. Round the back, away from the public gaze, they display simple rectangular forms and flush smooth surfaces. Skinny steel columns and simple box balconies and extensive overhangs to shelter four or five cars.”

The apartment house where I interviewed Satterfield, Lara and Minkove fit the description perfectly, except the cars are in front, just as they were at the Brentwood dingbat our family lived in many years ago.

Some of the dingbats are really weird, especially the embellishments on the facades. “Everything is there,” Banham wrote, “from Tacoburger Aztec to Wavy-line Moderne, from Cod Cape Cod to unsupported Jaoul vaults, from Gourmet Mansardic to Polynesian gabled and – even in extremity – modern architecture.”

Many a ranch house and bungalow have been torn down to make way for the dingbats. Odd as they are, they became part of the L.A. scene and, as more people flooded in and open space gave way to density, the dingbats provided a home for those uninterested in home ownership or unable to buy one.

In the case of the apartment house on Holt, as with others in Pico-Robertson, the building provided a sense of community, ethnic diversity and a mixture of young and old.

“Our building is a melting pot,” Lara said. “It’s a nice feeling. You come here, and you feel a sense of community.” Or as Minkove put it, “Everyone looks out for each other.”

That sense of community didn’t help when the tenants received a message from the city Planning Department, informing them that the landlord had applied for permission to tear down their building and one next door to permit construction of a 15-unit condominium project.

The tenants had to read through the 24 pages to figure out the message, and even then they were still not quite sure, because the heading on the document said that it was for approval “of a tentative tract map.”

Figuring out the Planning Department language is difficult even for someone like me, who used to write about city agencies for a living. But the tenants soon realized that this one meant their building would be torn down. They tried to find out what was going on and how they could protest.

“We all started out in a state of panic,” Satterfield said. The tenants contacted the office of their councilman, Jack Weiss, and groups representing tenants.

The tenants wanted to know when they would have to move and what they could do to prevent it.

A Weiss staff member asked for a delay in the approval process. Satterfield and other tenants called City Hall.

“You can get six different people in the city and get six different answers,” she said.

I wasn’t surprised. That’s City Hall. Big campaign contributors get an answer in minutes when they call City Hall. And they usually get the answer they want.

As of now, the tenants are in limbo. The project apparently is headed for approval. It may or may not happen, depending on the whim of the building owner.

This is happening all over the city. Each project is examined by the Planning Department, Building and Safety, the Fire Department, the school district, the Department of Water and Power, the Bureau of Street Lighting and the Bureau of Sanitation. As long as a project follows their rules, it’s OK.

Instead of letting these projects coast through the bureaucracy, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and the City Council should make preservation of middle-class and low-income rental housing a top city priority. The priority should be written into law.

I often write about this issue because it is determining the shape of our Jewish community. Pico-Robertson is a great neighborhood, with its mixture of young, middle-age and older renters who shop in local markets, eat at local restaurants and pray in neighborhood synagogues. Condo conversions are threatening this way of life.

Until leaving the Los Angeles Times in 2001, Bill Boyarsky worked as a political correspondent, a Metro columnist for nine years and as city editor for three years. You can reach him at bw.boyarsky@verizon.net.

An Explosive Reality

Steven Haberfeld is a trained conflict mediator in northern California, specializing in interethnic disputes. His particular specialty is disputes that pit disgruntled ethnic minorities against big bureaucracies.

He’s been at it for decades, first as a United Farm Workers organizer in California, later as head of an urban-renewal program in an Israeli development town. Now 57, he’s been living for the last decade in Sacramento, running an agency that mediates Indian tribal conflicts with the federal government.

None of this prepared him for his latest clash, though. As president of Kenesset Israel Torah Center, a local Orthodox congregation, Haberfeld was rousted from his bed in the pre-dawn hours of June 18 to learn that his synagogue had been firebombed. Go mediate that.

Kenesset Israel was one of three Sacramento synagogues torched last Friday morning, all within minutes of each other. Law enforcement sources are calling it a “coordinated” attack, involving “fairly sophisticated” incendiary devices. No anti-Semitic attack of this scale or complexity has occurred in America in years, if ever.

This being California, some local Jews were reacting with a sort of laid-back, philosophical shrug. Haberfeld, for example, says he and his fellow congregants are “taking it in stride.” The converted frame house where they prayed is completely gutted, leaving the congregation homeless. Haberfeld says it’s all “part of Jewish life, both historical and contemporary.”

