Should Europe take in a million Muslim refugees?
Should Europe take in about a million Syrian and other Muslim refugees? Should America take in tens of thousands?
Should Europe take in about a million Syrian and other Muslim refugees? Should America take in tens of thousands?
We are told that Jewish organizations have to recalibrate their messages in order to appeal to young Jews.
The more one knows about the Iran nuclear deal, the more obvious it becomes that it is a deception that portrays itself as a deal.
There are many reasons the Israeli political left is opposed to the American nuclear deal with Iran, just as there are many reasons that Haim Saban, one of the Democratic Party’s and Barack Obama’s leading fundraisers, has come out against the deal. It is terrible for America, terrible for Israel, terrible for the Middle East and for the cause of peace.
Many commentators — and not only Jews — compare the agreement between Iran and the United States, France, Britain, Germany, Russia and China to Munich 1938. Is this admittedly overused comparison valid?
For most supporters of same-sex marriage, the most persuasive, and certainly the most frequently offered, argument on behalf of same-sex marriage has been that homosexuals have no choice, that they could no more choose to be heterosexual than a heterosexual can choose to be a homosexual.
Shortly before she was elected attorney general of California, Kamala Harris and I debated same-sex marriage on CNN.
As just about every American knows by now, two murderers recently escaped a maximum-security prison in upstate New York.
For most Jews who care about Judaism, the moral essence of Judaism — indeed its ultimate purpose — is tikkun olam, literally meaning “repairing the world.”
In a spirit of honest inquiry and intellectual challenge, I would like to pose a series of questions to that majority of American Jews who consider themselves progressive (that is, Jews on the left of the political spectrum).