Not that he takes it lying down. He’s just less indignant than some because he’s not shocked. “What is characteristic of our synagogue,” he says, “is that we all have relatives and friends in Israel. So we’ve been living with this thing for some time in one form or another. We don’t expect not to be bombed.”

Leaflets found at two bomb sites claimed credit in the name of “Slavic” militants. They blamed “the International Jew World Order” for NATO’s bombing of Serbia. But sources close to the investigation say Serb émigré involvement is unlikely. Evidence points to organized groups of white supremacists long active in the Sacramento area. It looks like the same old haters. Only the excuse is new.

New, too, is the unprecedented outpouring of sympathy from non-Jews: two solidarity rallies, collections taken up by Methodist, Japanese-American and black groups, and countless citizens displaying in their windows a “Chai” solidarity poster published by the local daily paper.

“If it’s the Jewish community today, it could be the Asian-American community tomorrow and the African-American community the day after,” says Beryl Michaels, director of the Sacramento Jewish Federation.

Not surprisingly, most local Jews aren’t responding with the same equanimity as Steven Haberfeld. Many voice unvarnished outrage. Rabbi Brad Bloom of Congregation B’nai Israel, a Reform temple that suffered more than $800,000 in damage, publicly compared the attacks to Kristallnacht, the night in 1938 when Nazis torched most of the synagogues in Germany. He wasn’t the only one making the comparison.

But the outrage is sparking its own backlash. A good number of local Jews, it appears, were steamed at the Kristallnacht comparison. “It’s obscene, and it cheapens the memory of the Holocaust,” says Hillard Fahn, a member of a leading Sacramento Jewish family and a close observer of the community. “Kristallnacht was an attack by Germany on its Jewish community. What happened here was an attack by a small group of idiots, which was condemned immediately by the non-Jewish community, the police and the mayor.” In fact, Fahn says, the outpouring from the general community “only showed how much of a fringe element these people are.”

The debate in Sacramento mirrors a broader national debate over the extent of anti-Semitism in America, ignited by the publication in May of the American Jewish Committee’s annual survey of Jewish public opinion.

The survey showed a level of Jewish anxiety about anti-Semitism that many observers found surprisingly high. Professional monitors of prejudice, from the Anti-Defamation League to the General Social Survey of the University of Chicago, have found anti-Jewish bias dropping precipitously in recent years. Virtually every available measure — institutional discrimination, popular attitudes, anti-Jewish vandalism — shows American anti-Semitism at historic lows.

Yet Jews surveyed by the AJC chose anti-Semitism over intermarriage by 2-1 as the greatest threat to Jewish life in the United States. One-third said U.S. anti-Semitism is “currently a very serious problem,” and nearly two-thirds said it was “somewhat of a problem.”

Many commentators see the anxiety as a sign that too many Jews are out of touch. “My impression is that most Jews go through most of their lives without ever having anti-Semitism directed at them,” says Leonard Fein, national social action director of the Reform movement. And, yet, they remain convinced that it’s rampant. “My interpretation is that they remember what they were taught in Hebrew school.”

The bombings in Sacramento point to another possible interpretation: that the Jews are onto something. Even paranoids have enemies.

“It’s a sobering reminder that the classic scapegoating is still with us,” says Abraham Foxman, national director of the ADL, which has published several recent studies showing anti-Semitism in decline. “When there’s a problem between others, they find a way to blame us. This isn’t news.”

There may be some real news here, though. The Sacramento bombings hint at the emergence of a new kind of anti-Semitic attack, in which Jews are not scapegoats but genuine targets. These attacks become increasingly likely as national Jewish organizations get more involved in high-stakes diplomatic battles abroad.

It’s true, for example, that Jewish organizations played a leading role in pressing for NATO action against the Serbs. President Clinton acknowledged that publicly. So did the president of Albania. It’s conceivable that a few Serb hotheads might hear about it and decide to take action, if they haven’t yet. Not out of mindless prejudice, but as people who have a bone to pick, and choose terror as their weapon of choice.

We’ve already seen a wave of terror attacks on American Jewish targets apparently because of the Jewish community’s role in U.S. Middle East policy-making. As Jewish organizations increase their role in more arenas — Switzerland, Poland, Sudan, Iraq — the likelihood of attacks increases geometrically.

What can individual Jews do? Stay informed. Most Jews in Sacramento don’t know about the national organizations’ role in the Balkans. That’s wrong. Find out what all those agencies are doing in your name. If you think they’re wrong, protest. If you think they’re right, watch your back.

J.J. Goldberg writes a weekly column for The Jewish Journal.